Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

ENFORCEMENT OF NARCOTICS ABUSE LAWS CLASS III CONTAINED IN MEDICINE COMIX IN TEENAGERS Berliana Hajariah Maryanti; Muhtadi Muhtadi; HS Tisnanta
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 11, No 2 (2023): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v11i2.3578

Abstract

The widespread misuse of Komix cough medicine can be seen from the discovery of many packets of cough medicine in places where teenagers usually gather. Abuse of Komix cough medicine is increasingly widespread, as indicated by the frequent findings and increasing number of cases among teenagers in the Kanyurang village community. Efforts to overcome the abuse of class III narcotics contained in the drug Komix among teenagers in the Lampung Regional Police area are carried out with several efforts, including Pre-emptive, which is the first step for prevention carried out by the police by holding outreach and counseling. Preventive, is real prevention carried out by the Police in the form of vehicle raids in vulnerable areas where narcotics are distributed and trafficked. The final effort is Repressive, which has gone through several stages, namely inquiry, investigation, arrest, search, confiscation, examination, detention, and filing. The inhibiting factors in efforts to overcome the abuse of class III narcotics contained in the drug Komix among teenagers in the Lampung Regional Police are community factors and family factors, where there is a lack of understanding in the community, especially teenagers, about the dangers of drugs as well as social factors and the friendship environment. In efforts to overcome criminal acts through pre-emptive and preventive efforts, we can increase cooperation with religious institutions to strengthen faith for all levels of society and can tighten supervision, increase the intensity of patrols consistently, and carry out their duties and functions as law enforcement officers as regulated in the law. -invitation.keywords: Law Enforcement; Class III Narcotics; Komix Drugs.
Legal Protection for Children Exploited as Beggars in Bandar Lampung City M. Rizki Fatulloh; Rinaldy Amrullah; Rini Fathonah; Muhtadi Muhtadi
Journal of Law and Economics Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): NOVEMBER
Publisher : Yayasan Kawanad

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56347/jle.v4i2.285

Abstract

Child exploitation through forced begging in Bandar Lampung City constitutes a severe violation of fundamental rights, substantially undermining both physical and psychological development. Criminal networks systematically manipulate vulnerable minors for economic gain, representing a grave breach of child labor protection statutes. This research examines law enforcement mechanisms targeting exploitation perpetrators, identifies systemic barriers, and proposes enhanced legal protection frameworks. The investigation employs a sociological-juridical methodology, utilizing documentary analysis, ethnographic observations, and structured interviews with law enforcement personnel, social service practitioners, and child advocacy specialists. Analysis draws upon child protection theory and progressive jurisprudence principles. Findings reveal enforcement mechanisms remain fragmented, reactive, and institutionally unsupported. Primary impediments encompass inter-agency coordination deficits, inadequate street children documentation, and insufficient rehabilitation funding. The research advocates for policy restructuring and systematic strengthening of child protection mechanisms through interdisciplinary collaboration. The study's significance lies in advancing more integrated and effective legal safeguards for exploited children across municipal and national jurisdictions.
Urgensi Penguatan Kedudukan Dispute Board guna Menjamin Kepastian Hukum Proyek Jalan Multi-Tahun Paksi Aan Syuryadi; Muhtadi Muhtadi; Kasmawati Kasmawati
Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Vol 8, No 3 (2026): Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), Februari
Publisher : Mahesa Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34007/jehss.v8i3.2979

Abstract

Multi-year infrastructure projects are inherently characterized by high legal and financial complexities, where conventional litigation and post-project arbitration often prove to be protracted, reactive, and deleterious to project continuity. While the Indonesian regulatory framework, specifically Government Regulation No. 22 of 2020, has formally recognized the Dispute Board (DB) mechanism, its practical efficacy remains constrained by a profound normative lacuna regarding executorial enforceability. This research employs a legal-doctrinal method with a comparative approach, analyzing the Indonesian landscape against the FIDIC international standards and the Statutory Adjudication models of the United Kingdom and Singapore. The findings elucidate a critical "legal gap" where DB decisions, despite being contractually binding, lack public executorial authority (executorial title). This institutional weakness incentivizes moral hazard, allowing non-compliant parties to evade immediate financial obligations through judicial delays. Consequently, this study proposes a regulatory reconstruction by integrating the principle of temporary finality into the national legislative framework, specifically through the amendment of the Construction Services Law or the Arbitration Law. The proposed model advocates for a "fast-track enforcement" mechanism within the District Courts, predicated on a limited judicial review that precludes the re-examination of technical merits. Such a reform is imperative to safeguard project liquidity (cash flow), ensure legal certainty (rechtszekerheid), and fortify the resilience of National Strategic Projects against systemic disruption.
Politik Impunitas dan Stagnasi Akuntabilitas Konstitusional di Indonesia: Suatu Analisis Hukum Tata Negara Muchlis Sadzili; Yusdiyanto Yusdiyanto; Muhtadi Muhtadi
AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis
Publisher : Perhimpunan Sarjana Ekonomi dan Bisnis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37481/jmh.v6i1.1874

Abstract

The persistence of unresolved gross human rights violations in Indonesia reflects a deeper structural problem within the constitutional system, where legal accountability mechanisms remain weak and vulnerable to political intervention. This condition has enabled the emergence and consolidation of a politics of impunity, further reinforced by state-sponsored symbolic practices that normalize authoritarian legacies and erode public demands for justice. This study aims to analyze how the politics of impunity is formed and reproduced within Indonesia’s constitutional framework and to examine the role of symbolic state practices in sustaining the stagnation of constitutional accountability for gross human rights violations. Methodologically, this research employs a normative juridical type of research using constitutional law and socio-legal approaches. The unit of analysis includes constitutional norms, statutory regulations, judicial decisions, state policies, and symbolic practices related to human rights accountability. The study utilizes secondary data obtained through documentary and literature-based research, including legislation, court rulings, official state narratives, academic writings, and reports from human rights institutions. Data are analyzed through qualitative normative analysis, complemented by critical discourse analysis to assess the interaction between legal structures and symbolic narratives. The findings reveal that impunity is reproduced through stalled legal processes, weak institutional independence of human rights bodies, and the dominance of political calculations in state decision-making. Additionally, symbolic practices such as the legitimization of authoritarian figures contribute to the preservation of impunity by obscuring collective memory, reducing the urgency of accountability, and weakening constitutionalism in Indonesia’s democratic order.