Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.405
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum LAW REFORM Diponegoro Law Journal Wacana Hukum Qistie: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Media Hukum Administrative Law & Governance Journal Jurnal Kajian Peradaban Islam JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Indonesia Private Law Review Jurnal CREPIDO: Jurnal Mengenai Dasar-Dasar Pemikiran Hukum Filsafat dan Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Kajian Peradaban Islam Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia
Suteki Suteki
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Diponegoro
Religion Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Politik Hukum Penanganan Konflik Perkebunan oleh Pemerintah yang Berkeadilan Sosial Dwimas Suryanata Nugraha; Suteki Suteki
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 20, No 1 (2018): Vol. 20, No. 1, (April 2018)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v20i1.9827

Abstract

Negara Indonesia merupakan negara agraris, dimana sumber ekonomi dan penghidupan masyarakatnya sangat bergantung pada produksi maupun hasil-hasil pertanian. Hal tersebut mengakibatkan persoalan pada bidang pertanian menjadi masalah pokok bagi masyarakat Indonesia. Salah satu permasalahan pertanian di Indonesia yaitu sengketa tanah perkebunan yang berujung pada konflik perkebunan. Mayoritas konflik perkebun-an terjadi antara petani dengan perusahaan perkebunan yang menyebabkan banyak kerugian, baik material maupun non material. Konflik usaha perkebunan perlu ditangani dengan baik agar tujuan utama dari pengelolaan perkebunan dapat tercapai. Ketika konflik terjadi, pemerintah adalah pihak yang paling berwenang dalam menanganinya, pihak yang obyektif dan tidak memihak salah satu pihak yang berkonflik. Perlu adanya politik hukum penanganan konflik perkebunan oleh pemerintah yang memberikan rasa keadilan bagi pada pihak-pihak yang berkonflik. Legal Politics the Handling of the Plantation Conflict by the Government in Creating the Social Justice Indonesia is a agraris country, where economic and society lifes depend on agriculture product. It makes agriculture problems become the main problem for indonesian. One of agriculture problem in Indonesia is land plantation disputes that cause a conflict on plantation business. The majority of conflicts occur between farmers and plantation companies that cause many losses, both material and non-material. Plantation conflicts need to be handled properly so that the main objective of plantation management can be achieved. When conflict occurs, government is the most authorized party to handle it, the objective and impartial parties of either party in conflict. It is necessary to have a legal policy on handling of plantation conflicts by the government which gives a sense of justice for the parties.
Larangan Mudik dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif Dahlia Dewi Apriani; Suteki Suteki; Fadjrin Wira Perdana; Ferdinand Pusriansyah; Irwan Irwan; Yohan Wibisono
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi Vol. 2 No. 10 (2021): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3834.932 KB) | DOI: 10.59141/jist.v2i10.245

Abstract

Inkonsisten kebijakan mudik semakain memperdalam dan meruncing pad a tataran masyarakat, sehingga terjadinya polarisasi cara pandang masyarakat terhadap urgensi mudik yang sudah lama tertanam dalam sebagai realitas sosiokultural masyarakat Indonesia namun harus dilakukan meskipun bahaya pandemi Covid-19 mengancam. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis bagaimana pandangan hukum progresif terhadap kebiajakan larangan mudik. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian yuridis empiris untuk mengetahui dan menentukan bagaimana hukum itu berlaku sebagai norma atau das sollen. Hasil penelitian dijelaskan bahwa dalam perspektif Hukum Progresif, pemberlakuan Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor PM 13 Tahun 2021 untuk menghentikan kontroversi larangan mudik lebaran sekaligus menghadirkan kepastian hukum dalam perspektif Hukum Progresif adalah menegaskan cara pandang Pemerintah yang masih mendasarkan diri kepada ajaran ilmu hukum positif (analytical jurisprudence). Permenhub telah dengan sengaja “melokalisir” kebenaran hanya yang nampak secara tekstual dalam pasal-pasal Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor PM 13 Tahun 2021, yang oleh Hukum Progresif justru hal itu dikritik karena sama sekali tidak bisa menjelaskan kebenaran yang kompleks (keadilan substantive). Dalam perspektif Hukum Proresif, maka hukum selalu dikaitkan pada tujuan-tujuan di luar narasi tekstual hukum itu sendiri. Sehingga hukum harus memihak kepada kepentingan masyarakat (publik) dan demi kepentingan keadilan itu sendiri.
ANALYZING BANKRUPTCY CANCELLATION THROUGH THE PRINCIPLE OF JUSTICE: A CASE STUDY OF INTIDANA COOPERATIVE Adiel Mischa Kristianto; Suteki Suteki; Mahoro Jean Claude Geofrey
Indonesia Private Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/iplr.v6i1.4196

Abstract

Indonesian bankruptcy law, regulated under Act Number 37 of 2004, has yet to fully realize its principles, resulting in legal uncertainty and gaps in implementation. A notable example is the Intidana Cooperative bankruptcy case, where a cassation ruling was later overturned through a Review Court decision. This study analyzes the revocation of Intidana Cooperative’s bankruptcy through the lens of the Principle of Justice in Act Number 37 of 2004, reinforced by John Rawls’ Theory of Justice. Using descriptive analysis of legal documents, government policies, and prior studies, the research finds that the Judicial Review decision upheld the Principle of Justice by recognizing cooperative members as the least advantaged party. Petitioners for bankruptcy were themselves cooperative members, while other members lacked the power to influence cooperative actions without a resolution from the Cooperative Members’ Meeting, placing them in a vulnerable position requiring judicial protection. The study concludes that while justice was realized in this case, existing provisions safeguarding the interests of cooperative members in bankruptcy require further review to ensure equitable outcomes for all parties.
Community Engagement in Eradicating Corruption: Evaluating the Effectiveness and Reward Models for Whistleblowers As a Regional Strategy Suteki Suteki; Abdul Jalil; Aga Natalis; Dewi Rembulan
Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement) JPHI Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): (January-June 2025)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jphi.v8i1.20440

Abstract

Corruption represents a distinct social phenomenon within Indonesia's legal framework, which is rooted in the principles of a welfare state. Combating corruption requires more than enforcing formal regulations; it involves integrating cultural values, promoting good governance, and fostering active community participation. This study addresses these dimensions by examining the effectiveness of offering rewards to whistleblowers in regional corruption cases, investigating the factors that influence the success of these systems, and developing an optimal model for compensating whistleblowers to strengthen corruption eradication initiatives. The research combines normative legal analysis with sociological insights by employing a socio-legal framework—an approach that examines how law operates within its social context, considering both legal rules and their practical implementation in society. The findings reveal five key factors affecting the efficacy of reward systems: law enforcement, infrastructure, community involvement, cultural attitudes, and regulatory frameworks. The study highlights the importance of developing specific technical guidelines, providing robust protections for whistleblowers, ensuring transparent budget allocation processes, and fostering better coordination among law enforcement agencies. A well-structured reward system has the potential to enhance public trust, increase community participation, and cultivate a sustainable anti-corruption culture. This represents a strategic investment in achieving transparent, clean, and accountable governance in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Abdul Djalil Abdul Jalil Abdul Jalil Adiel Mischa Kristianto Aga Natalis Agil Widiyas Sampurna Ani Purwanti Dahlia Dewi Apriani Dewi Rahmaningsih Nugroho Dewi Rembulan Dian Trisusilowaty Dwimas Suryanata Nugraha Dyah Wijaningsih Erwin Syahputra Esmi Warasih Pudjirahayu Evander Reland Butar Butar Fadjrin Wira Perdana Ferdinand Pusriansya Irwan Ivan Wagner Lumbanraja, Anggita Doramia Mahoro Jean Claude Geofrey Mertha Hapsari Muh. Afif Mahfud Muhamad Hanif Yasyfi Nastiti Rahajeng Putri Offi Jayanti Otniel Yuristo Yudha Prawira Robiatul Adawiyah Tity Wahju Setiawati Tutut Ferdiana Mahita Paksi Yohan Wibisono