Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Diversion for Children in Conflict with the Law in Traffic Accident Crimes in South Solok Regency (Research Study at the South Solok District Attorney's Office) Helmi, Zetri Syafri; Maerani, Ira Alia
Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah Vol 20, No 2 (2025): June 2025
Publisher : UNISSULA Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jhku.v20i2.46252

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of diversion in resolving criminal acts of traffic accidents committed by children in South Solok Regency in the context of legal certainty and what are the obstacles and solutions to the implementation of diversion in resolving criminal acts of traffic accidents committed by children in South Solok Regency in the context of law enforcement. The research method used to analyze is the Sociological Juridical Research Method. The sociological juridical approach is an approach that emphasizes research that aims to obtain empirical legal knowledge by going directly to the object. Sociological juridical research is legal research using secondary data as its initial data, which is then continued with primary data in the field or on the community, examining the effectiveness of a regulation and research that wants to find a relationship (correlation) between various symptoms or variables, as a data collection tool consisting of document studies or library materials and interviews that are associated with the Theory of Law Enforcement and Progressive Theory. Referring to the description above, in an effort to uphold restorative justice based on the theory of Law Enforcement and Progressive Legal Theory, a criminal case resolution that follows the concept of restorative justice has the essence of unfair treatment for both victims and perpetrators. The existence of unfair legal regulations for both victims and perpetrators, with the aim of creating the principle of legal certainty. The existence of very detrimental and disproportionate treatment of suspects, defendants, and convicts, compared to the need to protect the rights of others in a just perspective as in the intent and purpose of Progressive Law. The rights of victims or perpetrators are not protected effectively, efficiently and proportionally by the state. The existence of unfair or less fair treatment for victims due to laws that are not conducive or laws that do not provide protection for the rights of the victims themselves, the regulations of which are still unclear.
Legal Protection for Victims of Fraudulent Investment Crimes Based on Restorative Justice at the Salatiga Police Resort Rifo, Kana; Maerani, Ira Alia
Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah Vol 20, No 2 (2025): June 2025
Publisher : UNISSULA Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jhku.v20i2.46025

Abstract

This study aims to determine and obtain data regarding legal protection for victims of fraudulent investment crimes using a restorative justice approach, then the obstacles faced by the police in handling this case and how to resolve this case using a restorative justice approach. The juridical-sociological research method is an approach in legal research that combines legal (juridical) and social (sociological) aspects to understand how law interacts with society and its impact on social order. This method involves collecting qualitative data, such as interviews, observations, and document analysis, to describe and explain how law affects society, how society responds to law, and how this interaction can shape better legal policies using the theory of restorative justice and the theory of law enforcement in an Islamic perspective. The results of the study show that First, legal protection based on restorative justice for victims of fraudulent investment crimes such as the fulfillment of victim rights, counseling, medical services or assistance, legal assistance, and providing information to victims related to the investigation and examination process of the crime experienced by the victim. Second, the obstacles faced in resolving the case are that the victim asks for the case to continue, there are parties who provoke, and want to provide a deterrent effect on the perpetrator. Third, the process of resolving criminal cases in Indonesia can usually be resolved through litigation or trials. However, the idea of resolving criminal cases using non-litigation methods or can also be called restorative justice emerged. Restorative justice or restorative justice contains the meaning of a restoration of relationships and atonement for mistakes that the perpetrator wants to make to the victim using methods outside the court with the aim that the problem can be resolved properly and an agreement is reached between the parties. By looking at it from the perspective of the perpetrator, victim and case.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN SEKSUAL TERHADAP ANAK (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 11/PID.SUS/2023/PN. SMG) Hanafi, Muhammad Zusron; Maerani, Ira Alia
Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Mahasiswa Vol 4, No 3 (2025): SEPTEMBER 2025
Publisher : Jurnal Ilmiah Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas penegakan hukum tindak pidana kekerasan seksual terhadap anak dengan studi kasus Putusan Nomor 11/Pid.Sus/2023/PN. Smg. Latar belakang penelitian ini adalah tingginya kasus kekerasan seksual terhadap anak di Indonesia yang menimbulkan dampak psikologis dan sosial yang serius, sehingga memerlukan penegakan hukum yang tidak hanya bersifat represif tetapi juga memberikan perlindungan bagi korban.Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui sejauh mana penegakan hukum dalam kasus kekerasan seksual terhadap anak, menganalisis pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan pidana terhadap pelaku dan hambatan penegakan hukum tindak pidana seksual terhadap anak. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif analitis, yang memadukan kajian peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin hukum, dan analisis terhadap putusan pengadilan terkait. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder, yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier, yang dianalisis secara kualitatif.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penegakan hukum dalam kasus ini efektif secara yuridis karena hakim telah menjatuhkan pidana penjara selama 11 (sebelas) tahun dikurangkan dengan masa penangkapan dan penahanan yang telah dijalani oleh terdakwa serta denda Rp1.000.000.000,00 sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 82 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak. Pertimbangan hakim mencakup aspek yuridis, sosiologis, dan psikologis, dengan fokus pada perlindungan korban sebagai anak di bawah umur dan pemberian efek jera kepada pelaku. Kendala yang dialami dalam proses penegakan hukum tindak pidana seksual terhadap anak yaitu terjadinya banyak korban yang tidak bersedia menjadi saksi untuk diminta keterangan dalam proses penyidikan sehingga memakan waktu yang lama. Namun, dari sisi preventif, penegakan hukum masih perlu ditingkatkan melalui edukasi publik, pengawasan lingkungan, dan program rehabilitasi korban.Kata kunci: Penegakan Hukum, Kekerasan Seksual, Anak, Pertimbangan Hakim, Perlindungan Anak.
STUDI PERBANDINGAN ALASAN PENGHAPUS PIDANA MENURUT KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA (KUHP) DAN HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM DALAM RANGKA PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM PIDANA NASIONAL Muhammad Maulana Firdaus; Ira Alia Maerani
Jurnal Hukum Vol 36, No 2 (2020): Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Unissula

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jh.v36i2.5346

Abstract

Criminal law is suffering that is deliberately inflicted upon a person who commits an act that meets certain conditions. The purpose of this research is to know the similarities and differences in criminal law enforcement between Dutch inheritance law and Islamic law and to know its contribution to the State of Indonesia.Theaim of this research is to find out the similarities and differences as well as knowing its contribution to the Criminal Code.The method of approach in this research is normative jurisdiction that is research conducted by focusing on the applicable regulations as well as literature or books relating to legal relations, especially regarding the reasons for criminal abolition according to the Criminal Law Act and Islamic criminal law. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the similarities and differences in the reasons for criminal eradication according to the Criminal Codeand Islamic criminal law, the similarity of reasons for the eradication of the two laws are among others: self-defense, forced power, carrying out orders / carrying out duties , unable to take responsibility. Whereas the difference is that Defendants are forced to exceed the limits, carry out the provisions of the law, get drunk, the defendant's death, past time. As well as the contribution of the reasons for the Criminal Eradication in Islamic Criminal Law in the Contribution of the Criminal Codethat will come. The contribution of Islamic law that the author wants to convey in contributing to the renewal that is to come, should be when there is an apology to the victim then abolish the criminal and stop the criminal process.