Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.77
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Voteteknika (Vocational Teknik Elektronika dan Informatika) Elkom: Jurnal Elektronika dan Komputer Jurnal Informatika dan Teknik Elektro Terapan Techne : Jurnal Ilmiah Elektroteknika JUTEKS JuTEkS (Jurnal Teknik Elektro dan Sains) Journal Geuthee of Engineering and Energy Jurnal Elektro Kontrol (ELKON) Jurnal Teknik Elektro: Ilmu dan Teknologi Mars: Jurnal Teknik Mesin, Industri, Elektro dan Ilmu Komputer
Giovanni Dimas Prenata
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Mathematics Physics

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
EVALUASI METODE KLASIFIKASI BERBASIS JARAK DAN PROBABILISTIK UNTUK DETEKSI GANGGUAN STATOR MOTOR INDUKSI Giovanni Dimas Prenata
Jurnal Elektro Kontrol (ELKON) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal ELKON
Publisher : Teknik Elektro Fakultas Teknik Universitas Muria Kudus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24176/elkon.v6i1.17376

Abstract

This study evaluates and compares the performance of three machine learning–based classification methods, namely Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), for diagnosing stator faults in induction motors using electrical and mechanical parameters, including phase voltage, phase current, power factor, rotational speed, torque, power, and temperature. The experimental results demonstrate that all three methods achieve an accuracy of 100% on the entire test dataset, while the KNN method maintains stable performance across all tested values of K. The consistency of results obtained from algorithms with fundamentally different principles margin-based, probabilistic, and distance-based indicates that classification performance is more strongly influenced by the quality and relevance of the selected features than by algorithmic complexity. Further analysis reveals that the primary differences among the methods lie in their computational characteristics and interpretability, where GNB offers superior efficiency, SVM provides robust decision boundaries, and KNN exhibits scalability limitations. These findings confirm that accurate and reliable induction motor stator fault diagnosis can be achieved using conventional classification algorithms when supported by appropriately selected and physically representative features.
Co-Authors Ahmad Ridho’i Junico Dwi Yussarianto Muhammad Alif Sofi Syariffudin Reza Sarwo Widagdo