Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

Evaluation of Development Projects on Special Allocation Funds Sources for the Pariaman City Self-Help Housing Program Rhama Budi Setia; Taufika Ophiyandri; Akhmad Suraji
CIVED Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025): Regular Issue
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/cived.v12i1.685

Abstract

This study evaluates the success rate of the program (target accuracy, satisfaction, and community self-reliance) of the special allocation fund (DAK) self-help housing assistance in Pariaman City, a coastal area with a majority of low-income residents and many uninhabitable houses. This program is part of the government's efforts to overcome poverty and deal with slum areas, as stipulated in the Minister of PUPR Regulation No. 7 of 2022. Previous studies may have only focused on one or two dimensions. This study uses a mixed method of quantitative and qualitative. Quantitative data were collected through a questionnaire with a Likert scale to measure target accuracy, satisfaction, and community self-reliance. Qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews with beneficiaries and related parties to understand their context and experiences related to the program. Data were analyzed quantitatively using descriptive statistics and qualitatively using thematic analysis. The results showed that the program was right on target (more than 80% of respondents gave the highest score), the level of satisfaction was high (more than 70% of respondents gave a score of 4 or 5), and community participation was very good (84.29% of beneficiaries were involved in house construction on average). These findings provide strong empirical evidence of the success of the DAK self-help housing assistance program in Pariaman City. The local government can use the results of this study to strengthen the DAK self-help housing assistance program, for example by increasing budget allocation or expanding the reach of the program.
Identifying and Analyzing Risks of Under Bid Price Contracts on Government Construction Projects in West Sumatra Amy Rahmadian Puteri; Akhmad Suraji; Benny Hidayat
CIVED Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025): Regular Issue
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/cived.v12i1.702

Abstract

This study analyzes the risks associated with under bid price contracts on construction projects in West Sumatra, a phenomenon that shows a significant increase from 7.28% in 2015 to 32% in 2020. This study is focused on the local context of West Sumatra, providing new insights into competitive dynamics and business practices that may be unique to this region, in contrast to previous studies that may be general or regional in nature. The research objective is to identify and analyze the risk factors that arise from this under bidding practice. Through a specially designed questionnaire survey distributed to 30 local contractors in West Sumatra, and data processing using the SIRISPRO application, this study quantified and identified three main risks: specification deviations and design changes, contract criticism, and price increases during execution. The results showed that contractors responded to these risks by conducting evaluation and inspection of specifications, correction of deviations, and evaluation of personnel and acceleration of work. The implication of these findings is the need to evaluate government project contract management policies, particularly related to bidding regulations and more comprehensive bid evaluation, to mitigate the risk of under bidding and ensure the sustainability of quality construction projects in West Sumatra.
Evaluation Study of Risk Management Process in The Business Process National Road Implementation Center (BPJN) West Sumatra Detia Enda Trivilla; Akhmad Suraji; Bayu Martanto Adji
CIVED Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025): Regular Issue
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/cived.v12i1.706

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of risk management implementation in national road infrastructure projects managed by the National Road Implementation Agency (BPJN) of West Sumatra, Indonesia. Employing an evaluative method that integrates qualitative and quantitative approaches, this research assesses risk management practices based on the guidelines set by the Ministry of Public Works and Housing. The study utilizes document reviews, structured interviews, and perception surveys involving at least 10 respondents, including Risk Owners, Risk Managers, and officials from the Risk Management Unit (UPR) responsible for planning, financial management, and technical operations. Findings indicate that while BPJN West Sumatra has effectively implemented several risk management aspects, deficiencies persist in risk monitoring and response strategies. Notably, the study highlights the urgent need for a structured risk monitoring system, more proactive mitigation strategies, enhanced stakeholder communication, and the integration of information technology. This research contributes to the existing literature by providing a comprehensive evaluation framework for risk management effectiveness in infrastructure projects, offering practical recommendations to improve risk management capacity and support the successful execution of national road infrastructure projects in West Sumatra.
Analysis of Fulfillment Security, Safety, Health, and Sustainability (K4) Standards Building Construction in Padang City Irvan Guswandi; Akhmad Suraji; Benny Hidayat
CIVED Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025): Regular Issue
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/cived.v12i1.715

Abstract

Construction services play a crucial role in national development, and providing Safety, Health, and Sustainability (K4) standards is an important aspect in its implementation. This study aims to channel the level of provision of K4 standards in building construction in Padang City from the perspective of stakeholders (Project Owners, Supervising Consultants, and Contractors), and identify areas that need improvement. This research method uses a qualitative approach with semi-structured interview techniques. Interviews were conducted in depth with representatives from each stakeholder to explore information on the understanding, implementation, and challenges related to K4 standards. Data analysis was carried out descriptively qualitatively by identifying themes that emerged from the interviews and comparing them with the applicable K4 standards. The results of the study indicate that the level of provision of K4 standards in building construction in Padang City is not yet optimal. Of the eight criteria containing K4 standards, there are three standards that have been 100% met (material quality standards, quality standards for the results of construction service implementation, and social protection guidelines for workers). However, there are five standards that still need to be improved, namely equipment quality standards (87.50%), occupational health and safety standards (84.37%), construction service implementation procedure standards (97.22%), operational and maintenance standards (66.67%), and environmental management standards (91.20%). The novelty of this study lies in its focus on the stakeholder perspective in evaluating K4 standards. Previous studies tend to view K4 standards from only one perspective, so this study provides a more comprehensive picture. In addition, this study also specifically identifies areas that need to be improved, so that they can be the basis for implementing more effective construction policies. The practical implications of this study are recommendations for more comprehensive construction policies to improve the provision of K4 standards. Local governments and construction associations can use the results of this study to develop more effective training, socialization, and supervision programs. In addition, this study can also be a reference for construction actors to increase awareness and compliance with K4 standards.
Study of Technical Qualification Evaluation for Construction Work Tender on Under Bid Price Contract Adel Emir Fuadi Harahap; Benny Hidayat; Akhmad Suraji
CIVED Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025): Regular Issue
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/cived.v12i1.716

Abstract

Based on data from LPSE Padang City for the 2021 and 2022 fiscal years, it was found that one third of the work packages in those fiscal year had an Under Bid Price Contract (UBPC) or an offer with less than 80% of the Owner’s Estimate (OE). The purpose of this study is to examine the conformity between field implementation and technical qualification documents in construction work tenders with less than 80% OE or under bid price contracts in Padang City and its impact on small qualifications. Qualitative analysis based on the results of interviews with implementing contractors from several institutions or agencies involved in the procurement process of goods/services in Padang City was used in this study. This study only focuses on the technical qualifications of construction work tenders on under bid price contracts in Padang City using the tender method and the one-envelope method with a small category Construction Services Business License for the 2023 Fiscal Year. The results of the study show that qualification documents and contract documents with HPS of less than 80% in the implementation in the field are still appropriate. The results of interviews with seven contractors showed that the main equipment and managerial personnel used were also still appropriate. The profit target has been achieved by 4 out of 7 respondents (57.14%) and the remaining 3 out of 7 respondents did not get any profit, this is known from the end of the contract period. 3 out of 7 respondents (42.86%) have minor disabilities and 4 out of 7 respondents do not have minor disabilities. 7 respondents (100%) also did not experience delays in work. 3 out of 7 respondents experienced one contract addendum and the remaining 4 out of 7 experienced two contract addendums.