Bambang Sugeng Ariadi Subagyono
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Published : 20 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Notaire

Keabsahan Lelang Non Eksekusi Sukarela Secara Online Tanpa Pejabat Lelang Vina Putri Salim; Bambang Sugeng Ariadi Subagyono
Notaire Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v5i1.33641

Abstract

AbstractAuction basically adopts the characteristics of a sale and purchase agreement (1457 BW), where the elements of price and goods are important elements. The difference is that auctions require the presence of an Auction Officer, especially for execution auctions and mandatory non-execution auctions. The auction has special regulations (Lex Specialis) namely Vendu Reglement, Vendu Instructie, and PMK 213/PMK.06/2020 concerning Auction Implementation Guidelines. The implementation of online auctions is carried out through the e-Marketplace Auction Platform where the implementation is usually carried out without an auction officer, for example auctions on eBay. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of voluntary non-execution auctions conducted online without auction officer and protection for parties who suffered losses due to default. This research is a legal research with a statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The results of the research are the validity of online voluntary non-execution auctions in the absence of an auction officer is valid by adopting the characteristics of a sale and purchase agreement. And for the legal protection, parties can take legal remedies for dispute resolution by choosing a settlement either through courts, arbitration or other alternative dispute resolution (conventionally/ online) in accordance with the provisions of the legislation.Keywords: Online Auction; Default; Auction Officer.AbstrakLelang pada dasarnya mengadopsi karakteristik dari perjanjian jual beli (1457 BW), dimana unsur harga dan barang merupakan unsur penting. Perbedaannya adalah pada lelang mengharuskan kehadiran seorang Pejabat Lelang, terutama untuk lelang eksekusi dan lelang non eksekusi wajib. Lelang memiliki peraturan khusus (Lex Specialis) yaitu Vendu Reglement dan Vendu Instructie sebagai peraturan lelang yang masih berlaku hingga saat ini. Selain itu pelaksanaan lelang juga diatur dalam PMK 213/PMK.06/2020 tentang Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Lelang. Pelaksanaan lelang secara online dilakukan melalui Platform e-Marketplace Auction dimana pelaksanaannya biasa dilakukan tanpa pejabat lelang, contohnya lelang di eBay. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui keabsahan lelang non eksekusi sukarela yang dilakukan secara online tanpa pejabat lelang dan bagaimana perlindungan bagi para pihak yang mengalami kerugian akibat wanprestasi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian yang didapatkan adalah keabsahan lelang non eksekusi sukarela secara online tanpa adanya pejabat lelang adalah sah dengan mengadopsi karakteristik perjanjian jual beli. Dan perlindungan bagi para pihak adalah dengan melakukan upaya hukum penyelesaian sengketa dengan memilih penyelesaian baik melalui pengadilan, arbitrase ataupun lembaga penyelesaian sengketa alternatif lainnya (secara konvensional/ online dispute resolution) sesuai dengan ketentuan Peraturan Perundang-undangan. Kata Kunci: Lelang Online; Wanprestasi; Pejabat Lelang.
Settlement of Bankruptcy Assets in A Form of Crypto Assets Throughout Bankcruptcy Process Hidayatullah, Tomi; Subagyono, Bambang Sugeng Ariadi; Chumaida, Zahry Vandawati; Aditya, Kukuh Leksono Suminaring
Notaire Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v6i3.50772

Abstract

AbstractThis research analyzes Crypto Assets as bankruptcy assets in the procedures for settlement by the curator in relation to statutory regulations, as well as the criteria for objects that can be included in bankruptcy assets. Generally, wealth is in the form of objects that can be seen, but the emergence of Crypto Assets in society breaks the stigma that exists in general. Based on bankruptcy practices in Indonesia, the categories or characteristics of objects that can be included as bankruptcy assets belonging to debtors are object that have resale value or economic value. This research is juridical-normative in nature. The results of this research show that crypto assets have met the classification as intangible objects. As bankruptcy assets, Crypto Assets cannot necessarily be used as a means of paying debts to creditors, because in Indonesia Crypto Assets are only allowed as an investment tool. However, Crypto Assets as bankruptcy assets must first be cleared by the curator until they are in the form of rupiah currency through certain stages in accordance with applicable law and regulations.Keywords: Bankruptcy; Bankruptcy Assets; Crypto Assets; Settlement.