Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.33
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Arena Hukum Jurnal Hukum Novelty Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Konstitusi PETITA: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah (PJKIHdS) Constitutional Review Lex Scientia Law Review Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Jurnal Konstitusi Human Rights in The Global South (HRGS) Pandecta : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal)
Muchamad Ali Safaat
Universitas Brawijaya
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 28 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Arena Hukum

 1 
The Domination Of Indonesian Ulama Council Withhold Law Of Halal Product Guarantee Muchamad Ali Safa'at
Arena Hukum Vol. 15 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2022.01502.3

Abstract

In the relation of law and politic perspective, law is not a neutral entity. Law is a battleground domain for political interests and as instrument of group domination. It can be seen in the formation and implementation of the Halal Law. This research aims to analyze the role of Indonesian Ulama Council (MUI) in the formation and implementation of the Halal Product Guarantee Act. This research uses socio legal method. The research result shows that MUI dominates by hold up the formation and implementation of the Halal Law. This is done by dominating the legitimacy of identity as a religious organization and using a network of organizations and political actors so that the process of establishing rules and administering halal law by BPJPH is hampered. Delegitimacy and disturbance are also experienced through requests for judicial review of the Halal Certification Law to the Constitutional Court and lawsuits to the courts.
PEMAKNAAN NORMA HAK ASASI MANUSIA DALAM UUD 1945 BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI Aan Eko Widiarto; Muchamad Ali Safa'at; Mardian Wibowo
Arena Hukum Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (6858.518 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2018.01002.8

Abstract

AbstractThe authority of judicial review of  an Act by the Constitutional Court has a strategic position in strengthening the rule of law in Indonesia, which is one of the characteristics is the recognition and protection of human rights. The Constitutional Court in exercising judicial review authority has interpreted various provisions of the 1945 Constitution on human rights. Some of which reinforce the meaning as grammatically read in the 1945 Constitution, but there are also decisions that mean differently than the grammatical meaning. This research was conducted to know the meaning of the provisions in the 1945 Constitution which regulate human rights, and to know whether through the Constitutional Court decision even change the meaning of human rights. This research method is normative juridical research. The approach used includes theoretical approach and conceptual approach. Based on the analysis of legal materials used in this study concluded that the decisions of the Constitutional Court other than affirm the meaning of human rights as contained in the 1945 Constitution, the Constitutional Court through its decision also has shifted (expand) some of the meaning of human rights contained in the 1945 Constitution. AbstrakKewenangan pengujian undang-undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi menempati posisi strategis dalam penguatan negara hukum di Indonesia, yang salah satu cirinya adalah adanya pengakuan dan perlindungan terhadap hak asasi manusia. MK dalam menjalankan kewenangan pengujian undang-undang telah menafsirkan berbagai ketentuan UUD 1945 mengenai hak asasi manusia, yang beberapa penafsiran tersebut menguatkan makna sebagaimana secara gramatikal terbaca dalam UUD 1945 namun terdapat pula putusan yang memaknai secara berbeda dibandingkan makna gramatikal UUD 1945. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui makna ketentuan dalam UUD 1945 yang mengatur mengenai hak asasi manusia, serta untuk mengetahui apakah melalui putusan MK terjadi pergeseran bahkan perubahan makna hak asasi manusia dimaksud. Metode penelitian ini berbentuk penelitian yuridis normatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan meliputi pendekatan teoretis (theoretical approach), dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Berdasarkan analisis bahan hukum yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini disimpulkan bahwa putusan-putusan MK selain menegaskan makna hak asasi manusia sebagaimana terdapat dalam UUD 1945, MK melalui putusannya juga telah menggeser (memperluas) sebagian makna hak asasi manusia yang tercantum di dalam UUD 1945.
Co-Authors A.A. Ketut Agung Cahyawan W Aan Eko Widiarto Agnes Harvelian Aritonang, Syofina Dwi Putri Demas Brian W Dhia Al Uyun, Dhia Fadli, Moh. Faisyah, Nur Fajar Laksono Fajar Laksono Suroso Fajar Laksono Suroso, Fajar Laksono I Dewa Gde Mayun Permana I Nyoman Nurjaya Indah Dwi Qurbani Mardian Wibowo Milda Istiqomah Muhammad Nur Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo Nurul Aprianti Rachmad Safa’at Rahmat, Al Fauzi Rahmatika, Nur Auliya Riana Susmayanti Shinta Hadiyantina Sholahuddin Al-Fatih Sudarsono Sudarsono Tunggul Ansari Setia Negara Uyun, Dhia Al