Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG BERHUBUNGAN DENGAN MUTU PELAYANAN KESEHATAN DI PUSKESMAS KARADENAN KECAMATAN CIBINONG KABUPATEN BOGOR TAHUN 2018 Matondang, Maya Rahmayati; Madjid, T Abdul; Chotimah, Indira
PROMOTOR Vol 2 No 4 (2019)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Kesehatan, Universitas Ibn Khaldun, Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (462.3 KB) | DOI: 10.32832/pro.v2i4.2240

Abstract

Service quality yang tinggi merupakan faktor terpenting agar tercapainya mutu pelayanan kesehatan. Beberapa faktor yang mempengaruhi mutu pelayanan kesehatan adalah faktor tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, dan emphaty.Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan mutu pelayanan kesehatan di puskesmaskaradenan kecamatan cibinong kabupaten Bogor. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kuantitatif, dengan desain penelitian cross sectional. Populasi dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 2.449 pasien. Sampel dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 96 responden dengan teknik purposive sampling.Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu kuesioner. Cara yang digunakan dalam menganalisa data menggunakan perangkat lunak aplikasi statistik. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa faktor tangibles (p-value = 0,372), faktor reliability (p-value = 0,176), dan faktor responsiveness(p-value = 0,594) tidak terdapat hubungan dengan mutu pelayanan kesehatandi puskesmas karadenan. Sedangkan faktor assurance (p-value = 0,001), dan faktor emphaty (pvalue = 0,001) terdapat hubungan dengan mutu pelayanan kesehatan di puskesmas karadenan. Simpulan dalam penelitian ini yaitu pada variabel faktor tangibles, faktor reliability, dan faktor responsiveness tidak terdapat hubungan dengan mutu pelayanan kesehatan. Sedangkan pada variabel faktor assurance dan faktor emphaty terdapat hubungan dengan mutu pelayanan kesehatan di puskesmas karadenan.
REFORMULATING THE LEGAL STANDING OF INTERESTED THIRD PARTIES IN SUBMITTING PRETRIAL MOTIONS AGAINST THE TERMINATION OF INVESTIGATION OR PROSECUTION Enos Syahputra Sipahutar; Faizin Sulistio; Abdul Madjid
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): July
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i4.3142

Abstract

This article discusses the urgency and necessity of reformulating the scope of third parties with legal standing to file a pretrial motion against the termination of investigation or prosecution. The study is motivated by a pretrial case in which the petition was rejected on formal grounds regarding the petitioner's legal standing, despite substantive indications of injustice in the law enforcement process. This research adopts a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches. The findings indicate that the limited interpretation of “interested third parties” as provided by the Constitutional Court in Decision Number 98/PUU-X/2012 does not fully reflect the principle of justice. Therefore, a redefinition of the scope of third parties particularly including suspects/defendants/convicts in separate case files is necessary to ensure equal access to justice and prevent discrimination in legal proceedings.
Reconstruction Model of Legal Liability for the Misuse of Artificial Intelligence on Personal Data Privacy in Indonesia Khiswatul Barokah; Yuliati; Abdul Madjid
NEGREI: Academic Journal of Law and Governance Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The increasing integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in digital ecosystems has raised new legal challenges regarding data privacy violations. In Indonesia, the normative framework for personal data protection particularly the Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 27 of 2022) remains inadequate in addressing the autonomous nature of AI systems that process and exploit personal data without direct human intervention. This research aims to reconstruct a legal accountability model for actors who misuse AI in ways that lead to personal data violations. The study employs a normative juridical method using a statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach, referencing the European Union’s GDPR as a benchmark. The findings reveal that Indonesia’s current legal framework lacks clarity in assigning responsibility among key actors, such as developers, data controllers, and platform providers. The absence of provisions concerning algorithmic profiling, training data legality, and automated decision-making weakens the protection of individuals' digital rights. In contrast, international models particularly the GDPR offer a multi-tiered responsibility structure, prohibit fully automated decisions affecting individuals, and impose strict liability for data misuse. This research also demonstrates that adopting principles such as vicarious liability, corporate accountability, and risk-based regulation would fill regulatory gaps and align Indonesian law with international standards. The practical value of this work lies in its proposed model for reconstructing Indonesia’s data protection regime. It introduces legal tools that anticipate the systemic risks of AI while ensuring that legal responsibility is clearly distributed across all entities involved in AI deployment. This framework supports the development of a more responsive and equitable legal system in the era of autonomous technologies
RESOLVING CRIMINAL ACTS OF NARCOTICS THROUGH A RESTORATIVE JUSTICE APPROACH IN EAST JAVA Syarib Rama Indradi Mukti; Bambang Sugiri; Abdul Madjid
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): January
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v4i6.2384

Abstract

This study discussed the handling of narcotics abuse crimes through a restorative justice approach based on the Indonesian National Police Regulation Number 8 of 2021 regarding the Handling of Criminal Acts Based on Restorative Justice. According to this regulation, individuals involved in narcotics abuse could undergo a restorative justice approach, giving them the opportunity to undergo medical or social rehabilitation without having wait for a court decision. The aim of this study was to analyze the basic principles considered and the strategies used by the Police in handling narcotics abuse cases through the restorative justice approach. In determining these consederations, it was important to ensure that the steps taken were in accordance with applicable legal provisions, as well as addressing the challenges in implementing restorative justice, which required effective strategies, so that these considerations and strategies could result in legal benefit and justice. This study was an empirical research using a socio-legal or juridical-empirical method with a legal sociology approach. The study used primary data obtained through interviews with informants, and the secondary data in the form of bibliographical sources. The research data were analyzed using a qualitative descriptive method. The results of this study has ben showed that the investigators considerations in handling narcotics crimes through the restorative justice approach were based on the requirements and mechanisms for handling them in accordance with the Police Regulation. The investigators strategy was to enhance understanding of the concept of restorative justice in order to overcome the challenges such as the low submission of Integrated Assesments and the lack of understanding among offenders about the concepts of restorative justice.
Reconstructing Legal Frameworks for Post-Mining Reclamation Guarantees and Ecological Justice Angga Kurniawan; Abdul Madjid; Istislam Istislam
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol. 10 No. 3 (2025): OCTOBER
Publisher : Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v10i3.12779

Abstract

This study analyzes the effectiveness of post-mining reclamation guarantee fund regulations in achieving environmental restoration and reconstructs a normative framework oriented toward ecological justice. The current reduction of reclamation guarantees to mere administrative requirements demonstrates the failure of the law to provide substantive protection for citizens’ constitutional rights to a healthy environment. Using normative juridical research with legislative, conceptual, and historical approaches, this study employs prescriptive–analytical methods to evaluate the gap between legal norms and practice and to formulate a responsive legal model. The findings reveal that reclamation guarantee funds have not effectively functioned as substantive legal instruments due to regulatory disharmony between the Minerba Law and the Environmental Protection and Management Law (UUPPLH), weak supervision, and the absence of strict sanctions. The study proposes a reconstruction of the legal framework through harmonization of environmental and mining regulations, adoption of the polluter pays and strict liability principles, and strengthening of interagency coordination. In addition, the establishment of a transparent and participatory Multi-Stakeholder Monitoring Board and a public e-monitoring system is recommended to ensure accountability and ecological restoration. The novelty of this research lies in integrating constitutional and environmental justice perspectives into a double-track sanction system that combines preventive and repressive functions of reclamation guarantees. This approach advances the eco-constitutional paradigm by linking legal certainty, environmental accountability, and participatory governance in post-mining management.