Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Kedudukan Dan Fungsi Wakil Presiden Republik Indonesia Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Suparto Suparto
PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 15 No 1 (2021): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v16i1.2008

Abstract

The position of the Vice President and the President is not equal, even though the President and Vice President are a single inseparable institution. The position of the President and Vice President which is not equal shows that the presidential institution is the organizer of a single government system. The position of the Vice President cannot be separated from the President as a unit of positions which are directly elected by the people through general elections. Then, the duties and powers of the Vice President in the 1945 Constitution do not provide regulation, because the provisions of Article 4 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution only mention their duties as assistant to the President, even though the President and Vice President are a single unit of office elected by the people through general elections. The authority of the Vice President is the authority mandated by the President to assist the President in implementing laws so that the responsibility remains with the President. The authority of the Vice President as a substitute for the President is all the powers that are in the position of President. In the future, it is necessary to make a law as an elaboration of the provisions of Article 4 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution
The Problematics Implementation of Law and Regulations Testing in Indonesia suparto suparto
Yuridika Vol. 37 No. 1 (2022): Volume 37 No 1 January 2022
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (328.465 KB) | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v37i1.28627

Abstract

One of the results of the constitutional change, particularly during the 3rd amendment in 2001 is related to the arrangement of judicial powers exercised by two state institutions; the Supreme Court (MA) and the Constitutional Court (MK). Both as executors of judicial power are given different duties regarding the object of testing a statutory regulation. The Supreme Court is based on Article 24A Paragraph (1) of The Constitution of 1945 relating to the authority to test the legality of statutory regulations under the law against laws, while the Constitutional Court is given the authority to examine constitutionality of laws against the Constitution of 1945  based on Article 24C Paragraph (1) of the Constitution of 1945. Based on the research, it was found that the two state institutions, namely MA and MK, are both given authority in examining the legislation causing problems such as the following : (1). Potentially raises the insynchronity between the Supreme Court's ruling and the Constitutional Court's ruling. (2). The Supreme Court's decision is considered by the Constitutional Court in making the decision. (3). There is a temporary suspension of testing in the Supreme Court (MA). This can affect the institutional relationship between judicial institutions, the image and the authority of the court's rulings, can also cause legal uncertainty so that it will harm the interests of the justice-seeking community.
PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI REPUBLIK INDONESIA TENTANG PERSELISIHAN HASIL PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PROGRESIF suparto suparto
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8, No 2 (2019): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (247.039 KB) | DOI: 10.30652/jih.v8i2.7197

Abstract

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang perselisihan pemilihan kepala daerah dalam perspektif hukum progresif. Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia berdasarkan UUD dan Undang-Undang mempunyai kewenangan untuk memutus perselisihan tentang hasil pemilihan umum termasuk didalamnya adalah perselisihan hasil pemilihan kepala daerah. Yang dimaksud dengan perselisihan hasil adalah perselisihan terkait dengan hasil penghitungan suara pasca pemilihan. Namun dalam putusan No. 45/PHPU D-VIII/2010 tentang sengketa pemilihan kepala daerah di Kabupaten Kotawaringin Barat, Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah, Mahkamah Konstitusi tidak hanya memeriksa hasil penghitungan suara saja melainkan juga memeriksa prosesnya dan menetapkan pemenangnya. Mahkamah berpendapat bahwa tidak boleh ada pihak yang diuntungkan  dalam perolehan suara akibat terjadinya pelanggaran konstitusi dan prinsip keadilan dalam penyelengaraan pemilihan kepala daerah. Pemilihan kepala daerah harus dilakukan secara demokratis dan tidak melanggar asas-asas pemilihan umum yaitu langsung, umum, bebas, rahasia, jujur dan adil. Oleh karena pemilihan kepala daerah di Kabupaten Kotawaringin Barat ditemukan adanya pelanggaran sejak awal proses pelaksanaannya yang dilakukan secara sistematis, terstruktur dan masif, maka Mahkamah Konstitusi membatalkan pasangan calon yang ditetapkan oleh Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU) sebagai pemenang dan menetapkan pasangan calon yang kalah  sebagai pemenang pemilihan kepala daerah.  Hal ini merupakan sesuatu yang luarbiasa dalam perkembangan sistem hukum di Indonesia mengingat selama ini hakim hanyalah dianggap sebagai corong undang-undang.  Walaupun oleh sebagian pihak dianggap kontroversial karena dianggap melampaui kewenangannya dan melanggar undang-undang,  keputusan  Mahkamah Konstitusi ini merupakan langkah terobosan dalam rangka menegakkan hukum progresif. Hukum progresif bertujuan untuk tercapainya keadilan substansif bukan hanya keadilan prosedural atau kepastian hukum. Hukum tidak dapat lagi ditempatkan sebagai sebuah dokumen absolut dan otonom. Kreatifitas manusia penegak hukumnya harus diberikan kesempatan untuk  berimprovisasi dalam penegakan hukum demi tercapainya keadilan. Kata kunci : Putusan ; Mahkamah Konstitusi ; Hukum Progresif.ABSTRACT This study aims to find out about the Constitutional Court Ruling on regional head election disputes in the perspective of progressive law. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia based on the Constitution and the Law has the authority to decide on disputes about the results of general elections including the disputes over the results of regional elections. The result of a dispute over results is a dispute related to the results of the post-election vote count. But in decision No. 45 / PHPU D-VIII / 2010 concerning the dispute over regional head elections in Kotawaringin Barat District, Central Kalimantan Province, the Constitutional Court not only examined the results of the vote count but also examined the process. The Court make an opinion that there should be no party who benefits from the vote due to violations of the constitution and the principle of justice in the implementation of regional head elections. Regional head elections must be carried out democratically and do not violate the principles of general elections, namely direct, general, free, confidential, honest and fair. Because the election of regional heads in Kotawaringin Barat Regency found violations from the beginning of the implementation process which was carried out in a systematic, structured and massive manner, the Constitutional Court canceled the candidate pairs determined by the General Election Commission (KPU) and transferred their votes to the losing candidate and set it as a winner. This is something extraordinary in the development of the legal system in Indonesia, considering that so far the judges have only been considered as the mouthpiece of the law. Although some parties are considered controversial because they are considered to exceed their authority and violate laws, this Constitutional Court decision is a breakthrough step in order to enforce progressive law. Progressive law aims to achieve substantive justice not only procedural justice or legal certainty. The law can no longer be placed as an absolute and autonomous document. Human creativity in law enforcement must be given the opportunity to improvise in law enforcement in order to achieve justice. Keywords: Verdict ; Constitutional Court ; Progressive Law.  
The Authority of the Party Court in Resolving Internal Disputes of Political Parties in Indonesia (A Case Study of Golkar Party) Suparto Suparto
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 4 (2022): October: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (242.265 KB)

Abstract

In its development, political parties as organizations are always faced with a conflict that often leads to divisions. On that basis, the internal party settlement is then regulated in the political party law. In Law no. 2 of 2011, it is stated that the resolution of internal conflicts of political parties related to management is resolved by the Party Court and the decision is final. However, many conflicts that occur in political parties are not resolved, for example as happened to the Golkar Party. The research method uses normative juridical with a statutory approach. Based on the results of the study, there are several influential factors in the resolution of internal disputes within the Golkar party, including: 1. The unusual and multi-interpreted form and format of the decision from the Golkar Party Court does not solve the problem of internal disputes in the management of the Golkar party, 2. There is a tendency for the government to intervene in the internal affairs of political parties, in this case the Golkar party, by acknowledging one of the parties close to or supporting the government in the form of ratification of the management of political parties, 3. The neutrality of the membership of the Party Court from internal political parties is doubtful and there is a tendency to side with one of the disputing parties. 4. The even number of members of the Party Court when hearing the dispute over the management of the Golkar party
Direct Election System for President and Vice President in Indonesia Post Amendment the Constitution of 1945 Suparto Suparto
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 5 (2022): Desember: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (192.673 KB)

Abstract

Indonesia has held 4 (four) direct elections for President and Vice President by the people after Amendment the Constitution of 1945. Of the 4 elections for President and Vice President, there is a difference in the 2019 election. In that year, the general election for the President and Vice President was held simultaneously with the Legislative election (elections for members of DPR, DPD, DPRD). This is different from the three previous elections, in the 2004, 2009 and 2014 elections, in which the general election for the President and Vice President was conducted after the Legislative election or not simultaneously. The general election for the President and Vice President in 2019 besides being carried out simultaneously, also still applies provisions regarding the minimum threshold (presidential threshold) for political parties to nominate a pair of President and Vice President as regulated in Article 222 of Law no. 7 of 2017 concerning Elections. Based on the research, it was found that the simultaneous election with the implementation of the presidential threshold resulted in the following points: (a). The occurrence of a non-ideal democratic system, because during the nomination stage for the presidential and vice-presidential pairs, the votes used by political parties or coalitions of political parties are the results of the previous period's legislative elections. Meanwhile, during the election stage for the pair of President and Vice President, the votes used are the results of the current year's election. (b). The existence of political parties that proposed pairs of candidates for President and Vice President did not qualify or did not obtain seats in the elections which were held simultaneously. Meanwhile, the pair of presidential and vice-presidential candidates he carried won the presidential and vice-presidential elections. c). Closing the opportunity for new parties to nominate pairs of candidates for President and Vice President, even though those parties are declared to have passed the selection (verification) and are designated as election participants by the General Elections Commission (KPU) because they do not have votes or seats because they have never participated in elections.
The Overplay Functions and Authority of The Sea Security Board (Bakamla) and The Sea and Coast Guard in Keeping Marine Security in Indonesia Suparto Suparto; Admiral Admiral
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 10, No 2: August 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v10i2.999

Abstract

Indonesia is a maritime country with a wide ocean. Geopolitically, Indonesia’s position is an international shipping lane. Therefore, it is necessary to have an institution that has the duty and authority to maintain sea and coastal security and shipping safety. The formulation of the problem is how the functions and authorities of the Sea and Coast Guard (SCG) and the Maritime Security Agency (Bakamla) are in guarding Indonesian seas. The research method used a normative juridical approach with secondary data and analyzed descriptively qualitatively. There are two overlapping institutions in carrying out their duties and functions, namely SCG which is regulated in Law No. Year 2008 concerning Shipping and Bakamla which is regulated under the Law No. 32 Year 2014 concerning Marine Affairs. The government intends that maritime security in Indonesia to be handled by the military, not civilians. This can be seen that the chairman of Bakamla is held by a general from the Indonesian Navy and is responsible to the President through the Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal and Security Affairs. While in Law No. 17 Year 2008 stipulates that SCG is under the Ministry of Transportation and is responsible to the President. Bakamla is more appropriate to be used as SCG, this is based on the consideration that Indonesia is a maritime country with wide seas with all its problems such as narcotics trafficking, human trafficking, terrorism, theft of marine resources, etc., so it would be more appropriate to submit it to Bakamla as a semi-official institution. military. As a consequence of this choice, it is necessary to revise Law No. 17 Year 2008 and Law No. 32 Year 2014.
Pengelolaan Wilayah Pesisir dan Pulau-Pulau Kecil di Kabupaten Lingga Berdasakan Undang Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2007 Suparto Suparto; Muhammad Faizal Pahlevi
Jurnal Selat Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021): Jurnal Selat
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1174.425 KB) | DOI: 10.31629/selat.v9i1.3765

Abstract

Lingga Regency has an area of ​​45,508.66 km2 with a land area of ​​2,235.51 km2 and an ocean 43,273.15 km2, with 531 large and small islands. There are still many small islands that have not been exploited for their natural resources and marine resources. Regarding the management of coastal areas, currently it has been regulated in Law no. 27 of 2007 in conjunction with Law no. 1 of 2014 concerning the Management of Coastal Areas and Small Islands (UU PWP3K). The formulation of the problem is how to implement the PWP3K Law and the obstacles faced by the Lingga Regency government. Based on the research, the results show that the implementation of the PWP3K Law has not run properly, because there is no regional regulation (Perda) on the Zoning Plan for Coastal Areas and Small Islands (RZWP3K) by the Riau Islands Province which is the legal umbrella for the Lingga Regency Government in managing coastal areas and islands. small island. The Lingga Regency Government currently prioritizes agricultural/agro-industry development programs even though developments in the marine and fisheries sector should require more special attention because most of the people work as fishermen and the area itself is included in the category of Coastal and Small Island areas. Another obstacle faced by the Lingga Regency Government is the limitation of authority between the Provincial Government and Regency/City Governments in Law no. 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government in terms of marine, coastal and small island management.
PEMISAHAN KEKUASAAN, KONSTITUSI DAN KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN YANG INDEPENDEN MENURUT ISLAM Suparto Suparto
Jurnal Selat Vol. 4 No. 1 (2016): JURNAL SELAT
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (819.35 KB)

Abstract

Separations of Powers theory had just been developed by John Locke and Montesquieu circa 17 A.C. Theory of Constitution had also just been emerged circa 18 A.C., even though in Old Greece many people had already discussed about this theory, when Rasulullah SAW rule Madinah and Madinah Constitution circa A.C..At that time Islam has also implemented independent and unbiased judicature. Keywords: Separations of Powers, Constitution, Judicature Teori Pemisahan Kekuasaan yang dikembangkan oleh John Locke dan Montesquieu baru muncul sekitar abad ke 17 dan 18. Sedangkan Islam sendiri telah mengenal adanya Pemisahan Kekuasaan dan Konstitusi jauh sebelum dunia barat (eropa) mempopulerkannya, yaitu pada masa pemerintahan Rosulullah Muhammad SAW di Negara Madinah. Islampun juga telah menerapkan adanya peradilan yang independen, bebas dan tidak memihak. Kata kunci: Pemisahan Kekuasaan, Konstitusi, Peradilan
Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah Tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah (RTRW) Provinsi Riau: Dinamika dan Permasalahannya Suparto Suparto
Jurnal Selat Vol. 6 No. 2 (2019): JURNAL SELAT
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (996.691 KB) | DOI: 10.31629/selat.v6i2.1273

Abstract

Regional Regulation (Perda) is a regulation made by the Regional Head together with the DPRD that fulfills the elements of welfare and usefulness of a region. One of the Regional Regulations that has a strategic function is the Regional Regulation on Regional Spatial Planning (RTRW) because that is where land allocation is in accordance with the functions of the area regulated. However, the drafting of the RTRW Regional Regulation is not easy to differ from other local regulations because many interests must be considered and accommodated in its compilation including the drafting of the Riau Province RTRW Perda. After going through a very long process, the establishment of regional regulations was finally determined by The Governor of Riau, namely Regional Regulation Number 10 Year 2018 concerning the Riau Province Regional Spatial Plan with the following details: (1). Cultivation Area = 8,067,344 ha. (2). Protected area covering an area of ​​945,532 ha, with a total area of ​​9,012,886 ha. Although the Regional Regulation concerning the Riau Province RTRW has been established, there are still problems that must be resolved, namely concerning the emptying of areas that have become oil palm plantations in forest areas. This is not an easy job because it has to cut down oil palm trees with an area of ​​hundreds of thousands of hectares. Based on Law Number 12 Year 2011 there is no difference between the Provincial RTRW Perda and other Perda or having the same position both in terms of position and formation procedures. Whereas in the process of establishing a Provincial Regional Spatial Planning Regulation involving many agencies and ministries, among others, the Ministry of Home Affairs, the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, the Ministry of National Development Planning/BAPPENAS, the Ministry of Agriculture and Spatial Planning and the Geospatial Information Agency.
Politik Hukum Pengisian Jabatan Publik Melalui Mekanisme Electoral System Oleh Mantan Narapidana Suparto Suparto; Umi Muslikhah
Jurnal Selat Vol. 7 No. 2 (2020): Jurnal Selat
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (967.45 KB) | DOI: 10.31629/selat.v7i2.1891

Abstract

Pengisian jabatan publik melalui electoral system oleh mantan narapidana khususnya tindak pidana korupsi menimbulkan gejolak di kalangan masyarakat. Hal ini karena korupsi termasuk kategori kejahatan luar biasa (extraordinary crime). KPU sebagai penyelenggara Pemilu mengeluarkan Peraturan KPU No. 20 Tahun 2008 yang melarang pencalonan mantan narapidana sebagai calon legislative. Namun, aturan tersebut bertentangan dengan Pasal 240 ayat (1) huruf g Undang-Undang Pemilu. Tulisan ini mengkaji politik hukum pengisian jabatan public melalui mekanisme electoral system oleh mantan narapidana merujuk pada Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 46P/ HUM/2018 serta Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 42/PUU-XIII/2015.