Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

Redesigning Indonesia’s Energy Governance: A Progressive Asymmetric Decentralization Framework for an Accelerated Energy Transition Novemyanto, Alfin Dwi
Gunung Djati Conference Series Vol. 61 No. 1 (2025): International Conference of the 17th OISAA’s International Symposium Türkiye
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/gdcs.v61i1.3270

Abstract

The urgency of accelerating energy transition in Indonesia arises from its commitment to the Paris Agreement and the national target of achieving Net Zero Emissions by 2060. However, the current legal framework remains highly centralized, limiting the autonomy of local governments and constraining innovation in renewable energy development. This study aims to propose a progressive legal framework through an asymmetric decentralization model that provides differentiated authority for regions based on their renewable energy potential and climate risk exposure. The research employs normative legal methods with a statute approach, conceptual analysis based on the welfare state theory and subsidiarity principle, and a comparative study with India and South Africa, which have implemented more decentralized models of energy governance. Findings show that Indonesia’s legal system suffers from normative deficits, particularly in integrating justice, participation, and flexibility into energy governance. The proposed asymmetric decentralization model emphasizes granting special authority to regions with strategic roles in the energy transition, supported by a green fiscal transfer mechanism and multilevel governance structures. This model strengthens Indonesia’s ability to bridge international climate commitments with local socio-ecological realities. The study concludes that reconstructing Indonesia’s energy law through asymmetric decentralization offers both academic novelty and practical relevance, providing a path toward more equitable, participatory, and adaptive energy governance. The contribution of this research lies in its formulation of a context-sensitive legal model that advances interdisciplinary debates on law, energy transition, and sustainable development in the Global South.
Merekonstruksi Kedaulatan Udara Indonesia dari Perspektif Meta-Konstitusional: Sebuah Kritik terhadap Dominasi Singapura dalam Pengelolaan Flight Information Region (FIR) Jumantoro, Tegar Raffi Putra; Novemyanto, Alfin Dwi
Jurnal Restorasi Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Restorasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/dwbdd986

Abstract

For more than seven decades, Singapore has dominated the management of Indonesia's Flight Information Region (FIR). This situation raises serious questions about air sovereignty and the supremacy of the national constitution. It stems from concerns about the delegation of FIR to foreign authorities, which is considered to disregard the basic principles of state sovereignty in the constitution and has the potential to weaken the legitimacy of the country's strategic policies. This study uses a legal-normative method with a conceptual and meta-constitutional approach to examine the constitutional and moral validity of the 2022 Indonesia-Singapore FIR Agreement. This approach allows researchers to criticize the reduction of the constitution to a mere procedural instrument and evaluate the extent to which the agreement reflects the principles of pactum subjectionis and leges fundamentalis. The results of the study show that the transfer of FIR has no objective technical basis and contradicts Article 1 of the 1944 Chicago Convention and Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution. Therefore, this study emphasizes the importance of reconstructing the meaning of air sovereignty through a meta-constitutional approach so that the state does not lose its normative foundation in the face of geopolitical compromises. This study contributes to the discourse on renewing the paradigm of constitutional law to be more reflective, civilized, and rooted in the will of the people. Selama lebih dari tujuh dekade, Singapura telah mendominasi pengelolaan Flight Information Region (FIR) Indonesia. Situasi ini menimbulkan pertanyaan serius tentang kedaulatan udara dan supremasi konstitusi nasional. Berawal dari kecemasan mengenai pendelegasian FIR kepada otoritas asing yang dinilai mengabaikan prinsip dasar kedaulatan negara dalam konstitusi dan berpotensi melemahkan legitimasi kebijakan strategis negara. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan meta-konstitusional untuk membedah keabsahan konstitusional dan moral dari Perjanjian FIR Indonesia–Singapura tahun 2022. Pendekatan ini memungkinkan peneliti untuk mengkritik reduksi konstitusi menjadi sekadar instrumen prosedural dan mengevaluasi sejauh mana kesepakatan tersebut mencerminkan prinsip pactum subjectionis dan leges fundamentalis. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa pengalihan FIR tidak memiliki dasar teknis yang objektif dan bertentangan dengan Pasal 1 Chicago Convention 1944 serta Pasal 33 ayat (3) UUD 1945. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya rekonstruksi pemaknaan kedaulatan udara melalui pendekatan meta-konstitusional agar negara tidak kehilangan fondasi normatif dalam menghadapi kompromi geopolitik. Penelitian ini berkontribusi pada wacana pembaruan paradigma hukum tata negara yang lebih reflektif, berkeadaban, dan berakar pada kehendak rakyat.