Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 29 Documents
Search

PENGARUH VISUM ET REPERTUM DALAM MENGUNGKAP TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN Siregar, Dahris
Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 7 No 2 (2024): Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Universitas Pamulang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32493/rjih.v7i2.45747

Abstract

Evidence is needed in cases of ordinary and severe investigative persecution. Law No. 8 of 1981 regulates the intended evidence. The court usually asks the defendant or suspect to explain his actions to the victim when proving the attempted goods. However, in reality, all those who are unlikely to commit crimes are brought to justice, including human beings, whether it is life or death. Proof of letters requested with the help of a doctor as an expert is one of the most important evidences in situations of persecution with visum et repertum, the medical results examined can be documented in writing in the form of a certificate, as well as an expert witness as a doctor. This research method is normative research, the meaning of law is considered either as mentioned in law books or as a standard that is a standard for the behavior of people who are considered reasonable. If visum et repertum does not align using the data provided by the defendant, the statement may be revoked, and visum et repertum has the ability to be examined again if the defendant does give a false confession
RATIO LEGIS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STRENGTH OF THE DECISION OF THE CONSUMER DISPUTE RESOLUTION BODY IN RESOLVING DISPUTES Siregar, Dahris; Sitepu, Karolina; Elyani, Elyani
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.579

Abstract

In Indonesia, there are 2 (two) ways to resolve disputes between business actors and consumers, namely by litigation and non-litigation. Dispute resolution process dispute resolution process through court channels or what is also called litigation will take a relatively long time. relatively long time. Meanwhile, on the contrary, settlement through non-litigation litigation, namely through one of the quasi-judicial institutions, namely the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body, which is mandated by Law Number 8 Year 1999 on Consumer Protection. 1999 on Consumer Protection. The research results show that settlement of consumer disputes through the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body (BPSK) can be considered ineffective. This is evidenced by the fact that there are still many parties who do not agree with BPSK's decision. This is also supported by several obstacles contained in it.
Penyuluhan dan Sosialiasi; Sertifikat Halal Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Konsumen dalam Memilih Makanan dan Minuman Di Universitas Tjut Nyak Dhien Medan Siregar, Dahris
Jurnal SOLMA Vol. 12 No. 3 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. Hamka (UHAMKA Press)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22236/solma.v12i3.12673

Abstract

Background: Mayoritas penjual makanan dan minuman tidak menyadari pentingnya sertifikat untuk memenuhi standar kehalalan barang yang dijual untuk menjaga pelanggan dalam aktivitas mereka. Kegiatan penyuluhan dan sosialiasi ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pentingnya sertifikat halal sebagai upaya perlindungan konsumen dalam membuat keputusan tentang makanan dan minuman. Metode: Kegiatan ini dilakukan melalui seminar, diskusi dan tanya jawab terhadap hak dan kewajiban pelanggan dan pelaku bisnis serta Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 dan Nomor 33 Tahun 2014 tentang jaminan produk halal. Hasil: Implikasi dari hasil kegiatan pengabdian ini dibuat untuk melindungi pelanggan dari makanan tidak memiliki sertifikat halal. Pemerintah membentuk organisasi yang bertanggung jawab untuk memastikan bahwa produk yang dipasarkan halal, mengeluarkan hukum yang mengatur labelisasi dan sertifikasi halal, melarang sosialisasi, himbauan, atau penarikan barang yang melanggar peraturan labelisasi halal, membentuk organisasi yang mengawasi produk halal, mendirikan organisasi pemeriksa halal, membentuk audit halal, dan membentuk lembaga pengawasan halal. Kesimpulan: Pedagang maupun konsumen belum menerapkan dan belum memahami pentingnya sertifikat halal sebagai standar kehalalan produk untuk melindungi pelanggan.
Artificial Intelligence Accountability in Positive Law Siregar, Dahris
International Journal of Sociology and Law Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): November: International Journal of Sociology and Law
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijsl.v2i4.765

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has developed rapidly in recent years, making judgments and executing tasks in ways comparable to decisions made by the human brain. These technological advances allow AI to replace or complement human work in various fields, but they also raise complex legal questions regarding accountability for the actions it performs. This study employs a normative juridical research methodology, which emphasizes the analysis of laws and regulations, concepts, principles, and legal theories, using literature as the primary data source. The findings show that AI, despite its advanced capabilities, remains a legal object rather than a legal subject. In accordance with Government Regulation No. 71 of 2019 on the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions in Indonesia, AI cannot be considered a legal entity with independent rights and obligations. Consequently, AI cannot be held legally accountable for its actions, as it operates under human creation, programming, and direction. Responsibility for any consequences arising from the use of AI lies with the individuals or institutions that develop, operate, and control it. This study highlights the importance of establishing a clear legal framework to regulate AI applications, ensuring that technological innovation aligns with legal certainty and accountability. It concludes that while AI may imitate human decision-making, it lacks autonomy in the legal sense and therefore cannot bear responsibility under positive law.
WANPRESTASI DALAM PERSPEKTIF KEBEBASAN BERKONTRAK: ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN HAK-HAK PARA PIHAK DALAM HUKUM PERJANJIAN Siregar, Dahris
Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8 No 2 (2025): Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Universitas Pamulang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32493/rjih.v8i2.53381

Abstract

Analyzing the connection between default and the freedom of contract concept in Indonesian treaty law is the goal of this study. As long as it doesn't go against the law, reasonable standards, or public order, the freedom of contract concept gives the parties the opportunity to negotiate terms that suit their interests. However, in practice, there are often defaults that cause disputes and cause problems regarding the protection of the rights of the parties. This study examines how default is seen in relation to contract freedom and the degree to which the law offers parties fairness and clarity using a normative juridical technique that combines a conceptual and legislative approach. The study's findings demonstrate that contractual flexibility is constrained by legal standards that govern the legal ramifications of default. Thus, in order to prevent misuse of the concept of freedom of contract and to ensure that the agreement's goal is still accomplished, the protection of the parties' rights must be balanced.
Hilangnya Jaminan Fidusia dalam Perjanjian Kredit dan Konsekuensi Hukumnya Dahris Siregar; Muhammad Dhobit Azhary Lubis
Equality : Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 3 No 1 (2026): Dinamika Hukum, Tata Kelola, dan Kesadaran Hukum Kontemporer
Publisher : Yayasan Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Sisi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69836/equality-jlj.v3i1.499

Abstract

The withdrawal of the fiduciary guarantee will be affected if the credit agreement's fiduciary guarantee object is destroyed or lost. The purpose of this research is to ascertain the legal implications of fiduciary pledges in credit agreements being lost by taking into account the position of creditors in such a scenario. The issues brought up, examined, and clarified in this study are centered on the application of rules or norms in positive law as it employs a normative research methodology. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials are used in the issue method, which combines a legal and conceptual approach. The study's findings demonstrate that the legal ramifications of a fiduciary guarantee loss arrangement do not absolve the debtor of making the outstanding credit installment payments to creditors. According to the study's findings, fiduciary assurances in credit agreements are essential for providing creditors with legal protection. since the debtor is the object of the guarantees. This implies that should the debtor fail to fulfill their obligations under the credit agreement with fiduciary assurances, in order to ensure the interests of creditors are protected by the law, when attempting to reach a settlement, creditors may seek executorial seizure of the debtor's assets.
Pacta Sunt Servanda Principles: Implementation in Agreements Managing Unanticipated Circumstances Dahris Siregar; Karolina Sitepu; Khairun Na’im
IJOLARES: Indonesian Journal of Law Research Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): IJOLARES : Indonesian Journal of Law Research
Publisher : CV Tirta Pustaka Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60153/ijolares.v4i1.262

Abstract

Conventional law is built on the idea of pacta sunt servanda, which means that both sides must follow through on their deal. The study analyzes the application and limits of the pacta sunt servanda principle in cases of unforeseen circumstances, particularly economic hardship, and the legal protection available to the parties. This study uses a normative legal approach by examining contract law provisions, the doctrine of hardship, and selected Indonesian Supreme Court decisions over the past decade. Although the pacta sunt servanda concept is formally binding, it can be overturned in very rare cases of foresight, the ideals of good faith and suitability, as well as Article 1338 paragraph 3 of the Civil Code.Although Article 1338(1) of the Civil Code affirms that agreements are binding, the pacta sunt servanda principle is not absolute and must be balanced with fairness and good faith. Indonesian judges have a tendency to recognize although the theory of  unforeseen circumstances is meant to stop extreme unfairness, the most important rule for keeping commercial ties steady and clear is still "pacta sunt servanda. It is suggested that parties to an agreement plan for the chance of things changing by including suffering, force majeure, or rewriting methods in their contracts. This will make the answer simple and easier to measure when something unexpected happens. This study recommends that every agreement include clear hardship or force majeure clauses. It also suggests that Indonesian law should regulate unforeseen circumstances more clearly to ensure legal certainty for both parties.
Sosialisasi Pembinaan Wawasan Kebangsaan untuk Meningkatkan Rasa Nasionalisme di SMK Free Methodist Medan Siregar, Dahris
ABDINE: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): ABDINE : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Riau Pesisir

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52072/abdine.v5i2.1281

Abstract

Kemampuan suatu bangsa untuk menjaga persatuan diantara warga negaranya sangat bergantung pada tingkat nasionalismenya.  Di era globalisasi yang serba teknologi ini, patriotisme mulai menurun, terutama di kalangan pelajar. Sikap nasionalisme, seperti kebanggaan terhadap tanah air, cinta tanah air, memenuhi tugas kewarganegaraan, dan menghargai segala keberagaman dalam kehidupan bermasyarakat, dikatakan lahir dari wawasan kebangsaan. Suatu bangsa yang memiliki rasa nasionalisme yang kuat di kalangan pemudanya akan maju.  Kegiatan sosialisasi dilaksanakan di sekolah SMK Free Methodist Medan dengan menggunakan metode seminar, diskusi, dan tanya jawab untuk mendorong generasi muda untuk menjadi patriot, khususnya pelajar Indonesia yang merupakan penerus masa depan negeri ini. Tujuan kegiatan sosialisasi ini adalah untuk  memelihara dan menumbuhkan semangat menjaga kerukunan dalam keberagaman, serta memperoleh pengetahuan, pemahaman, dan kesadaran kepada peserta didik tentang pentingnya wawasan kebangsaan dan meningkatkan rasa nasionalisme dalam menjaga stabilitas kehidupan berbangsa. Hasil pengabdian menunjukkan bahwa menanamkan wawasan kebangsaan untuk meningkatkan rasa nasionalisme pelajar adalah melalui sikap peduli, untuk meningkatkan kesadaran dan pengalaman baru tentang elemen penting dalam kehidupan bangsa, simulasi dapat membantu meningkatkan wawasan nasional.
Transforming Civil Procedural Law in the Digital Era: Evidence, Contracts, and Legal Certainty Dahris Siregar
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i3.12746

Abstract

This study examines the transformation of Indonesian civil procedural law in responding to the growing use of electronic contracts and digital evidence in the era of electronic commerce. Although electronic contracts have been formally recognized under Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions and its amendment, Law Number 19 of 2016, their application in civil dispute resolution continues to raise legal uncertainty, particularly in relation to evidentiary standards. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches to analyze the conformity of electronic contracts with the requirements of contract validity under Article 1320 of the Civil Code and their position within the evidentiary system governed by Article 1866 of the Civil Code. The findings demonstrate that electronic contracts possess evidentiary value equivalent to written documents, provided that electronic information and documents are accessible, readable, verifiable, and their authenticity and integrity are ensured through lawful electronic systems, digital signatures, and digital forensic verification. Furthermore, electronic evidence is affirmed as an extension of written evidence within civil procedural law, thereby strengthening legal certainty in civil disputes arising from digital transactions. The novelty of this research lies in its confirmation that the theory of civil procedural evidence accommodates electronic contracts as legally valid proof comparable to conventional written evidence, as long as both formal and substantive legal requirements are fulfilled. Accordingly, this study underscores the urgency of harmonizing civil procedural law with technological developments to enhance legal certainty, evidentiary reliability, and justice in Indonesia’s digital transaction framework.