Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

The Concept of Forced Defense As Legal Protection Against the Criminalization of Crime Victims Suriadiata, Irpan
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i2.4064

Abstract

Article 49 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) governs the concept of compelled defense, also known as "noodweer" in Dutch terminology. This article offers legal protection for individuals who engage in an unlawful conduct, such as abuse or murder, but do so in self-defense or in defense of another person who is under a severe threat to their life or physical well-being. The objective of this study is to ascertain the manner in which investigators constructed the legal framework to identify the suspect responsible for the abuse crime in the case that transpired at Yayasan Al-Amin NW Kilang in District Montong Gading, East Lombok district, West Nusa Tenggara on July 19, 2022, and to determine whether the suspect's actions constituted a forced defense in accordance with the provisions outlined in article 49, paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code. The present case study was authored utilizing analytical descriptive techniques in conjunction with empirical-normative research methods. The research findings indicate, initially, that the investigator's subjective elements significantly influence the trajectory of the investigation in the a-quo case. Consequently, the investigator formulates questions for the investigation in a manner that is streamlined solely to satisfy and substantiate the requirements outlined in Article 351 paragraph of the Criminal Code and to identify the suspect. The second criminal act of abuse pertains to the suspect's assault, which satisfies the criteria for a forced defense as defined in article 49 of the Criminal Code, provided that a-quo is satisfied.
Reconceptualization of the Recognition of the Unity of Customary Law Communities in Indonesian Legislation Suriadiata, Irpan
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 002 (2024): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.4785

Abstract

This study investigates the recognition of customary law communities in Indonesian legislation, with the objective of redefining the notion to better align with the evolving dynamics of customary law communities and the requirements of contemporary legal systems. This study employs a normative technique, which involves a systematic analysis of positive legal provisions, as well as an empirical sociological approach that encompasses the identification of unwritten laws and research on the efficacy of the law. The data utilized comprises primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources, obtained by traditional documentation research methods and information technology. The study findings suggest that current legislation has not adequately addressed the presence and rights of customary law communities. Hence, it is imperative to develop a more inclusive and cohesive reinterpretation of the notion of recognition that not only acknowledges the presence of customary law communities, but also ensures the effective safeguarding and enhancement of their rights. This study aims to enhance the development of legal policies that are more equitable and more aligned with the requirements of customary law communities in Indonesia.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA ORANG TUA DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN ANAK: PERGESERAN PARADIGMA MENUJU PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN BERSAMA DALAM HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA Suci Ramadhani Putri; Irpan Suriadiata
GEMOVE: Journal of Gender, Movement, and Empowerment Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): GEMOVE: Journal of Gender, Movement, and Empowerment
Publisher : Akademi Bisnis Lombok

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Indonesian juvenile justice system, regulated under Law No. 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, fails to establish parental criminal liability for offenses committed by minors. This legal vacuum has resulted in high recidivism rates and undermines the rehabilitative goals of juvenile justice. This study aims to analyze the necessity of establishing parental criminal liability in Indonesia's juvenile justice system, examine comparative models from Japan, Germany, and Canada, and propose a comprehensive framework for shared accountability between juveniles and their parents. Using qualitative normative-comparative legal research, this study develops the Theory of Dual Accountability in Juvenile Justice, which posits that criminal liability should be shared between the juvenile offender and negligent parents through proportional criminal sanctions, administrative penalties, and rehabilitative interventions. The findings demonstrate that Japan's Family Court system, Germany's parental responsibility model, and Canada's restorative justice approach all incorporate mechanisms that hold parents accountable for supervisory negligence. This study proposes amendments to Indonesia's Juvenile Justice Law to introduce three tiers of parental criminal liability: (1) criminal sanctions for gross negligence resulting in serious juvenile crimes, (2) administrative penalties for moderate supervisory failures, and (3) mandatory rehabilitative programs for minor cases. The proposed framework balances punitive measures with family rehabilitation, ensuring that both juveniles and parents bear proportional responsibility for criminal conduct. This paradigm shift toward shared accountability represents a fundamental reform in Indonesian criminal law, recognizing that effective juvenile crime prevention requires legal mechanisms that compel parental responsibility alongside juvenile rehabilitation.
Pemiskinan Koruptor Sebagai Instrumen Restoratif Dalam Membangun Peradaban Anti-Korupsi Suriadiata, Irpan
Qistie Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 18 No 2 (2025): Qistie : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (In Progress)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wahid Hasyim

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31942/jqi.v18i2.14511

Abstract

ABSTRAK Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui konsep pemiskinan koruptor dalam hukum pidana Indonesia sebagai instrumen restorative, dan bagaimana pemiskinan koruptor dapat berkontribusi dalam membangun peradaban anti-korupsi di Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, dan konseptual. Adapun hasil penelitian ini adalah, Pertama, Pemiskinan koruptor melalui perampasan aset merupakan instrumen restoratif yang tidak hanya memberi efek jera, tetapi juga mengembalikan kerugian negara dan memperkuat kesadaran kolektif akan pentingnya integritas. Dengan demikian, kebijakan ini berkontribusi besar dalam membangun peradaban anti-korupsi di Indonesia. Kedua, Peradaban bersih hanya bisa terwujud apabila setiap tindak pidana korupsi tidak hanya dihukum dengan penjara, tetapi juga dicabut hasil kejahatannya dan dimiskinkan. Dengan cara ini, hukum tidak hanya menakutkan, tetapi juga menyembuhkan luka sosial yang ditimbulkan oleh korupsi sehingga peradaban anti korupsi akan terwujud.
ENHANCING THE SETTLEMENT OF MILD ASSAULT CASES THROUGH PENAL MEDIATION: LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICES BY THE WEST LOMBOK RESORT POLICE SIS NANDA KUS ANDRIANTO; NOVITA LISTYANINGRUM; IRPAN SURIADIATA; ABABIL KARHOMA WIJAYA
LOIS: Jurnal Hukum dan Humaniora Vol 1 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Aksara Cendikia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Law enforcement addressing small offenses, particularly minor assaults, is increasingly shifting from traditional judicial systems to restorative justice approaches utilizing prison mediation techniques. This study aims to elucidate the functioning of penal mediation at the West Lombok Resort Police level, the legal frameworks that underpin it, and the challenges encountered throughout its implementation. We employed interviews, field observations, and document analyses to obtain the data. The poll results indicate that criminal mediation relies on the mutual agreement of the victim and the perpetrator, with investigators serving as facilitators and overseers of the procedure. This is supported by the Chief of Police Regulation and the principle that investigators possess the autonomy to make independent decisions, as articulated in the Criminal Procedure Code and the Police Law. Punitive mediation incorporates community members, such as village leaders and Bhabinkamtibmas, to leverage local and societal values in problem resolution.