Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

The Role Of Judicial Review In Protecting Religious Minority Rights In Indonesia Maula, Bani Syarif
Veteran Law Review Vol 1, No 1 (2018): November
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (244.639 KB) | DOI: 10.35586/velrev.v1i1.389

Abstract

Indonesia is a predominantly Muslim country, and Muslims in this country live in a pluralistic society harmoniously in their daily life. The absence of any reference to Islam in the Constitution shows that Indonesia is open to all religions besides Islam. The harmony of relationship among religious followers is preserved in the Indonesian constitution that acknowledges all of citizens have the religious freedom, which the state has to respect, protect and fulfill. The general idea of preserving the rights of religious freedom lies in the history of protecting religious minorities, and it is universally acceptable as one of the foundations of a democratic society. Therefore, ideally, a law which limits civil rights should never threaten the freedom of thought, conscience and religion, or impose limitations to those rights solely on the grounds of religious, political or other views. If the notion of protecting rights is as such, then the question arises is what mechanism can protect human rights as constitutional rights of citizens? The best legal mechanism in this context is to challenge the state and constitutional issues through the courts by means of the judicial review. This paper examines whether the judicial review as one of the best mechanisms to protect constitutional rights of citizens can be a concrete way to deal with human rights protection by challenging the state through the court. This paper concludes that the judicial review of executive acts and legislative power is very likely to be able to protect religious minority rights in Indonesia.
Kajian al-Ahwal al-Syakhsiyyah dengan Pendekatan Maqasid al-Syari'ah Maula, Bani Syarif
Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Vol 8 No 2 (2014)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah IAIN Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (256.832 KB) | DOI: 10.24090/mnh.v8i2.410

Abstract

Selama ini kajian al-Ahwal asy-Syakhsiyah seringkali hanya didasarkan pada ketentuan-ketentuan yang diambil dari kitab-kitab fiqih saja sehingga ia dikaji dengan tanpa melihat makna filosofis di dalamnya. Makalah ini melakukan kajian terhadap al-Ahwal asy-Syakhsiyah, yang merupakan studi di bidang hukum keluarga. Kajian ini perlu dilakukan agar aspek legal reasoning (proses ijtihad) dalam istinbat hukum bidang ini bisa dilihat secara cermat. Karena itulah pendekatan tujuan hukum (maqasid asy-syari’ah) penting digunakan agar penerapan hukum Islam dapat diarahkan untuk membentuk suatu tatanan masyarakat yang didasarkan pada kebaikan dan keadilan serta bersih dari kerusakan dan ketimpangan sosial. Urgensi aspek filosofis dan sosiologis dalam kajian ini terlihat pada penggunaan analisis dampak hukum (an-nazar fi al-ma’alat) dalam upaya penggalian maqasid asy-syari’ah. Penerapan metode ini bisa dilihat dalam kasus penentuan hukum pernikahan dengan ahli kitab, persaksian dalam talak, dan wasiat wajib.
Religious Freedom in Indonesia and Malaysia in the Constitutional Comparative Perspective (The Cases of Judicial Review in Blasphemous Offences) Maula, Bani Syarif
Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Vol 6 No 1 (2012)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah IAIN Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3389.319 KB) | DOI: 10.24090/mnh.v6i1.588

Abstract

Makalah ini membahas jaminan kebebasan beragama dalam konstitusi dua negara, yaitu Indonesia dan Malaysia, dan apakah judicial review bisa menjadi mekanisme terbaik untuk melindungi hak konstitusional warganegara dari kedua negara tersebut. Makalah ini berkesimpulan bahwa Indonesia dan Malaysia memiliki karakteristik konstitusi yang berbeda dalam hal ketentuan-ketentuan perlindungan kebebasan beragama. Namun demikian, judicial review di kedua negara tersebut bisa menjadi perlindungan bagi hak-hak agama minoritas, meskipun dalam prakteknya tidak selalu demikian, seperti dalam kasus judicial review undang-undang anti penodaan agama di Indonesia. Memang idealnya, judicial review merupakan cara yang paling efektif dalam menguji undang-undang yang merugikan kaum minoritas, dan juga judicial review seharusnya diletakkan sebagai faktor penting untuk melindungi hak asasi manusia.
The Role Of Judicial Review In Protecting Religious Minority Rights In Indonesia Maula, Bani Syarif
Veteran Law Review Vol 1, No 1 (2018): November 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (244.639 KB) | DOI: 10.35586/velrev.v1i1.389

Abstract

Indonesia is a predominantly Muslim country, and Muslims in this country live in a pluralistic society harmoniously in their daily life. The absence of any reference to Islam in the Constitution shows that Indonesia is open to all religions besides Islam. The harmony of relationship among religious followers is preserved in the Indonesian constitution that acknowledges all of citizens have the religious freedom, which the state has to respect, protect and fulfill. The general idea of preserving the rights of religious freedom lies in the history of protecting religious minorities, and it is universally acceptable as one of the foundations of a democratic society. Therefore, ideally, a law which limits civil rights should never threaten the freedom of thought, conscience and religion, or impose limitations to those rights solely on the grounds of religious, political or other views. If the notion of protecting rights is as such, then the question arises is what mechanism can protect human rights as constitutional rights of citizens? The best legal mechanism in this context is to challenge the state and constitutional issues through the courts by means of the judicial review. This paper examines whether the judicial review as one of the best mechanisms to protect constitutional rights of citizens can be a concrete way to deal with human rights protection by challenging the state through the court. This paper concludes that the judicial review of executive acts and legislative power is very likely to be able to protect religious minority rights in Indonesia.
REKONSTRUKSI STUDI ISLAM DI MASA KONTEMPORER Bani Syarif Maula
JURNAL YAQZHAN: Analisis Filsafat, Agama dan Kemanusiaan Vol 5, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : IAIN SYEKH NUR JATI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (551.72 KB) | DOI: 10.24235/jy.v5i1.4515

Abstract

ABSTRAKStudi agama, kususnya Islam, selalu memunculkan persoalan objektivitas antara peneliti dan objek yang dikaji sekaligus terhadap pihak lain, di mana masalah objektif atau subjektifnya suatu penelitian sangat bergantung terhadap pendekatan sekaligus metodologinya. Studi Islam bukan saja menyangkut persoalan fenomenologi, terutama jika dikaitkan dengan studi Islam di masa modern (kontemporer) sekarang ini. Studi Islam selalu dipengaruhi oleh perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan, sehingga pendekatan apapun yang digunakan untuk melakukan studi Islam, tidak dapat mendorong seseorang untuk cenderung mengukuhkan dan melahirkan truth claim terhadap pendekatannya dan menafikan yang lainnya. Selain itu, paradigma baru yang sesuai dengan perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan, khususnya ilmu-ilmu sosial, perlu mendapat tempat agar dapat menawarkan pandangan baru dalam mengkaji agama yang lebih terbuka dan berpandangan ke depan dengan mengakomodasi nilai-nilai universal.Kata Kunci: Rekonstruksi, Studi Islam, Studi Agama, Kontemporer, Modern
POLITIK HUKUM DAN UPAYA POSITIVISASI HUKUM ISLAM DI INDONESIA: STUDI TENTANG KONFLIK HUKUM DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG PERKAWINAN DAN UNDANG-UNDANG PERADILAN AGAMA Bani Syarif Maula
Jurnal Penelitian Agama Vol 16 No 1 (2015)
Publisher : IAIN Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (528.275 KB) | DOI: 10.24090/jpa.v16i1.2015.pp29-49

Abstract

Abstract: The politics of law that ignore the aspirations of society has led to inconsistency in the application of the law because of the differences between the will of the people with the legislation. This study specifically examines the political law in terms of the application of Islamic law in Indonesia which is envisaged in Law No. 1/1974 on Marmage and the Law 7/1989 on Religious Courts (and its amendment Law No. 3/2006). The political situation that characterizes the formation of the Marriage Law and the Law on Religious Courts clearly show trends and policy direction of the state law. It can be seen from the political aspects of the legal establishment, the political aspects of the content of the law (principles and the rule of law), and political aspects of law enforcement. These three aspects have made Islamic law practiced by the Indonesian Muslim community (the living laws) in conflict with formal legal rules defined by the state. The conclusion from this study is that the legal provisions in the Mariage Law that conflict, namely: Article 2 paragraph (1), Article 7 (1), Article 31 paragraph (3) and Article 34 paragraph (1) and (2), as well as Article 42 and 43 paragraph (1). While the legal provisions in the Law on Religious Courts where a conflict is Article 50 of Law No. 7/1989 and Article 50 paragraph (1) and (2) of Law No. 3/2006 (amendment of the same article of the Law No. 7/1989) Keywords: Politics, Law, Conflict of Laws, Islamic Law, Marriage Law, the Law on Religious Courts
Interfaith Marriage and the Religion–State Relationship: Debates between Human Rights Basis and Religious Precepts Maula, Bani Syarif; Muhsin, Ilyya
Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Vol 8, No 2 (2024): Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/sjhk.v8i2.19479

Abstract

Following the Constitutional Court’s dismissal of the judicial review of Article 2, Paragraph 1 of the Marriage Law, the Jakarta Central District Court granted approval for the registration of inter-religious marriages. The issue of inter-religious marriage has once again become a hot topic of social discussion. Following the controversy, the Supreme Court issued a circular ordering the court not to grant marriage registration applications for interfaith couples. This study draws on normative legal research and empirical analysis of interfaith marriages to answer the question of how states (through courts) view and negotiate interfaith marriages from state, legal, and religious perspectives. The objective of this study is to examine the arguments presented by proponents and opponents of interfaith marriage in Indonesia, particularly focusing on the discourse surrounding human rights principles and the adherence to religious teachings within the realm of marital practices. The study concluded that Islamic law remains one of the most fundamental elements of contemporary Muslim family life practices in Indonesia. All religions, including government officials and judges, generally consider interfaith marriages illegal and prohibit them under the Marriage Act. The Constitutional Court's decision to deny judicial review of the provisions governing interfaith marriage reinforces the argument that, in terms of the relationship between religion and the state, Indonesia falls into the category of countries with religiously governed enclaves.
Examining the Handling of Rohingya Refugees in Indonesia through the Lens of International Law and Maqāsid al-Shari’ah: An Exploration of Islamic Humanitarianism Maula, Bani Syarif
Mazahib Vol 23 No 1 (2024): VOLUME 23, ISSUE 1, 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UINSI Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21093/mj.v23i1.7942

Abstract

The issue of Rohingya refugees has gained significant attention globally and within Indonesian society, especially as many seek refuge in Aceh to escape persecution in Myanmar. The 1951 Vienna Convention and the 1967 Refugee Protocol form the global legal framework for refugee protection. However, Indonesia has not formally endorsed these statutes, so it is not legally bound to fulfill refugees’ basic needs. Despite this, Indonesia is obligated by the principle of non-refoulement, a customary international law or jus cogens, to manage Rohingya refugees entering its territory. This study examines Indonesia’s approach to refugee management through international law and maqāṣid al-sharī’ah, representing Islamic humanitarianism. Islamic scholarly discourse, specifically Fiqh al-Siyar, linked with maqāṣid al-sharī’ah, provides a foundation for contemporary humanitarian efforts. The study concludes that, under international law, Indonesia must protect refugees as part of implementing jus cogens. Additionally, from the maqāṣid al-sharī’ah perspective, Indonesia’s decision to welcome Rohingya refugees, despite not ratifying the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol, exemplifies Islamic humanitarianism and acknowledges refugees’ inherent human rights.
Training and Coaching as a Solution to Improve Nazhir's Professionality in Jekan Raya District, Palangka Raya City Maula, Bani Syarif; Akbar, Wahyu; Sayuti, M. Noor; Zulkifli; Permana, Farid; Novia; Rafi, Faris; Putra, Faiq Danendra Rizqi; Rahima, Dwira
Amala Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): May 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Economics and Islamic Business State Islamic University of Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (919.948 KB) | DOI: 10.23971/amala.v1i1.7

Abstract

Nazhir's professionality in Jekan Raya District is not optimal, because there are still some who do not carry out their duties after becoming Nazhir, one of which is not reporting the implementation of waqf assets to the Indonesian Waqf Board (BWI), did not receive any prior guidance or training related to the management and development of waqf, and that is one of BWI's duties regarding its duties and authorities which has not been implemented until now. This community service activity carried out by the Zakat and Waqf management study program FEBI IAIN Palangka Raya, aims to strengthen Nazhir's competence and professionalism through reporting assistance carried out with outreach activities and FGD in Jekan Raya sub-district.t. 100% of participants attended the activity and followed until the activity was finished. The results showed that participants gained new knowledge about the development of waqf management and realized the importance of waqf reporting, this became an increase in knowledge professionalism and competence for nazhir. Participants are interested in trying to practice it in the implementation of waqf management. It is hoped that this activity can increase waqf, especially in the Jekan Raya sub-district, Palangka Raya City.
Advocacy for Sharia and Legal Equality in Indonesia: An Examination of the Competency of Sharia Advocates in Banyumas Maula, Bani Syarif; Nada, Syifaun
Transformatif Vol 8 No 2 (2024): ISSUED IN OCTOBER 2024
Publisher : POSTGRADUATE OF PALANGKA RAYA STATE ISLAMIC INSTITUTION

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/tf.v8i2.9002

Abstract

Sharia advocates (Sharia lawyers) in Indonesia face the challenge of maintaining their significant role amidst the dominance of general advocates. This research evaluates the professionalism of Sharia advocates in the Banyumas region, focusing on the Banyumas Religious Court, Banyumas District Court, Purwokerto Religious Court, and Purwokerto District Court. This study used a qualitative and constructivist approach and collected primary data through interviews with Sharia advocates and secondary data from documents. Findings indicate that legislation recognizes Sharia advocates as professional advocates eligible to practice in all courts, akin to general advocates. However, Islamic universities, especially Sharia faculties, need to prepare graduates to compete with general law graduates for advocacy roles. In the Banyumas region, Sharia advocates provide legal services primarily in civil law cases under religious court jurisdiction across four courts. The main challenge for Sharia advocates is the public perception that they only handle Islamic legal cases and only practice in religious courts. Furthermore, there is a strong negative stigma among legal practitioners regarding the low proficiency of Sharia advocates in positive law, leading to their limited involvement in handling cases in District Courts (Civil Courts).