Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.949
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Jurnal Hukum Sasana Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research J-CEKI Bhayangkara Law Review
Hotma P. Sibuea
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 16 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research

 1 
Kewenangan Penyidik dan Penuntut Umum KPK untuk Melakukan Perampasan Aset Terdakwa yang Belum Diputus oleh Pengadilan dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pangihutan, Timothy; Sibuea, Hotma P.; Sugeng, Sugeng
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 4 No. 5 (2024): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v4i5.13113

Abstract

This research aims to describe the weaknesses in the regulation of asset confiscation in criminal acts of corruption in cases of defendants who have not yet received a court decision and to describe the regulation of asset confiscation of the assets of a defendant in a criminal act of corruption who dies before a decision is made in terms of the principle of separation of powers. The research method used is a normative approach method. Based on the research results, the weakness of the regulation of confiscation of assets in criminal acts of corruption in cases of defendants who have not received a court decision lies in the regulation of confiscation of state losses which is not regulated in the Corruption Crime Law, so that it is then misinterpreted as if it cannot be confiscated. Furthermore, the regulation of asset confiscation of the assets of a corruption defendant who dies before a verdict is reached must be regulated in the Corruption Crimes Law, meaning that the Corruption Eradication Commission can confiscate state losses based on the Corruption Eradication Committee investigator as prosecutor.
Co-Authors Ali Johardi ARIF KURNIAWAN Atmoko, Dwi Budi Budaya Dewi, Intan Permata Dwi Seno Wijanarko Efrianto, Gatot Elfirda Ade Putri Ferry Setiawan Ika Dewi Sartika Saimima Indra Lorenly Nainggolan Katrina Siagian Mau, Hedwig Adianto Muhapilah, Siti Opih Noviriska Nur Husein Amrah Nusonegara, Raja Akbar Pangihutan, Timothy Rahmat Saputra Safarin Novarizal Sinaulan, R. Lina Sugeng Sugeng Syahban Syahruddin, Erwin Tumanggor, M. S. Widijowati, Rr. Dijan Wijanarko, Dwi Seno