Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.99
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan Misykat al-Anwar Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Masyarakat SYNERGY: Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen Al-MIKRAJ: Jurnal studi Islam dan Humaniora Jurnal Ekonomika Manajemen Dan Bisnis Al Mabhats : Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Agama SEMINAR NASIONAL SOSIAL, SAINS, PENDIDIKAN, HUMANIORA Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi
Zainal Arif
Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
Religion Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Rekonstruksi Epistemologi Ushul Fiqh pada Era Artificial Intelligence: Telaah Konseptual terhadap Posisi AI dalam Proses Istinbāṭ Hukum Islam Razaq Hammam Alamsyah; Zainal Arif
MISYKAT AL-ANWAR JURNAL KAJIAN ISLAM DAN MASYARAKAT Vol 9 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Faculty of Islamic Studies, University of Muhammadiyah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24853/ma.9.2.361-378

Abstract

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has fundamentally transformed the production, organization, and dissemination of knowledge, including within the field of Islamic studies. While AI significantly enhances access to Islamic sources and accelerates legal research, its increasing role in generating legal arguments raises fundamental epistemological questions concerning its position within the methodology of uṣūl al-fiqh. This study aims to reconstruct the epistemology of uṣūl al-fiqh in the era of Artificial Intelligence by examining the epistemological status of AI in the process of istinbāṭ (Islamic legal reasoning). Employing a qualitative library research approach combined with conceptual analysis, this study critically examines classical and contemporary literature on uṣūl al-fiqh, Islamic legal theory, and Artificial Intelligence. The findings demonstrate that AI does not alter the normative foundations of Islamic law but transforms the ecosystem through which Islamic legal knowledge is produced and managed. Although AI possesses remarkable capabilities in literature retrieval, comparative analysis, argument mapping, and large-scale information processing, it lacks the normative reasoning, ethical consciousness, methodological competence, and moral accountability required for ijtihād. Consequently, AI cannot function as a source of law or as a mujtahid. The study proposes a Methodological Integration Model of Uṣūl al-Fiqh and Artificial Intelligence, positioning AI as an epistemic and methodological instrument that supports legal research while preserving human scholars as the sole holders of epistemological authority in Islamic legal reasoning. This model constitutes the principal novelty of the research by shifting the discussion from the legality or ethics of AI toward its epistemological integration within uṣūl al-fiqh, thereby providing a conceptual framework for developing Islamic legal studies that remains methodologically authentic while embracing technological innovation.
Fabricated Hadith as an Epistemic Threat: A Literature Review on Its Origins, Characteristics, and Social Mitigation Ichsan Kamil; Zainal Arif; Alhafidh Nasution; Abdul Wahid
Al Mabhats : Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Agama Vol 10 No 1 (2025): Al Mabhats : Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Agama
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat IAIN Lhokseumawe

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47766/almabhats.v10i1.7381

Abstract

This article addresses the critical issue of maudhu’ (fabricated) hadith as a significant challenge in the study of ‘ulum al-hadith, given its direct impact on the authenticity of Islamic teachings as derived from the Qur’an. It aims to provide a comprehensive explanation of the concept of maudhu’ hadith, covering its definition, historical emergence, driving factors, characteristic indicators in both sanad (chain of transmission) and matan (text), the jurisprudential rulings on its narration and practice, as well as the socio-religious consequences it engenders. Utilizing a literature review methodology, the study critically examines relevant books, articles, and scholarly works. The findings demonstrate that Maudhu’s hadith are narrations falsely ascribed to the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), rendering them unacceptable as evidence and prohibited from transmission except for the purpose of exposing their falsehood. The emergence of these fabricated hadith is influenced by diverse motives such as political conflict, adversarial strategies against Islam, ignorance, sectarian fanaticism, ethnic primordialism, and personality cults. Their dissemination creates serious problems by deepening community divisions, distorting perceptions of Islam, diminishing the prophetic image, and weakening religious motivation. Furthermore, the article emphasizes the crucial role of ulama strategies, including transmitter criticism, sanad verification, narrative comparison, the establishment of critical principles, and the codification of fabricated hadith, as essential measures to safeguard the purity of the Sunnah.
Co-Authors Abdul Basyit Abdul Wahid Agus Hidayatul Rohman Agus Niamilah Ahmad Fauzi Ahmad Suryadi Alfan Jawahir Muhammad Alhafidh Nasution Ansharullah Ansharullah Diska Amalia Sianti Fina Nurafni Ibnu Sina Ichsan Kamil Lilik Subaryanto Muh Turizal Husein Nur Asiah Raden Aditya Kusuma Razaq Hammam Alamsyah Tyasti Aryandini Uud Pandu Suandhana Zaharah Zaharah Zulfitria Zulfitria