Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA JUAL BELI TANAH ANTARA PENJUAL DAN PEMBELI: STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 265/Pdt.G/2024/PN Sby Ramadhiansa, Tubagus Reyhan; Subekti; Widodo, Ernu; Aribaawa, M. Yustino
COURT REVIEW Vol 5 No 06 (2025): ILMU HUKUM
Publisher : COMMUNITY OF RESEARCH LABORATORY (KELOMPOK KOMUNITAS LABORATORIUM PENELITIAN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69957/cr.v5i06.2040

Abstract

Jual beli tanah termasuk dalam jenis perjanjian formil karena tanah memiliki kedudukan khusus sebagai sumber daya yang penting bagi kehidupan dan penghidupan masyarakat. Pengaturan yang ketat ini bertujuan untuk melindungi hak-hak pihak yang terkait dan memastikan kepastian hukum atas kepemilikan tanah. Oleh karena itu, proses jual beli tanah harus dilakukan dengan mematuhi berbagai ketentuan hukum, seperti kewajiban melibatkan pejabat yang berwenang, misalnya Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT), yang bertugas memastikan bahwa transaksi tersebut sah dan sesuai dengan hukum yang berlaku. Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) sering digunakan untuk mengatasi keterlambatan, tetapi dapat menimbulkan wanprestasi yang mengakibatkan ketidakpastian hukum dalam kepemilikan tanah. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tipe penelitian normatif sesuai dengan judul dan masalah yang akan dibahas dalam penelitian ini. Hasil dari penelitian ini didapatkan bahwas Putusan Nomor 27/pdt.G/2013/PN/Blt dan Putusan Nomor 7/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Blt menyatakan sahnya jual beli tanah menurut hukum, termasuk hukum adat yang melibatkan perangkat desa, tetapi tidak dapat dilanjutkan dengan balik nama karena objek sengketa hanya dibeli sebagian, yang mengharuskan proses pemecahan tanah oleh PPAT sesuai Pasal 48 PP 24 Tahun 1997. Dalam perjanjian jual beli, itikad baik menjadi dasar penting sebagai perlindungan hukum preventif, sementara gugatan ke pengadilan berfungsi sebagai perlindungan hukum represif untuk memastikan kepastian hukum dan keadilan jika terjadi sengketa.
CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR FRAUD MONEY Rp 285.000.000 OF OVERSEAS TRAVEL DOCUMENT PROCESSING (VISA) (Case Study of Police Report Number: LP / 432 / IX / 2020 / SULUT / SPKT) Barail, Deiser; Borman, M.Syahrul; Handayati, Nur; Subekti, Subekti
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v5i1.557

Abstract

The difficulty of finding work in the country encourages many Indonesian workers to work abroad. To be able to leave Indonesia and be accepted in the destination country, one must have a visa as an entry permit and travel permit. However, there are still many people who do not understand the administrative procedures for visa processing, so service bureaus have emerged that offer document processing services. These service bureaus require operational and service fees. However, there are many cases where service bureaus receive money but do not fulfill their obligations, resulting in disputes that lead to police reports. This research examines criminal liability in visa processing fraud cases, with a focus on Police Report Case Study Number: LP/432/IX/2020/SULUT/SPKT. In addition, this study also analyzes the legal consequences of criminal fraud in visa management. The research method used is normative legal research, which examines legal norms based on a statutory approach. The analysis is carried out normatively qualitative with inductive logic, using the method of interpretation and comparative legal construction. In criminal law, fault is an important element in determining criminal liability. The principle of “no punishment without fault” emphasizes that a person can only be convicted if proven guilty. The legal consequences of the crime of visa fraud are criminal sanctions in accordance with Article 378 of the Criminal Code, which stipulates a maximum imprisonment of four years for perpetrators of fraud.
The Government Legal Warranty for Consumers in The Purchase of Property in Indonesia Subekti, Subekti; Sidarta, Dudik Djaja; Marwiyah, Siti; Suyanto, Suyanto; Ismail, Nazli bin
SASI Volume 29 Issue 4, December 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v29i4.1681

Abstract

Introduction: The sale and purchase of houses between developers and buyers often result default, which detrimental to consumers. The state has issued various policies regarding buying and selling houses and legal guarantees for buying and selling houses, but violations still occur and there is no legal guarantee from the state but must be resolved through litigation.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to analyze and find problems with house sale and purchase contracts based on the Sale and Purchase AgreementMethods of the Research: The method used in this research is normative juridical. The research used is library research. The basis used in this research is the juridical basis consisting of Law Number 1 of 2011, GovernmentRegulation Number 12 of 2021. Results of the Research: When the state issues permits to operate housing to developers, the state has provided a legal guarantee to protect its people. Due to the guarantees that have given by the Government through statutory regulations and consumers following the instructions, they are guaranteed to receive legal protection from the state, State Administrative Officials, in terms of granting permits they have gone through applicable legal procedures, if it is proven otherwise then the government must be responsible for the decision. State Administration. However, if there is a violation of the law by the developer, it will difficult for home buyers to claim losses. Experienced, meaning that at the implementation level there is no guarantee for buyers from the state.
Analysis of the Proof of Gratuity as a Criminal Act of Corruption in Criminal Justice Nurfathiana F; Subekti Subekti; Dudik Djaja Sidarta
Journal of Strafvordering Indonesian Vol. 2 No. 6 (2026): JOSI - JANUARY
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/z4akxw44

Abstract

This article examines the construction of proof of gratification as a form of corruption crime within the Indonesian criminal law system, particularly concerning the application of reverse proof as regulated in Law No. 31 of 1999 jo. Law No. 20 of 2001. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and jurisprudence review. The analysis results show that proof of gratification contains a juridical dilemma between the effectiveness of eradicating corruption and the protection of the presumption of innocence principle. Article 12B creates a shift in the burden of proof, which is normatively recognized by the Constitutional Court, but its implementation still raises issues of legal uncertainty and inconsistency in interpreting the elements of positional relationship and the intention of acceptance. The mechanism for reporting gratuities through the KPK essentially provides legal protection, but its effectiveness depends on the compliance of public officials and the capacity for oversight. This study emphasizes the need to strengthen regulations, harmonize jurisprudence, and provide technical guidelines for evidence to ensure a balance between the effectiveness of law enforcement and the protection of defendants' constitutional rights.
Criminal Liability of Debt Collectors in the Execution of Fiduciary Guarantees with Fraud Mode After the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Rommy Igrisa; Subekti Subekti
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1340

Abstract

The execution of fiduciary guarantees by debt collectors frequently gives rise to legal problems, particularly when such execution is carried out through fraudulent practices. Following the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019, fiduciary execution may no longer be conducted unilaterally unless the debtor voluntarily surrenders the collateral object. Nevertheless, in practice, debt collectors have shifted their modus operandi from physical coercion to more subtle forms of deception in order to obtain fiduciary objects. This research aims to analyze the criminal liability of debt collectors who execute fiduciary guarantees through fraudulent means and to examine the application of criminal law to such practices. The study employs a juridical-empirical research method, combining statutory analysis with field data obtained through interviews with debtors, debt collectors, and representatives of finance companies, as well as observations of fiduciary execution practices. The findings indicate that fraudulent acts committed by debt collectors such as impersonating finance company officers, providing false information, and making deceptive promises fulfill the elements of fraud as stipulated in Article 378 of the Indonesian Criminal Code. Moreover, such actions violate the Fiduciary Security Law and the Constitutional Court’s ruling, thereby giving rise to individual criminal liability and potential corporate liability when finance companies fail to exercise proper supervision. This study concludes that stricter law enforcement and enhanced legal awareness are necessary to protect debtors’ rights and ensure lawful fiduciary execution practices.
Analisis Putusan Panitia Khusus DPRD dalam Mewujudkan Pemerintahan Daerah yang Good Governace: Analysis of the Decision of the DPRD Special Committee in Realizing Good Governance in Regional Government Ahmad Dhafir; Wahyu Prawesthi; Subekti Subekti; Nur Handayati
Constitution Journal Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Constitution Journal June 2026
Publisher : UIN Kiai Haji Ahmad Sidiq Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/constitution.v5i1.329

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal status of the decisions of the Regional House of Representatives’ Special Committee (Pansus DPRD) in regional governance, as well as their legal implications for the obligation of regional governments to follow up on legislative oversight outcomes. This research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The results indicate that the decisions of the Pansus DPRD do not possess legally binding executorial force but are instead recommendatory and persuasive in nature, as stipulated in Law Number 23 of 2014 on Regional Government. Nevertheless, these decisions play a strategic role in the checks and balances mechanism through political and moral influence, and they have the potential to be transformed into regional policies. The legal implications of Pansus decisions are reflected in the strengthening of the principles of accountability, transparency, and proportionality in regional governance. However, the weak follow-up by the executive has led to the suboptimal functioning of legislative oversight. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen internal DPRD regulations, enhance the obligation of regional governments to respond, and foster synergy with internal government supervisory bodies in order to achieve good regional governance.   Abstract Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kedudukan hukum putusan Panitia Khusus (Pansus) DPRD dalam tata kelola pemerintahan daerah serta implikasi hukumnya terhadap kewajiban pemerintah daerah dalam menindaklanjuti hasil pengawasan legislatif. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa putusan Pansus DPRD tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum yang mengikat secara eksekutorial, melainkan bersifat rekomendatif dan persuasif sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. Meskipun demikian, putusan Pansus memiliki peran strategis dalam mekanisme checks and balances melalui pengaruh politik dan moral, serta berpotensi ditransformasikan ke dalam kebijakan daerah. Implikasi hukum dari putusan Pansus terlihat pada penguatan prinsip akuntabilitas, transparansi, dan proporsionalitas dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah. Namun, lemahnya tindak lanjut oleh pihak eksekutif menyebabkan fungsi pengawasan belum berjalan optimal. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penguatan regulasi internal DPRD, peningkatan kewajiban respons pemerintah daerah, serta sinergi dengan aparat pengawasan internal pemerintah guna mewujudkan tata kelola pemerintahan daerah yang baik.
Binding Power of Contracts Formed Through Click-Wrap And Browse Wrap Mechanisms in the Perspective of Indonesian Contract Law Taffy Faiq Syahmi; Subekti Subekti
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i4.3409

Abstract

The development of digital technology has encouraged the use of electronic contracts as a means of establishing legal relationships in online transactions. This study aims to analyze the validity and binding force of contracts formed through click-wrap and browse-wrap mechanisms in the legal perspective of Indonesian agreements. The research method used is normative juridical with legislative, conceptual, and case approaches. The results of the study show that electronic contracts are recognized and have legal force as long as they meet the legal requirements of the agreement as stipulated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code and Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. The click-wrap mechanism has a stronger binding force due to the explicit consent through the affirmative action of the user. In contrast, browse-wrap faces the constraint of proving the deal because consent is only assumed from the use of the service. Therefore, legal certainty for electronic contracts requires transparency, good faith, and adequate consumer protection.
Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Pemberatan di Surabaya Putusan Nomor1666/PID.B/2024/PN SBY Mochammad Gristyan Zaputra; Yoyo Ucuk Suyono; Subekti; Ernu Widodo
Jurnal QOSIM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial & Humaniora Vol 4 No 3 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/jq.v4i3.8520

Abstract

Penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana pencurian dengan pemberatan menjadi isu krusial dalam menjamin kepastian hukum dan keadilan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis penegakan hukum dan pertimbangan hakim dalam Putusan Nomor 1666/Pid.B/2024/PN Sby serta menjawab bagaimana penerapan norma hukum dalam praktik. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan kasus melalui studi kepustakaan. Hasil menunjukkan adanya kesesuaian norma dengan praktik, namun ditemukan disparitas pemidanaan. Temuan ini memperkaya kajian hukum pidana dan menegaskan perlunya standardisasi pemidanaan serta penguatan pendekatan keadilan restoratif.
International Legal Review of the Incident of Expulsion of Chinese Coast Guard Vessels in the North Natuna Sea Moch. Rizal Fanani; Wahyu Prawesthi; Subekti Subekti; Nurhandayati Nurhandayati
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v6i1.52766

Abstract

The incident of the expulsion of a Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) vessel by Indonesian authorities in the North Natuna Sea has become a recurring phenomenon, raising complex questions about the legality of such actions under international maritime law. This study aims to analyze the legal status of CCG vessels in Indonesia's Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), the legality of expulsion actions, and the legal implications of China's Coast Guard Law 2021. Using normative legal research methods with a qualitative approach, this study examines UNCLOS 1982, arbitration awards, state practices, and international legal doctrines. The results of the study show that the right to freedom of navigation of CCG vessels in the EEZ is not absolute and is limited by the obligation to pay due regard to the sovereign rights of coastal states. The expulsion action carried out by Indonesia, as long as it is proportionate and non-escalatory, can be justified as a legitimate countermeasure to protect its sovereign rights from illegal intervention. Further, the study found that China's Coast Guard Law 2021 is fundamentally contrary to UNCLOS, seeks to replace international law with domestic legislation, and significantly increases the risk of conflict escalation in the region. The study concludes that while Indonesia's actions can be legally justified, the international maritime law framework now faces systemic challenges that threaten regional maritime stability.
The Legal Certainty of Digital Consent In The Formation of Electronic Contracts is Reviewed From The Principle of Consensualism Taqwanda Aulia Mahfud; Subekti Subekti; Yoyok Ucuk Suyono; Ernu Widodo
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3509

Abstract

The development of information technology has driven a transformation in the formation of contracts from conventional forms to electronic contracts based on digital consent (digital consent). This condition raises legal problems regarding the conformity of digital consent with the principle of consensualism as the basis for the birth of an agreement and its legal certainty in the Indonesian legal system. This study aims to analyze the relevance of the principle of consensualism in the formation of electronic contracts based on digital consent and examine the legal certainty provided to the parties in electronic transactions. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a comparative approach. Legal materials are obtained through literature studies that are analyzed qualitatively and prescriptively. The results of the study show that digital consent in principle has fulfilled the elements of agreement as required in the principle of consensualism because it is a manifestation of the will of the parties expressed through electronic media. However, the current legal arrangements do not provide clear parameters regarding the standard of validity of digital consents, the quality of the agreement, and the mechanism of proof. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen regulations through the implementation  of affirmative consent standards, more specific regulations on forms of digital consent, and increased legal protection for parties to realize legal certainty in the formation of electronic contracts in Indonesia.