Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP ANAK DIBAWAH UMUR DARI JUDI ONLINE BEDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG PERLINDUNGAN ANAK Irvan Fahrudin; MD Shodiq; Mohamad Ismed
SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, February 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/sinergi.v3i2.2407

Abstract

Online gambling can be categorized as a cybercrime,because its criminal acts are carried out using the internet and computers. The occurrence of online gambling stems from the misuse of technological advancements, where gambling is conducted without face-to-face interaction and can instead be done online. Moreover, its payment transactions can be made via bank transfer, which makes it difficult for law enforcement officers to trace the perpetrators of online gambling. The victims of online gambling are not only adults and the elderly, but also include children. Children themselves are national assets that must be nurtured and protected by both the government and the law. In this regard, the author establishes the main issue, namely: The form of legal protection for children and the implementation of child protection laws to achieve justice and protect children from online gambling. For this thesis, the author uses a normative legal research method, which focuses more on written legal rules and the applicable system of norms, such as legislation and legal doctrines. This method examines how the law should be applied based on existing legal norms and principles, rather than how the law is actually implemented in society (a normative–empirical study).
Decolonizing Legal Norms: An Examination of Colonial-Era Criminal Codes in Modern Indonesian Jurisprudence Md Shodiq; Baran Akbulut; Hale Yilmaz
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/rjl.v3i6.3024

Abstract

Background. Indonesian criminal law continues to reflect colonial legacies inherited from the Dutch Wetboek van Strafrecht. Despite constitutional independence and ongoing legislative reforms, many colonial-era criminal provisions remain operative and influential within contemporary judicial reasoning, raising critical questions about the depth of legal decolonization in modern Indonesian jurisprudence. Purpose. This study aims to examine how colonial-era criminal codes persist and function within modern Indonesian jurisprudence, with particular emphasis on judicial interpretation, doctrinal practices, and the epistemic continuity of colonial legal norms in criminal adjudication. Method. A qualitative doctrinal and socio-legal research design is employed. The study analyzes statutory criminal law provisions, selected judicial decisions, and relevant legal scholarship using a postcolonial legal theory framework to identify patterns of colonial normative persistence and interpretive reasoning. Results. The findings reveal that a substantial number of criminal law provisions applied in Indonesian courts originate from colonial legal frameworks and are interpreted through formalistic reasoning that prioritizes state authority and public order. Judicial practice demonstrates limited engagement with socio-historical context judicial decisions, and relevant legal Conclusion. The study concludes that legal decolonization in Indonesia remains largely symbolic at the textual level and has not fully transformed jurisprudential practice.
The Legal Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Justice: From Surveillance to Sentencing Md Shodiq; Rina Farah; Nurul Huda
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/rjl.v4i3.3832

Abstract

Background. The increasing integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in criminal justice systems has raised significant concerns regarding its legal implications, particularly in surveillance and sentencing practices. As AI technologies become more embedded in law enforcement and judicial decision-making, questions surrounding privacy, accountability, and fairness have become central to discussions of legal reform. Purpose. The study aims to evaluate the extent to which current legal frameworks can address these challenges and propose reforms to ensure ethical use of AI in criminal justice systems. Method. A qualitative methodology is employed, using semi-structured interviews with legal experts, policymakers, and AI practitioners, alongside secondary data from case studies and policy documents. Results. The findings indicate that while AI has the potential to enhance efficiency, it often perpetuates existing biases and lacks sufficient oversight, leading to unjust outcomes. Conclusion. The study concludes that robust legal frameworks are essential to prevent the misuse of AI in criminal justice and to protect fundamental rights. This research contributes to the growing body of literature on AI's intersection with law and offers practical recommendations for legal reforms.