Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Ethnomathscience Identification of Traditional Weapons of Sigi Biromaru H.Mailili, Wahyuni; Gustina, Gustina; Nurmayanti, Yuli; Irmawati, Irmawati
12 Waiheru Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): 12 Waiheru
Publisher : Balai Diklat Keagamaan Ambon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47655/12waiheru.v9i2.175

Abstract

This descriptive research uses an ethnographic approach to identify ethnomascience on parts of Sigi Biromaru's traditional weapons that can be used as media and innovation in learning mathematics and science/IPA. The results of literature reviews show that concepts in the fields of mathematics, and science/IPA are found in parts of the traditional weapon described in the descriptions of the table. The results of the research show that the Kaliavo, Guma, and Doke shapes include triangular, square-long, quadrilateral, horizontal, hexadecimal, symmetrical, structural, quadrillary, and straight lines. On the other hand, physical concepts such as momentum, implosive, style, pressure, cultivation, tree morphology biology, tree anatomy, forest ecology, roles and cycles of carbon, forestry, plants, ecosystems, and human interaction with its natural environment, human development, ecological, technological, and cultural. Then ideas about chemistry, such as solid substances, and chemical elements of iron and steel.
Mental Models Based on Students Thinking Style About Objects in Static Fluid Gustina; Mansyur, Jusman; Laratu, Wahyuni N; Tule, Rahmat
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 10 No 11 (2024): November
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v10i11.7980

Abstract

This study aims to describe a mental models based on students' thinking styles about objects in static fluids. The type of research used is quasi-qualitative with a research design using Simple Research Design (SRD). This research was carried out at MAN Insan Cendikia, Palu City for grade XII students in the 2023 academic year, with 30 students as subjects. The instruments of this research are questionnaires, two-level test and interview guide. The data analysis technique used is the "Miles and Huberman Model" namely data reduction, data modeling and drawing conclusions. The results of data analysis showed that out of 30 students, there were 8 students with a Concrete sequential (Cs) thinking style, 12 students with an Abstract sequential (As) thinking style, 6 students with a Concrete random (Cr) thinking style, and 4 students with a Abstract random (Ar) thinking style. The group tested with abstract problem tended to have a higher average score than the group tested with concrete problem. When given abstract ploblem the Abstract sequential (As) and Sequential concrete (Cs) groups had a higher average score than the Abstract random (Ar) and Concrete random (Cr) groups.
Analysis of Students' Errors in Solving Physics Problems Based on Bloom's Cognitive Levels Sigit Sigit; Gustina Gustina
Journal of Innovative Physics Education Research Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Innovative Physics Education Research (April)
Publisher : CV. Dharma Samakta Edukhatulistiwa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61142/jiper.v1i1.201

Abstract

This study aims to analyze students' errors in solving physics problems based on Bloom's cognitive levels, particularly at the application level (C3), focusing on the simple machines topic. Conducted at SMP Negeri 11 Palu with Grade VIII students, this qualitative descriptive research involved 20 participants, with six respondents selected through purposive sampling categorized as high, medium, and low achievers. Data were collected using essay tests and interviews, analyzed through error categorization (translation, conceptual, strategic, and computational errors). The findings reveal that translation errors were the most frequent (58.3%), followed by conceptual errors (41.6%), strategic errors (20.8%), and computational errors (16.6%). The study highlights students' difficulty in interpreting problem statements, applying correct formulas, and executing problem-solving steps accurately. These findings emphasize the importance of addressing students' conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills in physics education. Future studies should explore interventions to minimize these errors and enhance learning outcomes.