Agung Putra Wijaya
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

EFEKTIVITAS PEMBELAJARAN PREVIEW, QUESTION, READ, REFLECT, RECITE, REVIEW DITINJAU DARI PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIS Agung Putra Wijaya; Tina Yunarti; Jamal Ludinsyah
AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Vol 8, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH METRO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (486.707 KB) | DOI: 10.24127/ajpm.v8i2.2128

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji efektivitas metode pembelajaran Preview, Question, Read, Reflect, Recite, Review (PQ4R) ditinjau dari pemahaman konsep matematis siswa. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri 20 Bandarlampung semester genap tahun pelajaran 2018/2019 sebanyak 346 siswa yang terdistribusi ke dalam sebelas kelas. Dari sebelas kelas tersebut diambil satu kelas secara acak sebagai sampel penelitian.Penelitianinimenggunakanone-group pretest-posttest design. Data penelitian diperoleh melalui tes berbentuk uraian pada materi Segiempat dan Segitiga. Analisis data penelitian ini menggunakan uji t berpasangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pemahaman konsep matematis siswa setelah mengikuti pembelajaran dengan metode PQ4R lebih tinggi dibandingkan pemahaman konsep matematis siswa sebelum mengikuti pembelajaran dengan metode PQ4R namun persentase siswa yang memiliki pemahaman konsep terkategori baik tidak lebih dari 60% dari banyaknya siswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran metode PQ4R. Dengan demikian, metode PQ4R tidak efektif ditinjau dari pemahaman konsep matematis siswa.Abstract This study aimed to find out the effectiveness of the Preview, Question, Read, Reflect, Recite, Review (PQ4R) learning method in terms of students' understanding of mathematical concepts. The population of this study was all seventh grade students of SMP Negeri 20 Bandarlampung in the even semester of the academic year of 2018/2019 as many as 346 students that distributed into eleven classes. The sample was taken randomly one class of the eleven classes as the study sample. This study used the one-group pretest-posttest design. The research data was obtained through a essay test of the quadrilateral and triangle. Data analysis of this research used paired t-test. The results showed that students' undestanding of mathematical concepts after taking the PQ4R learning method was higher than students' understanding of mathematical concepts before taking the PQ4R learning method, but the percentage of students who had a good understanding of the mathematical concepts was not more than 60% of the number of students who took PQ4R learning. Thus, PQ4R method was not effective in terms of students' understanding of mathematical concepts. 
PENGEMBANGAN MODUL DENGAN PENDEKATAN OPEN ENDED UNTUK MEMFASILITASI PENCAPAIAN LITERASI MATEMATIS Agung Putra Wijaya
AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Vol 6, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH METRO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (218.794 KB) | DOI: 10.24127/ajpm.v6i2.996

Abstract

This research and development aimed to develop module with an open ended approach to facilitate the achievement of mathematical literacy. This study was conducted only until the  field trial and the revision of product. The module was validated by experts with attention to aspects: matter, appearance, and practicality. Having been declared valid by experts, the test readability by the students was done. Based on the steps, it was obtained (1) the use of the module with an open ended approach in Linier Programmingwas expected by the students, (2) the module characteristics were in accordance with the curriculum and designed in accordance with the open-ended approach, (3) the experts responses to the module were appropriate in terms of aspects of matter, appearance, and practicality and (4) the students responses were good viewed by readability.
TINGKAT KECEMASAN MATEMATIS MAHASISWA DALAM MENGIKUTI PEMBELAJARAN ONLINE Agung Putra Wijaya; Nurain Suryadinata; Tia Agnesa
AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Vol 10, No 4 (2021)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH METRO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (318.714 KB) | DOI: 10.24127/ajpm.v10i4.4146

Abstract

Penelitian deskriptif kualitatif ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mendeskripsikan tingkat kecemasan matematis mahasiswa dalam mengikuti pembelajaran online dibandingkan dengan pembelajaran offline. Subjek penelitian ini diambil menggunakan secara purposive dengan melibatkan mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Lampung semester genap pada tahun akademik 2019/2020. Data dikumpulkan melalui skala kecemasan matematis dan pedoman wawancara. Analisis data penelitian ini meliputi reduksi data, penyajian data, serta penarikan kesimpulan dan verifikasi. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan, diperoleh simpulan bahwa (1) tingkat kecemasan matematis mahasiswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran online lebih tinggi dibandingkan pembelajaran offline dan (2) pada aspek kognitif dan afektif, tingkat kecemasan matematis mahasiswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran online lebih tinggi dibandingkan pembelajaran offline. Pada aspek fisiologis, tingkat kecemasan matematis mahasiswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran offline lebih tinggi dibandingkan pembelajaran online. Hasil penelitian menjadi masukan dalam merancang pembelajaran yang mampu meminimalisasi kecemasan matematis mahasiswa dalam mengikuti pembelajaran online.This qualitative descriptive study was conducted with the aim of describing students' mathematical anxiety levels in participating in online learning compared to offline learning. The subjects of this study were taken using purposive by involving students of the Mathematics Education, FKIP Universitas Lampung, even semesters in the academic year of 2019/2020. Data were collected through mathematical anxiety scale and interview guidelines. The data analysis of this research includes data reduction, data presentation, conclusion drawing and verification. Based on the results of research and discussion, it is concluded that (1) the level of mathematical anxiety of students who take online learning is higher than offline learning, (2) on the cognitive and affective aspects, the level of mathematical anxiety of students who take online learning is higher than offline learning. On the physiological aspect, the level of mathematical anxiety of students taking offline learning is higher than online learning. The results of this research become input in designing learning that is able to minimize students' mathematical anxiety in participating in online learning.
Meta-Analysis: The Effect of The Problem-Based Learning Model on Mathematical Reflective Thinking Ability Yanto, Bagus; Sri Hastuti Noer; Agung Putra Wijaya
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Profesi Guru Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): May
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jippg.v8i1.86267

Abstract

Until now, there have been many studies conducted on mathematical reflective thinking skills presented using problem-based learning models. This study aims to analyze published research on the effectiveness of problem-based learning models on mathematical reflective thinking skills. The method used is meta-analysis. The data analyzed were 8 journal articles that were used to determine the effect size. Data collection was carried out using a variable coding sheet as a coding instrument. The collected data were then analyzed using meta-analytic statistical techniques. The results of the analysis showed that the average effect size of the 8 articles was 2.63, which was included in the high effect size category. Of the 8 articles analyzed, 6 articles (75%) showed a high effect size category, while 2 articles (25%) showed a medium effect size category. The article with the highest effect size, which reached 5.29, shows that the problem-based learning model can provide a very significant increase in students' mathematical reflective thinking skills in learning mathematics.
Analysis of Instrument Quality in Measuring Mathematical Logical Thinking Ability Yulia Pratiwi; Niki Pujarwati; Marlinawati Marlinawati; Agung Putra Wijaya; Chika Rahayu
MATHEMA: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): MATHEMA
Publisher : Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33365/jm.v8i1.1162

Abstract

The ability to think logically in mathematics is a skill that must be developed through instruction. One strategy for developing this ability is the use of high-quality instruments. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the quality of a mathematical logical thinking ability test instrument in terms of its validity, reliability, difficulty index, and discriminating power using SPSS and Microsoft Excel. This research employed a quantitative method with an evaluative analysis approach. The subjects in this study were students of class VII.6 and VII.8 at SMPN 26 Bandarlampung. The instrument used was a descriptive test consisting of ten items, developed based on four indicators of logical thinking ability, namely the ability to interpret information, the ability to predict, the ability to solve problems, and the ability to draw conclusions. The results of this study indicate that: (1) the quality of the logical thinking ability test instrument meets the criteria for 100% validity; (2) the reliability of the logical thinking ability test instrument is 0.775, categorized as reliable; (3) the difficulty level analysis shows that nine items fall into the moderate category and one item falls into the easy category; (4) the discrimination power analysis shows that four items have good discriminating power and six items have fair discriminating power.
Analysis of Test Instrument Quality in Measuring Computational Thinking Skills in Seventh Grade Junior High School Ratio Material Gustina Nandari; Ayu Kusumaningtyas; Meliyani Lutfiah; Agung Putra Wijaya; Chika Rahayu
MATHEMA: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): MATHEMA
Publisher : Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33365/jm.v8i1.1251

Abstract

The integration of computational thinking in mathematics learning is essential to support 21st-century skills; however, assessment practices in schools still inadequately measure students’ thinking processes. This study aims to analyze the quality of a test instrument designed to measure junior high school students’ computational thinking ability on ratio material. A quantitative descriptive-evaluative method was employed involving 64 seventh-grade students. The instrument consisted of five contextual essay items developed based on computational thinking indicators: decomposition, pattern recognition, abstraction, generalization, and algorithmic thinking. Item analysis was conducted to examine validity, reliability, difficulty index, and discrimination power. The results indicate that all items were valid and the instrument showed high reliability (α = 0.81). The difficulty levels ranged from easy to moderate, while the discrimination power was categorized as sufficient to good. These findings demonstrate that the instrument is valid, reliable, and appropriate for measuring students’ computational thinking ability in mathematics learning at the junior high school level.
Quality Analysis of Mathematical Representation Test Instruments in Junior High School Statistics Nyoman Gita Gayatri; Fadhlur Rohman; Angga Saputra; Agung Putra Wijaya; Chika Rahayu
MATHEMA: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): MATHEMA
Publisher : Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33365/jm.v8i1.1370

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the quality of an essay test instrument measuring students’ mathematical representation ability on eighth-grade statistics material, which was administered to ninth-grade students at SMP Negeri 1 Bandar Lampung. The analysis covers item validity, reliability, difficulty level, and discrimination index. This study employed a quantitative approach with a descriptive method. The research subjects were 27 ninth-grade students, while the object of the study consisted of six essay items on statistics that were developed based on indicators of mathematical representation ability. The results show that only three items (numbers 2, 4, and 6) meet the validity criteria, while items 1, 3, and 5 are invalid. The reliability coefficient of the instrument is 0.685, which falls into the moderate category and is therefore acceptable. All items are categorized as easy based on the difficulty index analysis. However, the discrimination index analysis indicates that all items have low discrimination power and thus fail to distinguish between high- and low-ability students. These findings imply that the instrument requires comprehensive revision, particularly in terms of difficulty level and item quality, in order to more accurately measure students’ mathematical representation ability in statistics.