Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

PERSEPSI ULAMA MUHAMMADIYAH KALIMANTAN TENGAH TERHADAP PENGAKUAN KAWIN BELUM TERCATAT: (Rekognisi Fatwa Majelis Tarjih Tentang Pencatatan Nikah) Wahdini, Muhammad; Norcahyono, Norcahyono
Jurnal Darussalam: Jurnal Pendidikan, Komunikasi dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam Vol. 14 No. 1 (2022): September 2022
Publisher : IAI Darussalam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30739/darussalam.v14i1.1648

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze two key variables between the policy of acknowledging marriages that have not been recorded by the Dukapil and the fatwa of the Muhammadiyah Tarjih Council through the perceptions of Muhammadiyah scholars in Palangkaraya City. The type of field research is that researchers conduct direct interviews with careful objects with a phenomenological approach. The results of this study indicate that several sources chose to look at different spaces for the case of unregistered marriage, there is a condition that non-sirri marriage is done intentionally. So it is not absolutely forbidden to marry siri. Regarding the Dukcapil policy, Muhammadiyah Ulama see the positive side with the intention to accommodate and provide administrative convenience to the perpetrators of unregistered marriages who may not know the obligation to register marriages. However, it is certain that the Dukcapil must pay attention to the provisions of the Marriage Law in order to create harmonization between policies. The Muhammadiyah cleric of Palangkaraya city has the principle of Maslahah in this case.
Legal Analysis of Islamic Family Civil Dispute Settlement Through Mediation Norcahyono Norcahyono
Leges Privatae Vol. 1 No. 5 (2025): FEBRUARY-JOY
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/z4543031

Abstract

The resolution of Islamic family civil disputes through mediation has been regulated in national regulations, particularly in Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 1 of 2016. However, the implementation of this policy still faces various obstacles that hinder its effectiveness in peacefully resolving family disputes. This study aims to analyze the regulations governing mediation in the resolution of Islamic family disputes in Indonesia, evaluate the effectiveness of the applicable laws, and provide recommendations to enhance the role of mediation in the religious court system. Using a normative juridical method with a statute approach, this research examines how existing regulations have been implemented in practice and whether there is a need for revisions or improvements in the mediation system. The findings indicate that although mediation is mandatory in family dispute resolution, its success rate remains low due to limited public awareness, a shortage of certified mediators, and a lack of supervision and evaluation of its effectiveness.Therefore, strengthening the role of mediation is necessary by increasing mediator capacity, promoting the benefits of mediation to the public, and reinforcing regulations to ensure the optimal implementation of mediation. Thus, mediation is expected to become an effective solution in reducing the burden of cases in religious courts and achieving a more harmonious and fair resolution of family disputes.
Progresivitas Hukum Islam dalam Fikih Perlindungan Anak Perspektif Muhammadiyah Ahmad Habibi; Norcahyono Norcahyono; Ardi Akbar Tanjung
Al-Qisthu Vol 23 No 1 (2025): Al-Qisthu: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32694/qst.v23i1.6197

Abstract

The high incidence of violence and violations of children’s rights in Indonesia indicates the need to strengthen child protection through a legal approach that is responsive and oriented toward public welfare (maslaḥah). This article aims to analyze the progressiveness of Islamic law in Fikih Perlindungan Anak from the Muhammadiyah perspective, with a focus on the construction of institutional ijtihād by the Majelis Tarjih and Tajdid and the underlying principles of progressive Islamic law. This study employs a qualitative library research design, using a normative-analytical approach and content analysis of the Fikih Perlindungan Anak text and relevant supporting literature. The findings demonstrate that Muhammadiyah’s Fikih Perlindungan Anak represents a progressive formulation of Islamic law through a dynamic and contextual ijtihād paradigm oriented toward maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. Such progressiveness is reflected in the fiqh’s responses to contemporary child protection issues—including abortion, stunting, children’s civil rights, children in conflict with the law, child marriage, trafficking, and sexual violence—through an integrative dialogue between Islamic normative sources and Indonesia’s positive law. Accordingly, this fiqh constitutes an important contribution to the development of contemporary Islamic law that is humanistic, justice-oriented, and committed to the protection of vulnerable groups.
Pandangan Majlis Tarjih Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Tengah Tentang Tindakan Euthanasia Dalam Pendidikan Waris Islam: Tarjih Muhammadiyah Majlis View Of Central Kalimantan Concerning Euthanasia Action In Islamic Heritage Education Norcahyono Norcahyono; Ariyadi Ariyadi
Tunas: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): Tunas: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33084/tunas.v5i1.1192

Abstract

Penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif yang bersifat deskriptif kualitatif. Yang pengumpulan datanya dilakukan melalui kajian dari berbagai literatur dan juga dari berbagai pendapat majlis tarjih Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Tengah. Setelah pengumpulan dan pengolahan data, kemudian dilakukan analisis kualitatif. Penelitian yang ada dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Penelitian hukum normatif adalah penelitian hukum yang meletakkan hukum sebagai sebuah bagian sistem norma. Sistem norma yang dimaksud adalah mengenai asas-asas, norma kaidah, dari peraturan perundangan, putusan pengadilan, perjanjian serta doktrin (ajaran). Serta tempat penelitian adalah di Majlis Tarjih Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya. Kesimpulan dalam penelitian ini menurut analisis peneliti Majlis Tarjih Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya tidak memberikan putusan tetapi mereka memberikan pandangan terhadap tindakan eutanasia ditinjau dari hukum waris Islam memiliki beberapa kesimpulan sebagai berikut: 1. Mereka bersepakat hukum umum euthanasia (Aktif) adalah haram apapun alasanya. 2. Pelaku euthanasia tidak mendapatkan harta waris dari orang yang dibunuh. 3. Eeuthanasia (pasif) hukumnya boleh. 4. Mereka berselisih pendapat tentang bagaimana hukum orang yang membunuh si yang terbunuh yang mendapat maaf dari keluarga dengan bersedia membayar fidyad (Denda) apakah mendapat warisan atau tidak.