Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

TINDAKAN PEMUTUSAN AKSES INTERNET OLEH PEMERINTAH DALAM PERSPEKTIF NEGARA HUKUM YANG DEMOKRATIS Adi Prasetyo; Made Warka
YUSTISI Vol 10 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/yustisi.v10i2.14733

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji, dari perspektif negara hukum yang demokratis, pemblokiran akses internet oleh pemerintah sebagai upaya pencegahan kerusuhan. Metode penelitian ini bersifat normatif karena menggunakan teknik penulisan deskriptif-analitik, pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus, serta pengumpulan bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Temuan penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa, baik dari segi prosedural maupun substantif, tindakan pemutusan akses internet oleh pemerintah di Papua merupakan tindakan ilegal yang dilakukan oleh pejabat pemerintah, karena masih terdapat prinsip-prinsip negara hukum demokrasi yang belum terpenuhi dalam tindakan tersebut. menghentikan akses internet dalam situasi darurat. Jika negara dinyatakan dalam keadaan darurat, diharapkan pemerintah menetapkan mekanisme atau kebijakan pembatasan atau pemutusan akses internet sesuai dengan undang-undang. Hal ini dimaksudkan untuk menjamin kepastian hukum dalam melindungi hak asasi manusia dan mencegah penyalahgunaan wewenang. Sehingga keputusan dapat diambil sesuai dengan prinsip negara hukum yang demokratis dan pemerintahan yang sehat. Kata kunci: Pemutusan Internert; Negara Hukum; Perlindungan Hukum.

TINDAKAN PEMUTUSAN AKSES INTERNET OLEH PEMERINTAH DALAM PERSPEKTIF NEGARA HUKUM YANG DEMOKRATIS Adi Prasetyo; Made Warka
YUSTISI Vol 10 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/yustisi.v10i2.14733

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji, dari perspektif negara hukum yang demokratis, pemblokiran akses internet oleh pemerintah sebagai upaya pencegahan kerusuhan. Metode penelitian ini bersifat normatif karena menggunakan teknik penulisan deskriptif-analitik, pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus, serta pengumpulan bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Temuan penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa, baik dari segi prosedural maupun substantif, tindakan pemutusan akses internet oleh pemerintah di Papua merupakan tindakan ilegal yang dilakukan oleh pejabat pemerintah, karena masih terdapat prinsip-prinsip negara hukum demokrasi yang belum terpenuhi dalam tindakan tersebut. menghentikan akses internet dalam situasi darurat. Jika negara dinyatakan dalam keadaan darurat, diharapkan pemerintah menetapkan mekanisme atau kebijakan pembatasan atau pemutusan akses internet sesuai dengan undang-undang. Hal ini dimaksudkan untuk menjamin kepastian hukum dalam melindungi hak asasi manusia dan mencegah penyalahgunaan wewenang. Sehingga keputusan dapat diambil sesuai dengan prinsip negara hukum yang demokratis dan pemerintahan yang sehat. Kata kunci: Pemutusan Internert; Negara Hukum; Perlindungan Hukum.

Analysis of Inventory As An Object of Fiduciary Security In Credit Agreements Juridical Philosophical And Sociological Review Happy Trizna Wijaya; Made Warka; Krisnadi Nasution
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i1.288

The development of the global economy is progressing rapidly in line with the dynamics of globalization. To support economic activities, large amounts of capital are required that are quick and easy to access. One of the ways to obtain such funds is by applying for credit through financial institutions. In the credit application process, collateral or security is typically required to guarantee the debt. One such object of fiduciary security is inventory. Inventory is a type of movable property that can serve as fiduciary collateral. This study aims to examine the concept of inventory as fiduciary collateral and to analyze its philosophical, juridical, and sociological foundations. The findings indicate that inventory, as fiduciary collateral, may include raw materials, goods in process, and finished goods. Philosophically, this type of collateral is based on a relationship of trust between creditor and debtor, particularly regarding the repayment of debt as agreed upon using the specified collateral.Juridically, the use of inventory as fiduciary collateral is regulated under Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Security, specifically in the Elucidation of Article 6 letter c. The unique characteristic of inventory lies in its dynamic and transferable nature, which results in the principle of droit de suite (right of pursuit) not being applicable. This is further emphasized in Articles 20 through 24 of the Fiduciary Security Law. Sociologically, fiduciary security agreements involving inventory contribute positively to economic activities within society and support the realization of equitable, prosperous, and just welfare.

Legal Consequences of the Non-Functioning of Contradictoire Delimitatie in the Systematic Land Registration Program (PTSL) Andry Rudiman; Made Warka; Sjaifurrachman Sjaifurrachman
International Journal of Sociology and Law Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): August : International Journal of Sociology and Law
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijsl.v2i3.713

Measurement is a crucial initial step in the land registration process, as stipulated in Article 19 paragraph (2) letter a of the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). Article 17 of Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 on Land Registration emphasizes that measurements must be supported by physical data and boundary arrangements based on the agreement of adjacent landowners. One key principle in this process is the contradictoire delimitatie principle, which requires the presence of interested parties during the determination of land boundaries. This thesis aims to analyze the function of contradictoire delimitatie in the measurement results of the Complete Systematic Land Registration Program (PTSL), as well as to examine the legal consequences if this principle is not implemented. The study is expected to contribute to the development of legal knowledge in the field of land affairs and serve as a reference for academics, legal practitioners, judicial institutions, law enforcement officials, and land authorities. In practice, if the subject of a land parcel is unknown, information is obtained from neighboring landowners, community leaders, or relevant officials, and recorded in the Measurement Sketch (Gambar Ukur or GU). If boundary agreements have not been reached, dotted lines are used to indicate temporary boundaries. When the Work Map is attached to the GU, the landowner or their representative may sign it as a form of boundary agreement. The absence of the contradictoire delimitatie principle hinders the measurement process, map creation, land registration, and issuance of land rights certificates. Furthermore, unclear or poorly maintained boundaries often lead to overlapping claims and disputes in the field.

The Concept of Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) in Providing Legal Certainty Guarantees to Land Rights Holders Anna Martina Anggitasari; Made Warka; Sjaifurrachman Sjaifurrachman
International Journal of Sociology and Law Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): August : International Journal of Sociology and Law
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijsl.v2i3.716

This study aims to identify and analyze the ratio legis of the principle that the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) program needs to be regulated and adhered to. Furthermore, this research also seeks to examine the legal consequences of the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) program. The awareness of the special position of land in the Indonesian national consciousness is also revealed in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA), which states the eternal relationship between the Indonesian people and the land. However, the term “controlled” in Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution does not imply that the state is the owner. The general explanation of the 1960 UUPA clarifies that the state (government) only controls the land. The meaning of land being “controlled” does not equate to “owned” but rather refers to certain authorities granted to the state as a power organization. Ownership of land rights must be proven by authentic or valid evidence in the form of a land rights certificate, where such certified ownership is an absolute requirement. Therefore, the Indonesian Government, through the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency Number 6 of 2018 concerning Complete Systematic Land Registration, aims to facilitate the implementation of systematic and complete land registration as a government program. From this explanation, it can be concluded that the ratio legis of the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) program principle requires regulation and adherence to provide guarantees of legal certainty, transparency of information related to land parcels that can be utilized by legitimate parties, and ensure orderly administration in the field of land affairs, thereby delivering benefits and justice.

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PEKERJA YANG DI PHK (PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA) PADA PASCA UNDANG UNDANG CIPTA KERJA Nururrohim, Tri Septiyo; Made Warka; Moh. Zeinuddin
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 4 No. 3: Agustus 2024
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53625/jirk.v4i3.8263

Pemerintah Indonesia membuat UU Cipta Kerja dengan menggunakan konsep Omnibus Law untuk memudahkan iklim berusaha di Indonesia. Arah kebijakan lahirnya UU Undang Undang Cipta Kerja adalah paradigma pertumbuhan ekonomi namun memunculkan sejumlah problematika normatif, khususnya terkait pasal-pasal jaminan hak-hak bagi pekerja yang dianggap bertentangan dengan cita-cita hukum masyarakat Indonesia. Pada pasal 154A UU no 6 tahun 2023 ada beberapa tambahan poin alasan perusahaan boleh melakukan PHK jika dibandingkan UU no. 13 tahun 2003 tentang ketenagakerjaan. Sedangkan besaran pesangon pekerja yang di PHK hanya 0,5 (nol koma 5) kali ketentuan pasal 40 ayat (2) dalam PP no 35 tahun 2021. Pasca diberlakukannya UU. No 6 tahun 2023 tentang Cipta Kerja, pasal 156 ayat (4) poin c dalam UU no. 13 tahun 2003 tentang ketenagakerjaan dihapus sehingga tidak ada penggantian perumahan, pengobatan dan perawatan. Perlindungan hukum terkait hak-hak pekerja yang di PHK pasca diberlakukannya UU Cipta Kerja diatur dalam Pasal 151 ayat (1), pasal 154A ayat (1), pasal 156 UU No. 6 Tahun 2023. Akibat Hukum terhadap Pekerja yang di PHK (Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja) pada Pasca Undang Undang Cipta Kerja adalah status pekerja berubah menjadi non pekerja dan perusahaan tidak berkewajiban memberikan upah atau gaji lagi. Pekerja yang di PHK memiliki hak untuk mendapatkan uang pesangon, uang penghargaan masa kerja, dan uang penggantian hak lainnya sebagaimana dalam pasal 156 UU No. 6 Tahun 2023 dan dalam Pasal 52 ayat (1) PP No. 35 Tahun 2021

PROBLEMS IN REGULATING CHILD NEGLECT: REGULATORY LIMITATIONS IN INDONESIA M. Tantowi Nur Ansori; Made Warka
Akrab Juara : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Vol. 10 No. 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Yayasan Azam Kemajuan Rantau Anak Bengkalis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

The issue of child abandonment in Indonesian marriage law has significant implications for legal certainty and the protection of children's rights. Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage (as amended by Law No. 16/2019) regulates the status of legitimate and illegitimate children through the provisions of Articles 42, 43, and 44, while the Compilation of Islamic Law views marriage as a contract that creates a legal relationship and parental obligations towards children. Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 expanded access to proof of kinship by including scientific and technological evidence. However, the practice of abandonment—including cases that have attracted public attention—demonstrates gaps in the evidentiary system, the risk of subordination of children's rights, and the impact on children's inheritance rights and social status. This study uses a normative juridical approach and case studies to analyze regulations, judicial decisions, and the implications of the practice of abandonment for children's interests. The results of the study indicate: (1) a misalignment between formal legal provisions and evidentiary mechanisms in practice; (2) The Constitutional Court's decision opens up opportunities for rights restoration through scientific evidence, but its implementation is still hampered by access and understanding by relevant parties; and (3) child protection requires more responsive legal mechanisms and supporting policies to ensure legal certainty and the fulfillment of children's rights. It is recommended to strengthen procedures for proving kinship, educate the public about the law, and improve access to forensic/medical services to support fair court decisions that support the best interests of children.

Title

Found 17 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 17 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 17 Documents
Search