Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.696
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Akta Wacana Paramarta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI Law Development Journal Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities QOSIM: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial & Humaniora Journal of Contemporary Law Studies Academica : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat SASI Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences Khazanah Hukum
Suhardini, Eni Dasuki
Universitas Langlangbuana
Religion Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Kepastian Hukum Jaminan FIDUSIA Atas Aset Digital Cryptocurrency Sebagai Upaya Pembaruan Hukum Jaminan Dihubungkan Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang FIDUSIA Arif Wahyudin Hidayatulloh; Eni Dasuki Suhardin; Syahrul Machmud
Jurnal QOSIM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial & Humaniora Vol 4 No 3 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/jq.v4i3.7265

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi blockchain telah menghasilkan berbagai aset digital, termasuk cryptocurrency, yang memiliki nilai ekonomi dan dapat diperdagangkan secara internasional. Di Indonesia, cryptocurrency diakui sebagai komoditas yang dapat diperdagangkan berdasarkan regulasi dari Badan Pengawas Perdagangan Berjangka Komoditi (BAPPEBTI). Namun, pengaturan mengenai cryptocurrency dalam konteks hukum kebendaan dan hukum jaminan masih belum jelas. Keadaan ini menyebabkan ketidakpastian hukum, terutama mengenai kemungkinan cryptocurrency dijadikan objek jaminan fidusia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kepastian hukum cryptocurrency dalam konteks hukum kebendaan di Indonesia serta merumuskan pembaruan hukum yang diperlukan untuk mengakomodasi cryptocurrency sebagai objek jaminan fidusia dalam sistem hukum nasional. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan spesifikasi deskriptif analitis. Data diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan yang mencakup bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier, serta didukung oleh wawancara dengan narasumber dari Badan Pengawas Perdagangan Berjangka Komoditi (BAPPEBTI). Data yang terkumpul dianalisis secara kualitatif menggunakan pendekatan regulasi dan konsep hukum kebendaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa cryptocurrency secara yuridis memenuhi kriteria sebagai benda bergerak tidak berwujud karena memiliki nilai ekonomis, dapat dikuasai, dan dapat dipindahtangankan. Namun, hingga saat ini belum ada pengaturan yang secara eksplisit mengakui cryptocurrency sebagai objek jaminan fidusia yang menyebabkan adanya kekosongan hukum. Oleh karena itu, perlu dilakukan pembaruan hukum melalui revisi regulasi yang mencakup pengakuan cryptocurrency sebagai objek jaminan fidusia, serta mekanisme pendaftaran, penilaian, pengawasan, dan eksekusi aset digital, guna memberikan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hukum bagi semua pihak yang terlibat.
Concept of Position and Role People's Consultative Assembly as an Embodiment of People's Sovereignty in the State System in Indonesia Ari Wibowo; Eni Dasuki Suhardini; Dani Durahman
Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (May - Jun
Publisher : Greenation Research & Yayasan Global Resarch National

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/gijlss.v4i2.837

Abstract

The People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) is a state institution classified as a bicameral legislative institution in the constitutional system in Indonesia, with a membership composition consisting of members of the DPR and DPD. Condition gives rise to several potential problems, including conflicts of interest in carrying out their duties and authorities, so that it will be difficult to realize a people's sovereign democracy. It shows that first, the current position of the MPR is not related to a people's sovereign democracy, because there is a distortion of interests between the interests of the people and the interests of political parties, making it difficult for the MPR to accommodate the interests of the people. The importance of restructuring the position and role of the MPR to guarantee the upholding of the supremacy of democracy and the supremacy of the constitution, as mandated by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Legal Reconstruction of the Fragmentation of the Professional Advocate Organization and its Implications for Law Enforcement Jutek Bongso; Hernawati RAS; Eni Dasuki Suhardini
Law Development Journal Vol 8, No 2 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.8.2.806-821

Abstract

The legal profession constitutes one of the key components of law enforcement with a strategic role in upholding the rule of law, protecting human rights, and ensuring access to justice. The position of advocates as a free and independent profession presupposes the existence of a professional organization capable of structuring authority, maintaining professional competency standards, and enforcing ethical rules consistently. However, in practice, the regulation of advocate organizations in Indonesia under Law No. 18 of 2003 on Advocates has resulted in prolonged organizational fragmentation. Such fragmentation has generated uncertainty in the governance of the legal profession and has adversely affected the quality of law enforcement and legal certainty within the judicial system. This research aims to analyze the urgency of reconstructing the regulation of advocate organizations, to identify the factors underlying organizational fragmentation along with its implications, and to formulate an ideal model for reconstructing the advocate organizational system in Indonesia. The findings indicate that organizational fragmentation among advocates is a consequence of a regulatory design that fails to provide clear mechanisms for managing authority, organizational legitimacy, and conflict resolution. Internal factors, including leadership legitimacy crises and inconsistencies in the exercise of professional authority, intersect with external factors such as normative weaknesses, judicial interpretation, and evolving administrative practices. These conditions result in divergent professional standards, weakened systemic cohesion, and diminished legal certainty for the advocate profession. Based on these findings, this research proposes a reconstruction model through a hybrid single bar system, which centralizes fundamental professional authority within a single national structure while recognizing organizational plurality within clearly defined limits. This model is intended to safeguard professional independence, ensure consistency of professional standards, and strengthen the role of advocates as law enforcement actors. Accordingly, the study recommends either a revision of Law No. 18 of 2003 on Advocates or the enactment of implementing regulations as the normative foundation for the proposed reconstruction.
Digital Transformation and Regulatory Approaches in Capital Markets: A Comparative Legal Study of Indonesia and Malaysia Eni Dasuki Suhardini; Deshinta Arrova Dewi; Dani Durahman; Cecep Soleh Kurniawan; Panji Adam Agus Putra
Khazanah Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): Khazanah Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/kh.v8i2.54293

Abstract

This study aims to compare the regulatory frameworks governing fintech innovation, blockchain and digital assets, and investor data protection in the capital markets of Indonesia and Malaysia. It employs normative legal research using statute, comparative, and conceptual approaches. The analysis is based on primary legal materials, including legislation, regulatory guidelines, supervisory instruments, and official policy documents, as well as secondary legal materials, including academic literature and policy reports. The collected materials are examined through descriptive and comparative legal analysis. The findings demonstrate that Indonesia and Malaysia pursue broadly similar regulatory objectives through licensing, governance requirements, supervisory mechanisms, risk management, and investor protection. However, the two jurisdictions differ significantly in their institutional architecture. Indonesia adopts an integrated financial-sector regulatory approach under the Financial Services Authority, whereas Malaysia applies a more specialised capital-market supervisory model through the Securities Commission Malaysia. These institutional differences influence regulatory coherence, supervisory coordination, legal certainty, and regulators' capacity to address technology-specific risks. The findings imply that Indonesia should strengthen inter-institutional coordination and technology-specific supervisory standards, while both jurisdictions should ensure that innovation policies remain closely connected with cybersecurity, operational resilience, and investor protection. The originality of this study lies in integrating fintech regulation, digital asset governance, and investor data protection within a single comparative legal framework focused on regulatory coherence and institutional design.
Co-Authors Adinda Puspitasari Juanda Annisa Rahmawati Ari Wibowo Arif Wahyudin Hidayatulloh Cecep Soleh Kurniawan Christian S, Paulana Christin Septina Basani, Christin Septina Dani Durahman Dani Durahman Dani Durahman Deshinta Arrova Dewi Eddy Setiawan Eka Dadan Ramadhan Firdaus, M. Raihan Hernawati RAS Jutek Bongso Owen, Reynald Sandi Panji Adam Agus Putra Rahmawati, Amellia Ramdania, Dini Razak, Abdul Kamil Rian Firmansyah Saptana, Deni Sri Mulyati Chalil Suharno, Rachmat Syahrul Machmud Tejo, Eko Susanto