F. X. Joko Priyono
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro

Published : 44 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Vernacularization of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Diffusing Global Values in Indonesia’s Village Government Tisnanta, HS.,; Putri, Ria Wierma; Khanza, Yuga Narazua; Pereira, Lenilde; Priyono, FX Joko
LAW REFORM Vol 21, No 2 (2025): Law Reform
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v21i2.61705

Abstract

This article explores how Indonesia’s village governments interpret and implement the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through the process of vernacularization. Given Indonesia’s more than 81,000 villages, each with unique socio-cultural characteristics, localizing global norms is both a legal and practical challenge. The urgency lies in aligning global development frameworks with traditional village governance while maintaining local identities. This study aims to assess the implementation of Village SDGs and to evaluate vernacularization as a mechanism for translating global norms into culturally resonant practices at the grassroots level. Using a normative juridical method, this research analyzes legal documents, policy frameworks, and academic literature to identify patterns in SDG localization. Qualitative doctrinal analysis and thematic content review are applied to trace how global values are reinterpreted through local institutions and practices. Findings indicate that the 17 SDGs, along with Indonesia’s additional Goal 18 on adaptive village culture, align with existing local norms but require contextual adaptation. This is achieved through a three step vernacularization model involving translation, the role of vernacularizers, and framing, all grounded in a human rights based approach. The study concludes that vernacularization is essential to ensuring inclusive, culturally grounded, and sustainable implementation of the SDGs, reinforcing both universal values and local autonomy.
Realizing the Trinity of Pancasila Justice: A Socio-Legal Study of a Community-Based Conflict Resolution Ahmad Saparwadi; Priyono, FX Joko; Setyowati, Ro’fah
Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 10 No 2 (2025): Mulawarman Law Review - December 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/

Abstract

Public conflicts involving both religious and economic sentiments, such as the case of the "religious seller" (Gus Miftah) and the "ice tea seller," (Sunhaji) present unique challenges that are often difficult to resolve through formal law. This study aims to analyze the settlement of cases between religious sellers and iced tea sellers based on Pancasila justice. The type of research used is normative-empirical research with a philosophical, conceptual, and socio-legal approach. The legal materials used are primary and secondary, which are then analyzed using qualitative descriptive techniques. The results of the study show that the settlement of cases between religious sellers and ice tea sellers reflects the values of Pancasila justice because it is able to provide substantive justice for the parties. This is based on the mechanism of case settlement through deliberation, which is part of the values of divine justice and humanity and also society, one of which is mutual forgiveness between the two parties. The religious seller received social sanctions from the community for his insults, which were considered a warning from God and the community. Meanwhile, the iced tea seller received rewards from God and society in the form of material and immaterial support for what he experienced. Thus, this case represents justice for both parties in the context of Pancasila justice, which encompasses divine, humanitarian, and social justice.
Environmental Protection or Disguised Protectionism? Reassessing the Necessity Test in Brazil–Retreaded Tyres Sutrisno, Andri; Priyono, FX. Joko; Trihastuti, Nanik
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol. 16 No. 3 (2025): December 2025 (on progress)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v16i3.16156

Abstract

This article examines the interpretation and application of the necessary criterion under Article XX(b) of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 through critical doctrinal analysis of the WTO dispute Brazil–Measures Affecting Imports of Retreaded Tyres (WT/DS332). Employing normative legal research with a case-analytical and comparative approach, the article evaluates Brazil's 2007 import ban on retreaded tyres against the tripartite necessity framework legitimate objective, rational contribution, and the absence of reasonably available less trade-restrictive alternatives and critically interrogates the Appellate Body's application of the chapeau's non-discrimination requirements. The analysis finds that while Brazil's measure provisionally satisfied the Article XX(b) necessity criteria on the merits of its public health and environmental justification, the Appellate Body's chapeau ruling deployed a formalist methodology that conflated discrimination rooted in protectionist intent with discrimination arising from pre-existing regional treaty obligations and domestic judicial intervention beyond governmental control. This article argues that this interpretive approach imposes structurally unrealisable demands upon developing country regulatory actors and produces normatively unjustifiable outcomes. The article advances an original analytical framework for contextually differentiated interpretation of the chapeau, grounded in the Vienna Convention's object-and-purpose mandate, that distinguishes between bad-faith protectionism and institutionally constrained regulatory inconsistency.
The Position of Pancasila in the Development of Legal Theory (From Legal Formality to Legal Realism): A Case Approach Yuli Prasetyo Adhi; Priyono, FX. Joko
Indonesian Journal of Pancasila and Global Constitutionalism Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): January-June, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijpgc.v4i1.39210

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the position of Pancasila in the legal context in Indonesia and analyze the judge's decision with the Pancasila corridor. The judge's decision has considerations and a legal basis in it. The legal basis used by judges is the applicable laws and regulations. Meanwhile, we have Pancasila as the source of all legal sources, which means that the position of Pancasila is above the laws and regulations. Pancasila has values that are used as a guideline for community life. Then, how is the position of Pancasila in the development of legal theory and how Pancasila becomes a legal ideal and is used as a basis for deciding a case in court. One of the decisions used in this paper is a decision related to the exoneration clause. The analysis of Decision No. 400/Pdt/2019/PT SBY was conducted using the view of legal formality and the view of legal realism. The analysis was conducted using doctrinal research methods. This article has a novelty, namely criticizing positivism in Indonesia and offering Pancasila as a living law and integrating Pancasila in the case approach in the judge's decision. This article has theoretical implications as an enrichment of legal theory in Indonesia, making Pancasila the basis for the development of Indonesian state legal theory, and strengthening the legal paradigm. The practical implication is that there is an analysis of Pancasila's views in the judge's decision No. 400/Pdt/2019/PT SBY.