Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.906
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal UNEJ e-Proceeding AMANNA GAPPA Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum Media Iuris Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Indonesian Journal of Law and Society International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Suloh : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Semarang Law Review Journal of Economic & Business Law Review Journal of Private and Economic Law Journal of English Literature and Linguistic Studies (JELLS) Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Rechtenstudent Journal Al Itmamiy: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum
Galuh Puspaningrum, Galuh
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jember
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Mining Business License Area For Religious Community Organizations In The Perspective Of The Welfare State Zakiyatun Nufus; Fendi Setyawan; Galuh Puspaningrum
International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) (Special Issue) - International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) - January
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/ijhess.v7i1.6970

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the Special Mining Business Permit Area for Religious Community Organizations in the Perspective of the Welfare State (Walfare State). This study uses normative legal research methods using a legislative approach and a conceptual approach. This study uses the theory of legal certainty, the theory of justice, and the theory of the welfare state as analytical knives in analyzing these problems. The results of the study show that the legal transformation in policies related to Article 83A PP No. 25/2024 is formally irrelevant to the rules above, namely in Law Number 4 of 2009 and Law Number 3 of 2020. However, the rules are still valid and can be implemented responsibly and professionally based on the analysis of legislation and theoretical analysis carried out by researchers, decisions made by government officials have binding force on all members of society, and have a public function, in the sense of performing public services.
GUGATAN TIDAK DAPAT DITERIMA DENGAN ALASAN OBSCUUR LIBEL PADA PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NO. 67/PDT.G/2021/PN JMR) Moh. Ali; Kinasih Amara Krisdianti; Galuh Puspaningrum
Semarang Law Review (SLR) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Oktober
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/slr.v5i2.10732

Abstract

The claim formulation made by the plaintiff is used as a reference for a case or dispute in a court. A lawsuit that does not comply with the requirements of the procedural law will be declared that the lawsuit cannot be accepted or in other terms niet ontvankelijke verklaard (NO) in the final decision by the judge. There are various reasons for the dropping of the niet ontvankelijke verklaard, one of which is because the lawsuit that was made was not perfect, in the sense that the lawsuit was vague (obscuur libel). Obscuur libel means a claim whose contents are unclear so that it is said to be neither clear nor dark in the formulation of the claim. This research uses a normative juridical method using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. This research contains an analysis of a decision which states that the lawsuit contains elements of obcur libel so it is declared unacceptable. Judges need to dig deeper into jurisprudence to analyze a lawsuit so that it produces the right decision.AbstrakFormulasi gugatan yang dibuat oleh penggugat digunakan sebagai acuan dari suatu perkara atau sengketa disebuah pengadilan. Gugatan yang tidak sesuai syarat dalam hukum acara akan dinyatakan bahwa gugatan tersebut tidak dapat diterima atau istilah lainnya niet ontvankelijke verklaard (NO) pada putusan akhir oleh hakim. Alasan dari penjatuhan niet ontvankelijke verklaard sendiri terdapat berbagai penyebab salah satunya dikarenakan gugatan yang dibuat tidak sempurna, dalam artian gugatan tersebut kabur (obscuur libel). Obscuur libel memiliki arti gugatan yang isinya tidak jelas sehingga dikatakan tidak terang atau gelap dalam formulasi gugatannya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan penekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Penelitian ini berisi analisis suatu putusan yang menyatakan bahwa gugatan mengandung unsur obcuur libel sehingga dinyatakan tidak dapat diterima. Hakim perlu menggali lebih dalam mengenai suatu yurisprudensi untuk menggali dapat menganalisis suatu gugatan sehingga menghasilkan putusan yang tepat.
Co-Authors A mir Rizki, Mohammad Fa iq Abdul Hafid Firdaus Dani Widiyanti, Ikarini Dede Kania Dina Tsalist Wildana Dominikus Rato Dyah Ochtorina Susanti Emi Zulaika Ermanto Fahamsyah Fendi Setyawan Godeliva Ayudyana Suyudi Handono, Mardi Handono, Mardi Hapsari, Erdita Hazar Kusmayanti, Hazar I Wayan Yasa, I Wayan Ikarini Dani Widiyanti Iwan Rachmad Soetijono Kinasih Amara Krisdianti Marissa Ayu Niar Moh. Ali Nadiya Nurmaya Nony Aulia Ramadhanti Nuril Firdausiah Nuzulia Kumala Sari Prihatmini, Sapti Putri, Linda Cristina Rama Wisnu Wardana Salsabila Tamami Saudatus Zahro Utomo, Anindhia Aziza Raihana Widayanti, Ikarini Dani Zakiyatun Nufus