Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.024
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal 'ADALAH SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Jurnal Cita Hukum BERDIKARI : Jurnal Inovasi dan Penerapan Ipteks Jurnal Ius Constituendum JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Shar-E: Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Hukum Syariah Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI) JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah SULUH ABDI : Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat J-CEKI
Sarah Qosim
Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Optimalisasi Wewenang Dan Tanggung Jawab Hakim Pengawas Dalam Hukum Kepailitan Di Indonesia Aprita, Serlika; Qosim, Sarah
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): OCTOBER
Publisher : Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v7i2.3963

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the legal certainty of Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and PKPU related to the implementation of the duties, authorities, and responsibilities of bankruptcy supervisory judges in supervising the management and execution of bankruptcy property in the Surabaya Commercial Court. The research method used in this article is empirical juridical with case approach. The writing of this article first reviewed previous research related to the role and authority of supervisory judges in the Commercial Court, but in each article only describes the contents of the provisions of Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and PKPU related to the role and authority of bankruptcy law supervisory judges, and then this article analyzes the legal certainty of the enforcement of the authority and responsibility of the supervisory judge in the Surabaya Commercial Court on charges of having received bribes from PT Sky Camping Indonesia (SCI) as a curator in the bankruptcy process. The results of this article show that the legal certainty of Law No. 37 of 2004 on Insolvency and PKPU related to the authority and responsibility of supervisory judges, in practice in the field is not fully operational. The supervisory judge does not carry out his duties and authority to oversee the management and release of bankruptcy property because it has received bribes from PT SCI as a curator so that the supervisory judge determines the verdict of the debtor's bankruptcy assets to non-bankruptcy.Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa kepastian hukum Undang-Undang No. 37 tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU terkait pelaksanaan tugas, kewenangan, dan tanggung jawab Hakim Pengawas kepailitan dalam mengawasi pengurusan dan pemberesan harta pailit di Pengadilan Niaga Surabaya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam artikel ini adalah yuridis empiris dengan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Penelitian artikel ini terlebih dahulu mereview penelitian-penelitian sebelumnya terkait peran dan wewenang Hakim Pengawas di Pengadilan Niaga, namun pada masing-masing artikel tersebut hanya memaparkan isi ketentuan Undang-Undang No. 37 tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU terkait peran dan wewenang Hakim Pengawas hukum kepailitan, selanjutnya artikel ini menganalisa kepastian hukum pelaksaan Undang-Undang No. 37 tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU terkait wewenang dan tanggung jawab Hakim Pengawas di Pengadilan Niaga Surabaya atas dakwaan telah menerima suap dari PT Sky Camping Indonesia (SCI) sebagai Kurator dalam proses kepailitan. Hasil artikel ini menunjukkan bahwa kepastian hukum Undang-Undang No. 37 tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU terkait wewenang dan tanggung jawab Hakim Pengawas, dalam praktiknya di lapangan tidak sepenuhnya berjalan. Hakim Pengawas menyalahgunakan tugas dan wewenangnya untuk mengawasi pengurusan dan pemberesan harta pailit dikarenakan telah menerima suap dari PT SCI sebagai Kurator supaya Hakim Pengawas menetapkan putusan aset pailit debitur menjadi non pailit.      
Penerapan Daerah Kerja Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Satu Wilayah Provinsi Firdaus Akbar; Syahriati Fakhriah; M. Adi Saputra; Sarah
J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Vol. 4 No. 1: Desember 2024
Publisher : CV. ULIL ALBAB CORP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jceki.v4i1.6132

Abstract

This research is entitled "Implementation of PPAT Working Areas in Relation to Making Authentic PPAT Deeds in One Province". But in reality PPAT can only work in one district/city, referring to the old regulations. And the Decree of the Minister of Land Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency concerning the Appointment and Appointment of Work Areas as Land Deed Making Officials (PPAT) in 2017 is still in one district/city even though the Government Regulation has been in place in 2016. PPAT is a partner of BPN in terms of land registration, BPN only provides one district/city online tool. Henceforth, the Implementing Regulation as the implementation of the PPAT working area in relation to making an authentic PPAT deed in one province has not yet been established. The author obtained data directly by interviewing sources related to "Implementation of PPAT Work Areas in Relation to Making Authentic PPAT Deeds in One Province" and obtained data from literature studies in the form of literature, books, journals, laws and regulations. Scientific works and other reading sources. So with this, the discussion of the thesis focuses on the formulation of the problem. First, how the implementation of the PPAT work area is a province. Second, what is an obstacle in implementing the PPAT work area is one province
Warisan Mafqud dan Orang Mati Bersama Menurut Imam Mazhab dan Hukum Islam di Indonesia Sarah; Syamsul; Abdul Jafar
Shar-E : Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Hukum Syariah Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): Shar-E: Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Hukum Syariah
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37567/shar-e.v10i2.3108

Abstract

This study aims to examine the legal implications for inheritance rights for parties involved in cases of mafqud (missing persons) and individuals who die together according to Islamic law and the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) in Indonesia. The research employs a normative legal study method with an Islamic law approach. The findings indicate that Islamic law provides specific provisions for mafqud cases, considering an individual deceased after a certain period, while in cases of individuals dying together, inheritance distribution is based on confirmation of the order of death. KHI follows a similar principle and involves religious courts in resolving inheritance disputes to ensure fairness. The discussion emphasizes the importance of consistent application of legal provisions and the crucial role of religious courts in addressing uncertainty and conflicts in inheritance distribution.
Co-Authors Abdul Jafar Aprita, Serlika Ardha, Dea Justicia Dea Justicia Ardha Emilson, Nur Husni Febrina Hertika Rani Firdaus Akbar Gumar Herudiansyah Helwan Kasra Ismail Pettanase Jafar, Abdul kasra, Helwan Kasra M. Adi Saputra M. Adi Saputra Mona Wulandari Muhammad Taufiq Mulkan, Hasanal Mulkan Nur Husni Emilson Okpirianty, Reny Okpirianty Rani, Febrina Hertika Reny Okpirianty Rusydi, Yudistira Rusydi Serlika Aprita Syahriati Fakhriah Syahriati Fakhriah Syamsul Syamsul Syamsul Wasiatur Riskiyah