Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

KEDUDUKAN DAN PROSES PENETAPAN HUTAN ADAT PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO. 35/PUU-X/2012 SERTA IMPLEMENTASINYA DI PROVINSI RIAU Suparto, Suparto
Bina Hukum Lingkungan Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021): Bina Hukum Lingkungan, Volume 5, Nomor 2, Februari 2021
Publisher : Asosiasi Pembina Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia (PHLI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 41 Tahun 1999 tentang Kehutanan, hutan adat dimasukkan dalam hutan negara hal ini merugikan masyarakat adat sehingga Undang-undang tersebut diuji ke Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK). Permasalahannya adalah Bagaimana kedudukan dan proses penetapan hutan adat pasca putusan MK No. 35/PUU-X/2012 serta implementasinya di Provinsi Riau. Berdasarkan penelitian diperoleh hasil (1). Kedudukan hutan adat pasca putusan MK No. 35/PUUX/2012, hutan adat tidak lagi Bagian dari hutan negara melainkan menjadi hutan hak. Proses penetapan hutan adat diatur dengan Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan (LHK) No. P.32/Menlhk-Setjen/2015 tentang Hutan Hak. Agar hutan adat menjadi hutan hak, prosesnya melalui dua tahapan yaitu: (a) Pengakuan atas keberadaan masyarakat hukum adat melalui peraturan daerah (Perda). (b) Penetapan oleh Menteri LHK terhadap hutan adat. (2). Sampai saat ini di Provinsi Riau baru ada 2 hutan adat yang telah ditetapkan oleh Menteri LHK yaitu Hutan Adat Kampa dan Hutan Adat Petapahan di Kabupaten Kampar. Oleh karena itu perlu didesak untuk kabupaten lain agar segera membuat Perda tentang masyarakat hukum adat, sebagai syarat untuk penetapan hutan adat oleh Menteri LHK.
Analysis of the Synergy of the Penta Helix Model in Handling COVID-19 at the Pekanbaru City Level Ardiansyah Ardiansyah; Suparto Suparto; Wira Atma Hajri; M. Rafi; Pahmi Amri
Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): (April 2023)
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Kontemporer, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46507/jcgpp.v4i1.88

Abstract

The government has a crucial role in the management of COVID-19 since it is a leader. However, to speed up breaking the chain of transmission of COVID-19, the government needs various solutions from various stakeholders, considering that the COVID-19 pandemic is a broad problem and all parties are required to work together to achieve this goal. This study aims to explain the influencing factors and implications of the Penta Helix synergy in handling COVID-19 at the Pekanbaru City Level. This study then used a qualitative analysis method with Nvivo 12 Plus as an analytical tool to help visualise data from online media. The findings of this study indicate that the factors that influence the synergy of the Penta Helix model in handling COVID-19 at the Pekanbaru City Level include the role of government, involvement, and equality between actors, joint decision-making processes, formal organization, consensus, and collaboration factors in problem-solving. Then, the synergy of the Penta Helix model in handling COVID-19 in Pekanbaru City has two impacts, namely, the implications for developing the spirit of cooperation and accelerating the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic in Pekanbaru City. The implications of this research provide a reference for the importance of strengthening actor synergy based on a systematic mapping of the balance of roles of each stakeholder to optimally contribute to handling COVID-19 at the Pekanbaru City Level.
Implementation of Community Land Rights Acquisition for Public Interest and National Development within a Just Legal Framework in Indonesia Meidizon; Suparto; Ellydar Chaidir; Surizki Febrianto
Journal of Creative Power and Ambition (JCPA) Vol. 4 No. 01 (2026): Journal of Creative Power and Ambition (JCPA)
Publisher : CV Edujavare Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70610/jcpa.1260

Abstract

This study analyzes the implementation of land acquisition for public interest and national development within a justice-based legal framework in Indonesia. Using normative legal research with statutory and case approaches, this study finds that although legal regulations formally accommodate principles of justice, implementation gaps remain evident. Key issues include compensation mechanisms, limited public participation, and weak legal protection. The study concludes that a responsive and integrative legal framework is required to balance development interests and community rights while strengthening long-term legitimacy of land governance.
Non-Compliance Of Forestry Permits With Regional Spatial Plan (RTRW) In Siak Regency Suardi; Ellydar Chaidir; Suparto
Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sosial Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Juli
Publisher : CV Putra Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58540/jipsi.v5i2.1775

Abstract

The inconsistency between forestry permits and the Regional Spatial Plan (RTRW) has become a significant issue in natural resource governance in Siak Regency. This study aims to analyze the forms of non-compliance of forestry and plantation permits with the 2020–2040 Siak Regency RTRW, identify indications of maladministration in the licensing process, and formulate policy measures to strengthen spatial planning compliance. This research employs a normative legal approach supported by qualitative analysis and quantitative-spatial data. The data were obtained through the examination of statutory regulations, spatial planning documents, forestry and plantation permit data, field observations, and interviews with key informants. The findings reveal that Industrial Plantation Forest (HTI) permits covering 126,737 hectares and plantation permits covering 57,866 hectares operate outside the spatial allocation corridors stipulated in the Siak Regency RTRW. This mismatch indicates problems of intergovernmental coordination, weak spatial verification, and the suboptimal implementation of monitoring and sanction mechanisms. The impacts are not merely administrative but also include legal uncertainty, agrarian conflicts, peat ecosystem degradation, and increased vulnerability to forest and land fires. This study recommends the formulation of a regent regulation as a technical guideline for RTRW implementation, the strengthening of the Regional Spatial Planning Coordination Team (TKPRD), the integration of licensing data through GIS and the One Map Policy, periodic audits of problematic permits, and the enforcement of administrative sanctions in the form of permit cancellation or revocation against corporations proven to have violated spatial planning regulations.
Enhancing External Oversight of Constitutional Judges: A Study on the Role of the Judicial Commission in Indonesia and South Korea Suparto Suparto; Kim Hyeonsoo; David Hardiago; Rani Fadhila Syafrinaldi
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Contemporary Legal Challenges and Solutions in a Global Context
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v8i1.14140

Abstract

This study addresses the urgent need for enhanced external oversight of constitutional judges in Indonesia and South Korea, driven by increasing concerns over judicial integrity and accountability. Recent instances of judicial misconduct and rising public dissatisfaction highlight the necessity for effective mechanisms that ensure transparency and ethical conduct among judges. The research investigates the roles and effectiveness of the Judicial Commissions in both countries, providing critical insights into their operations and impacts on judicial oversight. By employing a comparative approach, the study reveals the strengths and weaknesses of each commission’s framework, focusing on ethical guidelines, disciplinary processes, and public engagement strategies. It identifies best practices that could be adapted or improved to enhance judicial oversight, thereby fostering greater public trust in the legal system. The findings indicate that while both commissions aim to uphold judicial integrity, their effectiveness is influenced by contextual factors such as political dynamics and public perception. Additionally, this study explores the implementation of external oversight for Constitutional Judges in Indonesia, particularly in light of the establishment of the Constitutional Court following the 1945 Constitution amendment. Given the court’s crucial role in upholding constitutionalism, the exclusion of constitutional judges from oversight mechanisms is untenable. The Judicial Commission emerges as the most suitable body for external supervision, yet prior legislative efforts to integrate constitutional judges under its purview have been invalidated by the Constitutional Court. To rectify this, the study recommends amending Article 24B paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution to explicitly include "Constitutional Judges." This amendment is essential to ensure that all judges, including constitutional judges, are subject to the same level of external scrutiny. Ultimately, this research contributes to the broader discourse on judicial independence and accountability, offering actionable recommendations to strengthen oversight institutions and foster a more resilient judiciary in both Indonesia and South Korea.
Analisis Sengketa Pajak dalam Kasus Gugatan Pajak Akuisisi Tanah dan Bangunan (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Pajak Nomor 002482.99/2020/PPM.XIVB) Efendi Ibnususilo; Beni Murtadi; Suparto Suparto
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Januari 2026
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v5i1.5471

Abstract

Disharmony between taxpayers and the government leads to tax disputes, often caused by differences in calculations regarding the amount of tax payable. Similarly, in land and building sales transactions, tax disputes can arise due to differences in calculations between the seller and buyer and the government (Regional Government) regarding the amount of Income Tax and Land and Building Tax (BPHTB) payable. In practice, tax disputes sometimes arise due to the issuance of a Tax Underpayment Assessment Letter (SKPKB). This study aims to analyze the legal interpretation of the 2021 Tax Court Decision Number PUT-002482.99/2020/PP/MXIVB regarding the BPHTB Lawsuit Case. This research uses a normative legal approach. This research is legal research that uses a legislative and conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that the tax appeal filed by PT. SAM in the Tax Court contains procedural errors that are not in accordance with legal principles because the principle of filing an appeal, where the description of the BPHTB calculation is not the object of the tax appeal dispute, because the object of the substance of the tax dispute is the decision of the tax collector in the form of objections to SKPDKB, SKPDKBT, SKPDKLB, SKPDN. The settlement of tax disputes at the appeal level has not yet received a decision on tax objections that are contrary to the requirements and procedures for appeal as stipulated in Article 31 and Article 35 of Law Number 14 of 2002 concerning the Tax Court. In conjunction with Article 103 and 104 of Law Number 28 of 2009 concerning PDRD. This fundamental misunderstanding between the object of the lawsuit and the object of the appeal is what causes taxpayers to lose the legal basis to fight for their rights from the outset.
Indonesia’s Online Loan Challenges: What Legal Actions Can Solve the Most Pressing Issues? Admiral Admiral; Suparto Suparto; Esy Kurniasih; Selvi Afriani; John Woodward; Fadhel Arjuna Adinda
Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement) JPHI Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): (January-June 2025)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jphi.v8i1.21959

Abstract

The rapid growth of online lending platforms in Indonesia has introduced significant challenges, particularly regarding predatory lending practices, lack of consumer awareness, and insufficient regulatory oversight. These challenges have raised concerns about consumer protection, the exploitation of borrowers, and the need for stronger legal frameworks to ensure fair and transparent lending practices. This paper explores the key legal and regulatory actions necessary to address these pressing issues. It examines the role of Indonesia's Financial Services Authority (OJK) in regulating online lenders and proposes potential improvements in licensing, supervision, and enforcement. The paper also suggests the introduction of clearer lending standards, such as interest rate caps and transparent fee structures, alongside stronger consumer protection laws to prevent harassment and over-indebtedness. Data privacy and security concerns are addressed, with a call for more robust protections around borrower data. Additionally, the paper advocates for financial literacy programs to empower borrowers with the knowledge to make informed decisions. The research contributes to the existing body of knowledge by providing an in-depth analysis of the legal gaps within Indonesia’s online lending market, offering comparative insights from other countries like India and the Philippines, and proposing actionable legal solutions. It also emphasizes the importance of integrating technology into the regulatory process to enhance oversight and consumer protection. Ultimately, this study aims to inform policymakers, regulators, and stakeholders in Indonesia’s fintech industry about the necessary legal reforms to create a more transparent, equitable, and secure online lending environment.
Resolution of Local Head Election Disputes: The Urgency of Establishing a Special Court Suparto Suparto; Admiral Admiral; Ardiansyah Ardiansyah; Jose Gama Santos
Wacana Hukum Vol 30 No 2 (2024): Article in Press
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Slamet Riyadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33061/wh.v30i2.12156

Abstract

In accordance with the Constitutional Court's decision Number 97/PUU-XI/2013, the Constitutional Court is no longer empowered to adjudicate disputes regarding regional election results, as Article 236 C of Law Number 12 of 2008 is deemed inconsistent with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. In response to the Constitutional Court's ruling, Law Number 8 of 2015 was enacted, which designates a specialised judicial body as the authority for resolving disputes about regional head election results in Article 157. The objective of this study was to determine whether a state institution is suitable for adjudicating disputes regarding the outcomes of regional head elections in the future. This study employed a normative legal research methodology, utilising secondary sources and analysing them through qualitative descriptive techniques. The findings of this analysis indicate that the creation of a specialised judicial entity to adjudicate election result disputes is the optimal resolution to the legal issues that arise. To avoid generating additional issues with the establishment of new state organisations and to enhance efficiency, the body responsible for adjudicating disputes about regional head election outcomes would henceforth be Bawaslu. The present Bawaslu has evolved into an entity tasked with a specific judicial duty, namely adjudicating complaints about regional election results as stipulated in Article 157 of Law Number 10 of 2016 concerning the Election of Governors, Regents, and Mayors
IMPLEMENTATION OF BPJS KESEHATAN COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH HEALTH FACILITIES IN ENSURING FAIR ACCESS TO HEALTH SERVICES Rahmad Hidayat Harahap; Suparto; Surizki Febriyanto
Hukum Responsif Vol 17 No 2 (2026): Vol 17 No 2 August 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33603/responsif.v17i2.12335

Abstract

Health is a constitutional right of citizens that must be guaranteed by the state through the provision of fair and equitable health services. In the implementation of the National Health Insurance Program (JKN), BPJS Kesehatan collaborates with various health facilities through cooperation agreements as the basis for providing health services to participants. However, the implementation of the agreement still faces various problems, such as inequality in the position of the parties, delay in payment of claims, limited health facilities, and disparity in service quality between regions that have the potential to affect the fairness of access to health services for the community. This study aims to analyze the implementation of the cooperation agreement between BPJS Kesehatan and health facilities in the implementation of JKN, examine its effectiveness in ensuring fair access to health services, and formulate efforts to strengthen the implementation of the agreement. This research is a normative legal research using a statute approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. The data used are in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials that are analyzed qualitatively through descriptive-analytical methods. The results of the study show that the implementation of BPJS Kesehatan cooperation agreements with health facilities has played an important role in expanding the scope of health services and increasing public access to health services. Its effectiveness in realizing fair access to health services still faces various obstacles, especially related to the uneven distribution of health facilities, the limitation of health workers, and the imbalance in contractual relations between BPJS Kesehatan and health facilities. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen regulations, reformulate cooperation agreement clauses, increase the transparency of claim payments, and strengthen supervision and equity in health facilities to support the realization of fair access to health services for the entire community.
Reconstructing the Enforcement Power of Civil Judgments through a National Enforcement Officer to Achieve Effective Judicial Enforcement A. Wafi; Ellydar Chaidir; Efendi Ibnususilo; Suparto Suparto; Surizki Febrianto
Jurnal El-Thawalib Vol 7, No 4 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/el-thawalib.v7i4.21062

Abstract

This study examines the crisis of enforcement efficacy in the Indonesian civil justice system—a structural irony in which the coercive power of state bailiffs has proven ineffective. Even when a judicial decision has attained the status of inkracht van gewijsde (final and binding), empirical evidence reveals a stagnation in the realization of rights, thereby fundamentally undermining the essence of legal protection for litigants. Employing a normative legal research methodology grounded in conceptual, statutory, and cross-jurisdictional comparative approaches, the study utilizes primary legal sources (legislation and relevant legal instruments), secondary sources (scholarly journals from the last decade, legal doctrine or communis opinio doctorum, and official reports), and tertiary sources; data were collected via documentation techniques and analyzed using a deductive-qualitative method. The findings indicate that reconstructing enforcement power through a "National Enforcement Officer" model is essential to bridge the gap between court judgments and the actual realization of the prevailing party's rights. This model enhances the professionalism of enforcement officials, inter-agency coordination, and the oversight of enforcement proceedings, ensuring they operate effectively and proportionately. Consequently, enforcement ceases to be merely an administrative stage and becomes an integral component of effective judicial enforcement, guaranteeing the actual implementation of court rulings