Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 26 Documents
Search

The KPK'S Investigation Termination Warrant (SP3) Authority: Endeavours To Prevent Abuse Of Power Mohammad Syaiful Aris; Nahdyan, Auly; Abrianto, Bagus Oktafian
Arena Hukum Vol. 17 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2024.01701.9

Abstract

The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) is a state entity created under Law No. 30 of 2002 in Indonesia to support the prosecutor’s office and the police in combating corruption. Law No. 30 of 2002 has been subject to multiple judicial reviews by the Constitutional Court (MK). In 2019, a proposal was submitted to amend Law No. 30 of 2002. The modification of the Law has both advantages and disadvantages, with some viewing it as weakening the KPK by categorising it inside the executive branch, thereby impacting the agency’s independence. One of the main focuses of this Article is the authorisation of the KPK to issue a Warrant to Terminate Investigation (SP3). SP3 results from the legal principle of defending human rights and serves as a tool for checks and balances, but it can also be prone to misuse. The research focuses on two main issues: changes in the KPK’s authority and the KPK Institution’s deconstruction. Secondly, the consequences of the KPK issuing SP3 and the risk of authority misuse in combating corruption. This study involves legal research utilising both statutory and conceptual approaches. This paper intends to evaluate the various ways in which power abuse might occur within a corruption eradication system, specifically focusing on delegating authority to the KPK in issuing SP3 from a constitutional standpoint. The conclusions of this study provide a way to prevent the abuse of SP3 through reporting procedures and case titles at the KPK Supervisory Board (Dewas). In addition, the method should include authorising the KPK to revoke SP3.
Legal Protection and Legal Certainty of Land Ownership: Community Service at Tambak Kemerakan-Sidoarjo -, Indrawati; Santoso, Urip; Hajati, Sri; Winarsi, Sri; Oktafian Abrianto, Bagus
Jurnal Dedikasi Hukum Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/jdh.v4i3.36369

Abstract

The government conducts land registration throughout the territory of the Republic of Indonesia to ensure legal certainty. Landowners are also obliged to register their land ownership rights through sporadic land registration or Systematic Land Registration. Sporadic land registration or Systematic Land Registration produces a land title certificate as proof of land rights, issued by the Regency/City Land Office. With the issuance of a land title certificate, a guarantee of legal certainty has been realized for the owner of the land title certificate, including certainty of land title status, certainty of land title subjects, and certainty of land title objects. A guarantee of legal protection is also realized for the owner of the land title certificate, namely the ownership of the land title certificate cannot receive interference or lawsuits from other parties and the land title certificate cannot be withdrawn or cancelled by anyone.   Abstrak Perlindungan Hukum dan Kepastian Hukum Kepemilikan Tanah: Pengabdian Masyarakat di Tambak Kemerakan-Sidoarjo.Pemerintah mengadakan pendaftaran tanah di seluruh wilayah Negara Republik Indonesia dalam rangka menjamin kepastian hukum. Pemilik tanah juga berkewajiban mendaftarkan tanah Hak Miliknya melalui pendaftaran tanah secara sporadik atau Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematik Lengkap. Pendaftaran tanah secara sporadik atau Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematik Lengkap menghasilkan sertipikat hak atas tanah sebagai surat tanda bukti hak atas tanah, yang diterbitkan oleh Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten/Kota. Dengan diterbitkan sertipikat hak atas tanah terwujud jaminan kepastian hukum bagi pemilik sertipikat hak atas tanah, meliputi kepastian status hak atas tanah, kepastian subjek hak atas tanah, dan kepastian objek hak atas tanah. Juga terwujud jaminan perlindungan hukum bagi pemilik sertipikat hak atas tanah, yaitu pemilik sertipikat hak atas tanah tidak mendapatkan gangguan atau gugatan dari siapapun dan sertipikat hak atas tanah tidak dapat dibatalkan oleh siapapun.
A Chance to Defend Regional Heads in The Procedure of Regional Head Dismissal as A Manifestation of The Proportionality Principle Aris, Mohammad Syaiful; Fauzurrahman, Iqbal; Abrianto, Bagus Oktafian; Nugraha, Xavier; Felicia, Stefania Arshanty
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 12 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.12.2.2023.241-266

Abstract

The existence of regional autonomy in Indonesia is implemented through regional leaders who have the authority to run local government. When carrying out their duties, regional leaders are supervised by other state institutions as a form of checks and balances in government power. Hence, the procedure to dismiss regional leaders regulates to involve the Regional People's Representative Assembly, the Supreme Court, and the President through the Minister of Home Affairs as a form of right to dismiss. However, the existence of the proportionality principle in the procedure to dismiss regional leaders, through the right given to regional leaders to defend themselves, has yet to be regulated in the law. This article talks about two things: first, the procedure to dismiss regional leaders, and second, the legal consequences and the position of a chance to summon regional leaders to explain and defend themselves in the procedure to dismiss regional leaders. This article aims to find the importance of proportionality principles in the procedure to dismiss regional leaders. The method used in this article is legal research, with statutes, conceptual, and case approaches. The results of this research show that although the procedure to dismiss regional leaders has been regulated in law, applying the proportionality principle only exists in jurisprudences. Hence, an ius constituendum is needed to determine legal consequences and certainty regarding the procedure to dismiss regional leaders.
KARAKTERISTIK PERIZINAN BERUSAHA BERDASARKAN UU NOMOR 6 TAHUN 2023 TENTANG PENETAPAN PERPU NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2022 TENTANG CIPTA KERJA MENJADI UNDANG-UNDANG Abrianto, Bagus Oktafian; Putra Nainggolan, Samuel Dharma
Al-Amwal : Journal of Islamic Economic Law Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): Al-Amwal : JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC ECONOMIC LAW
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, Fakultas Syariah, IAIN Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/alw.v8i2.4159

Abstract

Licensing is a spirit of administrative law that studies law in a moving state. Licensing is required for the running of a government, both central government and regional government. Based on the principle of decentralization, regional governments are allowed to regulate their own areas and for this reason permits are issued by the regional government. In practice, there is a lot of overlapping and overlapping regarding licensing between the central government and regional governments both in terms of substance and technical implementation in each existing Regional Work Unit (SKPD), the enactment of Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning the Determination of Replacement Government Regulations Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation Becomes a Law changing the licensing constellation in Indonesia. In the area licensing is attempted to be carried out through a service system implemented by Online Single Submission (OSS) and One Stop Integrated Service (PTSPP), both of which must be integrated with OSS. Licensing services in areas that are integrated with or PTSP are the focus of this research study. This research is normative legal research that uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach that will be used to answer existing legal issues.
Problematika Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Yang Bersifat Fiktif Positif Setelah Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Abrianto, Bagus Oktafian; Nugraha, Xavier; Hartono, Julienna; Kosuma, Indah Permatasari
Arena Hukum Vol. 16 No. 3 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2023.01603.5

Abstract

This doctrinal research aims to analyze the development of legal consequences and legal protection related to the Government's omission on applications to state administrative officials. Until the enactment of the Job Creation Act, there were 3 (three) different legal norms regarding the legal consequences of the Government's omission on applications to state administrative officials, namely fictitious rejection, in the State Administrative Court Law, fictitious approval followed up with applications, in the Government Administration Act, and fictitious approval without being followed up with an application, in the Job Creation Act. Based on the principle that the new law overrides the old law, the applicable legal consequences are as regulated in the Job Creation Act. Then, legal protection related to the Government's omission on applications to state administrative officials are the imposition of administrative sanctions, submitting applications for the determination of fictitious approval of state administrative decisions to the Administrative Court, filing claims based on government actions disputes, or submitting reports to the Ombudsman.
Challenging the “Half-Hearted” Fulfillment of the Rights of Workers with Disabilities Abrianto, Bagus Oktafian; Tinambunan, Hezron Sabar Rotua
Disable Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Disable: Law Review
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/dlr.v1i1.45076

Abstract

This study finds that there is a persistent legal conflict and regulatory disharmony between national provisions on disability employment quotas and their implementation at the company level. Empirical evidence shows that many companies fail to meet the quota obligation due to the absence of qualified applicants with disabilities, unprepared workplace environments, and the lack of operational technical guidelines. Furthermore, the absence of explicit sanctions in existing regulations creates legal uncertainty and weakens enforcement. Using a normative legal method with a statute and conceptual approach, this research analyzes the relevant legal framework and constructs arguments based on legal principles and theories in labor law concerning the rights of persons with disabilities. The study reveals that the current regulatory framework lacks integrated monitoring mechanisms, measurable evaluation indicators, and clear administrative sanctions, while also failing to provide incentives that could encourage compliance. The novelty of this research lies in offering a combined legal and policy framework that bridges the gap between normative provisions and practical implementation, supported by recommendations for detailed technical guidelines, accessibility audits, and structured incentive schemes. These findings contribute to strengthening inclusive labor policies in Indonesia, ensuring that the principle of inclusivity becomes a measurable and enforceable standard rather than a rhetorical aspiration.