Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP SENGKETA LAHAN SEBAGAI ALASAN PEMBENAR TERHADAP KEJAHATAN LINGKUNGAN BERUPA KEALPAAN ATAS LAHAN GARAPAN PERKEBUNAN BERSERTIFIKAT : Studi Kasus Putusan Bebas PT Gandaerah Hendana (Anak Usaha Samsung) Michael Giovanni Joseph; Daya Nur Pratama; Irwan Triadi
Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penulisan jurnal ini membahas tentang Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Sengketa Lahan sebagai Alasan Pembenar terhadap Kejahatan Lingkungan berupa Kealpaan atas Lahan Garapan Perkebunan Bersertifikat: Studi Kasus Putusan Bebas PT Gandaerah Hendana (Anak Usaha Samsung). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami dan menganalisis terkait analisis yuridis terhadap sengketa lahan sebagai alasan pembenar terhadap kejahatan lingkungan. Dalam penulisan jurnal ini menggunakan metode penelitian pendekatan kepustakaan yang mengambil dasar dari perundang-undangan yang berlaku di Indonesia dan menggunakan Metode deskriptif analisis, yaitu dengan menganalisa permasalahan yang ada serta analisis yuridis Terhadap Sengketa Lahan sebagai Alasan Pembenar terhadap Kejahatan Lingkungan berupa Kealpaan atas Lahan Garapan Perkebunan Bersertifikat. Analisis yuridis Terhadap Sengketa Lahan sebagai Alasan Pembenar terhadap Kejahatan Lingkungan berupa Kealpaan atas Lahan Garapan Perkebunan Bersertifikat: Studi Kasus Putusan Bebas PT Gandaerah Hendana (Anak Usaha Samsung) ditegaskan dalam Asas dan tujuan dari pengelolaan perkebunan diatur didalam ketentuan Pasal 2 j.o 3 Undang- Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perkebunan.
Peran Ganda Media Sosial dalam Penegakan Hukum Indonesia: Analisis Sosio-Legal antara Peluang Transparansi dan Risiko Erosi Due Process Irwan Triadi; Febrian Rizky Akbar
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/joecy.v5i3.5498

Abstract

This socio-legal study analyzes the dual role of social media in Indonesia's criminal justice system from 2019 to 2024 through thematic analysis of 15 viral legal cases. The research demonstrates that while social media enhances transparency and accelerates investigations in 80% of cases examined, it simultaneously erodes fundamental due process principles in 53% of cases through trial by social media and digital vigilantism. The phenomenon of "no viral no justice" reveals a critical institutional failure, where law enforcement agencies have externalized case prioritization functions to digital virality metrics rather than maintaining equal application of law. The study introduces the concept of "justice outsourcing" to explain how public pressure forces hasty responses that may compromise the presumption of innocence and equality before the law. Through analysis of secondary data including regulatory frameworks, institutional reports, and verified digital documentation, this research identifies a central tension between substantive justice demands and procedural integrity. The findings reveal that law enforcement responses, while demonstrating adaptability, often sacrifice careful investigation protocols for rapid public satisfaction. The study proposes a collaborative governance model involving law enforcement, digital forensic specialists, and independent fact-checking communities, alongside regulatory updates to the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and the Information and Electronic Transactions Law (UU ITE), to mitigate disinformation risks while protecting suspect rights and maintaining due process standards in the digital public sphere.
The Policy on Appointing Former Directors of Bankrupt Companies as Directors of State-Owned Enterprises Viewed from the Principles of Good Corporate Governance Muhammad Abduh; Atik Winanti; Irwan Triadi
Nusantara: Journal of Law and Islamic Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Nusantara: Journal of Law and Islamic Law
Publisher : Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/nusantara.v1i2.196

Abstract

This research analyzes the legal policy and validity of appointing former directors of bankrupt companies to the boards of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) under the principles of Good Corporate Governance (GCG). Utilizing a normative legal research method with statutory and case study approaches, the study specifically examines the appointment of Sigit Winarto as Director of PT JIEP following the bankruptcy of PT Istaka Karya. The findings demonstrate that such an appointment explicitly violates Article 93 of the Company Law in conjunction with Article 15 of the SOE Law, as it transpired within the mandatory five-year prohibition period without valid judicial rehabilitation. Consequently, the appointment is void ab initio due to substantive legal defects and contravenes the GCG principles of responsibility and accountability. Therefore, rigorous enforcement of administrative sanctions against the appointing authorities is imperative to safeguard the integrity of state asset management and to ensure legal certainty and public trust in the professionalism of SOE governance in Indonesia.
Peran Keluarga Dalam Menjunjung Tinggi Sikap Bela Negara Terhadap Paham Radikalisme Dalam Media Sosial Eriz Syawaldi; Gema Permana Rahman; Muhamad Afifullah; Irwan Triadi
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v1i4.504

Abstract

Radicalism is an internal threat to a country, because it triggers acts of terrorism, so it is necessary to instil a sense of nationalism in every family, because radicalism has the impact of national disintegration. This research uses a normative juridical approach method with descriptive analytical analysis of legal materials. The results of this study found that radicalism can be spread through social media massively, because Radicalism can appear unlimited in space and time. Therefore, efforts that can be made to reduce radicalism in the family, by introducing science properly and correctly, understanding science properly and correctly, minimising social inequality, maintaining unity and integrity, supporting peace actions, playing an active role in reporting radicalism and terrorism, increasing understanding of living together, filtering the information obtained.
Tanggung Jawab Negara terhadap Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum Zahrah Rani'ah Delyananda; Irwan Triadi
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v4i1.1709

Abstract

This article analyzes the state's responsibility in fulfilling human rights from a legal philosophy perspective, which raises the main issue of the imbalance between the ideal justice in the constitution and its reality. This study aims to determine the causes of the fulfillment of human rights in Indonesia, which is still limited to formalities even though the regulations are clear, and how legal philosophy can provide a basis for evaluating this situation. The research method used is normative-philosophical, with conceptual, legislative, and historical approaches, as well as qualitative-prescriptive analysis of Aristotle's theory of justice, Kant's deontological ethics, legal positivism, and the values of social justice in Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. The results of the study show that overly dominant legal positivism has resulted in the fulfillment of human rights often stopping at legality on paper rather than real justice. The state has also not been optimal in carrying out its ethical function of fulfilling, protecting, and respecting human rights through distributive, corrective, and affirmative policies. There is an urgent need to integrate moral values, governance ethics, and social justice principles in the interpretation and implementation of public policy. These results emphasize the need for a more ethical, responsive, and substantive justice-oriented legal paradigm shift so that the fulfillment of human rights in Indonesia can be truly meaningful and in line with the mandate of the constitution.
METODE PENDEKATAN HUKUM FILOSOFIS TERKAIT BENTUK PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARIAH Riski Ari Wibowo; Fakhrul Ardiyan; Irwan Triadi
NETIZEN: JOURNAL OF SOCIETY AND BUSSINESS Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): NETIZEN: JOURNAL OF SOCIETY AND BUSSINESS
Publisher : CV. ADIBA AISHA AMIRA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The philosophical legal approach is a method of legal analysis that focuses on the values, morals, and objectives of law. In the context of resolving Sharia economic disputes, this approach is crucial for understanding the philosophical basis of Islamic law and its application within the Indonesian national legal system. This study aims to describe how a philosophical legal approach can be used to analyze and develop a model for resolving Sharia economic disputes in accordance with the principles of substantive justice and the maqasid al-syarī'ah (objectives of sharia). The method used in this study is a juridical-philosophical approach with qualitative analysis. The results of the study indicate that a philosophical legal approach can strengthen the integration between Sharia law and positive law in resolving Sharia economic disputes, particularly in the context of religious courts and Sharia arbitration. This approach prioritizes a balance between legal certainty, expediency, and spiritual justice, which are the spirit of the Islamic legal system.
Konsekuensi Yuridis Penyimpangan Kewenangan dalam Implementasi Informed Consent Digital Rosi Wulandari; Slamet Tri Wahyudi; Irwan Triadi
JPNM Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): July : Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin (ACCEPTED)
Publisher : SM Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59945/jpnm.v4i3.1440

Abstract

Transformasi digital dalam sektor kesehatan memberikan perubahan signifikan khususnya dalam rekam medis, Seluruh administrasi rumah sakit beralih menjadi elektronik termasuk Informed Consent. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis aturan hukum tentang Informed Consent dapat di implementasikan tanpa celah penyimpangan dan mampu melindungi profesi kedokteran. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif yakni menganalisis norma norma pada peraturan perundang undangan terkait Informed Consent serta mengkaji dengan identifikasi tantangan serta kendalam implementasi Informed Consent digital yang dapat menimbulkan resiko kekeliruan dalam pencatatan digital. Hasil penelitian menunjukan Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 13 tahun 2025 tentang Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Manusia Kesehatan pasal 182 mengisyaratkan implementasi Informed Consent yang merupakan kewenangan seluruh prosesnya dilekatkan kepada dokter selaku subyek yang melakukan tindakan medis justru dapat dilimpahkan kepada tenaga kesehatan lainnya yang tidak memiliki kompetensi serupa. Hal ini berpotensi menimbulkan kesalahan dan kekeliruan yang memiliki konsekuensi hukum di kemudian hari apabila mengakibatkan kerugian materiil dan imateriil bagi pasien. Perlu adanya pedoman yang sesuai dan efektif untuk mengatur pelaksanaan pelimpahan wewenang persetujuan informed consent secara digital dalam konteks pelayanan kesehatan modern melalui penambahan subtansi dalam Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 13 tahun 2025 tentang Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Manusia Kesehatan pasal 182 agar memberikan penguatan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan profesi dokter dalam sistem kesehatan nasional untuk dapat dilaksanakan secara patuh dan seragam di seluruh penyedia fasilitas kesehatan.
Pembentukan Hukum Oleh Hakim Dalam Kerangka Teori Penemuan Hukum Jovansyah Ali; Irwan Triadi
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 10 No 2 (2026): Unes Journal of Swara Justisia
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/ewhtjj34

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis peran hakim sebagai pembentuk hukum dalam sistem peradilan Indonesia berdasarkan teori penemuan hukum, serta mengevaluasi bagaimana peran tersebut diaktualisasikan dalam mewujudkan keadilan substantif. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan studi putusan. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa keberadaan kekosongan, ketidakjelasan, dan ketidaksesuaian norma dengan kebutuhan masyarakat menjadikan penemuan hukum sebagai instrumen penting dalam praktik peradilan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa hakim tidak hanya menjalankan fungsi menerapkan hukum, tetapi juga berperan sebagai pembentuk hukum (judge-made law) melalui metode interpretasi, analogi, dan konstruksi hukum. Peran tersebut memperkuat kemampuan peradilan dalam menghasilkan putusan yang responsif tanpa mengabaikan prinsip kepastian hukum. Selain itu, praktik penemuan hukum memungkinkan hakim menyeimbangkan nilai kepastian, kemanfaatan, dan keadilan, sehingga putusan tidak berhenti pada aspek formal semata, tetapi juga memenuhi kebutuhan keadilan substantif.Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pembentukan hukum oleh hakim merupakan bagian integral dari penegakan hukum di Indonesia, dan penguatan kapasitas penemuan hukum diperlukan untuk memastikan keberlanjutan keadilan dalam dinamika sosial yang terus berkembang.
Penguatan Perlindungan Konsumen yang Inklusif: Upaya Mewujudkan Akses dan Keadilan Bagi Konsumen Rentan Rio Priambodo; Irwan Triadi
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 05 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i05.1893

Abstract

Perlindungan konsumen merupakan alat penting untuk memastikan bahwa hak-hak dasar masyarakat terpenuhi dalam proses penggunaan barang dan jasa. Namun, kelompok konsumen yang rentan—seperti penyandang disabilitas, lansia, komunitas berpenghasilan rendah, perempuan, dan komunitas dengan literasi digital terbatas—sering menghadapi hambatan dalam mengakses layanan dan memperoleh keadilan. Jurnal ini mengkaji urgensi penguatan perlindungan konsumen yang inklusif melalui analisis kebijakan, hambatan implementasi, dan strategi yang diperlukan untuk menciptakan sistem perlindungan yang lebih responsif terhadap kebutuhan kelompok rentan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kolaborasi antarlembaga, penerapan regulasi adaptif, peningkatan literasi, dan inovasi dalam layanan pengaduan berbasis teknologi merupakan hal esensial dalam memastikan aksesibilitas dan keadilan bagi semua konsumen. Melalui tinjauan literatur dan analisis konseptual, makalah ini mengevaluasi berbagai hambatan struktural dan budaya yang dihadapi oleh konsumen rentan dan menganalisis efektivitas kebijakan perlindungan konsumen yang ada. Makalah ini juga membahas strategi-strategi yang mungkin, seperti mengembangkan regulasi adaptif, meningkatkan literasi konsumen, memanfaatkan teknologi yang dapat diakses, dan memperkuat peran pemerintah dan lembaga regulasi dalam penegakan hukum.
Pembaruan Hukum Nasional dalam Menjawab Tantangan Globalisasi dan Digitalisasi Rasyid Tarmizi; Irwan Triadi
Journal of Contemporary Law Studies Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): November
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/lawstudies.v3i1.5005

Abstract

The rapid development of globalization and digitalization has significantly influenced various aspects of human life, including national legal systems. These transformations demand that states undertake comprehensive and sustainable legal reforms to address emerging challenges such as personal data protection, cybercrime, digital economy regulation, and cross-border jurisdictional issues. This study aims to analyze the urgency of national legal reform in responding to the dynamics of globalization and digitalization, as well as to identify strategic steps for developing an adaptive, responsive, and equitable legal system. The research employs a normative juridical method through legal analysis of relevant national and international laws and regulations, complemented by a literature review of global frameworks and comparative legal studies. The results indicate that legal reform must be comprehensive, covering the dimensions of legal substance, institutional structure, and legal human resources. Furthermore, reform efforts should be guided by the principles of national legal sovereignty, human rights protection, and alignment with global technological developments and international legal standards. The study concludes that through the modernization of its legal system, Indonesia can enhance its global competitiveness, protect national interests, and promote social justice in the digital era. An updated, inclusive, and forward-looking legal framework will ensure Indonesia’s readiness to face transnational legal challenges arising from ongoing globalization and rapid digital transformation.