Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.881
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jambura Law Review University Of Bengkulu Law Journal The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Jurnal Dedikasi Hukum Trunojoyo Law Review Dikdimas : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Journal of Juridische Analyse
Ramadhani, Susi
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bengkulu
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Increased Public Legal Awareness of the Primary Rights of Road Users That Need to be Prioritized Asep Suherman; Susi Ramadhani; Sudirman Sitepu
DIKDIMAS : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol. 2 No. 3 (2023): DIKDIMAS : JURNAL PENGABDIAN KEPADA MASYARAKAT
Publisher : Asosiasi Profesi Multimedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58723/dikdimas.v2i3.206

Abstract

The rampant violations of the main rights of road users that need to be prioritized can cause material and immaterial losses for those who get the main priority for road use. These violations can occur while driving or when utilizing road functions, due to intent, negligence, or ignorance. As a result of a lack of legal understanding and awareness, there is still a tendency to use and use roads not according to their designation, such as disruption of traffic order, delays for users of priority rights to obtain road access, and the potential for legal problems. The priority rights of road users that must be preceded are not fully understood by the community, especially regarding actions, criminal sanctions, and the importance of community participation. With this activity, people can add insight and knowledge to prevent and anticipate violations of the main rights of road users that need to be prioritized. The community is moved to orderly traffic to create conditions of obeying and obeying the law. As well as being able to provide awareness and increase legal awareness to prevent traffic violations in the future.
EFEKTIVITAS RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA ANAK BERHADAPAN HUKUM: EFEKTIVITAS RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA ANAK BERHADAPAN HUKUM Susi Ramadhani; Siska Amelya
Journal of Juridische Analyse Vol. 5 No. 02 (2026): Journal of Juridische Analyse
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasir Pengaraian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30606/joja.v5i02.5006

Abstract

The resolution of cases involving children in conflict with the law requires a different approach from the resolution of criminal cases involving adults. Children are legal subjects who have psychological, social, and developmental conditions that require special protection. Through Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, restorative justice and diversion are positioned as important instruments to protect children from the negative impacts of the criminal justice process. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of restorative justice in resolving cases involving children in conflict with the law and to examine its contribution to child protection and social reintegration. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and limited case approaches. The findings indicate that restorative justice has a strong legal foundation through the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law, Government Regulation Number 65 of 2015, Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2014, and Regulation of the National Police Number 8 of 2021. Its effectiveness is determined by victim recovery, child accountability, family and community involvement, prevention of negative stigma, and the ability to return children to their social environment constructively. Nevertheless, its implementation continues to face challenges, including differences in law enforcement officials’ understanding, institutional readiness, victim and family participation, community involvement, and post-resolution supervision. Therefore, restorative justice should not merely be understood as a mechanism for terminating criminal proceedings, but as a recovery process oriented toward the best interests of the child and sustainable social reintegration.
Reconstructing Environmental Criminal Law in Indonesia Through a Comparative Zemiological Legal Study Zico Junius Fernando; Annisa Sabilla Sueni; Firdaus Arifin; Susi Ramadhani; Almira Novia Zulaika
TRUNOJOYO LAW REVIEW Vol 8, No 1 (2026): February
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/tlr.v8i1.31912

Abstract

Environmental crimes in Indonesia are increasingly recognized not only as violations of legal norms but also as social and ecological harms affecting communities and ecosystems. However, the existing framework of environmental criminal law remains largely formalistic, emphasizing administrative violations and statutory illegality while insufficiently addressing the broader dimension of socio-ecological harm. This research examines how a zemiological perspective can contribute to the reconstruction of environmental criminal law in Indonesia through a comparative legal study. Using a normative juridical method with statute, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this study analyzes Indonesian environmental criminal law alongside developments in Belgium, the European Union, Argentina, Scotland, and the Philippines. The findings demonstrate that Indonesian law continues to rely on formal legality and weak corporate accountability, whereas comparative jurisdictions increasingly recognize severe environmental harm, ecocide, and collective victimization as bases for criminal responsibility. The contribution of this research lies in three main aspects. First, it develops a zemiological framework as a new theoretical basis for evaluating environmental criminal law beyond formal statutory violations, emphasizing social and ecological harm as the central criterion for criminalization. Second, it provides a systematic comparative legal analysis that identifies normative gaps between Indonesian law and emerging global models of harm-based environmental criminal law. Third, it proposes a conceptual model for reconstructing environmental criminal law in Indonesia by integrating the principles of social harm, the recognition of ecocide, and strengthened corporate liability.
Co-Authors Almira Novia Zulaika Amancik Amancik Annisa Sabilla Sueni Arya Dwi Bramantio Asep Suherman Ayub, Zainal Amin Barus, Sonia Ivana Fernando, Zico Junius Firdaus, Arifin Hairani, Ranty Wulandari Helda Rahmasari Hikari, Vionica Aufa Iskandar, Stevri Lekattia, Kurnia Lentiara Putri M. Yamani Monica Sandani Noeke Sri Wardhani Noeke Sri Wardhani Noeke Sri Wardhani Putra Perdana Ahmad Saifulloh Putri, Salsabila Ghaniah Randy Pradityo Ranty Wulandari Hairani Salsabila Ghaniah Putri Sazkia Putri Endita Sintia Yumena Siska Amelya Sudirman Sitepu Suhertini, Sakinah Vionica Aufa Hikari Yumena, Sintia Zeta Angelina Madius