Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA JUAL BELI TANAH ANTARA PENJUAL DAN PEMBELI: STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 265/Pdt.G/2024/PN Sby Ramadhiansa, Tubagus Reyhan; Subekti; Widodo, Ernu; Aribaawa, M. Yustino
COURT REVIEW Vol 5 No 06 (2025): ILMU HUKUM
Publisher : COMMUNITY OF RESEARCH LABORATORY (KELOMPOK KOMUNITAS LABORATORIUM PENELITIAN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69957/cr.v5i06.2040

Abstract

Jual beli tanah termasuk dalam jenis perjanjian formil karena tanah memiliki kedudukan khusus sebagai sumber daya yang penting bagi kehidupan dan penghidupan masyarakat. Pengaturan yang ketat ini bertujuan untuk melindungi hak-hak pihak yang terkait dan memastikan kepastian hukum atas kepemilikan tanah. Oleh karena itu, proses jual beli tanah harus dilakukan dengan mematuhi berbagai ketentuan hukum, seperti kewajiban melibatkan pejabat yang berwenang, misalnya Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT), yang bertugas memastikan bahwa transaksi tersebut sah dan sesuai dengan hukum yang berlaku. Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) sering digunakan untuk mengatasi keterlambatan, tetapi dapat menimbulkan wanprestasi yang mengakibatkan ketidakpastian hukum dalam kepemilikan tanah. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tipe penelitian normatif sesuai dengan judul dan masalah yang akan dibahas dalam penelitian ini. Hasil dari penelitian ini didapatkan bahwas Putusan Nomor 27/pdt.G/2013/PN/Blt dan Putusan Nomor 7/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Blt menyatakan sahnya jual beli tanah menurut hukum, termasuk hukum adat yang melibatkan perangkat desa, tetapi tidak dapat dilanjutkan dengan balik nama karena objek sengketa hanya dibeli sebagian, yang mengharuskan proses pemecahan tanah oleh PPAT sesuai Pasal 48 PP 24 Tahun 1997. Dalam perjanjian jual beli, itikad baik menjadi dasar penting sebagai perlindungan hukum preventif, sementara gugatan ke pengadilan berfungsi sebagai perlindungan hukum represif untuk memastikan kepastian hukum dan keadilan jika terjadi sengketa.
CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR FRAUD MONEY Rp 285.000.000 OF OVERSEAS TRAVEL DOCUMENT PROCESSING (VISA) (Case Study of Police Report Number: LP / 432 / IX / 2020 / SULUT / SPKT) Barail, Deiser; Borman, M.Syahrul; Handayati, Nur; Subekti, Subekti
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v5i1.557

Abstract

The difficulty of finding work in the country encourages many Indonesian workers to work abroad. To be able to leave Indonesia and be accepted in the destination country, one must have a visa as an entry permit and travel permit. However, there are still many people who do not understand the administrative procedures for visa processing, so service bureaus have emerged that offer document processing services. These service bureaus require operational and service fees. However, there are many cases where service bureaus receive money but do not fulfill their obligations, resulting in disputes that lead to police reports. This research examines criminal liability in visa processing fraud cases, with a focus on Police Report Case Study Number: LP/432/IX/2020/SULUT/SPKT. In addition, this study also analyzes the legal consequences of criminal fraud in visa management. The research method used is normative legal research, which examines legal norms based on a statutory approach. The analysis is carried out normatively qualitative with inductive logic, using the method of interpretation and comparative legal construction. In criminal law, fault is an important element in determining criminal liability. The principle of “no punishment without fault” emphasizes that a person can only be convicted if proven guilty. The legal consequences of the crime of visa fraud are criminal sanctions in accordance with Article 378 of the Criminal Code, which stipulates a maximum imprisonment of four years for perpetrators of fraud.
The Government Legal Warranty for Consumers in The Purchase of Property in Indonesia Subekti, Subekti; Sidarta, Dudik Djaja; Marwiyah, Siti; Suyanto, Suyanto; Ismail, Nazli bin
SASI Volume 29 Issue 4, December 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v29i4.1681

Abstract

Introduction: The sale and purchase of houses between developers and buyers often result default, which detrimental to consumers. The state has issued various policies regarding buying and selling houses and legal guarantees for buying and selling houses, but violations still occur and there is no legal guarantee from the state but must be resolved through litigation.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to analyze and find problems with house sale and purchase contracts based on the Sale and Purchase AgreementMethods of the Research: The method used in this research is normative juridical. The research used is library research. The basis used in this research is the juridical basis consisting of Law Number 1 of 2011, GovernmentRegulation Number 12 of 2021. Results of the Research: When the state issues permits to operate housing to developers, the state has provided a legal guarantee to protect its people. Due to the guarantees that have given by the Government through statutory regulations and consumers following the instructions, they are guaranteed to receive legal protection from the state, State Administrative Officials, in terms of granting permits they have gone through applicable legal procedures, if it is proven otherwise then the government must be responsible for the decision. State Administration. However, if there is a violation of the law by the developer, it will difficult for home buyers to claim losses. Experienced, meaning that at the implementation level there is no guarantee for buyers from the state.