Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

Legal Analysis of Article 3 Paragraph (1) and Article 2 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 20 of 2001 Concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption: A Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 1481 K/Pid.Sus/2018 Sitepu, Syahnisura E Tuahta; Adawiyah, Rodiatun; Ginting, Deraldo Natalino
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v6i1.1099

Abstract

This resea.rch a.na.lyzes the a.pplica.tion of A.rticle 3 Pa.ra.gra.ph 1 a.nd A.rticle 2 Pa.ra.gra.ph 1 of La.w Number 20 Yea.r 2001 concerning the A.mendment to La.w Number 31 Yea.r 1999 concerning the Era.dica.tion of Corruption, pa.rticula.rly through a. ca.se study of the Supreme Court Decision Number 1481 K/Pid.Sus/2018. The study a.ims to delve into judicia.l considera.tions in deciding corruption ca.ses a.nd contribute to the development of concepts a.nd theories of justice in Indonesia.n crimina.l la.w. The method used is a. norma.tive juridica.l a.pproa.ch with descriptive- a.na.lytica.l methods. The findings of this resea.rch indica.te tha.t the Supreme Court's decision is in a.ccorda.nce with existing provisions, unlike the decisions of the District Court a.nd High Court which were not ba.sed on clea.r lega.l provisions, na.mely A.rticle 12 letter e combined with A.rticle 12 A. Pa.ra.gra.ph (2) of La.w Number 31 Yea.r 1999 Jo La.w Number 20 Yea.r 2001 concerning the Era.dica.tion of Corruption, which stipula.tes a. minimum imprisonment of 4 (four) yea.rs a.nd a. ma.ximum of 20 (twenty) yea.rs. This discrepa.ncy ha.s rendered the District Court a.nd High Court decisions inconsistent with a.pplica.ble la.w
Legal Review of the Validity of a Power of Attorney to Sell as an Executorial Guarantee in a Breach of Performance Case : Case Study of Batang District Court Number 64/Pdt.G.S/2022/PN.Btg Edward, Edward; Adawiyah, Rodiatun
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education (On Progress July-Desembe
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v6i2.1170

Abstract

The power of attorney to sell is frequently employed as an alternative form of security in debt agreements outside of formal collateral mechanisms. Nonetheless, in practical application, such powers of attorney are often misused and treated as executorial guarantees, leading to legal complications when execution is attempted. This study seeks to assess the legal validity of a power of attorney to sell when used as an executorial guarantee in cases of default, and to evaluate the legal reasoning employed by the judges of the Batang District Court in Decision Number 64/Pdt.G.S/2022/PN.Btg. A normative juridical method was utilized, incorporating a statutory and case-based approach. Data were collected through literature reviews and judicial decision analyses and were examined using qualitative methods. The findings demonstrate that a power of attorney to sell cannot be equated with executorial collateral instruments such as mortgage or fiduciary security, as this contravenes the foundational principles of collateral law in Indonesia. The Batang District Court adjudicated that the said power of attorney lacked executorial force and thus required a civil lawsuit mechanism to execute the sale of the collateral. This judgment aligns with the principles of legal prudence and debtor protection, preventing potential abuse of legal authority. Accordingly, the use of a power of attorney to sell must be contextualized within its proper legal function and should not be construed as a substitute for executorial guarantees.
Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Keunggulan Surat Kuasa Saat Menjual Harta Tanah Ketika Debitur Tidak Memenuhi Kewajiban Ditinjau Dari Konteks Hukum Bisnis Pakpahan, Elvira Fitriyani; Adawiyah, Rodiatun; Nasution, Farah Hanifah
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 9 No 2 (2025): Unes Journal of Swara Justisia (Juli 2025)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/5rn2ty54

Abstract

Profesi Notaris mempunyai kedudukan yang penting dalam hal pembuatan akta pendirian suatu Perseroan Terbatas Perusahaan (PT) yang berbasis Penanaman Modal Asing (PMA). Akta yang dibuat oleh Notaris dapat menjadi dasar hukum atas statusnya harta benda, hak dan kewajiban seseorang. Kesalahan dalam suatu akta notaris dapat mengakibatkan hilangnya hak seseorang atau orang yang dibebani suatu kewajiban. Pembuatan akta itu berada di bawah wewenang dan kuasa Notaris. Termasuk juga dalam pembuatan akta pendirian Perseroan Terbatas yang berbasis Asing Langsung Penanaman Modal (PMA) itu sendiri. Metode penelitian hukum yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis empiris yaitu penelitian yang dilakukan atau ditujukan pada wawancara dan peraturan tertulis dengan sifat penelitian deskriptif analisis yaitu suatu metode yang berfungsi untuk menggambarkan atau memberikan gambaran mengenai objek yang diteliti. Sumber data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder dengan analisis data kuantitatif. Peraturan dalam pelaksanaan kewenangan pembuatan akta Perseroan Terbatas (PT) Penanaman Modal Asing (PMA) ini tidak ada pasal yang mengaturnya kewajiban melegalkan dokumen yang dibuat di luar negeri hanya berdasarkan peraturan Menteri Luar Negeri. Untuk dokumen seperti surat kuasa, namun hal itu diatur dalam Peraturan Menteri Luar Negeri No. 09/A/KP/XII/2006/01 tanggal 28 Desember 2006 (poin 68) tentang Legalisasi Dokumen.
Application of Provisions on Restorative Justice in Criminal Acts of Domestic Violence: A Study of Decision Number 56/PID.SUS/2020/PN BDW Kwekdinata, Winson; Fernando, Fernando; Adawiyah, Rodiatun
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education (On Progress July-Desembe
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v6i2.1282

Abstract

The resolution of criminal acts through restorative justice, as demonstrated in Decision Number 56/Pid.Sus/2020/PN BDW, provides an alternative mechanism for handling criminal cases, including complaint-based offenses. Although reconciliation was achieved between the defendant and the victim-witness, the defendant was nevertheless found guilty and sentenced to three months of imprisonment. The central issue examined in this study is whether the application of restorative justice in domestic violence cases aligns with Law Number 23 of 2004 and whether the judicial decision is consistent with prevailing legal standards. This research employs a normative and descriptive-analytical approach based on secondary data. The findings indicate that the application of restorative justice in this case adheres to the procedures outlined in the Decree of the Director General of the General Courts No. 1691/DJU/SK/PS.00/12/2020. Despite reconciliation and the withdrawal of the complaint, such actions do not eliminate the defendant’s criminal liability. Although the court ruled that the defendant was not required to serve the prison sentence, the researchers argue that reconciliation achieved through restorative justice should not merely serve as a mitigating factor but should instead form the legal basis for exemption from punishment. Moreover, the regulatory framework for resolving domestic violence cases through restorative justice should be developed in greater detail. When a domestic violence case fails to meet the formal requirements for restorative justice, the conventional criminal justice process should apply.
Legal Analysis of Criminal Acts of Corruption of Livestock Budget (Study of Decision No.3038 K/Pid.Sus/2021) Damanik, Stevi Idhel Wheis; prasetyo, Muhammad Arif; Adawiyah, Rodiatun; Ramadhana, Widodo; Sembiring, Josua Pramana Adika
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 13 No. 4 (2024): October: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/legal.v13i4.1075

Abstract

One of the crimes that is always in the spotlight in Indonesia is the problem of corruption. Corruption is no longer a foreign thing in this country. Indonesian corruption is even classified as an extraordinary crime because it has damaged not only state finances and the country's economic potential, but has also destroyed the pillars of socio-cultural, moral, political and legal security of Indonesia. As happened in the decision Number 3038 K / Pid.Sus / 2021, which stated that there had been a criminal act of corruption in the grant activity budget of the East Java Provincial Animal Husbandry Service in 2016, which was carried out by the Defendant IMAM HANAFI, SE bin MUCHAMAD HABIB. The empirical normative method is the method applied in this research where this method is carried out through research activities on reading materials and directly reviewing the objects being studied. The application of Article 2 Paragraph 1 of the Corruption Eradication Law in Decision Number 3038 K/Pid.Sus/2021 to the Defendant IMAM HANAFI, Se is in accordance with the fact that the defendant is a person assigned by the East Java Provincial Animal Husbandry Service to coordinate 5 Groups that will receive grant funds to buy livestock. That the judge in deciding the case considered that the defendant's actions had fulfilled the elements of a crime in Article 2 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 18 of Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption.
INHERITANCE RIGHTS OF OUTSIDE MARRIAGE DESCENDANTS AFTER THE RULING OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT NUMBER 46 OF 2010 Adawiyah, Rodiatun; Prasetyo, Muhammad Arif; Ongko , Eric; Wibowo, Stefani; Kamal, Julius
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v4i1.350

Abstract

Humans were created by God to consist of men and women, therefore they are required to live in pairs in a bond called marriage. As stated in the 1945 Constitution, Article 28B Paragraph (1), which reads "Everyone has the right to form a family and continue their offspring through legal marriage". Before there were special regulations regarding marriage, in particular Indonesia still used the Civil Code (KUHPerdata) or Burgerlijk Wetboek (BW) as stated in Book One, Chapter IV concerning Marriage. The research method used in this research is normative juridical, which is supported by primary and secondary data sources, and qualitative analysis is carried out. The research results show that in the Civil Code, children outside of marriage have the status of illegitimate children of their parents. However, the Civil Code provides an opportunity for both parents to recognize the child as a legitimate child. Article 42 of the marriage law. If the marriage is invalid, then the children born from the marriage do not occupy the position of legitimate children. Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 only recognizes children resulting from religiously valid marriages. Apart from that (the result of adultery), legally the child has no blood relationship with his father, but only has a civil relationship. If the biological father is not responsible, then the child through the mother can sue the father in civil law. The regulation of the inheritance rights of illegitimate children in Indonesian legislation and after the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 can be concluded in Article 863 B.W. First part Regarding the inheritance share of illegitimate children in group I, if the testator dies leaving legitimate descendants and/or the husband/wife who lives the longest, then illegitimate children who can be recognized as inheriting a third of what they would have received had they been legitimate child. Then Article 100 KHI states that children born out of wedlock only have a lineage relationship with their mother and their mother's family. Then article 43 paragraph 1 of Law Number 1 of 1974 states that children born outside of marriage only have a civil relationship with their mother and their mother's family.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN NOMOR 1082 K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2022 TENTANG SENGKETA MEREK YANG MEMILIKI PERSAMAAN PADA MEREK MASTERTINT Adawiyah, Rodiatun; Roymond Eygia, Migel; Arta Yanda Rajagukguk, Wisnu
SIBATIK JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): December
Publisher : Penerbit Lafadz Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/sibatik.v3i1.1779

Abstract

Brand disputes between the well-known brand "MASTERTINT" and the plaintiff receive legal protection. Legal protection for trademarks is regulated in trademark law number 20 of 2016. Proving the element of similarity in essence or in its entirety is the starting point for the panel of judges' consideration in trademark cases between MASTERTINT which is under COATINGS FOREIGN IP Co. LLC and brands come first. suing Soetrisno's MasterTint brand to the Supreme Court was deemed to have similar elements in essence or in its entirety. This research is a normative legal research method using a case approach which aims to find the legal basis, understanding and rules relating to the use of market survey results to show that brands are not used. Brand legal regulations in the new trademark law number 20 of 2016 have attempted to provide legal protection for brand rights holders. The handling of brand rights violations, which can be done in various ways, should be able to provide protection for brand rights holders.