Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 38 Documents
Search

HAKIM DAN MEDIASI: Pemaknaan Hakim Terhadap Mediasi Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan Negeri Pekalongan Shinta Dewi Rismawati; Saif Askari; M. Muslih Husein
Jurnal Penelitian Vol 9 No 2: November 2012
Publisher : IAIN Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/jupe.v9i2.142

Abstract

This sociolegal research was aimed to understrand the judge’s comprehension toward mediation in private lawsuit procession. This comprehension was so urgent in order to understand how pragmatism practice could infiltrate in law court. To do so, I used symbolic interaction approach and model to analyze the data, that snowball-purposively gathered from the Judges. The locus of this study located in Pekalongan District Court (Pengadilan Negeri). The study showed some divergences opinion among judges in understanding the laws/norms/statutes of mediation both, textually and contextually (as they applied the text of norm in their cases). So, it effected on the implementation of enforcement and made them tend to pragmatic in doing mediation as formalistic-routine procedure. The roots of this attitude came from internally factors such pragmatism itself and externally ones, pragmatism among the parties of lawsuit and their advocaats.
MODEL KONSTRUKSI HUKUM HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN KASUS KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA Shinta Dewi Rismawati
Jurnal Penelitian Vol 6 No 2: Nopember 2009
Publisher : IAIN Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/jupe.v6i2.226

Abstract

Pasca pemberlakuan UU No 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (PKDRT) ternyata tidak otomatis  mengurangi jumlah angka KDRT di wilayah hukum PN Pekalongan. Konstruksi hakim dalam memutus kasus KDRT dalam perspektif legal hermeneutic menjadi poin penting, mengingat putusan hakim memiliki posisi yang sangat strategis sebagai law as a tool of social control dan law as a social engineering. Permasalahan yang diangkat: pertama bagaimanakah konstruksi hukum hakim untuk memutus kasus KDRT di PN Pekalongan dalam perspektif legal hermeneutic; kedua, faktor-faktor apa sajakah yang mempengaruhi konstruksi hukum hakim  dalam memutus kasus KDRT tersebut?; Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 1). Putusan Hakim PN Pekalongan dalam memutus pekara KDRT telah melakukan 3 tahapan dalam legal hermeneutic, yakni teks, konteks dan kontekstualisasi meskipun sangat sederhana dengan metode interpretasi gramatikal, dan 2). Putusan hakim PN Pekalongan ternyata selain mempertimbangkan faktor-faktor hukum (yuridis) ternyata juga memperhatikan faktor-faktor non hukum, yakni sikap dan penampilan dari terdakwa dan saksi
KARAKTERISTIK KEJAHATAN PEMBUNUHAN DALAM KONSTALASI RELASI GENDER Shinta Dewi Rismawati
Jurnal Penelitian Vol 5 No 1: Mei 2008
Publisher : IAIN Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/jupe.v5i1.237

Abstract

Kejahatan pembunuhan tidak mengenal jenis kelamin, artinya pelaku dapat berjenis kelamin laki-laki maupun perempuan, akan tetapi ketidakadilan gender dapat memicu kejahatan berbasis gender. Kejahatan pembunuhan yang dilakukan oleh narapidana perempuan memiliki karakteristik tertentu, karena di dalam relasi gender yang tidak adil tersebut memunculkan marginalisasi, sub-ordinat, steorotipe, kekerasaan dan beban ganda terhadap perempuan dalam keluarga dan masyarakat, sehingga dapat mendorong dan memaksa perempuan melakukan kejahatan pembunuhan terhadap korban.
SISTEM PENGUPAHAN DAN PEMBAGIAN KERJA PEREMPUAN BURUH BATIK BERBASIS PUTTING OUT SYSTEM DI KOTA PEKALONGAN (Proses dan Implikasi Marginalisasi Terhadap Perempuan Buruh Batik) Rita Rahmawati; Shinta Dewi Rismawati; Esti Zaduqisti
Jurnal Penelitian Vol 10 No 2: November 2013
Publisher : IAIN Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/jupe.v10i2.365

Abstract

This research was motivated by the rampant of batik female workers who worked with the Putting Out System (POS) and were marginalized in Pekalongan City. This study was aimed to answer the research questions: what was the marginalization form of women workers through the wage system and division of labor in the production chain based on POS was; the actors who were involved in the process; what factors caused it; and what was implications for women workers, their family and bosses inside production process as well as outside the production process. In-depth interview and observation were used to investigate data. Triangulation of data source and investigating method were also used to validate the investigated data. In addition, Interactive model was used to analyze. The results were: (1) the actors who played a role in the process of marginalization of women workers in Pekalongan batik is the boss, makloon, religious elite (Kyai / Ustazd - ah), and the state; (2) the cause root of that marginalization was manipulated by patriarchal and capitalism ideology; and (3) the implication of that marginalization for woman workers inside production process was that they were positioned as a production machine to make a profit. While the implications outside the production process, they still lived in poverty.
PARTISIPASI PEREMPUAN DALAM PUSARAN PEMBANGUNAN DAERAH (Telaah Kritis atas Kendala dan Solusi) Shinta Dewi Rismawati
Muwazah Vol 4 No 1 (2012)
Publisher : UIN K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/muwazah.v4i1.152

Abstract

Abstract : Women's participation in any development process is very important and strategic in the context of policy decisions that is favored of women. The assumption is, that women as members of society is basically have the same chances and opportunities to participate in every stage of development, since women are also the subject of development. However, there are many obstacles and barriers to encourage women to participate actively, for instances: internal or external constraints. Internal herein is relating to personal / individual of the women themselves (aspect of psychologicalpersonality).  Whereas external here is associated with things that are outside of the women themselves (structural and cultural). Thus, the solution is also varies from internal and external as well, such as increasing the capacity building for women and the socialization and education concerning the true concept of gender to the public. Abstrak : Partisipasi perempuan dalam proses pembangunan sangat penting dan strategis dalam konteks keputusan kebijakan yang disukai wanita. Asumsinya adalah, bahwa perempuan sebagai anggota masyarakat pada dasarnya memiliki kesempatan yang sama dan kesempatan untuk berpartisipasi dalam setiap tahap perkembangan, karena perempuan juga subyek pembangunan. Namun, ada banyak kendala dan hambatan untuk mendorong perempuan untuk berpartisipasi secara aktif, untuk contoh: kendala internal maupun eksternal. Disini internal yang berkaitan dengan pribadi / individu perempuan itu sendiri (aspek psikologis-kepribadian). Sedangkan eksternal sini dikaitkan dengan hal-hal yang di luar dari perempuan itu sendiri (struktural dan kultural). Dengan demikian, solusi ini juga bervariasi dari internal dan eksternal juga, seperti meningkatkan pembangunan kapasitas bagi perempuan dan sosialisasi dan edukasi mengenai konsep gender benar kepada publik.
DISTRIBUSI PERAN STAKEHOLDER TERHADAP PENANGANAN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DALAM KONTEKS MASYARAKAT MADANI Shinta Dewi Rismawati
Muwazah Vol 4 No 2 (2012)
Publisher : UIN K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/muwazah.v4i2.161

Abstract

Abstract : Domestic violence is a human problem, because in it there is a dimension of human rights violations. Law No. 23 of 2004 on the Elimination of Domestic Violence are limitative have determined the distribution of the roles of each stakeholder in handling domestic violence cases. Stakeholders involved include the government as a representation of the state, NGOs, families, advocates, law enforcement officers, medical workers and clergy personnel. The number of stakeholders involved in the handling of domestic violence menginditifikasikan that domestic violence is a serious human rights crimes. Porposional division of roles between the state and the non-state institutions in the handling of domestic violence shows these regulations relevant to the concept of civil society in Indonesia.Abstrak : Kekerasan dalam rumah tangga adalah persoalan kemanusiaan, karena di dalamnya berdimensi pelanggaran hak asasi manusia. Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga, telah menentukan distribusi peran masing-masing pemangku kepentingan dalam menangani kasus-kasus kekerasan dalam rumah tangga. Pemangku kepentingan yang terlibat termasuk pemerintah sebagai representasi negara, LSM, keluarga, advokat,  aparat penegak hukum, tenaga medis dan rohaniawan. Jumlah pemangku kepentingan yang terlibat dalam penanganan kekerasan dalam rumah tangga mengindetifikasikan bahwa kekerasan dalam rumah tangga adalah kejahatan hak asasi manusia. Pembagian porposional peran antara negara dan lembagalembaga non-pemerintah dalam penanganan kekerasan dalam rumah tangga menunjukkan peraturan hukum tersebut relevan dengan konsep masyarakat madani di Indonesia.
PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM YANG BERKEADILAN GENDER (Pendekatan Studi Hukum Kritis Bagi Perlindungan Hak Asasi Perempuan Di Indonesia Pasca Ratifikasi CEDAW) Shinta Dewi Rismawati
Muwazah Vol 3 No 2 (2011)
Publisher : UIN K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/muwazah.v3i2.266

Abstract

The ratification of the CEDAW Convention through Law No. 7 of 1984 has konesekuensi depth, because the “spirit” that convention should be followed up by making gender-just legal rules, in other words the state has a moral obligation and legal accountability to promote the protection, promotion and protection of human rights against women. In order to realize the mission, the critical legal studies approach can be used as a means to oversee efforts to protect Women Rights in Indonesia
PERSEPSI POLIGAMI DI MATA PEREMPUAN PEKALONGAN Shinta Dewi Rismawati
Muwazah Vol 6 No 2 (2014)
Publisher : UIN K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/muwazah.v6i2.447

Abstract

Polygamy has always been an interesting discussion that gave birth to two groups that are always in the position of the pros and cons in the community. It is encouraging to conduct research on women's perception about polygamy in Pekalongan. Research results and analysis indicate that the perception of women Pekalongan on polygamy is quite diverse, but most rejected polygamy with a variety of reasons. They also say that polygamy could potentially bring up domestic violencePoligami selalu menjadi diskusi yang menarik yang melahirkan dua kelompok yang selalu dalam posisi pro dan kontra di masyarakat. Hal ini mendorong untuk melakukan penelitian tentang persepsi perempuan tentang poligami di Pekalongan. Hasil penelitian dan analisis menunjukkan bahwa persepsi wanita Pekalongan pada poligami cukup beragam, namun kebanyakan menolak poligami dengan berbagai alasan. Mereka juga mengatakan bahwa poligami berpotensi memunculkan kekerasan dalam rumah tangga
Konstruksi Hukum Perkawinan Poligami di Indonesia: (Prespektif Hukum Feminis) Shinta Dewi Rismawati
Muwazah Vol 9 No 2 (2017)
Publisher : UIN K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/muwazah.v9i2.1124

Abstract

The paper criticizes the construction of law, the existing legal arrangements concerning polygamous marriage in the perspective of legal feminism. The argument is that the legal construction of polygamous marriages in Indonesia is in fact not value-free, ambitious and adheres to a conventional patriarchal paradigm. The findings and analysis show that, Law Number 1 Year 1974 on Marriage is not value-free, ambiguous and gray, thus perpetuating the uncertainty in marriage law. The marriage law of conventional patriarchal paradigm just legitimizes husband's sexuality for polygamy by placing steorotif on women as her ordinate platform.
Keadilan Hukum Dalam Putusan Perceraian Narapidana Perspektif Critical Legal Studies Daulay, Royyan Mahmuda Al’Arisyi; Shinta Dewi Rismawati; Maghfur Ahmad
Restorative : Journal of Indonesian Probation and Parole System Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Federation of Indonesian Probation Officer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61682/restorative.v1i1.2

Abstract

Divorce is the right of every married couple in Indonesia to the extent of the reasons written in the marriage law. Prisoners are citizens who are given a criminal sentence in prison for a specified period of time. In a divorce trial involving a prisoner, often the judge's decision will be in the form of a verstek decision. This type of decision is made because convicts cannot attend court proceedings due to limitations in prison. This research assesses legal justice from the perspective of critical legal studies in viewing prisoners' divorce decisions in the form of verstek decisions. The research method used is juridical-normative research with a descriptive analytical approach. Data collection techniques were carried out using literature study methods that were relevant to the research object. The results of the research show that critical legal studies views that the verstek decision in prisoner divorce cases does not reflect the value of legal justice, only legal certainty. The recommendation is that efforts are needed to present post-modern regulations with values of justice, benefit and legal certainty, especially regarding the issue of prisoner divorce. Abstrak Perceraian merupakan hak setiap pasangan di Indonesia sesuai dengan alasan yang tertulis dalam undang-undang perkawinan. Narapidana merupakan warga negara yang diberikan hukuman pidana di dalam penjara untuk kurun waktu yang ditentukan. Apabila terjadi perceraian yang melibatkan narapidana, seringkali keputusan hakim akan berupa putusan verstek. Keputusan sedemikian dibuat karena narapidana tidak bisa menghadiri proses persidangan di pengadilan akibat keterbatasan di penjara. Penelitian ini menilai keadilan hukum perspektif critical legal studies dalam memandang putusan perceraian narapidana yang berupa putusan verstek. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif-analitis. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan metode studi literatur yang relevan dengan objek penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa critical legal studies memandang putusan verstek kasus perceraian narapidana tidak mencerminkan nilai keadilan hukum, baru sekadar kepastian hukum saja. Rekomendasinya adalah perlu upaya untuk menghadirkan regulasi yang bersifat post-modern dengan nilai-nilai berkeadilan, berkemanfaatan, dan kepastian hukum, terutama dalam persoalan perceraian narapidana. Keywords: Cerai Gugat, Narapidana dan Studi Hukum Kritis, Putusan Verstek