Articles
<![CDATA[Evaluation of Electronic Evidence in Criminal Justice in the Era of Advanced Artificial Intelligence Technology ]]>
<![CDATA[Sumardiana, Benny]]>;
<![CDATA[Pujiyono, Pujiyono]]>;
<![CDATA[Cahyaningtyas, Irma]]>;
<![CDATA[Wulandari, Cahya]]>
<![CDATA[ IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) Vol 9, No 2 (2024): Indonesia J. Crim. L. Studies (November, 2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Negeri Semarang (UNNES) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/ijcls.v9i2.50319
<![CDATA[Law enforcement is one of the many facets of society that have seen substantial changes as a result of the quick growth of digital technology, especially artificial intelligence (AI). The purpose of this study is to assess how electronic evidence is used in Indonesia's criminal justice system, pinpoint the difficulties encountered, and offer suggestions for enhancing the efficiency and equity of electronic evidence in the age of artificial intelligence. In line with the technological elements included in digital and criminal investigation research methodologies, this qualitative study aids in the creation of a theoretical framework for the use of electronic evidence in the setting of artificial intelligence. The results show that Indonesian law is now able to meet the needs of the digital age with its adaptation to technological advancements. Finding material truth in court proceedings is made possible by electronic evidence, which is legally acknowledged as a legitimate tool in criminal justice. To successfully address these issues and optimize the use of AI in the legal system, it is imperative to develop a strong ethical framework, improve law enforcement capacities, and update rules on a regular basis.]]>
<![CDATA[Obstacles in Proving the Crime of Money Laundering by Law Enforcement in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Sulistyo, Edhei]]>;
<![CDATA[Pujiyono, Pujiyono]]>;
<![CDATA[Cahyaningtyas, Irma]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): FEBRUARY ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.26623/jic.v9i1.8025
<![CDATA[This research aims to determine the obstacles to proving criminal acts of money laundering by law enforcement in Indonesia. The legal view regarding the crime of money laundering in Indonesia is that as long as there is no guilty verdict against the perpetrator of the predicate crime, then anything related to assets cannot be carried out. In practice, law enforcement still uses follow-up measures for money laundering suspects who prioritize punishment over asset recovery. This research focuses on proving the obstacles to the implementation of the Money Laundering Crime Law in the Police, Prosecutor's Office, and Corruption Eradication Commission. The research method in this writing uses doctrinal methods (juridical-normative) and non-doctrinal methods (juridical-empirical or socio-legal). The research results show that there still needs to be more conflict between the interests of law enforcement and the police, especially in terms of proving and recovering state losses. Obstacles to asset recovery that prosecutors can carry out are obstacles for prosecutors who are not given the authority to investigate criminal acts of money laundering that occurred before the 2010 Law on Money Laundering because the old law did not regulate the prosecutors' authority regarding this matter. Affairs. Criminal investigation. Money laundering. Likewise with the Corruption Eradication Commission, regarding the provisions of Article 69 concerning predicate crimes, they do not have to be proven first. Obstacles to Proving the Crime of Money Laundering by Law Enforcement in Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Optimizing Restorative Justice as an Alternative to Overcoming Corporate Crime in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Muksin, Muchlas Rastra Samara]]>;
<![CDATA[Pujiyono, Pujiyono]]>;
<![CDATA[Cahyaningtyas, Irma]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 27 No. 1 (2025): June 2025 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Internasional Batam ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.37253/jjr.v27i1.10388
<![CDATA[This research aims to analyze how the regulation of corporate criminal liability in Indonesia and the opportunity of restorative justice as an alternative to corporate crime prevention in Indonesia. By using a normative approach this research uses a case approach, statutory approach, philosophical approach and comparative approach, this research explores the regulation of corporate criminal liability in Indonesia and how the challenges of alternative corporate crime resolution through restorative justice as a means of crime prevention. The results of this study The legal framework in Indonesia has not been able to fully address the complexity of corporate criminal liability, both in terms of material and procedural aspects.The retributive approach has proven to not touch the root of the problem. This is where restorative justice offers an alternative with a focus on restoring relations between perpetrators, victims, and the community. However, its application in the corporate context is still limited and not supported by integrated regulations.Meanwhile, countries such as France and Germany have adopted the Victim Offender Mediation (VOM) mechanism as part of their criminal justice system. In France, VOM has a strong legal basis, including the 1993 amendment to the Criminal Procedure Code and institutional support from INAVEM. VOM is implemented at the pre prosecution stage, with the condition that the perpetrator admits guilt and the victim's consent. Judges and prosecutors are given the discretion to drop the case if mediation is successful.VOM there is not only a forum for compromise, but also a tool for restoring participatory and humane justice. With a clear mechanism and the active role of mediation institutions, this system opens up opportunities for renewal in handling corporate crimes in Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Implementation of Business Judgement Rules in Indonesia: Theories, Practices, and Contemporary Cases ]]>
<![CDATA[Irawan, Chandra Noviardy]]>;
<![CDATA[Pujiyono, Pujiyono]]>;
<![CDATA[Cahyaningtyas, Irma]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Empowering Community Strengthening Justice in Indonesia and Global Context ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/ijals.v4i1.23273
<![CDATA[Business judgment rule considerations were born with a background of problems where they are always blamed for losses suffered by the company, the impression that is built basically does not reflect the values in the company’s business operations. This research aims to analyze how is the adoption process Business Judgement Rule in Indonesian law, and how to apply Business Judgement Rule in Indonesian. This research also intended to understand the application of the Business Judgment Rule doctrine in Indonesia. This research is normative juridical research conducted through library research and analyzed by qualitative research methods on the secondary data found. The results of this study indicate that the application of the Business Judgment Rule can provide legal protection for the board of directors for business policies taken even though the business policy results in losses for the company, as long as the business decisions are made with prudence, in good faith, and in the scope of authority and responsibility.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak yang Lahir di Penjara Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia ]]>
<![CDATA[Agnetha, Bianca]]>;
<![CDATA[Cahyaningtyas, Irma]]>
<![CDATA[ JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): NOVEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.26623/julr.v5i2.5723
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study is to determine the government's efforts in providing legal protection for children born in prison through related laws and regulations and also how legal protection for children born in prison from human rights perceptions. The research method used is normative juridical research. The results showed that in the latest Correctional Law, there are changes and additional provisions regarding children born in prisons. The first provision is that there is a change in the age limit for children to live in prison with their mothers, who used to only reach the age of 2 (two) years to the age of 3 (three) years. Second, the children of female prisoners are placed in a separate room that is kept clean and suitable for the child's growth and development. Third, in the event that the child of a female prisoner is a child with special needs, the child may be placed in a disability services unit. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengetahui upaya pemerintah dalam memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi anak yang lahir di penjara melalui peraturan perundang-undangan yang terkait dan juga bagaimana perlindungan hukum bagi anak yang lahir di penjara dari persepktif hak asasi manusia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa dalam Undang-Undang Pemasyarakatan terbaru, terdapat perubahan maupun ketentuan tambahan mengenai anak yang lahir di penjara. Ketentuan pertama adanya perubahan mengenai batas umur anak dapat tinggal dipenjara dengan ibunya, yang dahulu hanya mencapai usia 2 (dua) tahun menjadi usia 3 (tiga) tahun. Kedua, anak dari narapidana perempuan ditempatkan pada ruangan terpisah yang terjaga kebersihannya dan layak untuk tumbuh kembang anak. Ketiga, dalam hal anak dari narapidana perempuan merupakan anak yang berkebutuhan khusus, anak dapat ditempatkan pada unit layanan disabilitas. ]]>
<![CDATA[Parental Responsibility Toward Child as Criminal Offender in Indonesian Criminal Reform ]]>
<![CDATA[Jananuraga, Hatma Aditya]]>;
<![CDATA[Cahyaningtyas, Irma]]>
<![CDATA[ IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) Vol 6, No 1 (2021): Indonesian J. Crim. L. Stud. (May, 2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Negeri Semarang (UNNES) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/ijcls.v6i1.30140
<![CDATA[Parents as the first guardian of the child make their role irreplaceable for children. The negligence of parents in interpreting their role as caretakers of children can have an impact on children's development. True children do not have the ability to plan a crime. ABH is more accurately seen as a victim. This study reveals the responsibility of parents to child offenders of criminal offenses in Indonesian law today and its reforms in the future. This study uses a qualitative approach and normative juridical research methods. Code No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System implies the use of Restorative Justice in every settlement of juvenile crime. There is no formal legality of parents' responsibility for criminal acts committed by children, however, the Law on the Criminal Justice System for Children only regulates the responsibility of parents in the form of compensation in terms of diversion. The principle of Vicarious Liability can be applied to child crimes in the future. The principle of Vicarious Liability can be clearly stated in the regulations relating to juvenile punishment. The principle of vicarious liability can be applied to parents for criminal acts committed by children in the context of the transfer of criminal acts, based on legal objectives, namely justice, certainty and legal usefulness in the application of criminal law in Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Reforming Justice: Unpacking the Pre-Judication and Post-Judicate Dynamics of the Sarpin Case in Law and Practice in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Sumardiana, Benny]]>;
<![CDATA[Pujiyono, Pujiyono]]>;
<![CDATA[Cahyaningtyas, Irma]]>
<![CDATA[ Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Advancing Justice, Rights, and Governance in a Digital and Decentralized World ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v8i2.10744
<![CDATA[This paper critically examines the Sarpin case within the context of Indonesia's criminal justice system, focusing on the legal reformation of pretrial procedures and their impact on the protection of suspects' human rights. Indonesia's criminal justice system adheres to the principle of presumption of innocence, which underscores the importance of safeguarding individual rights throughout the legal process. The introduction of the pretrial institution under the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) has introduced significant shifts in judicial practices, particularly in evaluating coercive measures such as arrest, detention, and the termination of investigations. This research addresses three key questions: first, how pretrial procedures are regulated from the perspective of criminal law; second, how the reform of pretrial practices has been influenced by Judge Sarpin's landmark decision; and third, the broader implications of his ruling on the protection of human rights within the Indonesian criminal process. The paper utilizes a normative research method, analyzing relevant statutes and legal concepts through a statutory approach. In the Sarpin case, Judge Sarpin ruled that the investigation warrant used to initiate proceedings against Budi Gunawan was invalid, highlighting a critical legal interpretation of pretrial powers. This ruling not only questioned the procedural foundation of the case but also demonstrated the significant role of pretrial in defending the rights of suspects. Article 77 of KUHAP grants district courts the authority to examine the legality of coercive actions, providing a vital safeguard against potential abuses. The paper evaluates how Judge Sarpin's decision has reshaped legal practices in Indonesia, emphasizing its potential to reform both judicial attitudes and the protection of fundamental rights.]]>
<![CDATA[Guardians of Innocence: Enhancing Legal Safeguards for Child Victims of Sexual Violence in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Andriansyah, Aziz]]>;
<![CDATA[Saraswati, Retno]]>;
<![CDATA[Cahyaningtyas, Irma]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesia Law Review Vol. 13, No. 3 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UI Scholars Hub ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Sexual violence against children is a crime that is quite disturbing and needs to get attention in society. The implementation of child protection must meet the requirements, among others, by implementing the development of truth, justice and child welfare. Based on the provisions in Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection. The basic rights of children who need adequate protection include the right to live, the right to develop, the right to protection, the right to participate and the right to education. Efforts to prevent sexual abuse in children can also be carried out by involving the participation of parents and the need for the involvement of law enforcement officials in handling cases of sexual abuse in children so that a child's perspective is expected to have a deterrent effect on perpetrators of crimes of sexual harassment. This research is a normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. The government's steps in efforts to prevent sexual violence are by carrying out active campaigns to increase public awareness and need to strengthen the deterrent effect on convicts of sexual violence against children by not granting convicts rights, such as remission, parole, and clemency so that perpetrators do not repeat their action at a later time.]]>
<![CDATA[Surrogate Mothers: A Radical Feminist Perspective and Regulation in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Salamor, Anna Maria]]>;
<![CDATA[Purwanti, Ani]]>;
<![CDATA[Cahyaningtyas, Irma]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 26 No 1 (2026) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2026.26.1.17742
<![CDATA[A surrogate mother is a woman who agrees to carry a child for a married couple in exchange for compensation. The practice of surrogacy occurs in various countries around the world, both openly and secretly. The purpose of this study is to analyze the practice of surrogate motherhood from the perspective of radical feminist theory and its regulation in Indonesian legislation. The method used is non-doctrinal, with primary data obtained from interviews with informants selected freely and secondary data. The findings of this paper show that radical feminism criticizes and rejects the practice of surrogacy, which is considered to create destructive divisions among women based on social and economic class. The regulation of surrogacy in Indonesian legislation includes the Health Law of 2009 (Amendment 2023), which has not yet been regulated, the MUI fatwa, which prohibits it, and civil law, which considers surrogacy agreements invalid. This article is expected to provide women with a perspective on the practice of surrogacy, which is not always a way out of economic problems, and on the fact that Indonesian legislation does not yet have a strong legal basis for regulating the practice of surrogacy. his study highlights the structural vulnerability experienced by surrogate mothers within patriarchal and capitalist frameworks. It also emphasizes the urgency of establishing clearer and more comprehensive legal regulations to ensure the protection of women’s rights and the legal status of children born through surrogacy practices in Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[REFORMASI BIROKRASI BADAN NARKOTIKA NASIONAL DALAM PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA ]]>
<![CDATA[Cahyaningtyas, Irma]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Progresif Vol 7, No 2 (2019): Oktober 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Doctoral of Law Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (128.595 KB)
|
DOI: 10.14710/hp.7.2.153-170
<![CDATA[Peredaran narkotika di Indonesia semakin meningkat sehingga diperlukan kinerja aparat penegak hukum yang profesional. Badan Narkotika Nasional merupakan penyidik pada tindak pidana Narkotika. Permasalahan pada arikel ini adalah pertama, bagaimanakah proses penyidikan tindak pidana narkotika guna menentukan kualifikasi pengedar atau pemakai yang dilakukan oleh penyidik Badan Narkotika Nasional? Kedua, bagaimanakah reformasi birokrasi Badan Narkotika Nasional sebagai aparat penegak hukum dalam perkara tindak pidana narkotika?Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam artikel ini adalah pendekatan socio legal serta berlokasi di Badan Narkotika Nasional Provinsi (BNNP) Jawa Tengah.Berdasarkan penelitian dan pembahasan dinyatakan bahwa penyidikan yang dilakukan oleh BNN didasarkan pada kualifikasi pelaku yang di bedakan menjadi 3 (tiga) yaitu pemakai atau pengguna, pengedar dan produsen. Dalam meningkatkan kinerjanya, perlu ada pembaharuan berupa reformasi birokrasi pada tatanan substansi hukum, struktur hukum, dan kuktur hukum. Hal tersebut akan berpengaruh pada proses penegakan hukum tindak pidana narkotika yang cepat dan profesional.]]>
