Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.449
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Gorontalo Law Review ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum LEGAL BRIEF NOMOI Law Review Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Journal of Law & Policy Review INSPIRING LAW JOURNAL Binamulia Hukum
Tan Kamello
Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 18 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 18 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Scope of the Element of Trick in Arbitration Board Decisions in Indonesia Sijabat, Joshua Narwastu; Kamello, Tan; Sembiring, Rosnidar; Nasution, Abdul Haris
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 13 No. 5 (2024): December: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/legal.v13i5.1170

Abstract

This study aims to determine the scope of the element of deception in the cancellation of arbitration decisions after the Constitutional Court Decision No. 15/PUU-XII/2014. The type of research used in this study is normative legal research (normative juridical). The nature of the research is descriptive, which explains how to study problems in society, develop concepts, collect facts, but does not test hypotheses. The type of data used is secondary data in the form of legal materials. Legal materials are in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Primary legal materials are authoritative legal materials. While secondary legal materials are in the form of all publications on law including textbooks, legal dictionaries, legal journals and comments on court decisions. By limiting the scope of the element of deception in the cancellation of arbitration decisions, it can provide justice for the disputing parties
Pendaftaran Tanah Karena Pewarisan yang tidak Memasukkan Keseluruhan Ahli Waris pada Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah (Studi Putusan Negeri Sorong No. 77/Pdt.G/2017/PN.Son) Siregar, Mutia Sari; Kamello, Tan; Purba, Hasim
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i3.3614

Abstract

Pendaftaran tanah karena pewarisan dilaksanakan untuk menjamin kepastian hukum yang diadakan oleh pemerintah di seluruh wilayah Republik Indonesia melalui Peraturan Menteri ATR/BPN Nomor 16 Tahun 2021 terkait permohonan pendaftaran peralihan hak atas tanah dengan mewajibkan ahli waris atau kuasanya dengan melampirkan surat tanda bukti sebagai ahli waris. Kasus yang terjadi adalah Maria Mustiah Siauta Daeng selaku Tergugat meningkatkan sertifikat Hak Guna Bangunan menjadi sertifikat Hak Milik secara sepihak dan tidak memasukkan keseluruhan ahli waris pada permohonan pendaftaran peralihan hak atas tanah melalui Surat Keterangan Ahli Waris kepada Kepala Kantor Badan Pertanahan Nasional Kota Sorong. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif empiris dengan menggunakan data primer, sekunder dan tersier yang dikumpulkan melalui studi pustaka dan penelitian lapangan dengan metode wawancara, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan metode analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa proses peningkatan sertifikat tersebut merupakan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum yang merugikan para ahli waris dan bertentangan dengan Pasal 34 ayat (8) dan Pasal 36 (3) Peraturan Pemerintah No 40 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Guna Usaha, Hak Guna Bangunan. Keabsahan dan penerbitan Sertifikat Hak Milik Nomor 200 Tahun 2009 dinyatakan tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum yang mengikat karena ahli waris lain masih dalam keadaan hidup dan tanah sebagai objek waris tersebut masih utuh atau belum terbagikan oleh para ahli waris lain.
Penerapan Asas Keseimbangan Perjanjian Kerja Sama Pemerintah Dengan Himbara Tentang Penyaluran Dana Bantuan Bidikmisi Simarmata, Arnos Dheo Vegha; Kamello, Tan; Mulhadi, Mulhadi; Andriati, Syarifah Lisa
Binamulia Hukum Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): Binamulia Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Krisnadwipayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37893/jbh.v13i1.691

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian adalah memberi masukan kepada Pemerintah Republik Indonesia dan Himpunan Bank Negara (Himbara) untuk hati-hati menggunakan dasar hukum dalam membuat perjanjian kerja sama, sehingga mewujudkan tata kelola pemerintahan dan perusahaan yang baik. Menggunakan metode penelitian hukum campuran dengan mengombinasikan metode yuridis normatif dan metode empiris dengan cara menganalisis perjanjian yang ada dan juga dengan wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa adanya dasar hukum yang tidak berlaku namun tetap digunakan dalam perjanjian, posisi tawar (bargaining position) yang harusnya ada di pemerintah namun pada perjanjian ada pada Himbara, dan tidak diatur mengenai besaran bunga apabila dana mengendap di rekening penampungan. Harus dilakukan adendum agar perjanjian ini tidak catat hukum.
Contemporary Legal Certainty in Insurance Default Claims: A Comparative Study of Islamic and Positive Law Perspectives Isdiana Syafitri; Sunarmi; Kamello, Tan; Purba, Hasim
MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, IAIN Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10465

Abstract

The breach of contract (wanprestasi) in contemporary insurance practices often results in legal uncertainty, particularly for insured parties who experience losses due to denied or inadequately fulfilled claims. This article examines the legal challenges associated with breach of contract claims in the Indonesian insurance context through a comparative analysis of positive and Islamic law perspectives. Utilizing a normative juridical approach, the study analyzes relevant legislation, including the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPer) and Financial Services Authority (OJK) regulations, alongside principles of fiqh muamalah related to contracts, justice, and legal certainty. The findings reveal that while positive law offers a relatively structured legal framework, its practical implementation still encounters significant barriers to ensuring adequate legal protection. Conversely, Islamic law underscores the importance of contract clarity—particularly in tabarru' and tijarah agreements—and upholds justice as a core value in transactional relationships. These principles can enhance legal certainty and ethical standards in dispute resolution processes when applied. This article contributes to the academic discourse by providing a theoretical and comparative foundation for developing a more inclusive and justice-oriented insurance dispute resolution model that integrates national legal norms and Islamic ethical values. It is expected to offer valuable insights for policymakers, legal scholars, and practitioners in designing responsive insurance policies aligned with the needs of a pluralistic society.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KONSUMEN TENTANG ADANYA KLAUSULA BAKU DALAM KONTRAK ELEKTRONIK ANTARA KONSUMEN DAN PIHAK E-COMMERCE (STUDI KASUS PADA E-COMMERCE SHOPEE) Prasetyo, Ade Jona; Saidin, Saidin; Kamello, Tan
Gorontalo Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 Oktober 2024, Gorontalo Law Review
Publisher : Universitas Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32662/golrev.v7i2.3745

Abstract

E-commerce trade has become a reality in today's technology-driven society. This type of trade has undoubtedly brought changes to the system of buying and selling goods, especially in terms of contracts or agreements. E-commerce agreements tend to implement what is known as Standard Clauses. Standard Clauses in agreements are generally not allowed to include certain conditions that could harm the public, which is why they are regulated under Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection as the legal basis for ensuring the rights and obligations of the parties involved. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate this issue. This thesis is titled “Legal Protection for Consumers Regarding Standard Clauses in Electronic Contracts Between Consumers and E-commerce Parties (Case Study on E-commerce Shopee)”. The problem statements in this thesis are: 1) How is the implementation of Standard Clauses in electronic contracts in Indonesia? 2) How is the law applied in e-commerce transactions involving electronic contracts that include standard clauses and what are the legal consequences for consumers and business actors? 3) What are the responsibilities and dispute resolution mechanisms for business actors towards consumers if there is a discrepancy in the electronic contract in e-commerce transactions? The method used in writing this thesis is normative juridical research, which is legal research that examines library materials or secondary data as the basic material to be studied, while its nature is descriptive analytical. The research approach used is the statute approach. The data analysis method used is a qualitative method obtained from research on the study object, which is in the form of contracts or agreements linked to the prevailing laws and regulations. The research findings indicate that the application of Standard Clauses in contracts/agreements in e-commerce still has issues, particularly in cases of default. These issues occur in the form, timing, and quality of the goods being traded, causing consumers to sometimes be dissatisfied with the purchased goods. For these issues, there are mechanisms for business actors to be responsible for compensation as regulated in the Consumer Protection Act (UUPK), and there are three (3) consumer dispute resolution efforts, namely efforts outside the court such as mediation and negotiation, through BPSK, and efforts through the court such as filing lawsuits and others.
Hak Preferen Kreditor Melaksanakan Lelang Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Simbolon, Fransiska Agustina; Kamello, Tan; Sidabariba, Burhan; Andriati, Syarifah Lisa
Gorontalo Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 April 2025, Gorontalo Law Review
Publisher : Universitas Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32662/golrev.v8i1.3849

Abstract

This research discusses the preferential rights of creditors in the implementation of fiduciary security execution auctions in Indonesia, as well as the impact of the Constitutional Court decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 on these rights. Prior to the decision, creditors could execute fiduciary security objects without going to court. However, the Constitutional Court's decision changed the mechanism by requiring the debtor's consent or a court decision. This research uses normative legal research methods with a case and statutory approach. The results show that the Constitutional Court's decision aims to protect debtors' rights from creditors' arbitrary actions, although it also creates legal uncertainty for creditors.
PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM PEMERINTAH KOTA MEDAN DALAM PENETAPAN TANAH LAPANG MERDEKA MEDAN SEBAGAI CAGAR BUDAYA (STUDI PUTUSAN: : NOMOR 542/PDT/2021/PT.MDN) Zulkarnain, Noni; Kamello, Tan; Sembiring, Rosnidar
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol 8, No 2 (2025): May 2025
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v8i2.3059

Abstract

Abstract: Cultural heritage is valuable for the nation because it can increase the sense of unity and awareness of national identity, therefore cultural heritage needs to be preserved and protected. This study will discuss three problems. This study uses a normative legal research method, with a legislative approach, legal concepts, cases, and comparative law. This research is prescriptive. The primary legal material used is Law Number 11 of 2010 concerning Cultural Heritage. Secondary legal materials are in the form of literature on cultural heritage and unlawful acts. The results of this study are the provisions of regulatory laws governing the criteria for cultural heritage status in the determination of Tanah Lapang Merdeka Medan as a cultural heritage according to Law Number 11 of 2010 concerning Cultural Heritage, Elements of unlawful acts imposed on the Medan city government in determining Tanah Lapang Merdeka Medan as a cultural heritage, Legal analysis of the considerations of the judge's decision in decision Number 542 / Pdt / 2021 / PT.Mdn with the values of justice, benefit and legal certainty. Keywords: Determination, Cultural Heritage, Act Against The Law Abstrak: Cagar budaya merupakan hal berharga bagi bangsa karena dapat meningkatkan rasa kesatuan dan kesadaran jati diri bangsa maka dari itu cagar budaya perlu dilestarikan dan dilindungi. Penelitian ini akan membahas tiga permasalahan Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konsep hukum, kasus, dan perbandingan hukum. Penelitian ini bersifat preskriptif. Bahan hukum primer yang digunakan yakni Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2010 Tentang Cagar Budaya. Bahan hukum sekunder berupa literatur mengenai cagar budaya dan perbuatan melawan hukum. Hasil penelitian ini adalah Ketentuan hukum regulasi yang mengatur mengenai kriteria status cagar budaya pada penetapan Tanah Lapang Merdeka Medan sebagai cagar budaya menurut Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2010 Tentang Cagar Budaya, Unsur-unsur perbuatan melawan hukum yang dikenakan kepada pemerintah kota medan dalam penetapan Tanah Lapang Merdeka Medan sebagai cagar budaya, Analisis hukum pada pertimbangan putusan hakim pada putusan Nomor 542/Pdt/2021/PT.Mdn dengan nilai-nilai keadilan, kemanfaatn dan kepastian hukum. Kata kunci: Penetapan, Cagar Budaya , Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH)  
Principles of Good Faith in the Reimbursement of Expenses within Oil and Gas Revenue Sharing Agreements in Indonesia Nurarafah, Nurarafah; Kamello, Tan; Yahya, Azhari; Dahlan, Dahlan; Jarnawi, Jarnawi
Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/sjhk.v9i1.14632

Abstract

This study seeks to examine and elucidate the significance of the principle of good faith within the national legal framework, as well as to develop norms pertaining to good faith in the context of operational cost recovery for production sharing contracts in Indonesia's oil and gas industry. This study utilizes a normative legal methodology alongside a legislative framework. The sources of data encompass essential legal materials, including legislation, journal articles, books, and pertinent research reports that contribute to the discourse. The analysis of the data is performed qualitatively through a juridical-philosophical lens, developing arguments rooted in legal philosophy, legal theory, and various legal principles. The findings reveal that the principle of good faith in the operational cost recovery of production sharing contracts in Indonesia is governed at each stage of the contract to safeguard the interests of disadvantaged parties. This regulation addresses the essential principle of good faith that all parties must adhere to in order to guarantee the equitable execution of rights and obligations. In the context of operational cost recovery for production sharing contracts in Indonesia, good faith is characterized by adherence to and compliance with audit results, reflecting a commitment to the proper execution of the business contract's terms. The operational cost recovery system is anticipated to serve as a reimbursement mechanism for expenses associated with oil and gas production.
Co-Authors Abd Haris Nasution Agusmidah Agusmidah Andrianti , Syarifah Lisa Arie Kartika Azhari Yahya Burhan Sidabariba Dahlan Dahlan Dedi Harianto Edy Ikhsan Harris, Abd. HASIM PURBA Hery Widijanto Isdiana Syafitri Jarnawi Jarnawi Khoirunnisa, Nabila Mulhadi, Mulhadi Nurarafah, Nurarafah Pinem, Faisal Hadi Prasetyo, Ade Jona Rosnidar Sembiring Rudy Haposan Siahaan Safrida Safrida saidin, saidin Shah, Elbarino Shah, Muhammad Rahmaddian Sijabat, Joshua Narwastu Simarmata, Arnos Dheo Vegha Simbolon, Fransiska Agustina Sipayung, Iskandar Muda Siregar, Mutia Sari Sitorus, Kristin Lusyana Sunarmi Syarifah Lisa Andriati T. Keizerina Devi Azwar Utari, Yowan Waruwu, Ariful Hakim Zulkarnain, Noni