Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

PROBLEMATIKA PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN DAERAH (PERDA) TENTANG RENCANA TATA RUANG WILAYAH PROVINSI RIAU Suparto, Suparto
Bina Hukum Lingkungan Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019): Bina Hukum Lingkungan, Volume 4, Nomor 1, Oktober 2019
Publisher : Asosiasi Pembina Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia (PHLI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (134.751 KB)

Abstract

Salah satu Peraturan Daerah (Perda) yang mempunyai fungsi strategis adalah Perda tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah (RTRW). Akan tetapi penyusunan Perda RTRW ini tidaklah mudah dan berbeda dengan Perda-perda yang lain karena banyak kepentingan yang harus dipertimbangkan. Contohnya adalah dalam penyusunan Perda RTRW Provinsi Riau. Walaupun Perda mengenai RTRW Provinsi Riau telah ditetapkan, penyusunannya memerlukan waktu yang cukup lama dikarenakan banyaknya institusi dan kementerian yang terlibat. Hal ini berbeda dengan penyusunan Perda yang lain. Selain itu, secara teknis di lapangan ada permasalahan yang harus diselesaikan yaitu menyangkut pengosongan areal yang telah menjadi perkebunan kelapa sawit di kawasan hutan. Hal ini bukanlah pekerjaan mudah karena harus menebang pohon kelapa sawit dengan luasan ratusan ribu hektar. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris dengan data sekunder dan primer. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui mekanisme dan permasalahan dalam penyusunan RTRW Provinsi Riau.
KEDUDUKAN DAN PROSES PENETAPAN HUTAN ADAT PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO. 35/PUU-X/2012 SERTA IMPLEMENTASINYA DI PROVINSI RIAU Suparto, Suparto
Bina Hukum Lingkungan Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021): Bina Hukum Lingkungan, Volume 5, Nomor 2, Februari 2021
Publisher : Asosiasi Pembina Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia (PHLI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 41 Tahun 1999 tentang Kehutanan, hutan adat dimasukkan dalam hutan negara hal ini merugikan masyarakat adat sehingga Undang-undang tersebut diuji ke Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK). Permasalahannya adalah Bagaimana kedudukan dan proses penetapan hutan adat pasca putusan MK No. 35/PUU-X/2012 serta implementasinya di Provinsi Riau. Berdasarkan penelitian diperoleh hasil (1). Kedudukan hutan adat pasca putusan MK No. 35/PUUX/2012, hutan adat tidak lagi Bagian dari hutan negara melainkan menjadi hutan hak. Proses penetapan hutan adat diatur dengan Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan (LHK) No. P.32/Menlhk-Setjen/2015 tentang Hutan Hak. Agar hutan adat menjadi hutan hak, prosesnya melalui dua tahapan yaitu: (a) Pengakuan atas keberadaan masyarakat hukum adat melalui peraturan daerah (Perda). (b) Penetapan oleh Menteri LHK terhadap hutan adat. (2). Sampai saat ini di Provinsi Riau baru ada 2 hutan adat yang telah ditetapkan oleh Menteri LHK yaitu Hutan Adat Kampa dan Hutan Adat Petapahan di Kabupaten Kampar. Oleh karena itu perlu didesak untuk kabupaten lain agar segera membuat Perda tentang masyarakat hukum adat, sebagai syarat untuk penetapan hutan adat oleh Menteri LHK.
Analysis of the Synergy of the Penta Helix Model in Handling COVID-19 at the Pekanbaru City Level Ardiansyah, Ardiansyah; Suparto, Suparto; Hajri, Wira Atma; Rafi, M.; Amri, Pahmi
Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): (April 2023)
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Kontemporer, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46507/jcgpp.v4i1.88

Abstract

The government has a crucial role in the management of COVID-19 since it is a leader. However, to speed up breaking the chain of transmission of COVID-19, the government needs various solutions from various stakeholders, considering that the COVID-19 pandemic is a broad problem and all parties are required to work together to achieve this goal. This study aims to explain the influencing factors and implications of the Penta Helix synergy in handling COVID-19 at the Pekanbaru City Level. This study then used a qualitative analysis method with Nvivo 12 Plus as an analytical tool to help visualise data from online media. The findings of this study indicate that the factors that influence the synergy of the Penta Helix model in handling COVID-19 at the Pekanbaru City Level include the role of government, involvement, and equality between actors, joint decision-making processes, formal organization, consensus, and collaboration factors in problem-solving. Then, the synergy of the Penta Helix model in handling COVID-19 in Pekanbaru City has two impacts, namely, the implications for developing the spirit of cooperation and accelerating the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic in Pekanbaru City. The implications of this research provide a reference for the importance of strengthening actor synergy based on a systematic mapping of the balance of roles of each stakeholder to optimally contribute to handling COVID-19 at the Pekanbaru City Level.
Enhancing External Oversight of Constitutional Judges: A Study on the Role of the Judicial Commission in Indonesia and South Korea Suparto, Suparto; Hyeonsoo, Kim; Hardiago, David; Syafrinaldi, Rani Fadhila
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Contemporary Legal Challenges and Solutions in a Global Context
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v8i1.14140

Abstract

This study addresses the urgent need for enhanced external oversight of constitutional judges in Indonesia and South Korea, driven by increasing concerns over judicial integrity and accountability. Recent instances of judicial misconduct and rising public dissatisfaction highlight the necessity for effective mechanisms that ensure transparency and ethical conduct among judges. The research investigates the roles and effectiveness of the Judicial Commissions in both countries, providing critical insights into their operations and impacts on judicial oversight. By employing a comparative approach, the study reveals the strengths and weaknesses of each commission’s framework, focusing on ethical guidelines, disciplinary processes, and public engagement strategies. It identifies best practices that could be adapted or improved to enhance judicial oversight, thereby fostering greater public trust in the legal system. The findings indicate that while both commissions aim to uphold judicial integrity, their effectiveness is influenced by contextual factors such as political dynamics and public perception. Additionally, this study explores the implementation of external oversight for Constitutional Judges in Indonesia, particularly in light of the establishment of the Constitutional Court following the 1945 Constitution amendment. Given the court’s crucial role in upholding constitutionalism, the exclusion of constitutional judges from oversight mechanisms is untenable. The Judicial Commission emerges as the most suitable body for external supervision, yet prior legislative efforts to integrate constitutional judges under its purview have been invalidated by the Constitutional Court. To rectify this, the study recommends amending Article 24B paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution to explicitly include "Constitutional Judges." This amendment is essential to ensure that all judges, including constitutional judges, are subject to the same level of external scrutiny. Ultimately, this research contributes to the broader discourse on judicial independence and accountability, offering actionable recommendations to strengthen oversight institutions and foster a more resilient judiciary in both Indonesia and South Korea.
Analisis Sengketa Pajak dalam Kasus Gugatan Pajak Akuisisi Tanah dan Bangunan (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Pajak Nomor 002482.99/2020/PPM.XIVB) Ibnususilo, Efendi; Murtadi, Beni; Suparto, Suparto
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Januari 2026
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v5i1.5471

Abstract

Disharmony between taxpayers and the government leads to tax disputes, often caused by differences in calculations regarding the amount of tax payable. Similarly, in land and building sales transactions, tax disputes can arise due to differences in calculations between the seller and buyer and the government (Regional Government) regarding the amount of Income Tax and Land and Building Tax (BPHTB) payable. In practice, tax disputes sometimes arise due to the issuance of a Tax Underpayment Assessment Letter (SKPKB). This study aims to analyze the legal interpretation of the 2021 Tax Court Decision Number PUT-002482.99/2020/PP/MXIVB regarding the BPHTB Lawsuit Case. This research uses a normative legal approach. This research is legal research that uses a legislative and conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that the tax appeal filed by PT. SAM in the Tax Court contains procedural errors that are not in accordance with legal principles because the principle of filing an appeal, where the description of the BPHTB calculation is not the object of the tax appeal dispute, because the object of the substance of the tax dispute is the decision of the tax collector in the form of objections to SKPDKB, SKPDKBT, SKPDKLB, SKPDN. The settlement of tax disputes at the appeal level has not yet received a decision on tax objections that are contrary to the requirements and procedures for appeal as stipulated in Article 31 and Article 35 of Law Number 14 of 2002 concerning the Tax Court. In conjunction with Article 103 and 104 of Law Number 28 of 2009 concerning PDRD. This fundamental misunderstanding between the object of the lawsuit and the object of the appeal is what causes taxpayers to lose the legal basis to fight for their rights from the outset.