Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.396
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Qistie: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Meta-Yuridis Unes Law Review JISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Mu'amalat: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian dan Inovasi Jurnal Darussalam : Pemikiran Hukum Tata Negara dan Perbandingan Mazhab Abdinesia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Media of Law and Sharia GEMOVE Journal of Gender Movement and Empowerment LOIS: Jurnal Hukum dan Humaniora
Irpan Suriadiata
Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Nusa Tenggara Barat
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Pemiskinan Koruptor Sebagai Instrumen Restoratif Dalam Membangun Peradaban Anti-Korupsi Suriadiata, Irpan
Qistie Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 18 No 2 (2025): Qistie : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wahid Hasyim

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31942/jqi.v18i2.14511

Abstract

ABSTRAK Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui konsep pemiskinan koruptor dalam hukum pidana Indonesia sebagai instrumen restorative, dan bagaimana pemiskinan koruptor dapat berkontribusi dalam membangun peradaban anti-korupsi di Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, dan konseptual. Adapun hasil penelitian ini adalah, Pertama, Pemiskinan koruptor melalui perampasan aset merupakan instrumen restoratif yang tidak hanya memberi efek jera, tetapi juga mengembalikan kerugian negara dan memperkuat kesadaran kolektif akan pentingnya integritas. Dengan demikian, kebijakan ini berkontribusi besar dalam membangun peradaban anti-korupsi di Indonesia. Kedua, Peradaban bersih hanya bisa terwujud apabila setiap tindak pidana korupsi tidak hanya dihukum dengan penjara, tetapi juga dicabut hasil kejahatannya dan dimiskinkan. Dengan cara ini, hukum tidak hanya menakutkan, tetapi juga menyembuhkan luka sosial yang ditimbulkan oleh korupsi sehingga peradaban anti korupsi akan terwujud.
ENHANCING THE SETTLEMENT OF MILD ASSAULT CASES THROUGH PENAL MEDIATION: LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICES BY THE WEST LOMBOK RESORT POLICE SIS NANDA KUS ANDRIANTO; NOVITA LISTYANINGRUM; IRPAN SURIADIATA; ABABIL KARHOMA WIJAYA
LOIS: Jurnal Hukum dan Humaniora Vol 1 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Aksara Cendikia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Law enforcement addressing small offenses, particularly minor assaults, is increasingly shifting from traditional judicial systems to restorative justice approaches utilizing prison mediation techniques. This study aims to elucidate the functioning of penal mediation at the West Lombok Resort Police level, the legal frameworks that underpin it, and the challenges encountered throughout its implementation. We employed interviews, field observations, and document analyses to obtain the data. The poll results indicate that criminal mediation relies on the mutual agreement of the victim and the perpetrator, with investigators serving as facilitators and overseers of the procedure. This is supported by the Chief of Police Regulation and the principle that investigators possess the autonomy to make independent decisions, as articulated in the Criminal Procedure Code and the Police Law. Punitive mediation incorporates community members, such as village leaders and Bhabinkamtibmas, to leverage local and societal values in problem resolution.
The Implementation of the Res Judicata Pro Veritate Habetur Principle to the Investigation of Money Laundering Irpan Suriadiata
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6170

Abstract

This study aims to determine the position of court rulings on predicate crimes under the principle of Res Judicata Pro Veritate Habetur in money laundering cases, along with the legal rationale utilized by judges in adjudicating TPPU cases involving predicate crimes as specified in Article 127 paragraph (1) of the Narcotics Law. This study utilizes a normative-empirical approach through a case study method. This research is supported by the review of case files, the observation of trial proceedings, and the analysis of literature from various criminal law sources and relevant statutes and regulations. The utilized data analysis method is judicial-normative. The findings of this study reveal a violation of the principle of Res Judicata Pro Veritate Habetur in the evaluation of money laundering offenses, as demonstrated by the Mataram District Court Decision No. 516/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Mtr, alongside the NTB High Court Decision No. 23/PID.Sus. 2023/PT.MTR, and the MARI Decision No. 4075 K/PID.Sus/2023, which neglected to account for the legally binding narcotics criminal ruling that serves as the predicate crime for the money laundering allegation. Both panels of judges committed errors in their legal reasoning by inadequately and incompletely assessing the predicate crime of narcotics offenses under Article 127, paragraph 1 of the Narcotics Law, concerning the evidence of 0.17 grams in relation to the sentencing and confiscation of the defendant's assets.
The Concept of Forced Defense As Legal Protection Against the Criminalization of Crime Victims Suriadiata, Irpan
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i2.4064

Abstract

Article 49 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) governs the concept of compelled defense, also known as "noodweer" in Dutch terminology. This article offers legal protection for individuals who engage in an unlawful conduct, such as abuse or murder, but do so in self-defense or in defense of another person who is under a severe threat to their life or physical well-being. The objective of this study is to ascertain the manner in which investigators constructed the legal framework to identify the suspect responsible for the abuse crime in the case that transpired at Yayasan Al-Amin NW Kilang in District Montong Gading, East Lombok district, West Nusa Tenggara on July 19, 2022, and to determine whether the suspect's actions constituted a forced defense in accordance with the provisions outlined in article 49, paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code. The present case study was authored utilizing analytical descriptive techniques in conjunction with empirical-normative research methods. The research findings indicate, initially, that the investigator's subjective elements significantly influence the trajectory of the investigation in the a-quo case. Consequently, the investigator formulates questions for the investigation in a manner that is streamlined solely to satisfy and substantiate the requirements outlined in Article 351 paragraph of the Criminal Code and to identify the suspect. The second criminal act of abuse pertains to the suspect's assault, which satisfies the criteria for a forced defense as defined in article 49 of the Criminal Code, provided that a-quo is satisfied.
Reconceptualization of the Recognition of the Unity of Customary Law Communities in Indonesian Legislation Suriadiata, Irpan
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.4785

Abstract

This study investigates the recognition of customary law communities in Indonesian legislation, with the objective of redefining the notion to better align with the evolving dynamics of customary law communities and the requirements of contemporary legal systems. This study employs a normative technique, which involves a systematic analysis of positive legal provisions, as well as an empirical sociological approach that encompasses the identification of unwritten laws and research on the efficacy of the law. The data utilized comprises primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources, obtained by traditional documentation research methods and information technology. The study findings suggest that current legislation has not adequately addressed the presence and rights of customary law communities. Hence, it is imperative to develop a more inclusive and cohesive reinterpretation of the notion of recognition that not only acknowledges the presence of customary law communities, but also ensures the effective safeguarding and enhancement of their rights. This study aims to enhance the development of legal policies that are more equitable and more aligned with the requirements of customary law communities in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Ababil Karhoma Wijaya Baiq Mulianah Fathur Rauzi Habibul Umam Taqiuddin Muhammad Syamsussabri Muhammad Yakub Novita Listyaningrum Pinton Setya Mustafa Septa Rahmadi, Didin Sis Nanda Kus Andrianto suci ramadhani putri Yakub, Muhammad