Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

The Application of the Principle of Judges’ Independence in Blasphemy Cases in Indonesia's Post-Reform Era Maula, Bani Syarif; Ariyanti, Vivi
AL-ISTINBATH : Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 6 No 2 November (2021)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (763.558 KB) | DOI: 10.29240/jhi.v6i2.3465

Abstract

This research departs from a paradigm that the freedom of judges is a form of court independence, which requires that decisions taken must consider objectivity without pressure from any party. This study focuses on the attitude of judges' independence from factors that can influence court decisions, both internal and external factors related to the interests of certain groups. Based on these problems, this study addresses the issue of the independence of judges in cases of blasphemy. This type of research is empirical normative with a qualitative descriptive approach. The data sought for this research is data that comes from the facts of the application of material and formal law by judges in court. In addition, this data is also strengthened by interviews. This study concludes that the analysis of the application of the blasphemy article proves that judges as law enforcers have difficulty translating the substance of blasphemy because of the unclear formulation of Article 156a letter 'a' of the Indonesian Criminal Code. The judge's decision in the blasphemy case does not reflect the independence values of the judges who decide the case. Judges in making decisions on cases handled must be based on their ability to think and will freely (independently) but within the limitations of responsibility and objectivity. The panel of judges in blasphemy cases tends to adopt a more general and situation-oriented attitudes.
Assessing Indonesia and Malaysia’s Legal Responsiveness to Domestic Violence Victims within Islamic Law Framework Nuroniyah, Wardah; Al Azkiya, Mohammad Azka; Wahid, Abdul; Labib Shodiq, Fatimah Lubabiyah; Maula, Bani Syarif
Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Vol. 19 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic University of Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri, Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/mnh.v19i2.13736

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of Indonesia and Malaysia’s legal frameworks for protecting victims of domestic violence through the lens of Islamic legal principles. It examines both substantive and procedural dimensions in light of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, which emphasize the preservation of life (ḥifẓ al-nafs), dignity (ḥifẓ al-‘ird), and family integrity (ḥifẓ al-nasl). Indonesia’s Law No. 23 of 2004 provides broad substantive protection by recognizing various forms of violence physical, psychological, sexual, and economic and extending safeguards to domestic workers. This inclusivity aligns with the Islamic principle of ‘adl (justice) and the duty to uphold human dignity, though weak coordination and limited law enforcement training hinder procedural implementation. In contrast, Malaysia’s Domestic Violence Act 1994 demonstrates stronger procedural responsiveness, particularly in issuing protection orders and promoting inter-agency cooperation. While its narrower scope excludes domestic workers, it reflects dar’ al-mafāsid (prevention of harm) through timely intervention. Malaysia’s dual legal system also integrates Islamic values into judicial practice. The study concludes that Indonesia excels in substantive inclusivity, while Malaysia demonstrates procedural strength. A hybrid model combining Indonesia’s normative scope with Malaysia’s procedural efficiency would better fulfill the Shariah’s holistic objectives of justice and protection.
Islam dan Modernitas: Pandangan Muslim terhadap Perkembangan Sosial, Politik dan Sains Maula, Bani Syarif
FIKRAH Vol 5, No 2 (2017): December 2017
Publisher : Prodi Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam, Fakultas Ushuluddin, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kudus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (5861.546 KB) | DOI: 10.21043/fikrah.v5i2.2234

Abstract

Islam is always highlighted by the world, among others in relation to the values of modernity, since some Muslims indeed reject the values contained in the modernity. This paper explains the Muslim response to the values of modernity in the social and political field, as well as the field of science. The social and political field explains issues of nationalism, democratization, and human rights. While in the field of science will highlight the issue of Muslim view of the theory of evolution. A theory that forms the basis for the development of modern science. The modernity that plagues the Islamic world, with all its positive-negative effects, becomes a challenge that Muslims must face today in contemporary times. Muslims are required to work extra hard to develop their potential to solve the problem. Tajdid and ijtihad are efforts by Muslims to preserve and preserve Islamic teachings to conform to modern values.