Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.996
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Daulat Hukum Jurnal Akta Al-Daulah : Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Gulawentah:Jurnal Studi Sosial Literasi Hukum Veteran Law Review Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan SIGn Jurnal Hukum JPM: JURNAL PENGABDIAN MASYARAKAT Law Development Journal IBLAM Law Review Mimbar Hukum Bakti Sekawan : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat (Z-COVIS)
Negara, Dharma Setiawan
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Humanities Astronomy Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Dari Teks ke Makna: Model Interpretasi Bertingkat sebagai Jawaban atas Ketegangan Hukum dan Keadilan Susilo, Erwin; Sari, Iustika Puspa; Negara, Dharma Setiawan
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Indonesian rule of law emphasizes that law should not be understood merely in a legal-formal sense, but also in its moral and social dimensions. This study stems from the persistent tension between legal certainty and justice and the need for an interpretative method capable of bridging the two. The main objective of this research is to examine and formulate a model of tiered legal interpretation that integrates four approaches derived from the common law tradition—Literal Interpretation (LI), Golden Rule (GR), Mischief Rule (MR), and Purposive Approach (PA)—into the Indonesian legal system. This model has been contextually applied in jurisdictions such as India, the United Kingdom, and the United States to balance statutory texts with underlying values of justice. The study reveals that tiered interpretation provides judges with a methodological framework to interpret law contextually and value-oriented, beginning from the grammatical meaning of a norm to the normative purpose of the legislature. Findings also show that similar practices have emerged in Indonesia, as reflected in the Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010, despite the absence of an explicitly institutionalized model. In conclusion, this approach aligns with the constitutional mandate and the foundational character of Pancasila-based law and proves to be a relevant response to the challenges of legal interpretation amidst social pluralism and the evolving nature of modern law.
Co-Authors Ainal Mardhiah Arif Rachman Putra Aryanto, Endra Andie Bambang Santoso Didit Darmawan Dirgantara, Febrian Donauli, Edison Evendi, Wakid Halizah, Siti Nur Husban, Husban Ikhwanuddin Ikhwanuddin Ilmi, Ichyaul Jahroni Khayru, Rafadi Khan Lufsiana, Lufsiana Mustafa, Abraham Reyhand Nainggolan, Samuel Dharma Putra Nuraini, Reny Pakpahan, Novritsar Hasitongan Rizky, Muchamad Catur Rommy Hardyansah Samsul Arifin Saputra, Rio Sari, Iustika Puspa Shahab, Alwi Mohamad Susilo, Erwin Wibowo, Agung Satryo Yudhantaka, Lintang