Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.757
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Purifikasi Jurnal Konstruksi Reformasi Hukum Trisakti JPNM : Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin Amicus Curiae
Tri Sulistyowati
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 31 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 31 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
STUDI PERBANDINGAN DI INDONESIA DAN MALAYSIA MENGENAI UPAYA HUKUM WARGA NEGARA ASING YANG DIDEPORTASI : Comparative Study in Indonesia and Malaysia on Legal Remedies for Deported Foreign Nationals Shafa Shafira Putriana; Tri Sulistyowati
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 8 No 2 (2026): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v8i1.25218

Abstract

Deportation is the forced removal or repatriation of a person, particularly a foreign national, from the territory of one country to their country of origin or another location. When deportation is imposed, foreign nationals are often in a very vulnerable position because the decision is unilateral, swift, and has serious consequences for their lives. The research question in this study is how foreign nationals can use legal mechanisms to challenge deportation in Indonesia and Malaysia. The research method uses a normative approach, analyzing legislation and relevant legal literature to explore systemic comparisons between the two jurisdictions. The results of the study show that Indonesia treats deportation as an administrative action that can be challenged through internal appeals or review in administrative courts, while Malaysia tends to provide more limited space with strong executive discretion. The analysis reveals significant differences in the patterns of protection for foreign nationals, particularly regarding access to objection mechanisms. This study concludes that harmonization between state security and procedural rights protection is a crucial aspect that needs to be strengthened in both countries.
Co-Authors Aden Alfiansyah Aditya Wisnuwardhana Djajaatmadja Albir Romdhony Alfiza Dzikri Aulia Alicia Ciller Almaina Ayuninnas Arya Kanduruan Sunarindra Abubakar Dimas Fazar Lazuardy Dimas Refaldy Eldira Amany Ericha Kania Ighfirly Erry Daffa Ramadhan Firyaldha Jelondra Mahadi Noor MAULANA ARIF HIDAYATULLAH MAULANA ARIF HIDAYATULLAH BARUS Meilano Tegar Istiadi Mikhail Rinaldi Pakilado Mochamad Ade Fahmi Muhamad Daffa Prayoga Muhammad Kevin Kwee Nafirdo Ricky Qurniawan Najwa Fadhilah Niky Wahyu Saputra Nuke Listiyawati Ratna Yuniarti Refaldy, Dimas Regitha Primasari Cahyani Retno Melianti Samuel Timoty Sandy Maulana Yusuf Saidi Shafa Shafira Putriana