Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.246
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pandecta Varia Justicia Borobudur Law Review Borobudur Law and Society Journal Borobudur Journal on Legal Services
Habib Muhsin Syafingi
Jl. Tidar 21 Magelang, Jawa Tengah Indonesia 56125
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 34 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 34 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Implementasi Peraturan Bupati Magelang No. 60 Tahun 2021 Tentang Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja dan Penanggulangan Kebakaran Septiantoro, Gilang; Adriantini Sintha Dewi, Dyah; Suharso, Suharso; Syafingi, Habib Muhsin
Borobudur Law and Society Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Vol 3 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31603/10125

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji implementasi Peraturan Bupati Magelang No. 60 Tahun 2021 terkait Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja dan Penanggulangan Kebakaran (Satpol PP dan Damkar) di Kabupaten Magelang, khususnya dalam wilayah Kecamatan Salaman. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah non-doctrinal atau penelitian yuridis empiris dengan pengumpulan data primer melalui kuisioner, wawancara, serta observasi dan dokumentasi sebagai data sekunder. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa implementasi peraturan tersebut meliputi berbagai tugas seperti pencegahan dan penanganan kebakaran, penyelamatan, pemberdayaan masyarakat, dan penanganan bahan berbahaya. Faktor penghambatnya antara lain jarak tempuh yang jauh, keterbatasan biaya, dan jumlah petugas yang kurang memadai. Misalnya, di Kecamatan Salaman hanya terdapat 27 petugas dengan 7 armada, padahal setiap armada membutuhkan 6 petugas.
Efektivitas Pendidikan Politik oleh Partai Politik dalam Meningkatkan Kesadaran Masyarakat di Kabupaten Semarang Tahun 2019-2023 Niqmah, Najwa Azizatun; Syafingi, Habib Muhsin; Sintha Dewi, Dyah Adriantini; Trisna Noviasari, Dilli
Borobudur Law and Society Journal Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): Vol 3 No 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31603/11688

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi efektivitas UU Nomor 2 Tahun 2011 tentang perubahan UU Nomor 2 Tahun 2008, khususnya pasal 11 huruf (a) yang mengatur fungsi partai politik dalam pendidikan politik bagi anggota dan masyarakat. Permasalahan dalam pelaksanaan pasal ini berkaitan dengan ketentuan pendidikan politik bagi anggota dan masyarakat luas, sebagaimana diatur dalam Pemendagri Nomor 36 pasal 11 ayat (3) dan (4) tentang pedoman fasilitasi penyelenggaraan pendidikan politik. Jenis penelitian ini adalah yuridis empiris dengan menggunakan metode pendekatan penelitian sosiologi hukum. Analisis dalam Penelitian ini menggunakan teori efektivitas Soerjono Soekanto yang menyebutkan 5 faktor pembentuk evektifitas hukum. Adapun sumber data yang digunakan terdiri dari data primer (wawancara) dan sekunder (buku, artikel, dokumentasi, dll). Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan studi lapangan dengan cara melakukan wawancara dengan narasumber yang bersangkutan. Serta Analisa data yang digunakan yaitu dengan metode kualitatif yang akan menghasilkan data deskriptif analitis. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa dalam pasal 11 huruf (a) UU Nomor 2 Tahun 2011 tentang perubahan atas UU Nomor 2 Tahun 2008 tentang fungsi partai politik dalam pelaksanaannya belum efektif berdasarkan analisis faktor penegak hukum, faktor anggaran, dan faktor masyarakat.
Supervision of Constitutional Court Judges after Decision No 005/PUU-IV/2006: A Reassessment in the Light of Later Developments Lestari, Dian; Suharso; Noviasari, Dilli Trisna; Syafingi, Habib Muhsin
Borobudur Law and Society Journal Vol. 5 No. 5 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31603/11767

Abstract

In Decision No 005/PUU-IV/2006 the Constitutional Court removed its own judges from the ethical supervision of the Judicial Commission, leaving them to an internal Honour Council. The decision has been widely criticised, but the criticism has rarely been tested against the record of internal supervision since then. This study asks whether the Court’s reasoning was sound and what model of supervision the record of 2006–2023 supports. It is normative research using statutory, case and conceptual approaches to the 1945 Constitution, the Judicial Commission and Constitutional Court Laws and their amendments, the 2006 decision and later decisions of the Court and its Honour Council. The Court’s argument that its judges are not ‘judges’ under Article 24B(1) is weak, but its concern for its impartiality in disputes involving the Commission is real. The later record shows that internal supervision did not prevent two judges from being convicted of corruption, that the Court twice struck down legislative attempts to add external members, and that an Honour Council with outside members was able, in 2023, to remove the Chief Justice from office for a serious ethical violation. The ethics of Constitutional Court judges should therefore be supervised by a permanent, statutory Honour Council with a majority of members from outside the Court and binding powers of sanction.
Deliberation Reduced: Legal Politics of Compensation in Land Acquisition under the Job Creation Law Ichsanudin, Alfi; Syafingi, Habib Muhsin; Noviasari, Dilli Trisna
Borobudur Law and Society Journal Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31603/16657

Abstract

Land acquisition for the public interest rests on the State’s Right of Control and on the social function of land rights, with deliberation (musyawarah) as the means of balancing public need and private property. The Job Creation Law amended Law No 2 of 2012 so that the compensation value set by the Appraiser is final and binding and serves only as the basis for deciding the form of compensation. This article asks how that amendment has changed the meaning of deliberation and what legal politics it expresses. It is normative legal research using statutory, conceptual and historical approaches, tracing the rules from Presidential Decree No 55 of 1993 through Law No 2 of 2012 and its implementing regulations to the Job Creation regime, and reading them through Mahfud MD’s theory of legal politics, Radbruch’s values of law and Rawls’s procedural justice. Deliberation has been reduced from negotiation over form and amount to a choice of the form of payment, while the unamended provisions on objection to the district court leave the amount contestable only through litigation. The change reflects an elitist and centralistic legal politics that ranks project speed and investment certainty above the bargaining position of owners. The article recommends treating the appraisal as a binding floor rather than a fixed price, through legislative amendment or constitutional review.
Co-Authors Agatha, Amanda Delvia Aji, Alan Bayu Ardianto, Anugrah Dwi Setyo Azhnuri, Wanda Minerva Bagaswara, Muhammad Arif Bambang Tjatur Iswanto, Bambang Tjatur Basri Basri Budiharto Budiharto Choully, Aufilana Dwi Dakum, Dakum Devi, Anggie Silvie Evita DIAN LESTARI Dyah Adriantini Sintha Dewi Efendi, Rahmadhani Widi Fajriastuti, Marini Ika Fariza Tama, Fasa Fianto, Ardi Kusna Fitri, Emilia Nur Hakim, Hary Abdul Hapsari, Puput Nia Heniyatun Herawati, Diandra Yuanita Hidayah, Ngirfah Ichsanudin, Alfi Insani, Yeirmila Nurlita Izzati, Alfina Nur Johny Krisnan, Johny Listari, Kartika Dwi Luluatussholihah, Desia Meivialora, Meivialora Moch Ikhsan, Oddie Moch Ikhsan, Oddie Muhammad, Fadil Mukti, Krisna Niqmah, Najwa Azizatun Noviasari, Dilli Trisna Praja, Chrina Bagus Editha Prasetiyo, Adi Candra Prayoga, Aryudha Ilham Ramadhan Puji Sulistyaningsih Qotrunada, Amelia Ramadhani, Sarah Budi Rejeki, Tri Septiantoro, Gilang Setiyani, Fatkhiah Priza Suharso Suharso Suharso Tarihoran, Muthiarahmi Trisna Noviasari, Dilli Yogatama, Muhammad Arsy Yogi Satria Nugraha, Yogi Satria Yudha, Angga Pradipta Yulia Kurniaty Yulianto, Yoga Farhan