Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.213
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Primary: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar Lentera Pendidikan : Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika SIGMA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Suska Journal of Mathematics Education Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI JIPMat (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika) Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika AL ISHLAH Jurnal Pendidikan MaPan : Jurnal Matematika dan Pembelajaran Jurnal Analisa Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA MATEMATIKA DAN PEMBELAJARAN JKPM (Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika) Al-Khwarizmi: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam ANARGYA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika JP3M (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Matematika) JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif) An Nisa'
Fitriani Nur
UIN Alauddin Makassar
Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : MATEMATIKA DAN PEMBELAJARAN

 1 
THE ANALYSIS OF MATHEMATICAL PROOF ABILITY Siti Hardianti; Thamrin Tayeb; Fitriani Nur; Ahmad Farham Majid; Baharuddin Baharuddin
MATEMATIKA DAN PEMBELAJARAN Vol 8, No 2 (2020): MATEMATIKA DAN PEMBELAJARAN
Publisher : IAIN Ambon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33477/mp.v8i2.1528

Abstract

The ability to prove mathematically is one of the important abilities in learning mathematics. This study aims to determine students' mathematical proof ability. This type of research is a qualitative descriptive study, which involved 38 sixth semester students of the Mathematics Education Department, Tarbiyah and Teacher Training College, Alauddin Makassar State Islamic University with 3 of them being interview subjects. The instruments and data collection techniques used were researchers using diagnostic tests and interview guides. The analysis techniques used are data reduction, display data, and conclusion drawing / verification. The result of this research is that the students' mathematical proving ability in working on the questions is not optimal. In the indicator of the ability to construct evidence, students are less able to make connections between known facts and the elements to be proven. Furthermore, on the indicator of the ability to read a proof, students are less able to use definitions as a basis for providing arguments.
THE INFLUENCE OF NHT-TYPE COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL ON MATHEMATICS LEARNING OUTCOMES REVIEWED FROM THE STUDENTS’ INTERESTS Andi Ika Prasasti Abrar; Zaenal Zaenal; A. Sriyanti; Fitriani Nur; Suharti Suharti
MATEMATIKA DAN PEMBELAJARAN Vol 9, No 2 (2021): MATEMATIKA DAN PEMBELAJARAN
Publisher : IAIN Ambon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33477/mp.v9i2.1908

Abstract

This article aims at finding out (1) the differences in the mathematics learning outcomes of the students who follow NHT type cooperative learning with the students who follow direct learning, (2) the influence of interaction between the learning model used and the students’ learning interests, (3) the difference in the mathematics learning outcomes between the students who follow NHT type cooperative learning and the students who follow direct learning reviewed from high learning interests, (4) differences in students’ mathematics learning outcomes between the students who follow NHT type cooperative learning and the students who follow direct learning reviewed from low learning interests. This the type of pseudo-experimental research. The instruments used are test of learning outcomes, questionnaires of students' learning interests, and observation of the Lesson Plan implementation. The analytical techniques used are descriptive analysis techniques and inferential statistical analysis with ANOVA tests, and Tukey advanced tests. Based on the results of the ANOVA test and Tukey advanced test obtained that there are significant differences in the mathematics learning outcomes between using a cooperative learning model NHT type and the direct learning model in the students who have a high interest in learning. Based on the data analysis, it is obtained the significant value of < α (0.010 < 0.05) then H0 is rejected. Therefore, it is concluded that there are significant differences in mathematics learning outcomes between using NHT-type cooperative learning model and the direct learning model in the students who have a low interest in learning.
Co-Authors A. Nurlutvia Ahmad A. Sriyanti Agusman Agusman Ahmad Farham Majid Alim, Bahrul Andi Dian Angriani Andi Dian Angriani Andi Fajrin Syarif Andi Halimah Andi Halimah Andi Ika Prasasti Abrar Andi Nurul Fadilah Baharuddin Baharuddin Basri Basri Besse Marjana Alwi Dahlia Patiung Eka Damayanti Fathu Ridha Fitri Annisa Mardhiah Mardhiah Muchlis Japar Muhammad Rusydi Rasyid Muhammad Shabir Umar Muljono Damopolii Nurpaidah Nurpaidah Nursalam Nursalam Nurul Khusnah Rara Aprilyanti Risno Risno Siti Hardianti Sitti Mania Sri Nensi Roslan Sri Sulasteri Sri Sulasteri Sri Sulasteri Suharti Suharti Suharti Suharti Suharti Suharti Sulhijrah Mustabil Syahratulnisa Syamsuar Thamrin Tayeb Thamrin Tayeb Ulfiani Rahman Ummi Rofika Hasan Zaenal Zaenal