Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

The Influence of Critical Thinking Implementation in Education: A Systematic Literature Review Aska Daulika; Kasiyah Junus; Harry Budi Santoso; Jahns Michael; Ilma Alpha Mannix
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Vol. 5 No. 9 (2025): Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v5i9.51391

Abstract

Critical thinking has emerged as a fundamental competency in 21st-century education, yet its effective implementation in educational settings remains challenging. While numerous pedagogical strategies exist to enhance critical thinking skills, there is limited comprehensive understanding of their impact on student engagement and the barriers to implementation across different educational contexts. This research aims to analyze the impact of critical thinking activities on student engagement and motivation. A systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, searching four databases (ScienceDirect, IEEE, Emerald Insight, Taylor & Francis) for publications from 2019-2024. The review employed a PICOC analysis framework and quality assessment criteria, ultimately analyzing 33 high-quality studies that met inclusion criteria. The analysis revealed that inquiry-based learning (IBL) and project-based learning (PBL) significantly enhance student engagement and motivation. Key barriers include inadequate teacher training (identified in 67% of studies), insufficient resources (45% of studies), and resistance to moving away from traditional teaching methods (52% of studies). Technology-enhanced pedagogical strategies, including collaborative learning platforms, game-based learning, and AI-assisted tools, demonstrated effectiveness in developing critical thinking skills. This research also highlights the importance of integrating technology in education as a means to support the development of critical thinking. These findings indicate that the development of critical thinking skills not only enhances student engagement but also prepares them to face real-world challenges.
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Co-Partner Indonesian Version Eni Rahmawati; Yeni Rustina; Dessie Wanda; Nicole van Veenendaal; Kasiyah Kasiyah; M Agung Akbar
Jurnal Keperawatan Soedirman Vol 21 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Keperawatan Soedirman (JKS)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu-ilmu Kesehatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jks.2026.21.2.21515

Abstract

The CO-PARTNER instrument was developed to measure parental participation in neonatal care settings, but an Indonesian-language version is not currently available. The purpose of this study was to adapt the CO-PARTNER instrument for cross-cultural use in Indonesian. Cross-cultural adaptation was conducted following Sousa's guidelines. Psychometric testing was conducted between September and December 2025. Eligibility criteria for participants were parents of infants admitted to a neonatal care unit. The study involved 257 respondents. The questionnaire's structural variables were tested using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in RStudio version 4.5.2. Based on established CFA criteria, one item (CCI 31) was eliminated due to low factor loading, resulting in a refined CO-PARTNER structure comprising 30 items across six domains. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients demonstrated strong internal consistency at both initial testing and retest for each of the six subscales (all > 0.70). Model fit indices showed satisfactory values: Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.994; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA)=0.044; and degrees of freedom (DF)=390. The CO-PARTNER Indonesia Version proved to be a reliable and valid tool for evaluating parental involvement in infant care within neonatal care units across six key components: daily care, medical care, acquiring information, parent advocacy, time spent with the infant, and closeness and comforting of the infant. The CO-PARTNER Indonesia Version is applicable for assessing parental involvement in neonatal wards, where such participation contributes to improved outcomes for both infants and parents