Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Perilaku Kekerasan Aparat Kepolisian Dalam Aksi Demonstrasi Mahasiswa Menurut Perspektif Hukum Dan HAM Ilham Kurniansyah; Asep Suherman
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): September - Oktober
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/p22nm994

Abstract

The violent behavior of police officers during demonstrations is an issue that often receives attention from a legal and human rights perspective. Law No. 39/1999 on Human Rights provides a legal basis that supports the protection of the basic rights of every individual, including the right to express opinions, assemble and organize, and the right to be protected from torture and cruel treatment. The purpose of this article is to analyze the factors that led police officers to commit acts of violence against protesting students, and to clarify the legal and human rights monitoring of this issue. This journal uses a normative legal research method, using a statutory approach. The legal materials used are primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Using the literature collection method, thus collecting data from the literature then traced, read and understood. The results of this study found that the background of police officers committing violence against students, including provocation, unprofessional officers and environmental conditions at the time of the demonstration. Police officers who are caught committing acts of violence must be reported to be dealt with according to applicable law.
Analisis Yuridis Normatif Undang-Undang Perlindungan Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Terhadap Anak Muhammad Farhan Hasan; Asep Suherman
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): November - Desember
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/rtcm1f48

Abstract

Domestic Violence or abbreviated as KDRT is a problem that is often found throughout the world and this is a topic that has never been resolved. Domestic violence is a social phenomenon that has been going on for a long time in some households in the world. This problem is a serious problem that involves violations of Human Rights (HAM). Child violence includes physical, psychological, sexual violence, and neglect. UNICEF defines violence against children as "All forms of physical and emotional abuse, sexual abuse, neglect, or commercial or other exploitation that result in actual or potential harm to the development, health, and survival of the child or to his or her dignity in the context of a relationship of responsibility, trust, or power". There are many theories related to violence against children, including theories related to stress in the family. Stress in the family can come from children, parents, or situational. Stress comes from children, for example children with different physical, mental, or behavioral conditions, toddlers, and children with chronic diseases. Stress comes from parents, for example parents with mental disorders, parents who have been victims of violence in the past, parents who have too high expectations of their children, and parents with high discipline
Reformasi Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Dengan Integrasi Penilaian Risiko Residivisme Untuk Pemidanaan Adil Reza Seby Alfikri; Asep Suherman
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Januari - Februari
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/hr2a9r36

Abstract

This research aims to explore the integration of recidivism risk assessment in Indonesia's punishment system with a more objective and data-based approach. The method used is normative research with a comparative legal approach, which compares the implementation of recidivism risk assessment systems in other countries with the practice in Indonesia. The results show that although recidivism risk assessment has the potential to improve justice and criminal justice effectiveness, there are major challenges in the form of inconsistency in the definition of recidivism, lack of clear time standards, and unfairness in rehabilitation assessment. Therefore, deep legal reforms and the use of data-driven methods balanced with humanitarian aspects are needed to create a more transparent and fair system. Suggestions from this research include the importance of developing clear standards regarding recidivism and increasing the capacity of judicial officers through training. In addition, the development of an objective data-based recidivism risk assessment system and strengthening collaboration between the public and private sectors in social reintegration are needed to achieve a more effective and fair criminal justice system.
Efektivitas Metode MediasiĀ  Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Terhadap Kepuasan Para Pihak Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Di Indonesia Rafa Ardhian; Rusma Renal Cholif; Togarma Sinaga; Asep Suherman
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Juli - Agustus
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/6e9q2c03

Abstract

Business disputes in Indonesia frequently arise from differences in interests, contract violations, and misunderstandings in the implementation of agreements. Litigation often proves inefficient due to high costs, lengthy processes, and the potential to damage long-term business relationships. Mediation emerges as a more efficient and flexible alternative dispute resolution mechanism, firmly supported by a normative foundation through Law Number 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution as well as Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of mediation in resolving business disputes, examine the driving and inhibiting factors, and assess its implications for party satisfaction. The findings indicate that mediation can be effective when supported by trust in the mediator, confidentiality of the process, and the willingness of parties to preserve long-term business cooperation, while challenges include the low level of legal awareness, uncooperative attitudes of disputing parties, and the limited availability of competent mediators. In conclusion, mediation has the potential to ensure satisfaction and strengthen substantive justice if implemented optimally, making it a strategic instrument in resolving business disputes in Indonesia.
Pengaruh Penerapan Alternative Dispute Resolution(ADR) Melalui Mediasi Terhadap EfektivitasPerlindungan Hak Konsumen Di Indonesia Nadine Alysa Azura; Dhiyaa Husniyyah; Fourega Gamelia Lubis; Asep Suherman
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Juli - Agustus
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/9x6th027

Abstract

Perkembangan transaksi konsumen di Indonesia semakin kompleks, khususnya dengan meningkatnya perdagangan elektronik (e-commerce) yang kerap menimbulkan sengketa antara konsumen dan pelaku usaha. Penyelesaian sengketa konsumen melalui jalur litigasi sering kali tidak efektif karena memakan waktu, biaya, serta menimbulkan beban psikologis bagi para pihak. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) melalui mediasi hadir sebagai instrumen penting dalam memperkuat efektivitas perlindungan konsumen. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana penerapan ADR melalui mediasi dapat memberikan perlindungan hukum yang cepat, sederhana, dan biaya ringan bagi konsumen. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, berbasis pada Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen, Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan, serta literatur akademik terkait ADR. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mediasi sebagai bagian dari ADR mampu meningkatkan akses keadilan bagi konsumen melalui penyelesaian yang win-win solution, namun masih terdapat kendala berupa rendahnya kesadaran konsumen akan haknya serta keterbatasan lembaga penyelesaian sengketa diluar pengadilan.
Efektivitas Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Di Indonesia Aura Faraz Az Zahra; Indah Ayu Zhafira; Fatrisia Yuristi; Asep Suherman
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Juli - Agustus
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/1dazjz66

Abstract

Business disputes in Indonesia have increased along with the development of the business world, but court resolution is considered slow, expensive, and incapable of restoring relationships between the parties. Mediation, as part of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), is a solution regulated normatively through Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016. This study aims to describe the legal basis for mediation in resolving business disputes and analyze its effectiveness in practice. The research method uses a normative juridical approach with an analysis of legislation, legal literature, and court decisions. The discussion shows that mediation can reduce costs, expedite resolution, and maintain business relationships, but faces obstacles such as a lack of public understanding and uneven quality of mediators.
Peranan Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Dalam Arbitrase Internasional Terhadap Kepastian Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Mutia Aulia Apriadi; Naurah Edsa Nakiyah; Miriam Mahalia; Asep Suherman
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Juli - Agustus
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/gv7nd577

Abstract

Penyelesaian sengketa bisnis internasional kerap menimbulkan persoalan kompleks, terutama karena perbedaan yurisdiksi, sistem hukum, dan kepentingan para pihak. Dalam konteks ini, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) melalui arbitrase internasional hadir sebagai instrumen yang mampu menawarkan efisiensi, kecepatan, dan fleksibilitas dalam proses penyelesaian sengketa. Isu hukum yang dikaji dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana peranan ADR dalam mekanisme arbitrase internasional dapat memberikan kepastian hukum bagi para pihak yang bersengketa. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif dengan pendekatan tematik melalui studi literatur, peraturan internasional seperti UNCITRAL Model Law, Konvensi New York 1958, serta peraturan nasional terkait arbitrase. Tujuan penelitian adalah mendeskripsikan hubungan antara ADR dan kepastian hukum serta menganalisis efektivitas penerapan arbitrase internasional terhadap sengketa bisnis lintas negara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ADR, khususnya arbitrase internasional, tidak hanya memperkuat posisi para pihak dalam memperoleh keadilan substantif, tetapi juga memberikan jaminan enforceability melalui pengakuan putusan arbitrase oleh berbagai negara. Namun demikian, masih terdapat tantangan berupa disparitas interpretasi hukum nasional dan potensi benturan kepentingan yang dapat mengurangi efektivitasnya. Dengan demikian, penguatan harmonisasi regulasi dan implementasi ADR dalam arbitrase internasional merupakan langkah penting guna menjamin kepastian hukum penyelesaian sengketa bisnis global.
Peran Mediasi Sebagai Bentuk Diversi Dalam Alternatif Penyelesaian SengketaTindak Pidana Anak di Bawah Umur (Studi Kasus di Polres Kota Bengkulu) Baihaqi Mumtazy; Muhammad Reyhan Saputra; Muhammad Rofiq; Asep Suherman
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Juli - Agustus
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/vapet481

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the role of mediation as a form of diversion in Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) for juvenile crimes at the Bengkulu City Police Resort, focusing on its position as a non-litigation mechanism recognized by positive law. This study uses a normative approach with a literature review method. The results of the study indicate that mediation as a form of diversion is the simplest and most flexible form of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), as it allows the parties to communicate directly with the involvement of a third party as a mediator. Mediation not only produces a mutually beneficial solution (win-win solution) but also maintains good relations between the disputing parties, unlike litigation processes that tend to produce winners and losers. Furthermore, the results of mediation can be legally binding if outlined in a peace agreement and ratified by the court, thus having the same legal force as a court decision. Thus, mediation as a form of diversion plays a strategic role in resolving disputes involving juvenile crimes peacefully and efficiently while maintaining long-term relationships between the parties
Pengaruh Kompetensi Mediator dan Biaya Penyelesaian Sengketa terhadap Efektivitas Alternative Dispute Resolution Ramaji Themas; Asep Suherman
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Juli - Agustus
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/17d08c70

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of mediator competence and dispute resolution costs on the effectiveness of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) as one of the non-litigation mechanisms in the Indonesian legal system. The competence of the mediator is seen as an important factor because it reflects the expertise, communication skills, and ability to maintain neutrality in facilitating the agreement of the parties. Meanwhile, the cost of dispute resolution is a significant consideration for the public in choosing ADR over litigation which is often time-consuming and expensive. The research method used is a quantitative approach with data collection through questionnaires that are distributed to respondents who have experience in the ADR process. Data analysis was carried out using multiple regression to determine the magnitude of the influence of each independent variable on the bound variable. The results show that both the competence of the mediator and the cost of dispute resolution have a significant positive influence on the effectiveness of ADR, so both need to be considered to improve the quality of non-litigation dispute resolution in Indonesia.
Pengaruh Kinerja Aparat Penegak Hukum Terhadap Tingkat Efektivitas Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Menangani Kasus Perdagangan Orang Yurika Sakinah Sakinah; Rahma Adzkia Putri; Asep Suherman
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Juli - Agustus
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/kw4wcy63

Abstract

Human trafficking is a serious violation of human rights because it harms the dignity, freedom, and safety of the victims. The main issue in dealing with human trafficking crimes in Indonesia is the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies, which often face obstacles from both structural and cultural factors. This paper aims to analyze how well the legal institutions perform in protecting victims' rights, identify the challenges faced, and develop strategies to improve the effectiveness of legal enforcement. The research method used is normative legal analysis with a legislative and conceptual approach. This study reviews various national legal instruments, such as Law Number 39 of 1999 on Human Rights and Law Number 21 of 2007 on the Eradication of Human Trafficking Crimes, as well as international instruments that have been ratified by Indonesia. The findings show that the role of law enforcement agencies is crucial in the success of enforcing human rights, whether in the functions of repression, prevention, or rehabilitation. However, there are still challenges such as limited resources, lack of coordination between agencies, corruption practices, and low understanding of human rights principles among law enforcement. Therefore, a comprehensive strategy is needed through strengthening the capacity of law enforcement, using modern investigation technologies, improving cooperation between national and international agencies, and ensuring victim-centered recovery.
Co-Authors Ahmad Zaid Al Baihaqi Alvin Ferdiansya Alyya Putri Ryani Ani Kartika Annisa Nur Muthmainnah Arie Elcaputera Aulia Rexana Sitaresmi Aura Faraz Az Zahra Bagas Prithajaya Putra Baihaqi Mumtazy Belvina Azahra Dea Agusti Saputri Dendi Saputra Dera Marshanda Dhimas Ragil Yusdhistira Dhiyaa Husniyyah Diana Permata Hati Dima Sentosa Dzakyyah Ameizki Atmaja Erindra Prayoga Fatimatul Risna Fatma Ratu Shifa Fatrisia Yuristi Fika Labuda Aziz Fourega Gamelia Lubis Habib Dwi Putra Hijrah Eritama Saputra Husnul Hamdi Yonas Yonas Ilham Kurniansyah Imelda Aprilia Putri Indah Anugerah Sidik Indah Ayu Zhafira Jennever Enjelina Gultom Kristin Nadya Anggela Siahaan Mella Kartika Putri Michelia Alba Nathania Miriam Mahalia Muhammad Arif Kurnia Pratama Muhammad Farhan Hasan Muhammad Fariz Al Ghaza Muhammad Rassya Abraridhandra Muhammad Reyhan Saputra Muhammad Rofiq Muhammad Zahri Hermawan Mutia Aulia Apriadi Nabila Fitriani Nabila Wista Salsabila Nabilla Carissa Davu Nadia Eka Putri Nadine Alysa Azura Nafisah Amanda Anggraini Putri Naurah Edsa Nakiyah Neza Genie Abdella Noeke Sri Wardhani Rafa Ardhian Rahma Adzkia Putri Rahmat Rizziawan Ramadhani, Susi Ramaji Themas Reka Saditri Acintya Renindita Renindita Repaldy Putra Zaki Reza Seby Alfikri Rifqah Humairah Rury Sagita Rusma Renal Cholif Saur Bakti Boru Manurung Shafira Yunda Maharani Silvia Sinta Soraya Anugrah Rhamadhani Sudirman Sitepu Syaftiara Alissa Dwitami Tasya Putri Afrudi Tia Zahara Togarma Sinaga Yolanda Febriani Yurika Sakinah Sakinah Zaqia Salsabillah