Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

A Discourse of Personal Data Protection: How Indonesia Responsible under Domestic and International Law? Yusliwidaka, Arnanda; Muhammad Ardhi Razaq Abqa; Khansadhia Afifah Wardana
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol. 19 No. 2 (2024): December, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v19i2.13279

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technology has heightened concerns regarding personal data protection, particularly in Indonesia, where regulatory frameworks are still evolving. The ransomware attack on Indonesia’s National Data Center (Pusat Data Nasional/PDN) on June 20, 2024, which led to the leakage of citizens’ personal data and disrupted public services, has sparked widespread public criticism and demands for stronger data protection measures. This incident highlights Indonesia’s weak national cybersecurity system and raises critical questions regarding the state’s responsibility for safeguarding personal data under both domestic and international law. The findings reveal that while Indonesia has enacted Law No. 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection, its enforcement remains weak, leaving citizens vulnerable to cyber threats. From an international law perspective, Indonesia is obligated to protect personal data under frameworks such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (RSIWA 2001). However, gaps in implementation, lack of institutional coordination, and inadequate cybersecurity infrastructure continue to hinder effective protection.  The novelty of this research lies in its dual legal analysis, bridging domestic and international legal responsibilities while examining the broader implications of state accountability in cybersecurity governance. This study contributes to legal discourse by proposing reinforced legal frameworks, improved institutional coordination, enhanced international cooperation, and the adoption of sophisticated cybersecurity technologies. Strengthening legal, social, and cultural structures is essential to prevent future data breaches and ensure comprehensive protection of Indonesian citizens’ personal data.
Measurable Fishing as An Attempt of Preventing Overfishing Phenomenon in Indonesian Waters Roisah, Kholis; Rahayu, Rahayu; Susetyorini, Peni; Yusliwidaka, Arnanda; Aziz, Saidatul Nadia Abd
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Contemporary Legal Challenges and Solutions in a Global Context
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v8i1.2054

Abstract

This research focuses on analyzing the effectiveness of the provision about the measurable fishing as specified in the Government Regulation Number 11 of 2023 as an attempt of preventing overfishing and maintaining the sustainability of biodiversity in Indonesian waters and sea territory. This study is a normative research with statute approach. The data used was secondary one consisting of primary legal, secondary legal, and non-legal materials. Overfishing phenomenon is a serious problem endangering ocean resource and environment. Some countries have reported the overfishing problems damaging the sea ecosystem. Indonesia is one of countries predictably encountering overfishing phenomenon, particularly in northern Java water territory. The indicators of overfishing phenomenon are smaller size of fish and fewer fish caught requiring the fishermen to go farther to catch fish. The fact of overfishing leads to a policy about zone-based measurable fishing and catching quota. This policy can cease overfishing phenomenon because it can control and monitor fish catch, and thereby makes resource and environment better in water or sea territory. Considering the conclusion of research, the concept of measurable fishing formulated by Indonesia is based on zone and quota. Zone base prioritize equal share for the fishermen, promotes economic growth, and determines the capacity of catch allowed for a certain species, while quota base focuses on the limitation of fish catching level based on the potency of fish caught that can control the fishing rate according to the fish resource.