Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.68
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune Nagari Law Review Unes Law Review Buletin Ilmiah Nagari Membangun Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Media Syari'ah: Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial RIO LAW JURNAL UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Sibatik Journal : Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Ekasakti Journal of law and Justice Lareh Law Review Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Media of Law and Sharia
Wetria Fauzi
Faculty Of Law, Andalas University, Padang, Indonesia
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 41 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Nagari Law Review

 1 
Diskresi Penggunaan Dana Cadangan (Provisional Sum) Pada Tender Pekerjaan Konstruksi Dengan Sumber Pendanaan Anggaran Pendapatan Dan Penerimaan Negara (APBN) Herlambang, Fahreza; Rembrandt, Rembrandt; Fauzi, Wetria
Nagari Law Review Vol 8 No 1 (2024): Nagari Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Andalas University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/nalrev.v.8.i.1.p.172-182.2024

Abstract

In the construction work tender mechanism with state budget funding sources, there are no provisions or clauses relating to the use of reserve funds (provisional sum). The use and provisional sum clause can be found in the procurement of goods/services with international contract standards, for example, FIDIC contract standards and the procurement of integrated design and build work. The addition of provisional sum requirements is a discretion by Middle High Leadership Officials, in the form of adding clauses to the Special Conditions of Contract, which does not become an assessment point or point that can invalidate the Provider Selection process. If the provisional sum is not interpreted as calculating unexpected costs or other costs, then it does not conflict with the provisions for preparing own estimated price in statutory regulations and meets the Discretionary requirements as regulated in the Government Administration Law.
Pengaturan Penjaminan Polis sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Dana Masyarakat dalam Praktik Perasuransian Fauzi, Wetria
Nagari Law Review Vol 7 No 2 (2023): Nagari Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Andalas University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/nalrev.v.7.i.2.p.354-362.2023

Abstract

Claiming an insurance policy is a complex issue. Sometimes, insurance companies refuse to pay claims for various reasons and cannot pay policyholders' insurance claims. Therefore, the presence of a policy guarantee institution is essential. Article 53, paragraph (4) of the Insurance Law stipulates that the Law regarding policy guarantee programs shall be formed 3 (three) years after the legalization of the Insurance Law. However, as mandated by Article 53, the policy guarantee institution has yet to be approved. Law Number 4 of 2023 concerning Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector or PPSK answers this problem. The Law provides a new mandate to form an institution, the Deposit Insurance Corporation (LPS). The existence of a Policy Guarantee Institution as mandated by the Law No. 40 of 2014 concerning Insurance could not be embodied. Therefore, enacting Law No. 4 of 2023 concerning the development and strengthening of the financial sector will hopefully become the answer. This Law provides the duties and authority of the Deposit Insurance Institution (LPS) to guarantee policies to protect public funds. However, to achieve the goal of the new Law, there should be good coordination between the Financial Services Authority (OJK), the financial services industry supervisory institution, and LPS, the policy guarantee institution. These two institutions should synergize with each other in protecting insurance policyholders.
Analisis Terhadap Batasan Adendum Perjanjian Kerjasama Pemerintah dengan Badan Usaha (KPBU) dalam Penyediaan Infrastruktur Fakhruddin, Husni Muhammad; Fauzi, Wetria; Warman, Kurnia
Nagari Law Review Vol 7 No 1 (2023): Nagari Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Andalas University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/nalrev.v.7.i.1.p.49-58.2023

Abstract

Agreements are one of the domains regulated through private legal instruments. However, agreements are not always governed by private legal instruments. Sometimes, public legal instruments also regulate an agreement, especially when it involves government entities. This study aims to examine the extent to which an addendum to a Public Private Partnership Agreement in Infrastructure Provision can be carried out, considering one of the specifications of the procurement mechanism for implementing business entities in the Public Private Partnership scheme, which includes attaching a draft agreement in the Request for Proposal (RfP) document. After a winning Business Entity is selected, the draft agreement is finalized, with the rule that the substance that has been completed cannot be changed. This research focuses on determining the limitations in making an addendum to the Public Private Partnership Agreement in Infrastructure Provision during the draft agreement's finalization and implementation phase. The research method used in this study is empirical legal research, which utilizes primary and secondary data. KPBU agreements are controlled by private legal instruments and regulated through public legal instruments. Even though some provisions do not allow changing the substance being competed for, these provisions are not norms that can be categorized as lex imperfect because if these provisions deviate, they will automatically injure the principles of procurement. Therefore the procurement is not following the principles regulated in the laws – invitation and may result in a failed auction condition.
Co-Authors Abdullah, Risyad Arben, Ali Aulia br Surbakti, Syafirah Azmi Fendri Begum khalidhazia, Trisno Marta Busyra Azheri Delfiyanti Delfiyanti Delima Fitrah, Indah Efendi, Raimon Elwi Danil Fakhruddin, Husni Muhammad Hamidi, Syahrul Harvia Santri, Selvi Herlambang, Fahreza Husni Muhammad Fakhruddin Indah Delima Fitrah Indradewa, Rhian Indriani, Lidya Khairani Khairani Khairani Khairani Lidya Indriani Lucy Juwita Asni Mirwati, Yulia Nia Wino Marisya Partynia Nur Imantya Pratama, Arya Putra Rizal Putri Zakia Yurahman Rahayu, Aisya Ratih Agustin Wulandari Rembrandt, Rembrandt Selvi Harvia Santri Syahfitri, Triyana Syahrul Hamidi Syofiarti Tasman Tasman Utami, Vanessa Yasniwati, Yasniwati Yoko Rasaki Rasaki Yoserwan Yuslim Zulkifli