Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.94
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Arena Hukum Pembaharuan Hukum Media Iuris Jurist-Diction Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Yuridika PATTIMURA Legal Journal Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Mohammad Syaiful Aris
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga
Religion Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Implications of District Court Decisions on the Stages of the 2024 Elections: Perspectives on the Indonesian Election System Pangastuti, Inagatha Setyarahma; Salman, Radian; Aris, Mohammad Syaiful; Putri, Luh Putu Yeyen Karista
PATTIMURA Legal Journal Vol 4 No 1 (2025): April 2025 PATTIMURA Legal Journal
Publisher : Postgraduate Program Doctoral in Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/pela.v4i1.18257

Abstract

Introduction: The stipulation of Decision Number 757/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Jkt.Pst raises many pros and cons, namely related to the decision to postpone the 2024 elections. Through the Decision, the Central Jakarta District Court decided and adjudicated the Unlawful Acts dispute filed by the Adil Makmur People's Party against the General Election Commission. The Central Jakarta District Court should not have the authority to adjudicate disputes filed by the Adil Makmur People's Party because it violates absolute competence. Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to analyze the position of the Decision and its legal consequences on the people's sovereignty in the electoral system in Indonesia. Methods of the Research: The research methods used are normative legal research methods, with a conceptual approach, a statue approach and a case approach. Results Main Findings of the Research: The research found that (1) the General Election Commission was right to appeal, showing that the 2024 election must be in accordance with the constitution, and (2) the postponement of the election violates the sovereignty of the people, as the election system in Indonesia should be carried out every five (5) years, and does not recognize the term postponing the election.
Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia: Juridical Challenges and Human Rights Perspectives Surasa, Ais; Sururie, Ramdani Wahyu; Gisymar, Najib A.; Aris, Mohammad Syaiful; Farid, Diana; Abdulah Pakarti, Muhammad Husni
Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan Vol 12 No 1 (2025): Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan
Publisher : Hukum Keluarga Islam IAIN LANGSA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/qadha.v12i1.11071

Abstract

Interfaith marriage refers to a union between two individuals who adhere to different religions and remains a complex issue within the Indonesian legal system. Legally, Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage does not explicitly regulate interfaith unions. However, Article 2(1) of the law states that a marriage is valid if conducted by the religious laws and beliefs of the parties involved. This commonly means that interfaith marriages lack legal recognition in Indonesia. This interpretation is further reinforced by the issuance of Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No. 2 of 2023. This study adopts a normative juridical method with a descriptive qualitative approach. Primary data were obtained from the Marriage Law, the Compilation of Islamic Law, fatwas issued by the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI), Muhammadiyah, Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), and SEMA No. 2 of 2023. Secondary data were gathered from legal literature, court decisions, and scholarly articles. The findings indicate that, under Article 2(1) of the Marriage Law, interfaith marriages are deemed invalid under Indonesian national law. However, from a human rights perspective—as stipulated in Article 16 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and Article 28B(1) of the 1945 Constitution—every individual has the right to marry regardless of religious affiliation. This study also outlines several legal alternatives available to interfaith couples seeking to formalize their marriage, including filing a court petition, temporarily adhering to one partner’s religious law, or marrying abroad. The legal implications of interfaith marriage include issues related to its validity, administrative registration, children's legal status, and both spouses' civil rights.
A Chance to Defend Regional Heads in The Procedure of Regional Head Dismissal as A Manifestation of The Proportionality Principle Aris, Mohammad Syaiful; Fauzurrahman, Iqbal; Abrianto, Bagus Oktafian; Nugraha, Xavier; Felicia, Stefania Arshanty
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 12 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.12.2.2023.241-266

Abstract

The existence of regional autonomy in Indonesia is implemented through regional leaders who have the authority to run local government. When carrying out their duties, regional leaders are supervised by other state institutions as a form of checks and balances in government power. Hence, the procedure to dismiss regional leaders regulates to involve the Regional People's Representative Assembly, the Supreme Court, and the President through the Minister of Home Affairs as a form of right to dismiss. However, the existence of the proportionality principle in the procedure to dismiss regional leaders, through the right given to regional leaders to defend themselves, has yet to be regulated in the law. This article talks about two things: first, the procedure to dismiss regional leaders, and second, the legal consequences and the position of a chance to summon regional leaders to explain and defend themselves in the procedure to dismiss regional leaders. This article aims to find the importance of proportionality principles in the procedure to dismiss regional leaders. The method used in this article is legal research, with statutes, conceptual, and case approaches. The results of this research show that although the procedure to dismiss regional leaders has been regulated in law, applying the proportionality principle only exists in jurisprudences. Hence, an ius constituendum is needed to determine legal consequences and certainty regarding the procedure to dismiss regional leaders.
Co-Authors Abdulah Pakarti, Muhammad Husni Bagus Oktafian Abrianto Dita Elvia Kusuma Putri Farid, Diana Fauzurrahman, Iqbal Felicia, Stefania Arshanty Gio Arjuna Putra Gisymar, Najib A. Iqbal Fauzurrahman Nahdyan, Auly Nugraha, Xavier Pangastuti, Inagatha Setyarahma Putri, Dita Elvia Kusuma Putri, Luh Putu Yeyen Karista Radian Salman Ramdani Wahyu Sururie Stefania Arshanty Felicia Sukardi Sukardi Surasa, Ais Vega Dinda Ardian Widiananto Nanda Prasetya