Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

p-Index From 2020 - 2025

3.143

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

All Journal Yustisia Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Arena Hukum Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Konstitusi PETITA: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah (PJKIHdS) Constitutional Review Lex Scientia Law Review Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences International Journal of Business, Law, and Education International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) IBLAM Law Review Jurnal Konstitusi Human Rights in The Global South (HRGS)

Muchamad Ali Safaat

Universitas Brawijaya

Author-ID : 367932

Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 29 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

1 2 3

CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION OF ORIGINAL INTENT ON FINDING THE MEANING OF SOCIAL JUSTICE IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW Agnes Harvelian; Muchamad Ali Safa'at; Aan Eko Widiarto; Indah Dwi Qurbani
Yustisia Jurnal Hukum Vol 9, No 3: December 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v9i3.42003

This article will study whether original intent method able to find justice in constitution and formulate constitutional interpretation that will able to perform constitutional supremacy. This study uses a doctrinal approach or also referred to as the normative legal approach. The method taken in this writing is analysis descriptive which describes and analyses constitutional interpretation with original intent method. Formulating constitution interpretation which answers people dynamic but doesn’t lose its original constitutional intent. This research shows that Constitutional interpretation with original intent method can mean as an interpretation which assimilate the spirit of how the original written constitution was formulated when building UUD 1945, the opinion of constitution’s founders in their understanding on the purpose and the nation’s ground principals. Basically, All the rules must not contradict with constitution’s intention. The freedom of judges to decide is not freedom without limits. The limitations of judges' freedom of interpretation are Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. Decisions made by judges must not conflict with Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution, constitutional judges have great power in interpreting the 1945 Constitution. This power is vulnerable to various interests which make the decisions of constitutional judges not objective. Accountability of decisions in public and academics should be a legal idea that can be realized, not to judge the verdict but to know the basis of interpretation and or legal discovery by constitutional judges

Dualisme Model Pengujian Peraturan Daerah Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja Nurul Aprianti; Muchamad Ali Safa’at; Indah Dwi Qurbani
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 9, No 2: August 2021 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v9i2.919

Tulisan bertujuan untuk menguraikan secara khusus tentang validitas norma dalam Pasal 181 ayat (2) Bab XIII Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja yang dikaitkan dengan model pengujian peraturan daerah melalui judicial review. Ketentuan tersebut mengatur mengenai harmonisasi dan sinkronisasi peraturan daerah yang dilakukan oleh Pemerintah. Adapun menurut Pasal 24A ayat (1) UUD NRI Tahun 1945 kewenangan menguji peraturan perundang-undangan di bawah Undang-Undang terhadap Undang-Undang berada di tangan Mahkamah Agung melalui mekanisme judicial review. Hal tersebut juga ditegaskan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Putusan Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015 dan Nomor 56/PUU-XIV/2016 terkait pembatalan norma pengujian peraturan daerah oleh Pemerintah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Analisis dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan kemudian dianalisis berdasarkan teori hukum yang terkait. Hasil kajian penelitian ini adalah bahwa norma Pasal 181 ayat (2) Bab XIII Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja tersebut invalid. Konsep mekanisme harmonisasi dan sinkronisasi peraturan daerah yang dilakukan oleh Pemerintah alangkah sebaiknya dibatasi pada saat masih berupa rancangan peraturan daerah. Hal tersebut guna untuk mewujudkan kepastian hukum sehingga penegakan hukum menjadi lebih efektif dan efisien.

Welfare Detection and Legal Effectiveness: Country Institutions Which the Authority is Regulated in Law in the Disputes of Authority Demas Brian W; Sudarsono Sudarsono; Rachmad Safa’at; Muchamad Ali Safa’at
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Vol 3, No 1 (2020): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute February
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v3i1.739

Institutional design of the state with separation of powers and checks and balance give birth to the intersection of authority. This condition has the potential to create a power dispute between state institutions. Provisions regarding the resolution of disputes over state institutions are inseparable from issues concerning subjectum and objectum litis which have become jurisprudential and the institution is independent and is not subordinate to other institutions, so there are several state institutions that cannot resolve disputes in the Constitutional Court, namely state institutions that regulate them outside the Constitution, whether regulated by law or under the law. The purpose of this study is to describe the provisions of dispute resolution for the authority of state agencies which the authority is regulated in law. This journal research uses a qualitative paradigm with a phenomenological approach in the translation. The results obtained in this study are: 1) Detection of Welfare which will be realized in maximum when all state agencies effective in operation; 2) Paradigm: Analysis of Dispute Authority of State Institutions. On the basis of a modern legal state, disputes over the authority of state institutions that are formed based on the law, need to be channeled to settle so that they remain based on due process of law and there are no rules in the process of resolving disputes over the authority of state institutions in the law.

CRITICAL LEGAL STUDIES (CLS): AN ALTERNATIVE FOR CRITICAL LEGAL THINKING IN INDONESIA Muchamad Ali Safa’at; Milda Istiqomah
PETITA: JURNAL KAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DAN SYARIAH Vol 7 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : LKKI Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/petita.v7i1.122

This article discusses Critical Legal Studies (CLS) as the critical study of the law that opposes the doctrine of legal formalism. As a form of critical study, CLS accommodates not only Marxist legal ideas but also liberalist-radical and postmodernist ones. This article aims to describe the ideas contained within CLS from the perspectives of various legal experts and identify its advantages and disadvantages, as well as its context with the legal development in Indonesia. The normative research method was utilized for the investigation and analysis of the existing legal doctrines. This article concludes with a critique of the law in Indonesia at present and an explanation as to how the ideas of CLS may be utilized as another radical alternative for solving legal problems in Indonesia. Abstrak: Artikel ini membahas mengenai Critical Legal Studies (CLS) sebagai studi kritis hukum yang menentang doktrin formalisme hukum. Sebagai bentuk kajian kritis, CLS tidak hanya menampung ide-ide hukum Marxis, tetapi juga liberalis-radikal dan postmodernis. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi secara singkat gagasan-gagasan yang terkandung dalam CLS dari berbagai pakar hukum, kelebihan dan kekurangannya, serta konteksnya dengan perkembangan hukum di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode normatif untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis keberadaan doktrin-doktrin hukum. Artikel ini diakhiri dengan kritik terhadap hukum di Indonesia saat ini dan bagaimana gagasan CLS dapat dimanfaatkan sebagai alternatif radikal lain dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan hukum di Indonesia.Kata Kunci: Studi Kritis Hukum, Doktrin Formalisme Hukum, Alternatif Radikal.

The Roles of the Indonesian Constitutional Court in Determining State-Religion Relations Muchamad Ali Safa'at
Constitutional Review Vol 8, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/consrev815

Indonesia is neither a religious state nor a secular state. Based on the Pancasila state ideology and the 1945 Constitution, Indonesia adheres to a symbiotic model in which the state and religion are different entities but have a mutually influencing relationship. This relationship pattern can be seen from several laws that regulate issues related to religion, especially Islam, which is embraced by the majority of Indonesians. As a political product, the pattern of relations between the state and religion in the law is dynamic. However, in accordance with the principles of a democratic rule of law, the dynamics of democratic politics are controlled by legal instruments, one of which is through the authority to review laws as one of the powers of the Constitutional Court. The Constitutional Court’s decisions in cases of judicial review of laws related to religion reinforce the model of the symbiotic relationship between the state and religion. Such decisions affirmed Pancasila as a model of Indonesian secularity that is needed for the sake of individual rights and freedoms, to balance or reconcile religious diversity, social integration and national development, and the independent development of the functional domains of society.

Corporate Social Responsibility: A Constitutional Perspective Muchamad Ali Safa’at
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Originally, the concept of CSR was come from business ethic values that impose corporation’s ethical responsibly to their social and natural environment. That development of ethical business was part of social consciousness on the degradation of environment as impact of corporation activities. This reality also raised the deep environmental ethic or deep ecology which challenge anthropocentrism economical development and urged ecocentrism development. In Indonesia, this phenomenon was marked by the enactment of Act 4/1982 on Environmental Management.The constitutional debate on CSR just began when the Indonesian Constitutional Court heard and decided the judicial review case of Act 40/2007 on Limited Liability Company which stipulate CSR mandatory law for corporation that have activity in natural resources areas. In its decision, Constitutional Court refused the petition. This means that the court affirmed that CSR mandatory law is not contrary to the Constitution. However, the legal argumentation of the court was not shifted from economical and environmental perspectives. The constitutional basis of the decision is Article 33 (4) concerning national economic principles and Article 33 (3) concerning state power on land, water, and natural resources. The Constitutional Court did not use the human rights concept as the source of CSR mandatory law.In constitutional law perspective, we can justify the CSR mandatory law from human rights guarantee on the constitution. CSR is one of the obligations to respect, to protect, to fulfill, and to promote human rights. Those obligations are not only bind over the government, but also corporation and all citizens. In that perspective, CSR should be mandatory law not only for the corporation which manage or correlate with natural resource, but for all corporations that operate in the middle of the society.

Kebijakan Pengelolaan Tambang dan Masyarakat Hukum Adat yang Berkeadilan Ekologis Muchamad Ali Safaat; Aan Eko Widiarto; Fajar Laksono Suroso
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 15, No 4 (2018)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah: pertama, bagaimana kebijakan pengelolaan sumber daya pertambangan berdasarkan undang-undang pertambangan mineral dan batubara? Kedua, bagaimana kebijakan pengelolaan sumber daya pertambangan perspektif masyarakat hukum adat yang berkeadilan ekologis? Metode penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa, pertama, kebijakan pengelolaan sumber daya pertambangan berdasarkan undang-undang pertambangan mineral dan batubara saat ini hendaknya disesuaikan dengan putusan-putusan mahkamah konstitusi dan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah dalam konteks perizinan. Pemerintah daerah provinsi sekarang ini mengambil alih kewenangan pemerintah kabupaten/kota untuk mengeluarkan izin tambang berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 tahun 2014 yang sebenarnya masih bersifat semi sentralistik dan secara kewilayahannya dalam konteks tambang masih berada di kabupaten, sementara pemerintah provinsi sebagai wakil dari pemerintah pusat; kedua, Kebijakan pengelolaan sumber daya pertambangan perspektif masyarakat hukum adat yang berkeadilan ekologis terletak pada konsep kearifan masyarakat hukum adat dalam pengelolaan sumber daya alam, dalam hal ini tambang yang menjadi hak penguasaan negara. Terdapat hubungan timbal balik antara manusia dengan alam, dimana masyarakat hukum adat selalu menempatkan keseimbangan alam dalam pengelolaan lingkungan (participerend cosmisch), sehingga keadilan ekologis dapat dirasakan semua unsur alam, selain manusia.The problems in this paper are: first, what are the mining resource management policies based on mineral and coal mining laws? and second, how is the mining resource management perspective of the ecological justice community indigenous people? This research method uses normative legal research with the classification of secondary data including primary legal materials including legislation in the fields of mineral and coal mining, environmental protection and management, and regional government. Secondary legal material in the form of books and journals, while secondary legal material in the form of online news. Data analysis using qualitative juridical analysis. The results of this study are first, current mining resource management policies based on mineral and coal mining laws should be adjusted to the decisions of the constitutional court and Law No. 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government in the context of licensing. The provincial government is currently taking over the authority of the district / city government to issue mining permits under Law No. 23 of 2014 which are actually still semi-centralistic and in the territory in the context of mines still in the district, while the provincial government is the representative of the central government; secondly, the policy of managing mining resources from the perspective of indigenous peoples with ecological justice lies in the concept of indigenous peoples’ wisdom in managing natural resources, in this case mining which is the state’s right of control. There is a reciprocal relationship between humans and nature, where customary law communities always place natural balance in environmental management (participerend cosmisch), so that ecological justice can be felt by all elements of nature, other than humans.

Pengujian Ketentuan Penghapusan Norma dalam Undang-Undang Muchamad Ali Safa’at
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 1 (2010)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Theoretically and practically (judicial review), include two types, namely formal verification (formale toetsingrecht) and material verification (materielle toetsingrecht). The formal verification is an authority of assessing whether or not a legislative product is produced in accordance with the prevailing procedures. While a material verification is an authority to examine and measure whether or not a legal regulation contradicts with a higher level regulation, as well as whether or not an authority has the right to establish a certain regulation. Article 51 paragraph (3) of Law Number 24 Year 2003 regarding Constitutional Court state about it. In this context, material verification include extensive material, ie the whole matter of law, in part, or a small part of a word or even punctuation that can affect the norm. Thus, the provisions not only affect the meaning, but even the existence of a norm should be examined by the Constitutional Court. In addition, the loss of norms can violate constitutional the rights of citizens’.

The Domination Of Indonesian Ulama Council Withhold Law Of Halal Product Guarantee Muchamad Ali Safa'at
Arena Hukum Vol. 15 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2022.01502.3

In the relation of law and politic perspective, law is not a neutral entity. Law is a battleground domain for political interests and as instrument of group domination. It can be seen in the formation and implementation of the Halal Law. This research aims to analyze the role of Indonesian Ulama Council (MUI) in the formation and implementation of the Halal Product Guarantee Act. This research uses socio legal method. The research result shows that MUI dominates by hold up the formation and implementation of the Halal Law. This is done by dominating the legitimacy of identity as a religious organization and using a network of organizations and political actors so that the process of establishing rules and administering halal law by BPJPH is hampered. Delegitimacy and disturbance are also experienced through requests for judicial review of the Halal Certification Law to the Constitutional Court and lawsuits to the courts.

PEMAKNAAN NORMA HAK ASASI MANUSIA DALAM UUD 1945 BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI Aan Eko Widiarto; Muchamad Ali Safa'at; Mardian Wibowo
Arena Hukum Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

AbstractThe authority of judicial review of Â an Act by the Constitutional Court has a strategic position in strengthening the rule of law in Indonesia, which is one of the characteristics is the recognition and protection of human rights. The Constitutional Court in exercising judicial review authority has interpreted various provisions of the 1945 Constitution on human rights. Some of which reinforce the meaning as grammatically read in the 1945 Constitution, but there are also decisions that mean differently than the grammatical meaning. This research was conducted to know the meaning of the provisions in the 1945 Constitution which regulate human rights, and to know whether through the Constitutional Court decision even change the meaning of human rights. This research method is normative juridical research. The approach used includes theoretical approach and conceptual approach. Based on the analysis of legal materials used in this study concluded that the decisions of the Constitutional Court other than affirm the meaning of human rights as contained in the 1945 Constitution, the Constitutional Court through its decision also has shifted (expand) some of the meaning of human rights contained in the 1945 Constitution.Â AbstrakKewenangan pengujian undang-undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi menempati posisi strategis dalam penguatan negara hukum di Indonesia, yang salah satu cirinya adalah adanya pengakuan dan perlindungan terhadap hak asasi manusia. MK dalam menjalankan kewenangan pengujian undang-undang telah menafsirkan berbagai ketentuan UUD 1945 mengenai hak asasi manusia, yang beberapa penafsiran tersebut menguatkan makna sebagaimana secara gramatikal terbaca dalam UUD 1945 namun terdapat pula putusan yang memaknai secara berbeda dibandingkan makna gramatikal UUD 1945. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui makna ketentuan dalam UUD 1945 yang mengatur mengenai hak asasi manusia, serta untuk mengetahui apakah melalui putusan MK terjadi pergeseran bahkan perubahan makna hak asasi manusia dimaksud. Metode penelitian ini berbentuk penelitian yuridis normatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan meliputi pendekatan teoretis (theoretical approach), dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Berdasarkan analisis bahan hukum yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini disimpulkan bahwa putusan-putusan MK selain menegaskan makna hak asasi manusia sebagaimana terdapat dalam UUD 1945, MK melalui putusannya juga telah menggeser (memperluas) sebagian makna hak asasi manusia yang tercantum di dalam UUD 1945.

Co-Authors A.A. Ketut Agung Cahyawan W Aan Eko Widiarto Adithya Tri Firmansyah R Agnes Harvelian Aritonang, Syofina Dwi Putri Demas Brian W Dhia Al Uyun, Dhia Fadli, Moh. Faisyah, Nur Fajar Laksono Fajar Laksono Suroso Fajar Laksono Suroso, Fajar Laksono I Dewa Gde Mayun Permana I Nyoman Nurjaya Indah Dwi Qurbani Mardian Wibowo Milda Istiqomah Muhammad Nur Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo Nur Rizkiya Muhlas Nurul Aprianti Rachmad Safa’at Reza Guritna Hutama Riana Susmayanti Sholahuddin Al-Fatih Sudarsono Sudarsono Tunggul Ansari Setia Negara

Title

Found 29 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 29 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 29 Documents
Search