Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.363
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH JURNAL MERCATORIA Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Kosmik Hukum Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Literacy : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities
Putri Rumondang Siagian
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

 1 
Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Larangan Pengajuan Praperadilan Oleh Orang Yang Berstatus Daftar Pencarian Orang (DPO) Putri Rumondang Siagian; Syafruddin Kalo; Edi Yunara; Muhammad Hamdan
Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Vol 2, No 3 (2021): Oktober 2021 - Januari 2022
Publisher : Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55357/is.v2i3.177

Abstract

This thesis is motivated by the principle of the rule of law which guarantees human rights to form the concept of pre-trial. Pre-trial in principle aims to carry out horizontal oversight of all acts of forced effort by law enforcers in the interests of criminal cases so that these actions do not conflict with legal and statutory regulations in addition to internal supervision within the apparatus itself. La Nyalla's pre-trial request as a suspect who fled or are in the status of a list of people search (DPO) status was learned that even though he was a DPO, La Nyalla won a pre-trial lawsuit which was stated through Court Decision Number: 19 / Pra.Per / 2016 / PN.Sby. After the pre-trial decision filed by the DPO suspect, the Supreme Court issued a Circular of the Supreme Court (SEMA) No. 1 of 2018 on March 23, 2018, discusses the prohibition on pre-trial submissions for suspects who have fled or are on the status of a search list (DPO). But the rules of SEMA No. 1 of 2018 seems to be deviated from the granting of pre-trial requests from suspects with DPO status through Court Decision Number 23 / Pid.Pra / 2018 / PN Pbr and Court Decision No.8 / Pid.Pra / 2018 / PN. Plw. Determination of DPO is a consequence of suspects who do not attend to the investigator's summons as stated in Article 112 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code after proper calling is carried out in accordance with procedural rules. If viewed from Article 79 of the Criminal Procedure Code which regulates the submission of pre-trial, there is a limitation of the right of the suspect to file a pre-trial application for the suspect himself. The problem in this study is how are the pre-trial arrangements in the Criminal Procedure Code and the Criminal Procedure Code? how is the position of SEMA No. 1 of 2018 in legislation? How is the position of the suspect who is a DPO in filing a pre-trial application? This study uses theory. The method used in this study is a normative legal research and  descriptive analytical. This study uses secondary data sources. This secondary data uses 3 (three) sources of data, namely primary legal material, secondary legal material, tertiary legal material. This data collection method is obtained from the library research. Data collection tool is done by studying documents. Analysis using the qualitative method then emphasizes the deductive method. The results of this study indicate that the KUHAP and RKUHAP through the commissioners' judges have given the suspect and the related parties the right to make horizontal supervision efforts on the actions of the investigator. SEMA is not authorized to prohibit citizens' rights. The position of SEMA No.1 Year 2018 is part of the legislation which is the nature of policy rules by binding to Supreme Court agencies as regulators Court Decision Number 23 / Pid.Pra / 2018 / PN Pbr and Decision No.8 / Pid.Pra / 2018 / PN. Plw became a breakthrough for pre-trial single judges in providing justice to suspects with DPO status for filing pre-trial
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Bedah Plastik Estetik yang Merubah Fitur Wajah Tengku Keizerina Devi Azwar; Arya Tjipta Prananda; Eva Syahfitri Nasution; Putri Rumondang Siagian; Hilbertus Sumplisius M. Wau; Utary Maharany Barus
JURNAL MERCATORIA Vol. 16 No. 1 (2023): JURNAL MERCATORIA JUNI
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/mercatoria.v16i1.8433

Abstract

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertanggungjawaban hukum dalam bedah plastik estetik yang mengubah fitur wajah, mengingat kemajuan teknologi alat kedokteran dan ketidakpuasan seseorang terhadap wajahnya yang diberikan oleh Tuhan Yang Maha Esa. Penelitian dilakukan dengan sudut pandang penerapan Undang-undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 tentang Kesehatan. Dokter yang melakukan pembedahan plastik sering kali melakukan kesalahan, baik sengaja maupun lalai hingga menimbulkan korban. Oleh karenanya, dokter tidak akan terlepas dari jeratan hukum maupun sanksi akibat tindakannya. Fokus masalahnya tentang pengaturan bedah plastik estetik di Indonesia dan tanggung jawab hukum dokter dalam melakukan bedah plastik estetik yang mengubah fitur wajah. Kajian ini menggunakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan, teknik pengumpulan data melalui studi kepustakaan yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil kajian menyimpulkan bahwa hubungan antara dokter dan pasien terjadi karena adanya perjanjian timbal balik yang menimbulkan hak dan kewajiban. Dokter berjanji untuk merubah atau menyempurnakan bagian tertentu dari pasien pada bagian wajah, sedangkan pasien berjanji untuk membayar biaya pengobatan, perawatan, dan pembedahannya. Jika salah satu pihak tidak memenuhi atau melanggar perjanjian tersebut, maka pasien dapat menuntut dokter berdasarkan Pasal 1239 KUHPerdata. Selain itu, masing-masing pihak yang dirugikan dapat menuntut dengan gugatan berdasarkan wanprestasi.
PENERAPAN PRINSIP DUE PROCESS OF LAW TERHADAP KEABSAHAN PENETAPAN TERSANGKA YANG TIDAK DIDAHULUI PEMERIKSAAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 10/Pid.Pra/2024/PN Bdg) Maulia Permata Rizki Pohan; Edi Yunara; Putri Rumondang Siagian
Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi Vol 14, No 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi
Publisher : Universitas Galuh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25157/justisi.v14i1.22955

Abstract

Prinsip due process of law dalam hukum acara pidana Indonesia menuntut agar setiap proses hukum dijalankan sesuai standar negara hukum yang menjunjung keadilan dan perlindungan hak individu. Prinsip ini menekankan pentingnya perlakuan adil terhadap tersangka, termasuk hak untuk menyampaikan pendapat dan didampingi penasihat hukum. Penelitian ini membahas penerapan prinsip tersebut dalam penetapan tersangka yang tidak didahului pemeriksaan, berdasarkan Putusan Nomor 10/Pid.Pra/2024/PN Bdg. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan studi undang-undang dan analisis putusan pengadilan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyidik tidak menjalankan kewajibannya sesuai prinsip due process karena tidak memberikan kesempatan kepada pemohon untuk menjelaskan kronologi peristiwa. Hakim dalam putusannya mengabulkan permohonan praperadilan, menyatakan penetapan tersangka tidak sah, memerintahkan penghentian penyidikan, dan memulihkan hak-hak pemohon. Studi ini menegaskan bahwa cacat prosedural dalam penetapan tersangka merupakan pelanggaran serius terhadap due process of law yang seharusnya disertai pertanggungjawaban etik, administratif, perdata, hingga pidana bagi penyidik yang melanggarnya.
Economic Globalization and Legal Sovereignty: Who Owns Copyright in Indonesia? T. Keizerina Devi Azwar; Yati Sharfina Desiandri; Putri Rumondang Siagian
LITERACY : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): August : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities 
Publisher : Badan Penerbit STIEPARI Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56910/literacy.v3i2.3310

Abstract

Economic globalization has increasingly shaped the field of intellectual property rights (IPR), transforming copyright protection from a domestic matter into a strategic tool of global trade. Through international instruments such as the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) and the Berne Convention of 1886, universal copyright standards are enforced across jurisdictions. Yet this harmonization generates tension between international obligations and national legal sovereignty. This article employs a juridical-normative method with doctrinal, case study, and comparative approaches to examine these dynamics. The case of Auld Lang Syne illustrates how public domain works evolve into shared cultural heritage, while the dispute of Ahmad Dhani v. Once Mekel reveals persistent enforcement challenges in Indonesia. Comparative analysis of the United States, United Kingdom, Japan, and Indonesia demonstrates divergences in copyright duration, derivative work protection, and exceptions such as parody. The article argues that Indonesia must ground its response to globalization of IPR in Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution, thereby ensuring that national copyright law is not merely a passive rule taker within the global system but an active framework that safeguards cultural identity and national interests.
Urgensi Reformasi Hukum Pidana Hak Cipta terhadap Pembajakan Sinematografi di Media Sosial TikTok Indonesia Digital Oesman Bahari Abdullah; O.K. Saidin; Putri Rumondang Siagian
Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Vol 8, No 3 (2026): Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), Februari
Publisher : Mahesa Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34007/jehss.v8i3.3001

Abstract

Cinematographic piracy on TikTok presents a significant challenge to the enforcement of criminal copyright law in Indonesia. The platform’s short-video format, viral nature, and monetization potential have facilitated the widespread distribution of unauthorized film excerpts. Although Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright provides criminal sanctions for copyright infringement, its enforcement remains ineffective, primarily due to the classification of copyright offenses as complaint-based crimes. This study aims to examine the regulation of criminal copyright law in addressing film piracy on TikTok and to analyze the urgency of reforming the offense classification and adopting more adaptive criminal sanctions. This research employs a normative legal method with a juridical-normative approach, relying on statutory analysis, legal doctrines, and relevant scholarly literature. The findings indicate that the complaint-based offense mechanism and non-proportional sanctions relative to the perpetrators’ economic gains undermine deterrence and weaken copyright protection. Therefore, legal reform is necessary through the adoption of a mixed offense model based on the perpetrator’s characteristics and the implementation of adaptive sanctions to enhance the effectiveness of copyright law enforcement in the digital era.
The Paradox of Law Enforcement Press Conferences: A Comparative Study on Public Information and Suspects' Rights Putri Rumondang Siagian; Hendri Hendri; Fahrizal S.Siagian
Kosmik Hukum Vol. 26 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v26i3.28687

Abstract

This study examines the balance between public access to information and the protection of suspects’ rights in the practice of law enforcement press conferences in Indonesia, as well as its comparison with international standards. Public access to information is a constitutional right guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution and the Law on Public Information Disclosure, yet in practice it often clashes with fundamental rights of suspects protected under the Criminal Procedure Code, such as the right to privacy, humane treatment, and the presumption of innocence. Press conferences frequently disclose suspects’ identities or images and present official narratives that may create public perceptions of guilt before a final court judgment. Such practices generate social stigma, undermine dignity, and violate the principle of due process of law. This normative legal research employs statutory and comparative approaches, showing that the United Kingdom and France impose strict restrictions on the publication of suspects’ identities, while Indonesia tends to resemble Thailand, where protection remains weak. The comparison highlights a regulatory gap in Indonesia, indicating the need for more detailed rules governing press conferences, limitations on disclosed information, and independent oversight mechanisms. Accordingly, a proportional balance between the public’s right to information and the protection of suspects’ rights can be realized within the framework of a democratic rule of law.
Analyzing the Rationality of Criminal Sanctions for Copyright Offences in Indonesia's Creative Economy Putri Rumondang Siagian; Widad Azzuhdi Manurung
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol. 17 No. 2 (2026): August 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v17i2.17340

Abstract

Copyright infringement in Indonesia causes economic losses to creators and copyright holders while threatening the sustainability of the creative economy. To address this issue, Law No. 28 of 2014 provides criminal sanctions for certain copyright infringements. However, the use of criminal law remains controversial, particularly regarding the principles of ultimum remedium, proportionality, and the objectives of criminalisation. This study analyses the construction of copyright offences in Indonesian law, their relationship with creative economy protection, and the rationality of criminal sanctions based on the theory of the purpose of criminalisation. Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and policy approaches, the study analyses primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials through qualitative legal interpretation. The findings show that criminalisation is justified to protect the economic value of intellectual works and support the sustainability of the creative industry. Nevertheless, criminal sanctions should be applied selectively to serious, commercial infringements causing significant harm, consistent with the principle of ultimum remedium. The novelty of this research lies in examining copyright offences through the rationality of the purpose of criminalisation as a balanced instrument for protecting the creative economy, beyond conventional analyses of copyright protection and law enforcement effectiveness.
PENERAPAN ASAS DROIT DE SUITE TERHADAP BENDA JAMINAN FIDUSIA YANG DIJADIKAN BARANG BUKTI DALAM PERKARA NARKOTIKA (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Padang Sidempuan Nomor: 323/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Psp dan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Padang Sidempuan Nomor: 38/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Psp Verawaty Manalu Manalu Manalu; Putri Rumondang Siagian; Syarifah Lisa Andriati
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): February 2026
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v9i1.5931

Abstract

Abstract: The Criminal Code does not clearly state what is meant by evidence, but from the way of obtaining the evidence, it can be concluded that the definition of evidence is the result of a series of investigators' actions in confiscation and/or searches and/or examination of letters to take over and/or store under their control movable or intangible objects for the purpose of evidence in investigations, prosecutions and trials. In practice, confiscations carried out by investigators still often involve the rights of third parties, one of which is the confiscation of fiduciary collateral objects used to commit narcotics crimes. This study uses a normative legal research type supported by empirical data with data collection techniques in the form of interviews and literature studies. Data analysis is carried out qualitatively and produces research in the form of analytical description. The study concluded that there is a conflict between the state's authority to confiscate narcotics evidence and the rights of third parties as fiduciary recipients through the principle of droit de suite. In practice, investigators have difficulty accommodating requests for the return of evidence due to the complex process, limited time, and the weak legal standing of third parties. This requires consideration of utility and fairness, in accordance with the Fiduciary Guarantee Law's objective of supporting the development of the financing sector. The Padang Sidempuan District Court's decision No. 323/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Psp, which confiscated a vehicle belonging to a third party, demonstrates a lack of legal protection, while decision No. 38/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Psp, which returned the vehicle to the fiduciary recipient, reflects the appropriate, fair, and beneficial application of the droit de suite principle for third parties not involved in the crime. Keywords: droit de suite principle, fiduciary guarantee, confiscation, evidence, narcotics case. Abstrak: Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana tidak menyebutkan secara jelas tentang apa yang dimaksud dengan barang bukti, namun dari cara mendapatkan barang bukti tersebut dapatlah ditarik kesimpulan bahwa pengertian barang bukti adalah hasil serangkaian tindakan penyidik dalam penyitaan dan atau penggeledahan dan atau pemeriksaan surat untuk mengambil alih dan atau menyimpan dibawah penguasaannya benda bergerak atau tidak berwujud untuk kepentingan pembuktian dalam penyidikan, penuntutan dan peradilan. Dalam praktiknya, penyitaan yang dilakukan oleh penyidik masih sering melibatkan hak pihak ketiga salah satunya adalah penyitaan terhadap benda jaminan fidusia yang digunakan untuk melakukan tindak pidana narkotika. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian hukum normatif yang didukung dengan data empiris dengan teknik pengumpulan data berupa wawancara dan studi kepustakaan. Analisis data dilakukan secara kualitatif dan menghasilkan penelitian dalam bentuk deskriptif analitis. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa Terdapat konflik antara kewenangan negara melakukan penyitaan barang bukti narkotika dan hak pihak ketiga sebagai penerima fidusia melalui asas droit de suite. Dalam praktik, penyidik kesulitan mengakomodasi permohonan pengembalian barang bukti karena proses yang rumit, waktu terbatas, dan lemahnya posisi hukum pihak ketiga. Hal ini menuntut pertimbangan nilai kemanfaatan serta keadilan, sesuai tujuan UU Jaminan Fidusia untuk mendukung pembangunan sektor pembiayaan. Putusan PN Padang Sidempuan No. 323/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Psp yang merampas kendaraan milik pihak ketiga menunjukkan kurangnya perlindungan hukum, sedangkan putusan No. 38/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Psp yang mengembalikan kendaraan kepada penerima fidusia mencerminkan penerapan asas droit de suite yang tepat, adil, dan bermanfaat bagi pihak ketiga yang tidak terlibat tindak pidana. Kata Kunci: asas droit de suite, jaminan fidusia, penyitaan, barang bukti, perkara narkotika.
Co-Authors Azwar, Tengku Keizerina Devi Edi Yunara Eva Syahfitri Nasution, Eva Syahfitri Fahrizal S.Siagian Hendri Hendri Hilbertus Sumplisius M. Wau Maulia Permata Rizki Pohan Muhammad Hamdan O.K. Saidin Oesman Bahari Abdullah Syafruddin Kalo Syarifah Lisa Andriati T. Keizerina Devi Azwar Tjipta, Arya Utary Maharany Barus Verawaty Manalu Manalu Manalu Widad Azzuhdi Manurung Yati Sharfina Desiandri