Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

The Urgency of Protecting the Privacy Rights of Kidfluencers on Social Media in Indonesia in Relation to the 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child Asyilla Shafa Aline Faza; Sinta Dewi Rosadi; Betty Rubiati
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 10 No 2 (2024): Oktober
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v10i2.6884

Abstract

The research aims to analyze the protection of kidfluencers' privacy rights on social media in Indonesia from the perspective of the Convention on the Rights of the Child of 1989 and to analyze the urgency of legal protection for kidfluencers' privacy rights on social media in Indonesia. The approach method used is normative juridical, emphasizing the study of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, as well as a legal comparison between Indonesian law and French law. This study will analyze data obtained from library research using a qualitative juridical analysis method. The results show that the existing laws in Indonesia do not provide adequate protection for kidfluencers' privacy rights on social media. This legal gap has resulted in various cases of privacy rights violations of kidfluencers on social media, indicating the urgency for legal regulations that can provide better protection for kidfluencers' privacy rights.
Legal Liability of AI Developers for Individual Interactions with Chatbots Resulting in Death: A Comparative Study Khairunnisa Maharani; Sinta Dewi Rosadi; Nella Sumika Putri
Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum VOLUME 10 ISSUE 1 OCTOBER 2025
Publisher : PDIH Untag Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/jidh.v10i1.6768

Abstract

The development and use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in platforms such as chatbots has raised ethical and legal concerns. This study aims to examine the legal responsibilities of AI developers, focusing on the case of Garcia Vs. Character Technologies, in which a teenager’s death was allegedly influenced by interaction with an AI chatbot. This study compares Indonesian and European Union legal frameworks on AI developer liability for harms arising from chatbot interactions. This study is a legal study that uses a normative juridical approach by conducting a review of legislation and comparing laws with other countries to answer the research questions. The results show that the regulation of AI ethics in Indonesia is still developing and relies on the Electronic Information and Transactions Law and the Personal Data Protection Law, which do not specifically regulate AI, while the European Union already has more comprehensive regulations. The responsibilities of AI developers, such as those in chatbot platforms, include ensuring system security from physical or psychological impacts, protecting personal data, and ensuring fair and transparent algorithms. Universally, both in Indonesia and the European Union, developers are required to comply with the principles of safety, fairness, and human rights by conducting testing to avoid bias and negative impacts on users.
Biometric Data Processing Based on Artificial Intelligence and the Principle of Accountability: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and European Union Sinta Dewi; Audena Priscilla Sihombing; Tri Andika
Law Development Journal Vol 8, No 2 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.8.2.943-955

Abstract

Digital advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have accelerated the use of biometric data to speed up identification with high accuracy. However, the processing of biometric data raises serious privacy challenges, particularly regarding security and data controllers' accountability. Using normative juridical research methods with descriptive-analytical approaches, laws and regulations, legal doctrines, scientific literature, and practical cases, including World App, Holy Moment, and Clearview AI, this study aims to analyze the application of accountability principles in AI-based biometric data processing through a comparative study between Indonesia and the European Union. The findings indicate that in Indonesia, Law Number 27/2022 on Personal Data Protection (PDP Law) provide a legal basis for biometric data protection; however, its implementation remains constrained by weak supervision, the absence of derivative regulations, and limited understanding of privacy among the public and business actors. In contrast, the European Union, through the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the EU-AI Act, enforces a robust accountability principle supported by strict oversight and substantial sanctions, resulting in more effective protection of biometric data. The recommendations of this study include strengthening AI regulations and supervisory mechanisms in Indonesia to ensure that AI-based biometric data processing is conducted lawfully, transparently, and responsibly, while simultaneously fostering public trust in digital technologies.
Legitimasi Kebijakan Tarif Resiprokal Amerika Serikat Terhadap Indonesia Dalam Kerangka Prinsip Most Favoured Nation WTO dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Lalu Lintas Perdagangan Ekspor dan Impor Antara Indonesia Dengan Amerika Serikat Aliffio Danendra; Sinta Dewi Rosadi; Purnama Trisnamansyah
Jurnal Global Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 11 (2026): Jurnal Global Ilmiah
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/jgi.v3i11.406

Abstract

Sistem perdagangan internasional yang dikembangkan oleh World Trade Organization (WTO) dibangun atas prinsip non-diskriminasi, yang diwujudkan melalui prinsip Most Favoured Nation (MFN) sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal I GATT 1994, yang mewajibkan negara anggota untuk memberikan setiap keuntungan perdagangan yang diberikan kepada satu mitra dagang secara otomatis dan tanpa syarat kepada seluruh anggota lainnya. Namun penerapan kebijakan tarif resiprokal Amerika Serikat melalui Executive Order 14257 dan Executive Order 14326 menetapkan tarif impor yang berbeda terhadap negara-negara mitra dagang termasuk Indonesia sehingga menimbulkan persoalan mengenai kesesuaiannya dengan prinsip MFN. Selain itu kebijakan tersebut juga berpotensi memengaruhi lalu lintas perdagangan antara Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat, mengingat hubungan dagang bilateral kedua negara yang signifikan. Oleh karena itu artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis legitimasi kebijakan tersebut dalam perspektif hukum WTO serta pengaruhnya terhadap perdagangan bilateral antara Indonesia dengan Amerika Serikat. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan interdisipliner yang memadukan analisis doktrin hukum dengan perspektif perdagangan internasional dan ekonomi, dianalisis secara kualitatif melalui kajian terhadap bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan tersebut bertentangan dengan prinsip MFN karena memberlakukan perlakuan tarif yang berbeda-beda tanpa dasar non-diskriminasi yang seragam, dan tidak memenuhi persyaratan pengecualian sebagaimana diatur dalam GATT 1994 yang hanya membolehkan penyimpangan dari prinsip MFN dalam keadaan terbatas tertentu. Meskipun demikian, dampaknya terhadap perdagangan bilateral pada tahun 2025 belum signifikan karena masih dipengaruhi daya saing produk Indonesia, penyesuaian harga oleh pelaku usaha, mekanisme cost sharing antara mitra dagang, dan mekanisme kontrak preorder yang memungkinkan transaksi tetap berjalan sesuai kesepakatan sebelum kebijakan tarif diberlakukan.