Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.9
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya Litera Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa BAHASTRA Jurnal Arbitrer Fon: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia KEMBARA Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra Jurnal Gramatika Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya Adabiyyat: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Komposisi: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Seni Linguistik Indonesia Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra SCAFFOLDING: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam dan Multikulturalisme Jurnal Edukasi Sumba (JES) Ghancaran: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Jurnal Pena Indonesia Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Jurnal Pembelajaran Bahasa dan Sastra
Yuliana Setyaningsih
Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta
Religion Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 33 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
LOCAL WISDOM VALUES OF JAVANESE CHILDREN’S TRADITIONAL GAMES: A METHAPHORICAL ECOLINGUISTIC VIEW Rahardi, Kunjana; Setyaningsih, Yuliana
Linguistik Indonesia Vol. 37 No. 2 (2019): Linguistik Indonesia
Publisher : Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1578.359 KB) | DOI: 10.26499/li.v37i2.102

Abstract

This research focuses on the description of local wisdom values in the traditional children’s games based on the local Javanese culture. The locational research data source was the Javanese children living in a Javanese community, especially those in Yogyakarta. The substantive data was the local wisdom values contained in the traditional children’s games. The data was gathered by using the observation method, namely by observing texts of traditional children’s games available during the research timeline. The techniquesused to apply theobservation method wererecording and note-taking. Besides the observation method, interviewing methods were also applied. Interview was conducted to several experts who understand the local wisdom values contained in the Javanese traditional children’s games. In addition, the interview was conducted to children who play the traditional children’s games. Data analysis was carried out using distributional and content analysis methods. This research applies the methaphorical ecolinguistic view –which involves social,cultural, and ethnic perspectives–toanalyze the data. The local wisdom values found in this research are(1) solidarity,(2)balance,(3) synergy,(4) sportsmanship,(5) agility and resilience,(6) agility and precision, and(7) obedience to norms.
DOMINANSI TIPE-TIPE ARGUMENTASI ANAK-ANAK USIA DINI DALAM PERSPEKTIF STEPHEN TOULMIN: STUDI KASUS DICTO DAN IVO Setyaningsih, Yuliana; R. Kunjana Rahardi
Linguistik Indonesia Vol. 42 No. 2 (2024): Linguistik Indonesia
Publisher : Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26499/li.v42i2.616

Abstract

Kajian terhadap penalaran anak usia dini erat kaitannya dengan perkembangan metakognisi anak. Anak yang kuat mengemukakan argumennya dalam berkomunikasi biasanya mempunyai kemampuan metakognitif yang tinggi. Kajian mengenai hal ini masih sangat jarang ditemukan di Indonesia berdasarkan penelusuran peneliti dari berbagai sumber referensi yang dapat diakses. Sementara itu, argumen-argumen tersebut mendesak untuk dideskripsikan mengingat keterkaitannya dengan perkembangan metakognitif anak muda sebagai generasi penerus bangsa. Berdasarkan asumsi tersebut maka dilakukan penelitian terhadap argumentasi anak usia dini. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan dominasi tipe argumentasi pada anak usia dini. Perspektif teoritis yang digunakan adalah teori argumen Stephen Toulmin. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian studi kasus. Studi kasus ini menempatkan Dicto dan Ivo sebagai subjek penelitian ini. Kedua anak kecil tersebut berjenis kelamin laki-laki, Dicto berusia 4 tahun berlatar belakang etnis Sunda, sedangkan Ivo berusia 6 tahun berlatar belakang etnis Jawa. Data penelitian ini berupa tuturan argumentatif berupa sejumlah klaim yang merupakan tanggapan terhadap situasi yang dikonstruksikan peneliti sebagai instrumen penelitiannya. Peneliti menganalisis transkripsi teks video atau audio yang berisi tanggapan spontan terhadap situasi yang dikonstruksi oleh peneliti dan disampaikan kepada kedua subjek penelitian melalui orang tuanya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tipe argumentasi yang dominan pada anak usia dini adalah tipe Claim + Ground.
The use of intellectual standards to assess the quality of students' argumentative writings Nakrowi, Zain Syaifudin; Ansori, Dadang S.; Mulyati, Yeti; Setyaningsih, Yuliana
LITERA Vol. 22 No. 2: LITERA (JULY 2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Languages, Arts, and Culture Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/ltr.v22i2.60465

Abstract

To comprehensively examine the quality of argumentative writing, it is important to integrate the aspects of structure and substance. This study seeks to foreground the application of Intellectual Standards (IS) as a core component of the argumentative writing process. The research aims to determine the quality of argumentation in terms of structure using the TAP Toulmin concept and substance using IS. The research participants were 80 high school students in Central Java, Indonesia. A mixed method approach with an exploratory sequential QUAL-quan design is adopted. The results show that the quality of the arguments in terms of structure and substance is in the low category. Structurally, 97.5% of students' written arguments ranged from 1.1 to 2.0 on a scale of 0.0-5.0. In substance, 81.25% of students' argumentation ability scores are in the range of 04.9 - 09.6 on a scale of 0.00-24.00. In addition, the findings show that the completeness of the structure influences the substance score. Furthermore, the results of this study can be used as a reference for teachers in teaching argument texts. Elements of warrant, backing, modal qualifier, and rebuttal must be emphasized in preparing argumentative texts.Keywords: Argumentative Texts, Structure and Substance of Arguments, Toulmin, Intellectual Standards
Co-Authors Ansori, Dadang S. B. Widharyanto B. Widharyanto B. Widharyanto, B. Widharyanto Caesarine, Regina Dhea Dadang S. Ansori Engel Bertha Halena Gena Etheldredha Tiara Wuryaningtyas Fransisca Despa Listiani Fransisca Despa Listiani Fransiskus O Sanjaya Galih Kusumo Handoko Handoko Jasmine Belinda Budijanto Jasmine Belinda Budijanto Kristophorus Divinanto Adi Yudono Kurniasari, Yohana Rina Maranta, Patrick Fiskhas Nakrowi, Zain Syaifudin Nanda Permatasari, Agmi Sinta Pilipus Wai Lawet Pranowo Pranowo Pranowo R Kunjana Rahardi R. Kunjana Rahardi Refa Lina Tiawati Risbe Purnama Dewi SULISTYANINGRUM, CAECILIA FANI Titian Gea Wahyudi Rahmat Yudono, Kristophorus Divinanto Zethly Ronaldo