Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.323
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Cita Hukum Rechtsidee Pembaharuan Hukum Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris Jurnal Yuridis JISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADIL : Jurnal Hukum KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Indonesian Journal of International Law Indonesian Notary Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Law & Pass : International Journal of Law, Public Administration and Social Studies Jurnal Ragam Pengabdian
Sonyendah Retnaningsih, Sonyendah
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 19 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 19 Documents
Search

 1   2 
TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS/PPAT TERHADAP AKTA YANG DINYATAKAN BATAL DEMI HUKUM OLEH PUTUSAN PENGADILAN (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 473/PDT.G/2019/PN.TNG) Shakilla Vyatri Adjany; Sonyendah Retnaningsih
JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Vol 9, No 6 (2022): JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/justitia.v9i6.3165-3174

Abstract

Akta merupakan alat bukti yg sempurna kalanya masih ada kesalahan atau kelalaian. Hal itu menarik untuk dikaji mengenai analisis akibat hukum dan tanggung jawab Notaris/PPAT terhadap akta yang dinyatakan batal demi hukum oleh putusan pengadilan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini adalah deskriptif analisis, yaitu gambaran yang menyeluruh, sistematis dan rinci tentang situasi yang diteliti dari segi hukum dan teori hukum. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah normatif, yaitu survei terhadap bahan pustaka (data sekunder) yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer. Akibat hukum terhadap akta yang dinyatakan batal demi hukum adalah batal demi hukum, dapat dibatalkan, dan tidak ada. Akta notaris yang menjadi bahan sengketa para pihak memungkinkan pihak yang merasa dirugikan untuk mengajukan gugatan ke pengadilan. Tanggung jawab Notaris/PPAT terhadap akta yang dinyatakan batal demi hukum adalah akta notaris yang tidak memenuhi aspek lahiriah, formal dan materil. Notaris dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban atas kelalaian perdata, administrasi dan pidana dalam perbuatannya.
KEDUDUKAN AKTA PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI LUNAS DALAM HAL PENGEMBANG PAILIT DITINJAU DARI ASAS KELANGSUNGAN USAHA Dhea Eldi Safiera; Sonyendah Retnaningsih; Disriani Latifah Soroinda
Jurnal ADIL Vol 17 No 1 (2026): JULI 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian Universitas YARSI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33476/ajl.v17i1.6172

Abstract

Tulisan ini menganalisis penerapan asas kelangsungan usaha terhadap akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli lunas pada perusahaan pengembang yang dinyatakan pailit berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat Nomor 30/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2022/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst dan peran notaris dalam menjelaskan kepada para pihak tentang klausula yang mengakomodir asas kelangsungan usaha dalam akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian doktrinal yang dilakukan secara preskriptif menggunakan data sekunder. Data sekunder yang digunakan mencakup bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan tersier. Data sekunder tersebut diperoleh dari studi kepustakaan atau studi dokumen. Untuk melengkapi data tersebut dilakukan wawancara dengan narasumber, seperti kurator, notaris, dan konsumen. Hasil penelitian ini menemukan bahwa penerapan asas kelangsungan usaha terhadap akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli lunas pada perusahaan pengembang yang dinyatakan pailit berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat Nomor 30/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2022/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst adalah dengan cara kurator melanjutkan proses PPJB lunas yang telah disepakati antara penjual dengan pembeli, yakni melakukan penandatanganan AJB, melakukan proses balik nama sertifikat ke atas nama pembeli, dan melakukan penyerahan bangunan beserta sertifikatnya kepada pembeli. Notaris berperan penting untuk menjelaskan kepada para pihak tentang klausula yang mengakomodir asas kelangsungan usaha dalam akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli.
Letters of Demand in Civil Disputes: Comparative Jurisprudence Between Indonesia and Malaysia Sonyendah Retnaningsih; Muhammad Rizqi Alfarizi Ramadhan
KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Vol. 20 No. 1 (2026): KRTHA BHAYANGKARA: APRIL 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v20i1.5224

Abstract

A letter of demand (sommatie) is a formal interpellation addressing a party’s non-performance. In Indonesia, a significant juridical paradox exists: while Article 1238 of the Civil Code mandates a formal warrant, Supreme Court Decision No. 117 K/SIP/1956 renders it discretionary, often resulting in premature litigation. Conversely, Malaysian jurisprudence formalizes the Letter of Demand (LOD) as a mandatory pre-action protocol and a material manifestation of bona fides. Utilizing a doctrinal and qualitative methodology, this study evaluates the functional role of these instruments within both jurisdictions. The results indicate that the discretionary nature of the Indonesian sommatie undermines judicial efficiency. To strengthen scholarly contribution, this study proposes a procedural harmonization model advocating for mandatory pre-action protocols in Indonesia. This paradigm shift reinterprets the sommatie as a vital Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) instrument rather than a mere procedural trigger, effectively filtering out unnecessary litigation and upholding the principle of swift, simple, and cost-effective justice.
Violation of the Obligation to Use Indonesian Language in International Business Contracts Involving Foreign Legal Entities as Parties under Indonesian Law Sonyendah Retnaningsih; Muhammad Rizqi Alfarizi Ramadhan; Supaphorn Akkapin
LAW & PASS: International Journal of Law, Public Administration and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 5 (2024): December
Publisher : PT. Multidisciplinary Press Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/lawpass.v1i5.47

Abstract

The Indonesian language is the official national language, required for use in all official state documents in Indonesia, as stated in Law No. 24 of 2009 on the National Flag, Language, Emblem, and Anthem. Article 31, paragraph (1) mandates the use of Indonesian in memorandums of understanding (MoUs) or agreements between state organizations, Indonesian government agencies, and private entities. When a foreign party is involved, Article 31, paragraph (2) requires the agreement to be in both Indonesian and the foreign language or English. Presidential Regulation No. 63 of 2019 also emphasizes the use of Indonesian in agreements, allowing foreign languages only as translations to ensure mutual understanding. However, the Supreme Court Circular Letter No. 3 of 2023 complicates this by stating that Indonesian private institutions or individuals cannot cancel agreements made in a foreign language without an Indonesian translation, unless bad faith is proven. This creates inconsistency with the regulations. This research examines two main issues: first, the synchronization of regulations regarding the use of Indonesian in agreements with foreign parties, and second, the legal consequences of agreements that do not use Indonesian. The research uses doctrinal and descriptive methods, with qualitative analysis of secondary data, concluding that agreements not in Indonesian are legally void and may be annulled by the courts.
Comparison of Consumer Dispute Resolution of Car Purchases on Credit in Indonesia, Malaysia and Australia Sri Wahyuni; Efa Laela Fakhriah; Anita Afriana; Sonyendah Retnaningsih
Rechtsidee Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v14i1.1163

Abstract

General Background: Consumer protection in car credit financing requires effective dispute resolution mechanisms. Specific Background: Indonesia, Malaysia, and Australia apply different legal and institutional approaches to resolving consumer disputes. Knowledge Gap: Comparative evidence on the strengths and weaknesses of these systems remains limited. Aims: This study compares consumer dispute resolution mechanisms for car credit purchases in the three countries. Results: Using normative legal research with statutory, case, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the study found that Indonesia faces overlapping institutional authority, Malaysia provides a simpler tribunal-based mechanism, and Australia adopts preventive protection through hardship notices and the Australian Financial Complaints Authority. Novelty: The study integrates institutional authority, procedural simplicity, legal certainty, and preventive protection into a comparative framework across three different legal systems. Implications: Strengthening institutional authority, simplifying procedures, and adopting preventive consumer protection mechanisms may improve legal certainty in Indonesia. Highlights: Indonesia experiences overlapping institutional authority in dispute resolution. Malaysia applies a streamlined tribunal-based settlement system. Australia emphasizes preventive consumer protection through external dispute resolution. Keywords: Car Loan Purchase, Consumer Protection, Dispute Resolution, Legal Comparison
PERTIMBANGAN HUKUM DALAM PERKARA BANTAHAN (DERDEN VERZET) ATAS SENGKETA TANAH MENURUT SURAT EDARAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2018 Sonyendah Retnaningsih; Suherman; Yoni Agus Setyono; Muhammad Rizqi Alfarizi Ramadhan
Jurnal Yuridis Vol 11 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Yuridis
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jyur.v11i1.7743

Abstract

Derden Verzet adalah upaya hukum luar biasa untuk melawan keputusan hakim yang merugikan seseorang. Perlawanan pihak ketiga diatur dalam Pasal 195 ayat (6) dan (7) HIR, atau Pasal 206 ayat (6) RBG. Pasal 195 ayat (6) HIR. Perlawanan pihak ketiga terhadap penyitaan eksekutorial hanya dapat dilakukan setelah ada putusan yang memiliki kekuatan hukum tetap. Pada prinsipnya, perlawanan yang diajukan oleh pihak ketiga terhadap penyitaan eksekutorial tidak menghentikan eksekusi. Dalam hal ini, pihak ketiga harus dapat membuktikan bahwa dia adalah pemilik dari barang yang disita. Selain itu, penentang harus benar-benar memiliki kepentingan untuk meminta pengangkatan penyitaan eksekusi tersebut karena telah merugikan haknya. Jika pihak ketiga dapat membuktikan bahwa barang tersebut adalah miliknya dan bukan milik tergugat, maka penentang harus diakui sebagai penentang yang jujur, dan perintah penyitaan harus dicabut. Dengan demikian, putusan mengenai perlawanan pihak ketiga terhadap penyitaan eksekusi hanya berhubungan dengan pencabutan penyitaan eksekusi atas barang milik pihak ketiga dan tidak memutuskan hak kepemilikan tanah. Namun, dalam prakteknya, terdapat keputusan-keputusan mengenai Derden Verzet yang memutuskan mengenai kepemilikan hak atas tanah yang dipersengketakan. Hal ini menimbulkan masalah hukum dalam pelaksanaan eksekusi karena bantahan atau perlawanan pihak ketiga terhadap keputusan eksekusi hanya berhubungan dengan pencabutan penyitaan eksekusi atas barang milik pihak ketiga.
Settlement of Mortgage Collateral Disputes Sold Below Market Value in Indonesian Civil Procedure Law Sri Wahyuni; Efa Laela Fakhriah; Anita Afriana; Sonyendah Retnaningsih; Muhammad Rizqi Alfarizi Ramadhan
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 20 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v20no3.5439

Abstract

The execution of Mortgage Rights (Hak Tanggungan/HT) through auction constitutes a legal mechanism for resolving disputes arising from defaults in bank credit agreements. However, there is currently no specific regulation governing the standards for determining the auction limit price of Mortgage Rights objects. As a result, when a debtor defaults, the auctioned Mortgage Rights object may fail to generate sufficient proceeds to fully settle the bank’s outstanding receivables. This study aims to analyze the resolution of disputes concerning the sale value of Mortgage Rights objects auctioned below market value from the perspective of evidentiary principles in Civil Procedural Law. This normative legal research employs a statutory approach, conceptual approach, and case study approach. The results indicate that although there is a written credit agreement between the bank and the debtor secured by a Mortgage Rights object whose value generally exceeds the amount of the debt, in practice, when the debtor defaults and the Mortgage Rights object is sold through auction, the proceeds may still be insufficient to repay the bank’s outstanding debt. This study proposes that, in cases where a debtor defaults on a bank credit agreement and the Mortgage Rights object has been auctioned, the court should impose the burden of proof on the bank to demonstrate that the auction process conducted over the Mortgage Rights object complied with applicable legal provisions. Therefore, if the auction proceeds are insufficient to cover the outstanding debt, such deficiency should become the bank’s risk and should not be imposed upon the debtor. This approach is essential to ensure legal certainty and justice.
Protection of Non-Participating Creditors in PKPU Homologation: Reconstruction of the Creditorum Parity Principle and the Fairness Test of Results Mewengkang, Ferry Febri; Hamid, Adnan; Retnaningsih, Sonyendah; Abdullah, Zaitun
Jurnal Ragam Pengabdian Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Mei-Agustus, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Multidisciplinary Perspectiv
Publisher : Lembaga Teewan Journal Solutions

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62710/vpvkrw27

Abstract

This study examines the legal protection of non-participating creditors in the homologation of Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) under Indonesian bankruptcy law. Although homologation binds all creditors, including those who do not participate in the proceedings, Law Number 37 of 2004 primarily emphasizes procedural legitimacy through voting and quorum requirements without explicitly assessing the fairness of outcomes. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches supported by grammatical, systematic, and teleological interpretation of relevant legal provisions and doctrines. The analysis reveals that the current PKPU framework allows non-participating concurrent creditors to receive substantially lower recoveries than they would reasonably obtain in bankruptcy, thereby conflicting with the principles of paritas creditorum and pari passu pro rata parte embodied in Articles 1131 and 1132 of the Indonesian Civil Code. Furthermore, the substantive review authority granted to judges under Article 285 has not been fully utilized to protect vulnerable creditors. This study proposes strengthening the application of the paritas creditorum principle through an Indonesian version of the best interests of creditors test as a fairness benchmark during homologation, ensuring that restructuring promotes legal certainty while safeguarding equal treatment and distributive justice for all concurrent creditors.
Reconstructing Consumer Dispute Resolution for Air Transportation Service Users Under Civil Procedure Law Sri Wahyuni; Efa Laela Fakhriah; Anita Afriana; Sonyendah Retnaningsih
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol 13, No 2 (2026): Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jph.v13i2.52766

Abstract

The increasing use of air transportation services has intensified the legal relationship between passengers as consumers and airlines as business actors, resulting in a growing number of disputes, particularly concerning the loss of passengers’ belongings on international flights. This study aims to analyze the ratio decidendi of Supreme Court Decision Number 649 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016 and formulate a reconstruction model for resolving air transportation consumer disputes through non-litigation and litigation mechanisms from the perspective of civil procedure law. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Legal materials were analyzed qualitatively through legal interpretation and systematic legal analysis. The findings reveal that the current regulation of non-litigation and litigation dispute resolution for air transportation consumers remains fragmented, creating legal uncertainty. In its ratio decidendi, the Supreme Court affirmed that aviation law constitutes lex specialist and prevails over general consumer protection provisions. Therefore, this study proposes replacing Minister of Industry and Trade Decree Number 350/MPP/Kep/12/2001 with a Government Regulation and aligning litigation procedures with civil procedure law to achieve legal certainty, effective consumer protection, and consistent dispute resolution.
Co-Authors Adnan Hamid Anita Afriana Anita Afriana Billquis Kamil Arasy Dhea Eldi Safiera Disriani Latifah Soroinda Efa Laela Fakhriah Efa Laela Fakhriah Ernila Erfa Isis Ikhwansyah Lifana Clarissa Irawan Mada Devi Kartikasari Mewengkang, Ferry Febri Muhammad Rizqi Alfarizi Ramadhan Muhammad Rizqi Alfarizi Ramadhan Muhammad Rizqi Alfarizi Ramadhan Muhammad Rizqi Alfarizi Ramadhan Novia Dwi Cahyani Fauzal Ramadhan, Muhammad Rizqi Alfarizi Regina Ayu Sepriani Reva Vergano Shakilla Vyatri Adjany Sri Wahyuni Sri Wahyuni Suherman Supaphorn Akkapin Velentina, Rouli Anita Widhayaka, Unggul Wibawa Yolanda Kusumawati Yoni Agus Setyono Zahra, Siti Athirah Zaitun Abdullah