Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.14
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Daulat Hukum Unes Law Review SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis JURNAL ILMIAH GLOBAL EDUCATION Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Impresi Indonesia Palangka Law Review
Elin Sudiarti
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Palangka Raya, Palangka Raya, Indonesia
Religion Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Implementation of the Non-Discrimination for Employees Principle under Manpower Law Ongnot Hersiani; Ariani Yestati; Elin Sudiarti; Syamhudian Noor
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 9, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v9i1.52152

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of the principle of non-discrimination under Law Number 13 of 2003 on Manpower at PT. Trio Motor in Kuala Kurun, Gunung Mas Regency. The research is motivated by the existence of company policies prohibiting married couples from working in the same unit and the dismissal of female employees after marriage, which potentially contradict the principle of equal treatment in employment relations. The purpose of this study is to analyze the implementation of the principle of non-discrimination in company practices and to assess its conformity with Indonesian labor law and ILO Convention Number 111 of 1958. This research employs an empirical juridical method by combining statutory analysis with field research through interviews, observations, and literature studies. The data obtained are analyzed using a descriptive qualitative approach to evaluate the implementation of Articles 5, 6, and 153 paragraph (1) of Law Number 13 of 2003 on Manpower. The findings show that the implementation of the non-discrimination principle at PT. Trio Motor is still not optimal, as company policies prioritize professionalism and conflict prevention over equal treatment for workers. Consequently, a gap remains between normative legal provisions and employment practices.
JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF JUDGES’ CONSIDERATIONS IN COMPENSATION DECISIONS FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT (STUDY OF DECISION NOMOR 92/PDT.SUS-HKI/HAK CIPTA/2024/PN NIAGA JKT.PST Sherla Demelan Tamara; Any Nugroho; Elin Sudiarti
SOSIOEDUKASI Vol 15 No 1 (2026): SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universaitas PGRI Banyuwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i1.8520

Abstract

The research focuses on the judge’s legal reasoning in the Central Jakarta Commercial Court ruling No. 92/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Hak Cipta/2024/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst regarding song copyright infringement. The purpose is to examine the basis of the judge's consideration in determining compensation and assess the accuracy of the legal basis used based on the principle of legal certainty. Normative juridical methods underpin this study, combining legislative, case, and conceptual approaches. The findings uncover that judges seek to safeguard the economic rights of creators; however, the legal foundation applied is not entirely appropriate, as it reflects a conflation of criminal and civil norms. In addition, the determination of compensation is not explained in detail and has not taken into account the royalty standards set by the LMKN. The study shed light that the decision reflects an inconsistency in the application of copyright law by combining civil and criminal legal norms in determining compensation, thereby weakening legal certainty and creating ambiguity in the legal basis for resolving song copyright infringement disputes.
Praktik Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat antara Toko Modern dan Pasar Tradisional dalam Ketidaksesuaian Jarak sebagaimana diatur dalam Perda Kota Palangka Raya No. 17 Tahun 2014 tentang Toko Modern Perti Gina; Mulida Hayati Hayati; Elin Sudiarti; Rollys Suriani
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 4 (2026): Tema Hukum Perdata dan Kenotariatan
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i4.3032

Abstract

This study examines unfair business competition between modern retail stores and traditional markets in Palangka Raya City due to non-compliance with minimum distance regulations under Regional Regulation No. 17 of 2014. Using an empirical, and regulatory analysis. The results show that the rapid expansion of modern retail outlets often violates zoning requirements, causing financial losses and business closures among traditional traders, alongside weak local government supervision. Consistent regulatory enforcement is required to ensure fairness and sustainable local economic development.
Tinjauan Yuridis Disharmoni Perlindungan Hukum Antara Hak Cipta dan Hak Merek terhadap Objek yang Sama: Studi Putusan Nomor 40/Pdt.Sus-Hak Cipta/2024/Pn.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. Alda Paramita Azhara; Thea Farina; Elin Sudiarti; Nuraliah Ali
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 4 (2026): Tema Hukum Perdata dan Kenotariatan
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i4.3078

Abstract

Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) protection in Indonesia, as regulated in Law No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright and Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications, is a fundamental basis in ensuring legal certainty for creators and business actors. However, in reality, legal disharmony often occurs when an object has a dual function as both a work of art and a commercial distinguishing mark (trademark). This normative conflict is triggered by a conflict of registration principles, namely the declarative principle of copyright versus the constitutive principle (first-to-file) of trademark rights, which often leads to overlapping protection claims. This study aims to analyze the resolution of legal disharmony between copyright and trademark rights over the same object by referring to Decision Number 40/Pdt.Sus-Hak Cipta/2024/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. The research method used is normative juridical with a statute approach and a case approach. The results of the analysis show that the Panel of Judges resolved the disharmony by applying the originality test as a benchmark. The findings of the study confirm that when an object has been registered and used as a trademark first, the subsequent registration of that object as copyright is considered to not meet the criteria of originality. Harmonization of protection can be achieved through the synchronization of originality testing.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Sarjana Penggerak Pembangunan Indonesia (SPPI) atas Keterlambatan Pembayaran Gaji sebagai Kepala Satuan Pelayanan Pemenuhan Gizi (SPPG) di Kota Palangka Raya Nurdiana; Novea Elysa Wardhani; Elin Sudiarti
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 12 (2025): Tema Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i12.3142

Abstract

The Sarjana Penggerak Pembangunan Indonesia (SPPI) Program deploys university graduates as Heads of the Nutrition Fulfillment Service Units (SPPG) to support the "Golden Indonesia 2045" vision. However, delays in salary payments have impacted their welfare and the quality of services provided. This empirical legal research conducted at the SPPG in Palangka Raya City indicates that these delays are caused by administrative factors, budgetary constraints, regulatory issues and coordination challenges. Legal protection for these graduates can be implemented through both preventive and repressive measures.
Co-Authors Alda Paramita Azhara Any Nugroho Ariani Yestati Evi Evi F.X. Ary Setiawan Habibah Habibah Helena Valensia Heriamariaty Heriamariaty Ivani Dominica Ivans Januardy Joanita Jalianery Jovita Sesylia Karlinae D. Bangas Mulida Hayati Mulida Hayati Hayati Naik Josua Simamora Nazira Azwa Noor, Syamhudian Novea Elysa Wardhani Nuraliah Ali Nurdiana Ongnot Hersiani Perti Gina Rohit Nur Alfin Rollys Suriani Sandi Mangara Sijabat Satriya Nugraha Sherla Demelan Tamara Tahasak Sahay Thea Farina Thea Farina Embang