Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.737
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Tasharruf: Journal Economics and Business of Islam Kunuz: Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance Al-Mujtahid: Journal of Islamic Family Law Al-'Aqdu: Journal of Islamic Economics Law Jurnal Interdisipliner Sosiologi Agama Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (Nyiur-Dimas) Khazanah Hukum Khazanah Sosial
Nurlaila Isima
Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Manado
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

 1   2 
URGENSI PENGAKUAN HUKUM YANG HIDUP PADA MASYARAKAT DALAM ASAS LEGALITAS DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF SOSIOLOGI HUKUM Isima, Nurlaila
Jurnal JINNSA (Jurnal Interdipliner Sosiologi Agama) Vol 2 No 1 (2022): Volume 2 Nomor 1 Tahun 2022
Publisher : Program Studi Sosiologi Agama Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Dakwah IAIN Manado

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30984/jinnsa.v2i1.266

Abstract

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengambarkan urgensi pengakuan hukum yang hidup pada masyarakat dalam asas legalitas ditinjau dari perspektif sosiologi hukum. Indonesia merupakan negara yang menggunakan hukum pidana warisan produk kolonial yang pada saat itu berfaham individualitas, dimana sampai sekarang masih tetap menggunakan KUHP kolonial yang baru. Dengan masih berlakunya asas legalitas, maka sangat berpengaruh terhadap keberadaan dan perkembangan hukum di Indonesia, terutama dalam hubungannya dengan hukum adat yang ada. Hal ini dikarenakan hukum yang hidup dalam masyarakat merupakan hukum asli Indonesia dan merupakan identitas bangsa Indonesia. Sehingga pengakuan ini juga bukan hanya berkaitan dengan pengakuan hukum akan tetapi juga pengakuan masyarakat majemuk Indonesia. Sampai saat ini ide pengakuan hukum yang hidup dalam masyrakat tercermin dari pemikiran-pemikiran para akademisi tentang asas legalitas materiel. Asas legalitas materiel pada dasarnya tidak dikenal di dunia Eropa, karena ini hasil buah pikiran masyarakat Indonesia akan kearifan suku dan bangsa di Indonesia. Asas legalitas materiel coba dituangakan dalam Konsep Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Meskipun baru sebatas rancangan diharapkan segera bisa disahkan oleh para pembuat undang-undang.
Reconciling Traditions: The Role of Local Wisdom in Mediating Divorce in Indonesia's Religious Courts Rosdalina Bukido; Sjamsuddin A. K. Antuli; Nurlaila Harun; Nurlaila Isima; Ulin Na'mah
Khazanah Sosial Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Khazanah Sosial
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/ks.v6i2.32809

Abstract

In response to escalating divorce rates in Indonesia, particularly within its Religious Courts, this study explores the limitations of current mediation practices. It proposes local wisdom-based mediation as an alternative approach. Traditional mediation within these courts often fails to prevent divorces effectively, prompting the need for innovative solutions that integrate cultural insights. This research aims to assess the effectiveness of mediation processes within Indonesia's Religious Courts and investigate the potential role of religious leaders in improving mediation outcomes. Specifically, it highlights how local wisdom can be leveraged to mitigate divorce rates by fostering reconciliation and resolving disputes outside formal legal procedures. Using an empirical approach, researchers collected data by interviewing 50 informants, namely judges, religious leaders, and the government, related to the increasing divorce rate. The findings that can be presented are that religious figures, as locals, can reconcile divorced parties without the need to go to religious courts. The Religious Court is seen as a formal facility to certify the divorce of both parties, but has yet to be able to prevent divorce optimally. That is, the high divorce rate in religious courts requires the involvement of religious leaders in reconciling parties who want to divorce. This study accepts the potential for integrating local wisdom in mediating to reduce divorce rates. With an emphasis on cultural sensitivity and community involvement, this approach aims to go beyond the limitations of conventional legal frameworks and promote more meaningful outcomes in resolving marital conflict.
Victim-Centered Legal Pluralism and Child Protection Governance in Addressing Sexual Violence in Aceh’s Pesantren Rosdalina Bukido; Nurlaila Isima; Hamzah Kamma; Misbahul Munir Makka; Naylah Salsabilah Kamaru
Khazanah Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Khazanah Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/kh.v8i1.47268

Abstract

This study examines sexual violence in Aceh’s pesantren (Islamic boarding schools) through a victim-centered legal pluralism perspective, focusing on the interaction between religious authority, local sharia-based criminal law, national child protection instruments, and institutional governance. Using a juridical-sociological approach, this study draws on semi-structured interviews with twelve informants, including survivors, pesantren actors, legal actors, child protection officers, and advocates from non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in Bener Meriah and North Aceh. The interview data are complemented by documentary analysis of legal regulations, child protection reports, NGO documents, media-based case documentation, and selected legal records. The findings show that sexual violence in pesantren is enabled by hierarchical relations between kiai (pesantren leaders), ustaz (religious teachers), and santri (students), especially when takzim (reverential respect toward religious authority) develops into unquestioned obedience without accountability. The study also finds that the pre-amendment implementation of Qanun Aceh No. 6 of 2014 during the 2024 fieldwork period had strong social and religious legitimacy but remained limited in ensuring victim recovery, psychosocial assistance, restitution, educational reintegration, and post-sanction monitoring. Although national instruments such as the Child Protection Law, the TPKS Law, and PMA No. 73 of 2022 provide broader victim-centered protection norms, their implementation in pesantren remains weak and fragmented. Institutionally, relevant actors such as the Ministry of Religious Affairs, DP3A, UPTD PPA, law enforcement agencies, NGOs, and pesantren administrators do not yet operate within an integrated case-management system. This study contributes to socio-legal scholarship by arguing that child protection in pesantren requires not only legal reform, but also mandatory safeguarding governance, integrated referral mechanisms, and enforceable institutional accountability.
A Public Benefit or Social Harm? A Maslahah Mursalah Evaluation of Coastal Reclamation and Fishermen's Livelihood Transformation in Maasing Village, Manado, Indonesia Radlyah Hasan Jan; Nurlaila Isima; Afnan Rafly Ferdiansyah; Rashid Mohamed Dzambo
Tasharruf: Journal Economics and Business of Islam Vol 11, No 1 (2026): JUNE
Publisher : IAIN Manado

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30984/tjebi.v11i1.4296

Abstract

Coastal reclamation has become a significant strategy for urban development, but its implementation often creates tensions between economic growth and the protection of coastal communities’ livelihoods. This study aims to evaluate the socio-economic consequences of coastal reclamation in Manado, Indonesia, particularly its impact on affected Muslim fishing communities, through the perspective of maslahah mursalah. This research employs a qualitative socio-legal approach by combining empirical field research and normative legal analysis. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with traditional fishermen, local government representatives, and relevant stakeholders in Maasing Village, supported by field observations and analysis of coastal development policies and legal documents. The data were analyzed thematically by examining the relationship between reclamation policies, community welfare, and the objectives of Islamic law (maqasid al-shariah). The findings indicate that reclamation has generated uneven socio-economic consequences. Although the project has improved urban connectivity and supported infrastructure development, affected fishermen experience reduced access to fishing areas, declining income, increased operational costs, and uncertainty regarding livelihood sustainability. Limited community participation and inadequate socialization have further contributed to perceptions of exclusion among fishermen. From the perspective of maslahah mursalah, these conditions demonstrate that reclamation has not fully realized public welfare principles, particularly in protecting livelihood and wealth (hifz al-mal) and maintaining social stability. The study highlights the importance of integrating economic development with social justice, environmental sustainability, and meaningful community participation in coastal governance.
Co-Authors Afnan Rafly Ferdiansyah Amu, Muhammad Raihan Bilalu, Naskur Bukido, Rosdalina Dano, Farhan Hamzah Kamma Ibrahim, Suryadi Misbahul Munir Makka Mohammad Rafiq Soleman Muhamad Sauki Alhabsyi Muliadi Nur Nasruddin Yusuf, Nasruddin Naylah Salsabilah Kamaru Nurlaila Harun Prayoga, Taufik Ilham Purwadi, Wira Radlyah Hasan Jan Rashid Mohamed Dzambo Rosdalina Bukido Sjamsuddin A. K. Antuli Subeitan, Syahrul Mubarak Tumiwa, Anisa Jihan Ulin Na'mah Ulin Na'mah Usup, Djamila